Tag Archives: bank

Cryptocurrency firms struggle to find banking partners after US bank collapses- Where to next? Singapore? Switzerland? Hong Kong?

Cryptocurrency firms struggle to find banking partners after US bank collapses- Where to next? Singapore? Switzerland? Hong Kong?

Sources suggest that some cryptocurrency companies have turned to Cross River Bank as their preferred banking partner to address this issue

Recently, there have been reports indicating that cryptocurrency companies are facing challenges when finding banking partners. This issue has arisen following the collapse of two prominent US-based banks, namely Signature Bank and Silvergate Capital. As a result, many cryptocurrency firms struggle to secure banking services, causing significant problems for their operations.

Some cryptocurrency companies have turned to Cross River Bank as their preferred banking partner to address this issue. In particular, Circle Internet Financial Ltd. has moved its business to Cross River Bank from Silicon Valley Bank, where it had held $3.3 billion in assets. This move highlights the importance of finding a reliable banking partner for cryptocurrency companies, as they require access to banking services to conduct their business effectively.

The struggle to find banking partners for cryptocurrency companies underscores the challenges that these firms face as they navigate the fast changing landscape of digital currencies. While some banks are starting to embrace cryptocurrencies and offer banking services to these companies, many are still hesitant to do so. As a result, finding a banking partner that is willing to work with cryptocurrency companies is crucial to their success in the long run.

Where are some feasible countries? What are some challenges that we can foresee?

Switzerland

The collapse has forced the crypto industry to seek new banking partners, with some turning to offshore financial companies like Jewel and others looking to transfer their funds overseas. This has led several digital currency companies to turn to Swiss banks, as Switzerland has established a “Crypto Valley” in the region of Zug, which has favourable regulations and a supportive environment for blockchain and cryptocurrency companies.

Swiss banks are known for their confidentiality and discretion, which is important for the privacy-conscious crypto industry. Swiss banking services also offer a range of products and services that can be customised to the specific needs of crypto firms. This can include access to multiple currencies, secure digital storage, and international transactions.

Swiss banks have a strong reputation for stability and reliability, and the Swiss government has a long history of promoting the country as a financial hub. These factors make Switzerland a popular destination for businesses seeking secure and trustworthy banking partners. The combination of favourable regulations, a supportive environment, and a strong reputation for reliability and confidentiality make Swiss banking a good option for crypto firms.

In addition to Switzerland, several other countries are emerging as favourable locations for digital currency firms.

Singapore

One of these countries is Singapore, which has a well-established financial industry and has been actively exploring blockchain technology in various sectors. Singapore’s regulatory framework for digital currencies is relatively open, and the government has been supportive of blockchain-based businesses, making it an attractive destination for digital currency firms.

Singapore has not forbidden cryptocurrency like some other countries have, which has made it a popular location for crypto firms. In addition, the city-state has a robust financial infrastructure, making it an attractive option for banking. Crypto-friendly regulations: Singapore has taken a positive approach to the cryptocurrency industry, with the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) providing clear guidance on the regulatory framework for crypto companies. In addition, the Payment Services Act was passed in 2019 to regulate digital payment tokens, including cryptocurrencies.

Singapore provides various benefits for crypto firms seeking to establish themselves in the region. The country’s banking system is highly developed and stable, with major global banks such as DBS and UOB operating there, providing a sense of security for crypto firms needing a reliable banking partner. Furthermore, Singapore’s strategic location in Southeast Asia grants easy access to major Asian markets, such as China and India, making it ideal for crypto firms looking to expand their business in the region. In addition, Singapore offers favourable tax policies, including a flat corporate tax rate of 17% and various tax exemptions and rebates, which is attractive for crypto firms seeking to reduce their tax burden.

Moreover, Singapore has a well-recognized reputation as an innovation hub focusing on developing cutting-edge technologies. This creates an innovation-friendly environment that can be particularly enticing for crypto firms searching for a supportive environment to grow and innovate. In summary, Singapore’s strong banking system, access to Asian markets, favourable tax policies, and innovation-friendly environment make it an attractive location for crypto firms looking to establish themselves in the region. Singapore’s well-regulated financial system can provide peace of mind for crypto firms looking to establish long-term banking relationships.

Malta

Another country that is gaining popularity among digital currency firms is Malta, which has established itself as a hub for blockchain and cryptocurrency businesses in Europe. Malta has taken proactive steps to attract digital currency firms, such as introducing a regulatory framework for digital currencies and establishing a government agency to oversee the sector. In addition, Malta has a favourable tax regime for blockchain-based businesses, making it a cost-effective location for digital currency firms.

Malta, an EU member state, has made efforts to attract cryptocurrency businesses, making it an attractive banking option for crypto firms. One reason is that Malta has proactively created a regulatory framework for the cryptocurrency industry. The country’s Virtual Financial Assets Act establishes a clear legal framework for cryptocurrency companies operating in Malta. It establishes a regulatory authority, the Malta Digital Innovation Authority, to oversee the industry and ensure compliance. Malta’s banking system is also stable, unlike the US-based Signature Bank and Silvergate Capital, which recently experienced major bank collapses. This stability can reassure crypto firms looking for a reliable banking partner. As an EU member state, Malta provides access to the EU’s single market, which can be beneficial for crypto firms looking to expand their business in Europe.

Malta’s pro-crypto attitude is another reason crypto firms should consider banking in the country. Malta has positioned itself as a “blockchain island” and has actively promoted the development of the cryptocurrency industry, attracting several major crypto companies to set up shop in Malta. Additionally, Malta offers tax benefits for businesses, including a low corporate tax rate of 35% and a refund system for foreign investors, which can provide additional tax benefits for crypto firms.

Other countries that digital currency firms consider include Gibraltar, Estonia, and Bermuda. Gibraltar has been working to establish itself as a “blockchain hub” and has taken steps to create a regulatory framework for the cryptocurrency industry. The country also offers attractive tax benefits. Liechtenstein: Liechtenstein has taken a proactive approach to regulate the cryptocurrency industry and has established a clear legal framework for the sector. The country also offers attractive tax benefits. Bermuda has also introduced a regulatory framework for digital currencies and has been actively exploring the use of blockchain technology in various sectors.

Challenges

While some countries clearly benefit from this saga, some face some challenges. Hong Kong has long been known as a financial hub in Asia, with a reputation for being friendly and open towards new businesses, including those in the cryptocurrency industry. However, recent banking challenges Hong Kong’s crypto firms face after the closure of Silvergate and Signature banks suggest that the city’s banking system may not be as ready as its government is making it out to be.

One of the biggest challenges Hong Kong’s crypto firms faces is the difficulty opening local bank accounts. According to industry insiders, banks in the city are not keen to serve crypto businesses, making it even harder for these firms to access banking services. This is a significant setback for Hong Kong, aiming to become a virtual asset hub. If the city’s banking system cannot support the needs of crypto businesses, it will be difficult for Hong Kong to achieve this goal.

One reason for the reluctance of banks in Hong Kong to serve crypto businesses may be due to regulatory uncertainty. Despite the government’s push to become a hub for virtual assets, there is still a lack of clear regulations in the space. This can make it difficult for banks to assess the risks associated with serving crypto businesses, leading them to err on the side of caution and avoid these clients altogether. This is not only happening in Hong Kong. It’s important to note that Swiss banks are also cautious when dealing with crypto firms, as cryptocurrencies carry risks and potential for money laundering. Due to regulatory pressure, some Swiss banks have already stopped offering services to crypto firms. Taking a careful stand is essential for the banks.

Another issue is the reputational risk associated with serving crypto businesses. While the cryptocurrency industry has come a long way in terms of legitimacy and mainstream acceptance, some still perceive it as a high-risk, unregulated sector. Banks that serve crypto businesses may be seen as supporting this perception, which could damage their reputation and lead to increased scrutiny from regulators.

The challenges Hong Kong’s crypto firms face highlight the need for the city’s banking system to become more accommodating towards the needs of this industry. While the government has made strides in promoting Hong Kong as a virtual asset hub, more must be done to ensure the city’s banking system is ready to support this goal. Clear regulations and guidance from regulators can help to provide banks with the clarity they need to serve crypto businesses. In contrast, education and outreach efforts can help to address the reputational concerns associated with the industry. Until these issues are addressed, Hong Kong’s ambitions of becoming a virtual asset hub may remain out of reach.

I hope this dilemma is short-term. Hong Kong being a financial hub close to China, would be a big plus for the crypto industry. Not only will we see an influx of Chinese tech talents into Hong Kong, but we will also be seeing huge capital inflows too.

Ending remarks

In conclusion, the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrency is constantly evolving and can vary significantly between countries. While some countries embrace cryptocurrencies and develop favourable regulatory frameworks, others remain sceptical and have introduced strict regulations or outright bans on cryptocurrency trading and related activities. As such, it is vital for cryptocurrency firms to carefully consider the regulatory framework and banking system in each country where they operate or plan to expand into. This includes evaluating the legal and tax implications and the risks and benefits associated with banking in each country.

As the recent struggles of cryptocurrency firms to find banking partners illustrate, it is also important to identify reliable banking partners willing to work with the firm and provide necessary banking services. This may involve conducting due diligence on potential banking partners and assessing their ability to meet the unique needs of cryptocurrency firms.

My humble takeaway message to all is this: While the growth potential of the cryptocurrency industry is significant, firms must navigate the regulatory and banking landscape carefully and strategically to ensure their long-term success. Given the uncertainties, it’s worth noting that each country has its own regulatory framework and banking system. Crypto firms should carefully consider the risks and benefits of banking in each country before making a decision.

by Anndy Lian

 

Source: https://www.financialexpress.com/business/blockchain/cryptocurrency-firms-struggle-to-find-banking-partners-after-us-bank-collapses-where-to-next-singapore-switzerland-hong-kong/3028866/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

¿Qué han aprendido los bancos de la crisis de Silvergate Bank?

¿Qué han aprendido los bancos de la crisis de Silvergate Bank?

El mercado de las criptomonedas se ha visto sacudido recientemente por una importante crisis en Silvergate Bank (NYSE:SI), una institución financiera que se especializa en activos digitales. Los efectos de esta crisis han sido generalizados y han causado gran preocupación entre los inversores. Las acciones de Silvergate Bank han experimentado una fuerte caída, alcanzando un mínimo histórico de 4,86 dólares el viernes, lo que representa una caída de casi el 98% desde el cierre récord de la institución en noviembre de 2021. Como resultado, la capitalización de mercado de Silvergate Bank sufrió una pérdida total de más de 7.000 millones de dólares.

El impacto de esta crisis no se ha limitado solo a Silvergate Bank. La industria criptográfica en general también se ha visto afectada, con participantes importantes como Coinbase Global y Ebang International experimentando una caída notable de alrededor del 1% cada uno. Además, incluso las criptomonedas populares Bitcoin y Ethereum se han visto afectadas, experimentando una disminución de aproximadamente el 4,8% durante la última semana.

La crisis en Silvergate Bank comenzó cuando el banco retrasó la presentación de su informe anual. El retraso provocó una venta masiva de acciones de Silvergate, lo que provocó un efecto dominó en el criptomercado. La situación empeoró cuando Silvergate Bank anunció que había tomado una decisión basada en el riesgo de descontinuar Silvergate Exchange Network, su red de criptopagos. Esto provocó que las acciones de Silvergate cayeran casi un 50% en la bolsa de valores de Nueva York el jueves.

La caída de las acciones relacionadas a las criptomonedas es un recordatorio de que el mercado criptográfico sigue siendo muy volátil y susceptible a cambios repentinos. El hecho de que la crisis de un banco pueda tener un gran impacto en todo el mercado es preocupante. Sin embargo, vale la pena señalar que esta crisis no indica necesariamente una falla fundamental en el criptomercado. En cambio, puede ser una indicación de que algunos exponentes, como Silvergate Bank, no estaban adecuadamente preparados para los riesgos asociados con el mercado.

El incidente de Silvergate Bank destacó algunos problemas importantes con el enfoque de gestión de riesgos e informes financieros del banco. Una de las principales revelaciones de la crisis es que las deudas incobrables de Silvergate no eran sus activos sino sus depósitos. En términos simples, esto significa que Silvergate había estado utilizando los depósitos de sus clientes para invertir en activos de riesgo en lugar de mantener esos depósitos en inversiones más seguras y estables. Esta es una señal de alerta importante para cualquier banco, y se refiere particularmente al contexto de un banco que se enfoca en activos digitales y criptomonedas.

Se ha hecho evidente que Silvergate, una institución financiera que se ocupa de activos digitales, no estaba adecuadamente preparada para manejar el mercado volátil. Como resultado, sus clientes e inversores han sufrido pérdidas significativas. Para evitar tales situaciones, la gestión del riesgo es fundamental para tratar con activos digitales y criptomonedas. Los bancos deben permanecer atentos a la hora de identificar, evaluar y mitigar los riesgos potenciales. Hay varias áreas clave que los bancos deben considerar en su enfoque de gestión de riesgos.

En primer lugar, los bancos deben identificar varios riesgos de los activos digitales y las criptomonedas, incluidos los riesgos de mercado (como la volatilidad de los precios), los riesgos operativos (como las infracciones de seguridad), los riesgos legales y regulatorios (como el cumplimiento de las normas AML y KYC) y los riesgos reputacionales (como publicidad negativa). Una vez que se han identificado los riesgos, los bancos deben evaluar el impacto potencial y la probabilidad de cada riesgo.

Este enfoque permitirá a los bancos priorizar los riesgos y asignar los recursos en consecuencia. Los bancos deben tomar medidas para mitigar los riesgos mediante la implementación de medidas de seguridad sólidas, la diligencia debida con los clientes y las contrapartes y la diversificación de sus carteras de activos digitales. Asimismo, las instituciones financieras deben monitorear los riesgos continuamente y ajustar sus estrategias de gestión de riesgos en consecuencia. Esto puede implicar el uso de métricas de riesgo, la realización de pruebas de estrés y mantenerse actualizados sobre los desarrollos de la industria.

Junto con la gestión de riesgos, también deben considerar cómo informar sus libros cuando se trata de activos digitales y criptomonedas. Necesitan informar con precisión sus tenencias y transacciones en tiempo real porque el valor de estos activos puede cambiar rápidamente. Esto puede requerir un software de contabilidad especializado y el desarrollo de procesos internos para rastrear y reportar transacciones de activos digitales. Además, seguramente los bancos deban adaptar sus prácticas de informes para reflejar las características únicas de los activos digitales y las criptomonedas.

Por ejemplo, es posible que los bancos deban informar sobre los activos digitales específicos que poseen y los riesgos particulares asociados con esos activos. Probablemente, también deban proporcionar divulgaciones más detalladas sobre sus tenencias y transacciones de activos digitales para garantizar la transparencia con los clientes y los reguladores. Las prácticas de gestión de riesgos e informes son vitales para los bancos que se ocupan de activos digitales y criptomonedas. Los bancos deben identificar, evaluar y mitigar los riesgos de manera proactiva mientras desarrollan sólidas prácticas de informes que reflejen con precisión sus tenencias y transacciones de activos digitales.

En última instancia, la crisis del banco Silvergate sirve como advertencia tanto para los bancos como para los inversores. Destaca la necesidad de una adecuada gestión de riesgos, informes financieros y diversificación, particularmente en el contexto de los activos digitales y las criptomonedas. Si bien el mercado de las criptomonedas y los activos digitales sigue siendo volátil e impredecible, aquellos que estén preparados para tomar las precauciones necesarias e invertir sabiamente aún pueden tener éxito y crecer en esta industria emocionante y en rápida evolución.

En tiempos de crisis, es fundamental recordar la importancia de la diversificación. Los inversores que han diversificado sus carteras pueden estar mejor preparados para capear la tormenta causada por la caída de las acciones criptográficas. Enfatizando esto nuevamente, también vale la pena señalar que la caída de las acciones de criptomonedas no significa necesariamente que las criptomonedas en sí mismas sean inversiones inherentemente riesgosas. Si bien el criptomercado puede ser volátil, también ha experimentado un crecimiento significativo en los últimos años y se espera que continúe expandiéndose en los próximos años. Como tal, los inversores interesados en invertir en el criptomercado pueden considerar hacerlo a través de una cartera diversificada que incluya una variedad de activos diferentes.

También es importante que los inversores lleven a cabo una debida diligencia exhaustiva al seleccionar inversiones en el criptomercado. Esto incluye investigar los antecedentes y el historial de las empresas e individuos detrás de las inversiones y analizar las tendencias del mercado y los riesgos potenciales. Al adoptar un enfoque cuidadoso e informado para invertir en el criptomercado, los inversores pueden protegerse mejor de los cambios repentinos del mercado y las crisis como la experimentada por Silvergate Bank y la industria criptográfica en general.

Source: https://es.finance.yahoo.com/noticias/aprendido-bancos-crisis-silvergate-bank-070000997.html?guccounter=1

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

Silvergate Bank’s crisis: A wake-up call for risk management in crypto banking

Silvergate Bank’s crisis: A wake-up call for risk management in crypto banking

The cryptocurrency market has recently been shaken by a significant crisis at Silvergate Bank, a financial institution that specialises in digital assets. The effects of this crisis have been widespread and have caused a great deal of concern among investors. Shares of Silvergate Bank have experienced a sharp drop, hitting an all-time low of $4.86 on Friday, representing a decline of nearly 98% since the institution’s record high close in November 2021. As a result, the market capitalisation of Silvergate Bank has suffered a total loss of over $7 billion. The impact of this crisis has not been limited to Silvergate Bank alone. The wider crypto industry has also been affected, with major players such as Coinbase Global and Ebang International experiencing a noticeable drop of around 1% each. Additionally, even the popular cryptocurrencies Bitcoin and Ethereum have both taken a hit, experiencing a decline of roughly 4.8% over the past week.

The crisis at Silvergate Bank started when the bank delayed filing its annual report. The delay sparked a sell-off of Silvergate’s shares, triggering a domino effect across the crypto market. The situation worsened when Silvergate Bank announced that it had made a risk-based decision to discontinue the Silvergate Exchange Network, it’s crypto payments network. This caused Silvergate’s shares to tumble by nearly 50% on Thursday’s New York stock exchange. The fall in crypto stocks is a reminder that the crypto market is still highly volatile and susceptible to sudden shifts. The fact that one bank’s crisis can greatly impact the entire market is concerning. However, it is worth noting that this crisis does not necessarily indicate a fundamental flaw in the crypto market. Instead, it may be an indication that some players in the market, such as Silvergate Bank, were not adequately prepared for the risks associated with the market.

The Silvergate Bank incident highlighted some significant issues with the bank’s risk management and financial reporting approach. One of the key revelations from the crisis is that Silvergate’s bad debts were not its assets but its deposits. In simple terms, this means that Silvergate had been using its customers’ deposits to invest in risky assets rather than holding those deposits in more secure and stable investments. This is a major red flag for any bank, and it particularly concerns the context of a bank that focuses on digital assets and cryptocurrencies.

It has become evident that Silvergate, a financial institution dealing with digital assets, was not adequately prepared to handle the volatile market. As a result, their customers and investors have suffered significant losses. To avoid such situations, managing risk is critical to dealing with digital assets and cryptocurrencies. Banks must remain vigilant in identifying, assessing, and mitigating potential risks. There are several key areas that banks should consider in their risk management approach.

Firstly, banks should identify various risks of digital assets and cryptocurrencies, including market risks (such as price volatility), operational risks (such as security breaches), legal and regulatory risks (such as compliance with AML and KYC regulations), and reputational risks (such as negative publicity). Once risks have been identified, banks should assess the potential impact and likelihood of each risk. This approach will enable banks to prioritise risks and allocate resources accordingly. Banks should take steps to mitigate risks by implementing robust security measures, conducting due diligence on clients and counterparties, and diversifying their digital asset portfolios. Banks must monitor risks continually and adjust their risk management strategies accordingly. This may involve using risk metrics, conducting stress tests, and staying up-to-date on industry developments.

Alongside risk management, banks should also consider how to report their books when dealing with digital assets and cryptocurrencies. Banks need to accurately report their holdings and transactions in real time because the value of these assets can change rapidly. This may require specialised accounting software and the development of internal processes for tracking and reporting digital asset transactions. Moreover, banks may need to adapt their reporting practices to reflect the unique characteristics of digital assets and cryptocurrencies. For example, banks may need to report on the specific digital assets they hold and the particular risks associated with those assets. Banks may also need to provide more detailed disclosures about their digital asset holdings and transactions to ensure transparency with clients and regulators. Risk management and reporting practices are vital for banks that deal with digital assets and cryptocurrencies. Banks must proactively identify, assess, and mitigate risks while developing robust reporting practices that accurately reflect their digital asset holdings and transactions.

Ultimately, the Silvergate Bank crisis serves as a cautionary tale for banks and investors alike. It highlights the need for proper risk management, financial reporting, and diversification, particularly in the context of digital assets and cryptocurrencies. While the market for cryptocurrencies and digital assets remains volatile and unpredictable, those prepared to take the necessary precautions and invest wisely may still be able to succeed and grow in this exciting and rapidly-evolving industry.

In times of crisis, it is essential to remember the importance of diversification. Investors who have diversified their portfolios may be better able to weather the storm caused by the fall in crypto stocks. Emphasising this again, it is also worth noting that the fall of crypto stocks does not necessarily mean that cryptocurrencies themselves are inherently risky investments. While the crypto market can be volatile, it has also seen significant growth in recent years and is expected to continue expanding in the coming years. As such, investors interested in investing in the crypto market may want to consider doing so through a diversified portfolio that includes a range of different assets.

It is also important for investors to conduct thorough due diligence when selecting investments in the crypto market. This includes researching the background and track record of the companies and individuals behind the investments and analysing market trends and potential risks. By taking a careful and informed approach to investing in the crypto market, investors can better protect themselves from sudden market shifts and crises like the one experienced by Silvergate Bank and the broader crypto industry.

Source: https://www.benzinga.com/23/03/31239033/silvergate-banks-crisis-a-wake-up-call-for-risk-management-in-crypto-banking

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j