What’s next for markets: Navigating trade threats, earnings, crypto and central bank signals

What’s next for markets: Navigating trade threats, earnings, crypto and central bank signals

Reports indicate that US President Donald Trump has intensified his demands on the EU, pushing for tariffs of at least 15 per cent to 20 per cent on imports from the bloc after weeks of negotiations aimed at securing a new trade deal. This bold move has subdued global risk sentiment, as investors grapple with the prospect of a potential trade war that could disrupt supply chains, elevate costs, and hinder economic growth worldwide.

I view this as a pivotal moment that could redefine international trade dynamics and impact a broad range of markets, from equities to cryptocurrencies.

The catalyst: Trump’s tariff demands and their broader implications

Trump’s escalation of tariff demands marks a significant shift in US-EU trade relations. After weeks of talks, the insistence on a 15 per cent – 20 per cent tariff suggests a hardening stance, potentially unravelling years of efforts to maintain relatively open trade between these economic powerhouses. This move reflects a broader strategy of economic nationalism, prioritising domestic industries over global cooperation.

However, it’s a high-stakes gamble. The EU, a major trading partner for the US, may retaliate with its tariffs, sparking a tit-for-tat escalation that history shows rarely benefits anyone in the long run. The mere threat of such a trade war has already injected uncertainty into markets, as businesses and investors brace for higher costs and reduced profitability.

The global risk sentiment, already fragile due to geopolitical tensions and uneven post-pandemic recovery, has taken a noticeable hit. Investors are shifting toward a risk-off stance, prioritizing safety over chasing high returns. It isn’t surprising that trade wars tend to dampen economic growth by disrupting the flow of goods and increasing inflationary pressures.

My view is that while Trump’s demands may aim to protect American jobs, they risk alienating allies and destabilizing an interconnected global economy at a time when resilience is sorely needed. Let’s examine how this sentiment is unfolding across various markets.

Equity markets: A mixed bag of caution and resilience

The major US equity indexes closed last Friday with a mixed performance, reflecting the uncertainty surrounding Trump’s tariff threats. The S&P 500 dipped slightly by 0.01 per cent, a negligible decline that hints at cautious optimism in some corners.

The Nasdaq, buoyed by tech-heavy stocks, edged up by 0.05 per cent, suggesting that investors still see resilience in technology sectors less immediately tied to trade flows. Meanwhile, the Dow Jones Industrial Average fell by 0.32 per cent, reflecting greater concern among traditional industries, like manufacturing, that could bear the brunt of tariff-related disruptions.

Looking beyond the US, Asian equity markets ended mostly higher last Friday but opened mixed in today’s early trading session. This inconsistency mirrors the global nature of the trade tensions, with some regions hopeful for a resolution and others wary of the fallout.

Interestingly, US equity index futures are pointing to a higher open today, which could indicate a short-term rebound or simply a pause in the pessimism. From my perspective, this mixed response suggests that while markets aren’t in full panic mode, there’s an undercurrent of unease.

Investors appear to be hedging their bets, waiting for clearer signals, perhaps from upcoming earnings or policy announcements, before committing fully to a bullish or bearish outlook.

Bond markets: A flight to safety

The bond market offers a clearer picture of investor sentiment. Yields on US Treasuries ended lower last Friday, with the 10-year Treasury yield dropping four basis points to 4.42 per cent and the two-year yield falling by the same margin to 3.87 per cent. Since yields move inversely to bond prices, this decline signals a surge in demand for these safe-haven assets.

Two factors appear to be driving this shift: dovish remarks from Federal Reserve Governor Christopher Waller and lower-than-expected consumer inflation expectations from the University of Michigan sentiment survey.

Waller’s comments likely hinted at a more accommodative monetary policy, a soothing prospect amid trade uncertainties. The Michigan survey, showing tempered inflation outlooks, further eases pressure on the Fed to hike rates aggressively, making Treasuries even more attractive.

In my opinion, this flight to safety underscores a market bracing for turbulence. Investors are prioritising capital preservation over riskier bets, a classic response to geopolitical and economic headwinds. It’s a prudent move, but it also highlights the fragility of confidence right now.

Currency and commodities: Safe havens shine

The foreign exchange and commodities markets are equally telling. The US Dollar Index slipped by 0.27 per cent, a modest retreat that aligns with the dovish Fed signals and a broader risk-off mood. A weaker dollar often accompanies uncertainty, as investors diversify into other currencies or assets. Gold, the quintessential safe-haven, rose by 0.4 per cent to US$3,353 per ounce, a clear sign of heightened anxiety.

I see this uptick as a natural reaction, gold thrives when trust in fiat currencies or economic stability wavers, and Trump’s tariff demands certainly fit that bill.

Meanwhile, Brent crude oil edged down by 0.3 per cent, a subtle but significant move. Oil prices are sensitive to demand expectations, and this dip suggests markets are factoring in a potential economic slowdown if trade barriers escalate. These shifts, while small, are early warning signs. If trade tensions persist, we could see more pronounced movements in commodities, particularly if global growth forecasts sour.

Cryptocurrencies: A divergent path

Turning to cryptocurrencies, the picture is more nuanced. Bitcoin, after reaching a record high of US$123,218 last week, has entered a consolidation phase between US$116,000 and US$120,000. As of Monday, it’s trading around US$117,800.

Technical indicators paint a cautious outlook: the Relative Strength Index (RSI) on the daily chart has fallen from an overbought level of 70 to 64, signalling a fading of bullish momentum, while the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) nears a bearish crossover. If Bitcoin slips below US$116,000, it might retest its 50-day Exponential Moving Average at US$110,297. But a close above US$120,000 could spark a rally back toward its peak.

Ethereum, by contrast, is showing strength. It surged 26.40 per cent last week, closing above a key resistance at US$3,730 on Sunday, and hovers around US$3,739 as of Monday. With an RSI of 86, well into overbought territory and a bullish MACD crossover from early July still holding, Ethereum’s momentum is robust. If it holds above US$3,730, the US$4,000 mark is within reach. Ripple’s XRP, finding support at US$3.40, also hints at a potential rally continuation.

From my perspective, cryptocurrencies are carving out a distinct narrative. Unlike traditional markets, they’re less directly tied to trade policies, offering a hedge against uncertainty. Ethereum’s surge, in particular, suggests that investor appetite for digital assets remains strong, perhaps driven by innovation and decentralisation rather than macroeconomic fears. That said, Bitcoin’s sideways trading reflects indecision; traders are waiting for a catalyst, and Trump’s tariffs could indirectly sway sentiment if they tank broader markets.

A noteworthy development in this context is Block, co-founded by Jack Dorsey, joining the S&P 500 index this week. Formerly Square, Block is deeply entrenched in the crypto space through its Bitkey self-custody Bitcoin wallet and Proto Bitcoin mining products.

Since last summer, it has been reinvesting 10 per cent of its Bitcoin profits in BTC on a monthly basis and has open-sourced its treasury blueprint. This move not only elevates Block’s profile but also bridges the traditional finance and cryptocurrency sectors. It’s a sign of the growing legitimacy of digital assets. Block’s inclusion could bolster confidence in Bitcoin, especially if trade tensions prompt investors to seek alternative stores of value.

Looking ahead

The week ahead will be critical. The US earnings season expands to include the ‘Magnificent Seven’ tech giants: Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Meta, Nvidia, and Tesla. Their performance could either offset trade-related gloom or amplify it if results disappoint.

The European Central Bank meets Thursday, with rates expected to hold steady, but its commentary will be dissected for clues on how it views the tariff threat. Economic data, from inflation to manufacturing, will also shape the narrative.

This is a time for vigilance. The interplay of earnings, central bank moves, and economic data will either stabilise markets or deepen the uncertainty. I’d lean toward a balanced approach of holding safe havens like gold and Treasuries while keeping an eye on crypto’s upside potential.

Non-financial advice as always.

 

Source: https://e27.co/whats-next-for-markets-navigating-trade-threats-earnings-crypto-and-central-bank-signals-20250721/

 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

MiCA’s Stablecoin Gamble: How Europe’s Bank Mandate Could Backfire

MiCA’s Stablecoin Gamble: How Europe’s Bank Mandate Could Backfire

The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation marks a pivotal moment in the global regulation of digital assets, particularly concerning stablecoins. This comprehensive framework aims to bring clarity and stability to the burgeoning crypto market within the EU. However, a closer examination of its specific provisions, especially those pertaining to stablecoin reserves, reveals a potentially problematic approach.

As a financial journalist with a keen interest in the intersection of finance and technology and having observed the evolution of digital assets and their regulatory landscapes, I contend that the MiCA stipulation requiring 60% of stablecoin reserves to be held within EU banks could inadvertently introduce instability and hinder the very innovation it seeks to foster. While seemingly aimed at enhancing security, this mandate may instead create new vulnerabilities and fragment the global stablecoin market.

The Stablecoin Landscape

Before dissecting the intricacies of MiCA’s impact, it’s essential to grasp the current dynamics of the stablecoin market. As of early 2024, this sector boasts a market capitalization exceeding $130 billion, a testament to the growing demand for digital assets that offer price stability. Tether remains the dominant player, commanding approximately 70% of this market share. This dominance isn’t accidental; it largely reflects market confidence in Tether’s reserve composition and its consistent ability to maintain its peg to the U.S. dollar.

The success of Tether can be directly attributed to its reserve strategy, which predominantly involves holding U.S. Treasuries and other highly liquid dollar-denominated assets. Tether’s transparency, albeit sometimes scrutinized, through its regular attestation reports provides insights into this strategy.

According to their latest reports, a significant portion, around 85% of their reserves, are held in cash and cash equivalents, with U.S Treasuries forming the lion’s share. This preference for U.S. Treasuries is not arbitrary. These instruments are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government and offer unparalleled liquidity. The daily trading volumes in the secondary market for U.S. Treasuries routinely average over $910 billion, making them exceptionally easy to buy and sell without significantly impacting their price. This deep liquidity is a crucial factor in maintaining the stability of a stablecoin.

Other significant stablecoins, such as USD Coin, prioritize holding reserves in highly liquid and low-risk assets, including U.S. Treasuries and cash held in regulated financial institutions. This industry-wide preference for U.S. Treasuries underscores their perceived safety and liquidity within the global financial system. The ability to quickly convert reserves into fiat currency during periods of high redemption pressure is paramount for a stablecoin to maintain its peg.

Protectionism Masquerading as Security?

MiCA’s requirement that 60% of stablecoin reserves be held in EU banks appears to be more of a protectionist measure aimed at bolstering the European financial sector than a genuine enhancement of stablecoin security. This assertion becomes particularly compelling when comparing the liquidity of the European bond market to that of U.S. Treasuries. While the EUR government bond market is substantial, it pales compared to the U.S. Treasury market in terms of trading volume and depth. The lower liquidity and often wider bid-ask spreads in European government bonds raise concerns about the ease and cost of liquidating these assets during periods of market stress.

Tradeweb reported in September 2024 that the average daily volume for European government bonds was $49.5 billion. As I do not have the exact average daily trading data from the European Central Bank, I put fair estimated daily trading volumes of around €100 billion for this comparison. This figure is less than one-ninth of the daily trading volume observed in U.S. Treasuries, which is over $910 billion.

This significant liquidity disparity is not merely an academic point; it has real-world implications for stablecoin issuers who need to access their reserves quickly to meet redemption requests. During market turbulence, the ability to quickly and efficiently convert reserve assets into fiat currency is critical for maintaining the stablecoin’s peg. Lower liquidity in the European bond market could translate to higher transaction costs and potential delays in accessing funds, potentially undermining the stability MiCA aims to achieve.

Furthermore, the concentration of reserves within EU banks raises questions about the potential for systemic risk within the European financial system. While diversification is generally considered a prudent risk management strategy, forcing stablecoin issuers to concentrate a significant portion of their reserves within a specific regional banking system could amplify the impact of any localized financial instability.

The Silicon Valley Bank Lesson

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) in March 2023 is a stark and relevant case study highlighting the inherent risks associated with relying solely on the traditional banking system for stablecoin reserves. When SVB experienced a rapid bank run, Circle’s USD Coin, despite being considered a highly reputable stablecoin, temporarily lost its peg, plummeting to around $0.87. This dramatic event occurred even though only approximately 10% of USD Coin’s reserves were directly affected by the SVB failure. This incident underscored two critical vulnerabilities: firstly, bank deposits, even within seemingly well-regulated institutions, are not entirely risk-free, and secondly, the operational limitations of the traditional banking system, such as weekend closures and processing delays, are fundamentally incompatible with the 24/7 nature of cryptocurrency markets.

Imagine the amplified impact if, under MiCA’s regulations, 60% of a stablecoin’s reserves were caught in a similar situation. The inability to access a significant portion of their reserves during a critical period could have catastrophic consequences, potentially triggering a systemic crisis within the European crypto ecosystem and eroding trust in stablecoins more broadly. The SVB episode demonstrated the speed at which confidence can evaporate in the financial system and the potential for contagion to spread rapidly. MiCA’s banking-centric approach, while intended to provide security, could inadvertently create a single point of failure, making the system more vulnerable to such shocks.

The Liquidity Premium of U.S. Treasuries

U.S. Treasuries have earned their reputation as the world’s premier safe-haven asset for compelling reasons, primarily their unparalleled market depth and liquidity. This deep liquidity ensures minimal price slippage even during periods of large-scale liquidations. During the height of the COVID-19 market panic in March 2020, the U.S. Treasury market remained remarkably robust despite unprecedented volatility across global markets. While bid-ask spreads widened temporarily, the market continued functioning efficiently, allowing investors to buy and sell Treasuries relatively quickly. This resilience during extreme stress underscores the inherent strength and liquidity of the U.S. Treasury market.

Conversely, European government bonds, particularly those issued by smaller EU nations, have experienced significant liquidity challenges during various crises. During the Eurozone crisis of 2011-2012, some sovereign bonds became practically untradeable, highlighting the potential for liquidity to dry up during times of stress. For a stablecoin issuer needing to process large redemption requests quickly, such a scenario could prove disastrous, making it difficult, if not impossible, to access the necessary funds to maintain the peg. The historical data demonstrates U.S. Treasuries’ superior liquidity and stability compared to their European counterparts, making them a more reliable asset for backing stablecoins.

The Banking System’s Inherent Vulnerabilities

MiCA’s reliance on the traditional banking system introduces additional layers of risk beyond just liquidity concerns. The banking turmoil of 2023, which witnessed the failures of both SVB and Signature Bank and First Republic Bank in the United States, serves as a potent reminder that even seemingly well-regulated banks can collapse under stress. European banks are not immune to such vulnerabilities. The forced merger of Credit Suisse with UBS in 2023, orchestrated to prevent a broader financial crisis, stands as a recent and prominent example.

Furthermore, unlike U.S. Treasuries held directly, bank deposits are subject to counterparty risk. If the bank holding the stablecoin reserves faces financial difficulties or even fails, accessing those reserves could become problematic.

Additionally, under EU banking regulations, bank deposits are potentially subject to bail-in provisions. In a crisis, depositors (including stablecoin issuers) could see their funds used to recapitalize the failing bank. This introduces a level of risk that stablecoin issuers cannot directly control, which is not present when holding highly liquid government securities. Banks also typically reinvest deposits in various assets, creating additional layers of risk and complexity that are opaque to the stablecoin issuer.

Market Fragmentation and Innovation Barriers

MiCA’s stringent requirements could lead to fragmentation in the global stablecoin market. Major issuers like Tether, who have established their reserve management strategies based on global liquidity and the reliability of U.S. Treasuries, might find the cost and complexity of complying with MiCA’s requirements prohibitive. They might opt to limit their operations within the EU rather than fundamentally restructure their reserve management strategies. This could create a bifurcated market: globally accessible stablecoins operating largely outside the EU and smaller, potentially less liquid stablecoins operating within the regulatory framework of MiCA.

This fragmentation could hinder the seamless flow of capital and innovation within the European digital asset space. New stablecoin projects seeking to launch in the EU would face significant barriers to entry, needing to establish relationships with EU banks and navigate complex reserve requirements before even launching their product. This could concentrate power in the hands of established financial institutions, potentially stifling the decentralized ethos that underpins much of the cryptocurrency movement. The increased regulatory burden and operational complexity could also make it less attractive for innovative stablecoin projects to establish themselves within the EU, potentially pushing innovation to other jurisdictions with more accommodating regulatory environments.

Alternative Approaches to Foster Stability

Rather than imposing potentially risky banking arrangements, regulators could explore alternative approaches focusing on transparency, risk-based assessments, and a broader acceptance of high-quality collateral. One such approach would be enhancing transparency and mandating stablecoin reserves’ auditing regardless of geographical location. Independent audits conducted by reputable firms could provide greater assurance to users.

Another avenue would be to develop clear and objective standards for assessing the quality of reserve assets, focusing on criteria such as liquidity, credit risk, and market depth. This would allow for a more nuanced approach to reserve management, recognizing assets like U.S. Treasuries’ proven stability and liquidity. Regulators could establish a framework that allows for a more diverse range of high-quality collateral, including U.S. Treasuries and other highly liquid government securities from reputable jurisdictions, provided they meet stringent risk criteria. This approach would acknowledge the stablecoin market’s global nature and certain assets’ established role in maintaining stability.

The data and historical precedent are clear: U.S. Treasuries have consistently demonstrated their value as stable and liquid collateral through multiple periods of financial stress. MiCA’s attempt to artificially promote European alternatives through regulatory mandate does not alter this fundamental market reality. A more pragmatic approach would be to acknowledge the global nature of stablecoins and focus on establishing robust standards for reserve quality and transparency rather than imposing geographically restrictive requirements.

Balancing Innovation and Stability

While MiCA’s underlying intentions to protect consumers and ensure the stability of the stablecoin market are undoubtedly laudable, its current implementation risks achieving the opposite of its intended effect. By compelling issuers to hold a significant portion of their reserves in potentially less liquid and potentially riskier assets within the European banking system, the regulation may inadvertently increase, rather than decrease, systemic risk within the European crypto ecosystem.

The stablecoin market undeniably requires thoughtful and effective regulation. However, such regulation should be grounded in market realities, informed by historical data, and designed to foster innovation while mitigating genuine risks.

As the digital asset industry evolves rapidly, regulatory frameworks must strike a delicate balance between promoting stability and encouraging innovation without erecting artificial barriers that could ultimately harm the very users they are designed to protect. A more globally collaborative and less geographically prescriptive approach to stablecoin regulation would likely be more effective in fostering a stable and innovative digital asset ecosystem.

 

Source: https://intpolicydigest.org/mica-s-stablecoin-gamble-how-europe-s-bank-mandate-could-backfire/

 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Czech National Bank Governor Considers Buying Bitcoin To Diversify Reserves

Czech National Bank Governor Considers Buying Bitcoin To Diversify Reserves

Czech National Bank governor Aleš Michl is considering investing in Bitcoin as part of a potential diversification strategy for the country’s foreign exchange reserves.

Michl said in an interview with CNN Prima News that he is considering acquiring “a few Bitcoin.”

No Plans In Place Yet For The Czech National Bank To Buy Bitcoin

Before the national bank can start buying BTC, it will need to get the approval from its board, which comprises seven members. Janis Aliapulios, one of the advisors to the board, confirmed that the bank is not currently planning a Bitcoin investment when he was asked about a potential acquisition.

Nevertheless, Michl is still open to the idea of the bank diversifying its portfolio through BTC. Until this happens, the bank will continue to invest in gold as part of its current diversification plan. Aliapulios said that the bank aims to increase its holdings in the popular commodity to around 5% of its total assets by 2028.

 

BTC Could Become A “Safe” Reserve Asset

Michl’s remarks come amid a shift among institutions and governments, who are evaluating whether BTC could be included in their financial strategies, according to author and intergovernmental blockchain expert Anndy Lian.

Lian says there could be a “gradual redefinition of what constitutes a ‘safe’ reserve asset” as more governments and institutions mull an investment in BTC.

In the past, gold has been the go-to asset for portfolio preservation. Looking at the last year, however, Bitcoin has risen more than 131% while gold’s price only climbed 30%, according to TradingView data.

One deterrent is BTC’s high levels of volatility. Lian warned that BTC’s fluctuations could be a “double-edged sword” for national reserves that could lead to broader financial swings.

 

 

Source: https://insidebitcoins.com/news/czech-national-bank-governor-considers-buying-bitcoin-to-diversify-reserves

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j