Tag Archives: critical

Is September a Critical Risk Threshold for Bitcoin?

Is September a Critical Risk Threshold for Bitcoin?

Bitcoin’s September performance has long been a focal point for investors, oscillating between historical bearishness and recent bullish surges. This month, often dubbed a “critical risk threshold,” now faces a confluence of macroeconomic pressures, leveraged market dynamics, and diverging investor sentiment. As the U.S. tariff war escalates and derivatives markets grow increasingly overheated, the question of whether September 2025 will mark a turning point—or a tipping point—demands closer scrutiny.

Ask Aime: Will Bitcoin’s September performance be defined by historical bearishness or recent bullish trends?

Seasonal Trends: From Bearish Legacy to Bullish Anomaly

Historically, September has been a weak period for Bitcoin. In 2024, the cryptocurrency fell below $55,000 during the month, reflecting a pattern of profit-taking and macroeconomic uncertainty [1]. However, 2025 shattered this narrative. By August 27, 2025, Bitcoin had surged to an all-time high of $111,842.71, driven by the approval of U.S. Bitcoin ETFs and a weakening U.S. dollar [2]. This 11% September rally—the best in a decade—defied historical trends, signaling a shift in market sentiment from risk-off to risk-on [3].

The divergence underscores Bitcoin’s evolving role. While traditional safe-haven assets like gold have delivered a mere 6% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) from 2015 to 2025, Bitcoin’s CAGR of ~115% has repositioned it as a growth asset rather than a hedge [4]. Yet, this transformation does not negate September’s inherent volatility. The month remains a battleground for macroeconomic forces, where institutional flows and geopolitical shocks can amplify price swings.

Macroeconomic Triggers: Tariffs, Dollar Weakness, and Diverging Flows

The unresolved U.S. tariff policies under President Donald Trump have injected unprecedented uncertainty into global markets. By 2025, tariffs had pushed the average U.S. tariff rate from 2.5% in 2024 to 16.5%, disrupting supply chains and triggering retaliatory measures from trade partners [5]. While Bitcoin initially dipped amid tariff-driven economic anxiety, its inverse correlation with the U.S. dollar has since become a tailwind. The Dollar Index (DXY) hit a multi-year low in late 2024, bolstering Bitcoin’s appeal as a hedge against fiat devaluation [3].

Meanwhile, investor flows between Bitcoin and gold have diverged sharply. Gold, traditionally a store of value, has struggled to compete with Bitcoin’s speculative allure. Data from 2015 to 2025 shows Bitcoin’s market cap expanding from ~$1 billion to over $1 trillion, while gold’s growth has remained stagnant [6]. This shift reflects a broader reallocation of capital toward assets perceived to outperform in inflationary environments, even as leveraged derivatives markets amplify systemic risks.

Leveraged Market Fragility: Derivatives and the Amplification of Volatility

The Bitcoin derivatives market has reached unprecedented levels of activity. By Q3 2025, open interest (OI) in BTC derivatives exceeded $73.59 billion, with institutional participation driving concentrated positions on exchanges like CME and Binance [7]. While leverage ratios have not shown sustained spikes, the sheer volume of speculative bets creates fragility. A single macroeconomic shock—such as a tariff-related market selloff—could trigger cascading liquidations, exacerbating price swings.

This fragility is compounded by the lack of regulatory clarity. Unlike traditional markets, crypto derivatives operate in a gray zone, where leverage limits and margin requirements vary widely across platforms. As of June 2025, leveraged longs accounted for 60% of total OI, with short positions struggling to gain traction amid bullish sentiment [8]. Such imbalances heighten the risk of a “gamma squeeze” if prices move sharply against leveraged positions.

Strategic Implications: Cautious Positioning in a High-Stakes Environment

For investors, the convergence of these factors suggests a need for cautious positioning. While Bitcoin’s September 2025 rally hints at strong institutional confidence, the interplay of tariffs, dollar weakness, and leveraged markets creates a volatile cocktail. Key considerations include:
1. Hedging Against Derivatives Risk: Diversifying exposure across spot and derivatives markets to mitigate liquidation risks.
2. Monitoring Macro Triggers: Closely tracking U.S. tariff announcements and Federal Reserve policy shifts, which could disrupt both Bitcoin and gold.
3. Leveraging Divergent Flows: Allocating capital to Bitcoin for growth while maintaining a smaller gold position to hedge against systemic shocks.

Conclusion

September 2025 has emerged as a critical juncture for Bitcoin, where historical volatility collides with macroeconomic tailwinds and leveraged fragility. While the cryptocurrency’s surge defies traditional seasonal patterns, the unresolved U.S. tariff war and derivatives-driven speculation create a high-risk environment. Investors must balance optimism with prudence, recognizing that Bitcoin’s role as a macro hedge—and its susceptibility to systemic shocks—is far from settled.

Source:
[1] Bitcoin surges 11% in best September in a decade [https://www.etoro.com/news-and-analysis/crypto/bitcoin-surges-11-in-best-september-in-a-decade-is-85k-next/]
[2] Bitcoin price history Aug 27, 2025 [https://www.statista.com/statistics/326707/bitcoin-price-index/]
[3] Bitcoin’s price history: From its 2009 launch to its 2025 [https://www.aol.com/finance/bitcoin-price-history-2009-2024-191156264.html]
[4] XAUUSD vs. Bitcoin – A Decade of Data (2015-2025) [https://www.tradingcup.com/learn/xauusd-vs-bitcoin-decade-of-data-should-you-copy-trade]
[5] The Trade Deficit Delusion: Why Tariffs Will Not Make … [https://www.intereconomics.eu/contents/year/2025/number/4/article/the-trade-deficit-delusion-why-tariffs-will-not-make-america-great-again.html]
[6] Bitcoin Value Graph 2015-2024 [https://www.statmuse.com/money/ask?q=bitcoin+value+graph+2015-2024]
[7] The New Gold standard? Bitcoin’s macro hedge role amid… [https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/new-gold-standard-bitcoins-macro-hedge-role-amid-us-debt-anndy-lian-uv9cc]
[8] CoinGlass Crypto Derivatives Outlook-2025 Semi annual [https://www.coinglass.com/learn/semi-annual-outlook-en]

 

Source: https://www.ainvest.com/news/september-critical-risk-threshold-bitcoin-2509/

 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

The Future of Crypto Regulation With Trump: A Critical Turning Point for the Digital Asset Industry

The Future of Crypto Regulation With Trump: A Critical Turning Point for the Digital Asset Industry

The cryptocurrency industry has always been a space of tension between innovation and regulation. For years, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has been at the center of this tug-of-war, with its leadership shaping the trajectory of the digital asset market. Under Gary Gensler’s tenure as SEC chair, the agency adopted a hardline approach to enforcing securities laws, targeting both token issuers and intermediaries. Now, as Gensler prepares to step down, the crypto world is bracing for what could be a pivotal shift. A pro-Trump Congress, coupled with a more favorable regulatory outlook, could usher in a new era for the industry—one that prioritizes clarity, growth, and innovation over punitive enforcement.

This potential shift raises an important question: Can the United States finally strike the right balance between regulation and innovation? If so, the crypto market could see unprecedented growth, with clearer rules encouraging mainstream adoption and investment. But to understand where we’re headed, we must first examine where we’ve been.

Gensler’s Tenure: A Double-Edged Sword

Gary Gensler’s time at the SEC has been nothing short of controversial. When he took the helm, many in the crypto community were optimistic. After all, he wasn’t just another bureaucrat—he was a former MIT professor who had taught courses on blockchain technology. His deep understanding of the space seemed to promise a more informed and balanced approach to regulation. But as his tenure unfolded, it became clear that his vision for the industry was far more rigid than many had hoped.

Under Gensler, the SEC brought roughly 100 crypto-related enforcement cases, surpassing the 80 cases initiated by his predecessor, Jay Clayton. While Clayton’s focus was primarily on token issuers—companies that launched cryptocurrencies the SEC deemed to be unregistered securities—Gensler expanded the scope. He zeroed in on market intermediaries, such as exchanges and lending platforms, accusing them of skirting securities laws by failing to register and disclose their operations. This shift in focus sent shockwaves through the industry, with major players like Coinbase and Binance finding themselves in the SEC’s crosshairs.

Perhaps Gensler’s most contentious stance has been his assertion that most cryptocurrencies, including XRP, are unregistered securities. This position has led to high-profile legal battles, such as the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple Labs, which has become a litmus test for the agency’s regulatory authority. He has repeatedly warned that the majority of crypto projects are destined to fail, citing regulatory noncompliance and a lack of sustainable business models. While his defenders argue that these actions are necessary to protect investors, critics contend that his heavy-handed approach has stifled innovation and driven companies offshore.

A Pro-Crypto Congress: A Glimmer of Hope?

As Gensler exits the stage, the prospect of a pro-crypto Congress under a Trump administration offers a potential lifeline for the industry. Former President Donald Trump, who was once openly skeptical of cryptocurrencies, has recently softened his stance. His more recent pledges suggest a willingness to embrace the digital asset market, signaling a possible alignment between the executive and legislative branches on the need for a balanced regulatory framework.

One of the most promising developments is the U.S. Senate’s decision to establish a cryptocurrency subcommittee, with Senator Cynthia Lummis at the helm. Lummis has long been a champion of Bitcoin and blockchain technology, advocating for clear and fair regulations that encourage innovation while safeguarding consumers. Her leadership could be instrumental in crafting policies that address the unique challenges of the crypto market without stifling its growth.

A pro-crypto Congress is likely to prioritize the development of a comprehensive regulatory framework, something the industry has been clamoring for. This could include defining the legal status of cryptocurrencies, establishing clear guidelines for token issuance, and creating a regulatory sandbox for blockchain startups to experiment and innovate. Such measures would not only reduce the regulatory uncertainty that has plagued the industry but also attract more institutional investors, driving mainstream adoption and increasing the value of digital assets.

The Economic Case for Crypto-Friendly Policies

The economic potential of the cryptocurrency market is staggering. According to an article on Forbes, the global blockchain market is projected to grow from $7.18 billion in 2022 to $163.83 billion by 2029, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 56.3%. The United States, as a global financial leader, has a unique opportunity to capitalize on this growth by fostering a regulatory environment that supports innovation and investment in blockchain technology.

Clearer regulations could also help address some of the industry’s most pressing challenges, such as fraud and market manipulation. While the crypto market has made strides in reducing illicit activity, I think it is still not good enough. Robust regulatory oversight, including Know Your Customer (KYC) and Anti-Money Laundering (AML) requirements, could help build trust in the market and protect investors from bad actors.

Beyond addressing these challenges, a well-regulated crypto market could serve as a powerful engine for economic growth. Blockchain technology has applications far beyond cryptocurrencies, with potential use cases in supply chain management, healthcare, and even government services. PwC estimates that blockchain could generate $1.76 trillion in business value by 2030. By embracing this technology, the United States can position itself as a global leader in the digital economy, ensuring its competitiveness in the years to come.

The Dangers of Overregulation

While the case for crypto-friendly regulations is compelling, it’s crucial to avoid the pitfalls of overregulation. Excessive or poorly designed rules could stifle innovation and drive companies to relocate to more favorable jurisdictions, a phenomenon known as “regulatory arbitrage.” This is already happening to some extent. For example, Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, has faced regulatory challenges in multiple countries, including the United States. In response, the company has adopted a decentralized structure, with no official headquarters, to minimize its exposure to regulatory risks.

This trend is concerning because it undermines accountability and consumer protection. If the United States wants to remain a hub for innovation, it must strike a balance between enforcing compliance and fostering growth. Regulators should work collaboratively with industry stakeholders to develop policies that address their concerns while ensuring adherence to existing laws. Public-private partnerships, industry roundtables, and open consultations on proposed regulations could go a long way in building trust and creating a framework that works for everyone.

A Personal Perspective: Pragmatism Is Key

As someone who has closely followed the evolution of the cryptocurrency market, I believe the current regulatory landscape is unsustainable. The lack of clarity and consistency in the SEC’s approach has created an environment of uncertainty that hinders innovation and deters investment. While Gary Gensler’s efforts to enforce securities laws are well-intentioned, his heavy-handed tactics have often done more harm than good, alienating the very companies that have the potential to drive the industry forward.

The transition to a pro-crypto Congress represents a unique opportunity to reset the regulatory agenda. By adopting a pragmatic approach, lawmakers can address the legitimate concerns raised by Gensler while creating an environment that encourages growth and innovation. This includes recognizing the unique characteristics of cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology, which often don’t fit neatly into existing regulatory categories.

For instance, the debate over whether cryptocurrencies should be classified as securities, commodities, or something else entirely has been a major source of contention. A more nuanced approach—such as creating a new regulatory category for digital assets—could help resolve this issue and provide much-needed clarity for the industry.

Conclusion: A New Chapter for Crypto?

The cryptocurrency market is at a crossroads. With Gary Gensler stepping down and Trump leading a possibility more pro-crypto Congress on the horizon, the industry has a chance to turn the page and enter a new era. Clearer, more effective regulations could unlock the full potential of blockchain technology, driving innovation, investment, and economic growth. But achieving this vision will require a collaborative effort from regulators, industry leaders, and policymakers.

The stakes are high, but the rewards are even greater. If the United States can strike the right balance, it could cement its position as a global leader in the digital economy. The time to act is now, and the opportunity to shape the future of crypto is one we cannot afford to miss.

 

Source: https://www.securities.io/the-future-of-crypto-regulation-with-trump-a-critical-turning-point-for-the-digital-asset-industry/

 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

The Role of Pro-Crypto Politicians in Cryptocurrency Adoption: A Critical Examination

The Role of Pro-Crypto Politicians in Cryptocurrency Adoption: A Critical Examination

Cryptocurrencies have become a topic of heated debates and discussions worldwide. Pro-crypto politicians have emerged as enthusiastic advocates, highlighting the potential benefits of digital currencies, including economic growth, financial inclusion, and technological advancement. However, to gain a well-rounded perspective on the role of these politicians in cryptocurrency adoption, it is essential to consider the opposing viewpoints.

Critics argue that the speculative nature of cryptocurrencies often overshadows their supposed benefits, casting doubt on the claims made by pro-crypto politicians. They point out the highly volatile nature of digital assets like Bitcoin, which can lead to significant price fluctuations and create an environment conducive to speculative trading and market manipulation. Skeptics caution that the lack of robust regulations exposes investors to financial risks and has the potential to destabilize the broader economy. To address these concerns, pro-crypto politicians must acknowledge and address the risks associated with cryptocurrencies through appropriate regulatory measures.

Here are a few examples of politicians who have shown support for cryptocurrencies and have advocated for their adoption:

Francis Suarez:  Suarez is one of several local politicians in the US with a crypto-friendly stance. He took office as the mayor of Miami in 2017 and soon became the first American politician to take 100% of their salary in Bitcoin. He has also been hailed as one of the leading proponents of cryptocurrency adoption in the US.

Andrew Yang: Yang is a former Democratic presidential candidate who has been an advocate for cryptocurrencies. He has previously stated that he believes cryptocurrencies and blockchain technology have the potential to create a more transparent and accountable government.

Ted Cruz: Cruz is a Senator from Texas who has been a vocal advocate for cryptocurrency. He has proposed making Texas a “crypto oasis” and has introduced legislation to require vendors on Capitol Hill to accept crypto payments. He has also pushed for the adoption of cryptocurrency within Congress using incentives such as food.

Cynthia Lummis: Lummis is a Senator from Wyoming who has been a vocal advocate for Bitcoin and cryptocurrency. She believes that Bitcoin can be an effective store of value, and has criticized the U.S. dollar for losing its value over time due to inflation. Lummis also supports the idea of a decentralized financial system, and sees cryptocurrencies as a way to achieve this.

Here are a few examples of politicians who have voiced concerns or expressed reservations about cryptocurrencies:

Janet Yellen: As the former Chair of the Federal Reserve and the current United States Secretary of the Treasury, Janet Yellen has expressed concerns about the misuse of cryptocurrencies for illicit activities. She has highlighted the need for strong regulatory measures to prevent money laundering, terrorist financing, and other financial crimes associated with digital currencies.

Elizabeth Warren: Senator Elizabeth Warren has been critical of cryptocurrencies, particularly their lack of consumer protection and the potential for market manipulation. She has called for increased regulation and oversight to safeguard investors and ensure market integrity.

Brad Sherman: Congressman Brad Sherman has been one of the most vocal critics of cryptocurrencies in the United States. He has expressed concerns about the potential for cryptocurrencies to facilitate illegal activities, including money laundering and tax evasion. Sherman has advocated for a complete ban on cryptocurrencies, citing their potential threats to the stability of the financial system.

Gary Gensler: While not strictly anti-crypto, Gary Gensler, the current Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), has emphasized the need for robust regulation and investor protection in the cryptocurrency space. He has voiced concerns about the lack of transparency, potential fraud, and market manipulation in the crypto markets.

Key Challenges

Regulation and oversight

The cryptocurrency industry is grappling with a significant challenge – the need for effective regulation and oversight. Pro-crypto politicians have consistently championed a light-touch regulatory approach, believing it to be the key to fostering innovation and driving industry growth. They argue that excessive regulation can stifle technological advancements and impede the potential benefits that cryptocurrencies offer.

However, opponents of this approach raise legitimate concerns about the potential risks associated with a less stringent regulatory framework. They argue that a light-touch approach might inadvertently create loopholes in regulations, leaving consumers exposed to various threats, including fraud, security breaches, and other malicious activities. Without robust regulations in place, critics assert that malicious actors may exploit the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies, potentially resulting in financial harm to unsuspecting investors.

To address these concerns, critics emphasize the importance of comprehensive regulations that strike a delicate balance between nurturing innovation and safeguarding the interests of investors and the general public. They stress the need to implement measures that effectively combat money laundering, fraudulent schemes, and market manipulation. By establishing clear guidelines and standards, they argue that market integrity can be upheld, and a transparent and reliable crypto ecosystem can be built.

Furthermore, critics of the light-touch regulatory approach emphasize that effective oversight plays a crucial role in maintaining public trust in digital currencies. They assert that without proper supervision, cryptocurrencies risk being viewed as illegitimate financial instruments, thereby hindering their widespread adoption. Skeptics argue that by implementing comprehensive regulations and establishing competent oversight bodies, confidence can be instilled among users, investors, and the public at large.

While pro-crypto politicians advocate for a light-touch regulatory approach to foster innovation and industry growth, critics raise valid concerns about potential regulatory loopholes, consumer vulnerability, and the erosion of public trust. Striking the right balance between nurturing innovation and ensuring comprehensive regulations is a complex challenge that policymakers and stakeholders must tackle. By adopting a thoughtful and well-crafted regulatory framework, risks can be mitigated, investors can be protected, and a robust crypto ecosystem that fosters innovation and consumer confidence can be cultivated.

Potential for technological innovation

While politicians who support cryptocurrencies often emphasize the exciting possibilities for technological innovation, there are critics who voice concerns about their speculative nature. These critics argue that the volatile nature of cryptocurrencies and their susceptibility to market manipulation make them a risky investment choice, posing significant financial risks not only to individual investors but also to the broader economy.

Skeptics are quick to point out the unpredictable price fluctuations exhibited by cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, which create an environment conducive to speculative trading and market manipulation. They argue that without robust safeguards and regulations in place, unscrupulous actors can exploit these vulnerabilities, potentially causing substantial losses for unsuspecting investors. These risks have far-reaching consequences, as financial market stability can be compromised.

Furthermore, critics caution against politicians who passionately promote cryptocurrencies without adequately addressing the associated risks. They argue that policymakers must recognize the potential dangers posed by speculative trading, market manipulation, and the lack of investor protection. Failing to address these concerns could inadvertently encourage reckless behavior and contribute to financial instability.

The concerns raised by skeptics extend beyond the individual investor’s well-being. They emphasize how cryptocurrency volatility can have a profound impact on the broader economy. Unpredictable price swings and market manipulations can erode market confidence, impact consumer sentiment, and disrupt established financial systems. To mitigate these risks and ensure the stability and integrity of financial markets, critics stress the need for comprehensive regulations and effective oversight.

In essence, while politicians in favor of cryptocurrencies highlight the potential for technological innovation, critics bring forth valid concerns regarding their speculative nature and associated risks. They caution against political endorsements that overlook these risks and advocate for a more measured and responsible approach to promoting cryptocurrencies. By acknowledging and addressing these concerns, policymakers can strike a balance that fosters innovation while safeguarding investors and maintaining stability in the broader economy.

Financial exclusion and inequality

Financial exclusion and inequality are critical issues that generate considerable debate within the context of cryptocurrencies. Pro-crypto politicians frequently emphasize the potential for financial inclusion, particularly in regions where access to traditional banking systems is limited. They argue that cryptocurrencies offer an opportunity for individuals without access to formal financial services to participate in the global economy.

However, skeptics express concerns about the decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies and its potential impact on existing inequalities. They argue that individuals with limited resources or technological literacy may face significant barriers when it comes to accessing and engaging with the crypto ecosystem. This, in turn, can exacerbate the digital divide, deepening the disparities that already exist within society.

Critics stress the importance of policymakers acknowledging and addressing these concerns to ensure that the benefits of cryptocurrencies are accessible to all segments of society. They advocate for the implementation of measures that bridge the gap and promote inclusivity. These measures could include initiatives to improve digital literacy, expand internet access, and make cryptocurrencies more user-friendly for individuals with limited technological expertise. By doing so, policymakers can help mitigate the potential for cryptocurrencies to perpetuate existing inequalities and instead leverage their transformative potential to foster financial inclusion.

It is essential for policymakers to consider the broader implications of cryptocurrency adoption and develop strategies that promote equal participation and access. By proactively addressing the challenges related to financial exclusion, policymakers can work towards creating a more equitable and inclusive crypto ecosystem. Through targeted efforts, education, and infrastructure development, it becomes possible to empower individuals from all walks of life to harness the benefits of cryptocurrencies and contribute to a more inclusive financial future.

Pragmatic and informed approach

In light of these arguments, it is crucial for policymakers and pro-crypto politicians to adopt a pragmatic and informed approach. While the potential benefits of cryptocurrencies are significant, it is essential to thoroughly evaluate and understand the associated risks. This includes considerations such as consumer protection, investor education, and cybersecurity. Critics caution against blind promotion of cryptocurrencies without considering the potential consequences. Instead, they advocate for evidence-based decision-making and collaboration with experts from various fields to develop effective regulations and policies that strike a balance between fostering innovation and ensuring public safety.

To sum up, while pro-crypto politicians assert that their support is instrumental in driving cryptocurrency adoption, skeptics raise valid concerns that cannot be ignored. Striking the right balance between innovation, regulation, and consumer protection is crucial for the sustainable growth and adoption of cryptocurrencies. Pro-crypto politicians must address these counterarguments and work towards comprehensive frameworks that maximize the potential benefits while mitigating risks. By making informed decisions and remaining adaptable, policymakers can pave the way for responsible cryptocurrency adoption in the future.

 

Source: https://www.securities.io/the-role-of-pro-crypto-politicians-in-cryptocurrency-adoption-a-critical-examination/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j