The Dark Side of Altcoins: Collusion, Price Manipulation, and the CEX Problem

The Dark Side of Altcoins: Collusion, Price Manipulation, and the CEX Problem

The cryptocurrency market, once a beacon of hope for financial innovation and transparency, is now facing a crisis of confidence that threatens its very foundation. As we move through 2025, it has become obvious that the altcoin sector is plagued by a toxic mix of collusion, price manipulation, and a glaring lack of transparency—especially on centralized exchanges (CEXs). The result is a market that feels increasingly rigged, where genuine price discovery is rare and retail investors are left holding the bag. I watched this industry evolve from its idealistic beginnings to its current state, I believe the time for self-reflection and reform is now, before the damage becomes irreversible.

The Mechanics of Manipulation in 2025

The most insidious problem in today’s altcoin market is the collusion between project teams and market makers. In theory, market makers are supposed to provide liquidity and stability, but in practice, many have become partners in manipulation. The process is disturbingly simple: project teams allocate large amounts of tokens to market makers at deep discounts before a token generation event (TGE). These market makers then orchestrate artificial price pumps at launch, creating the illusion of demand. Retail investors, seeing the price action, rush in—only to see the token’s value collapse as insiders dump their holdings.

The numbers in 2025 are staggering. In my own observation, most of the newly launch altcoin have lost 95% of their market cap. This is not a fluke or a reflection of poor project quality; it is a direct result of coordinated manipulation. The median altcoin launched in 2024-2025 is down by at around 70% from its TGE price. This pattern is so consistent that it has become a running joke among traders: “Buy the rumor, sell the TGE, and pray you’re not the last one out.”

Centralized Exchanges: The Silent Enablers

Centralized exchanges, which still control roughly more than half of the global crypto market cap, are at the heart of this crisis. Despite their dominance, most CEXs have done little to address the manipulation happening on their platforms. The incentives are clear: listing fees and trading volumes are lucrative, and exchanges benefit from the volatility and hype that manipulated launches generate.

Transparency is sorely lacking. While some exchanges have made token efforts to publish proof-of-reserves or improve listing standards, these measures are often superficial. The reality is that order books can be spoofed, wash trading is rampant, and the true nature of liquidity is hidden behind closed doors

This lack of transparency is fundamentally at odds with the ethos that drew so many to crypto in the first place. Bitcoin’s original promise was a system where trust was replaced by cryptographic proof and open ledgers. In 2025, the altcoin market feels more like a casino run by insiders than a transparent, decentralized financial system.

This is also reflected in the poll that I have conducted, 82.4% of the respondents think that CEX should held to a higher standard and they should lead by example to help the crypto industry.

The Human Cost: Confidence in Freefall

The impact of this dysfunction is not just financial—it is deeply personal. I have spoken with countless retail investors who entered the market in good faith, only to be burned by the same cycle of hype, manipulation, and collapse. Many have lost significant savings, not because they made reckless bets, but because the system was stacked against them from the start.

This erosion of trust is now quantifiable. According to a poll on X conducted by me, 63% of respondents believe that most altcoin prices are manipulated, and 37% have reduced or stopped investing in new token launches altogether.

The Absurdity of TGE Pricing

Perhaps the most glaring symptom of the current malaise is the absurdity of TGE pricing. In a rational market, the price of a new token should reflect its utility, adoption prospects, and the fundamentals of the project. Instead, TGE prices are set at levels designed to maximize returns for insiders and early backers, with little regard for long-term sustainability.

The result is a predictable crash. New tokens losing more than half its value within the first two weeks of trading become a norm. This is not just a problem for speculators; it undermines the entire process of capital formation and innovation in the crypto space. When every new launch seems like a trap for retail investors, genuine projects struggle to attract long-term supporters.

The Failure of Self-Regulation

For years, the crypto industry has argued that self-regulation is preferable to government intervention. But the events of 2024 and 2025 have shown that self-regulation is, at best, a myth. The industry’s inability—or unwillingness—to police itself has created a Wild West environment where bad actors thrive and honest participants are left disillusioned.

Just this morning, I warned my community that “the industry is eating itself alive,” and that unless meaningful reforms are enacted, both retail and institutional investors will continue to flee. My warning is echoed by community members who acknowledge that the status quo is unsustainable.

The Case for Reform: Transparency and Decentralization

So, what can be done to restore trust and legitimacy to the altcoin market? In my view, the answer lies in a renewed commitment to transparency, decentralization, and investor protection.

First, centralized exchanges must be held to higher standards. This means real-time publication of order flows, full disclosure of market maker relationships, and transparent token allocation data. Exchanges should be required to implement robust surveillance systems to detect and prevent manipulation, and to cooperate with independent audits. Some progress is being made—several exchanges have begun publishing more detailed transparency reports —but these efforts are still the exception rather than the rule.

Second, the industry must accelerate the shift toward decentralized exchanges (DEXs) and on-chain trading. While DEXs currently account for about 25% of trading volume, they offer a level of transparency and auditability that CEXs simply cannot match.

Every trade is recorded on a public blockchain, making it much harder to conceal manipulation. Uniswap v4 and dYdX have shown that it is possible to build liquid, efficient markets without relying on centralized intermediaries.

Based on a poll that I have done, 74.3% of the respondents think the industry must shift to DEX. I believe more and more people understand the importance of decentralization.

Third, token launches need to be fundamentally reformed. This could include longer vesting periods for insiders, transparent allocation disclosures, and mechanisms to ensure fair price discovery—such as open auctions or liquidity bootstrapping pools. Some projects are experimenting with “fair launches,” where tokens are distributed via community-driven mechanisms rather than private sales. While not a cure-all, these approaches represent a step in the right direction.

My Perspective: Why I Still Believe in Crypto

Despite the current malaise, I remain cautiously optimistic about the future of crypto. The technology that underpins digital assets—blockchain, smart contracts, decentralized finance—still has the potential to revolutionize the global financial system. But for that potential to be realized, the industry must confront its demons.

As an observer and participant in the crypto space, I have seen both the best and worst of what this market has to offer. I have witnessed the excitement of genuine innovation, the thrill of new possibilities, and the power of community-driven projects. But I have also seen the damage wrought by greed, collusion, and a lack of accountability.

The choice facing the industry is stark. It can continue down the current path, sacrificing trust and legitimacy for short-term gains. Or it can embrace reform, transparency, and a renewed commitment to the values that made crypto compelling in the first place.

Conclusion: The Road Ahead

The crisis of trust in the altcoin market is not an abstract problem; it is a clear and present danger to the future of digital assets. Collusion between project teams and market makers, abetted by the opacity of centralized exchanges, has created a market where manipulation is the norm and genuine price discovery is the exception. The result is a loss of confidence, a flight of capital, and a growing sense of disillusionment among investors.

But it does not have to be this way. By demanding greater transparency, embracing decentralization, and supporting thoughtful regulation, the industry can chart a new course. The road ahead will not be easy, and there will be resistance from those who benefit from the status quo. But the alternative—a market defined by manipulation and mistrust—is unacceptable.

I urge industry leaders, regulators, and investors to seize this moment. The future of digital assets depends on our willingness to confront hard truths, to demand better, and to build a market worthy of the ideals that inspired its creation. Only then can we restore trust, unlock innovation, and realize the promise of a truly decentralized financial system.

 

Source: https://www.securities.io/the-dark-side-of-altcoins-collusion-price-manipulation-and-the-cex-problem/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Binance Team Rebuffs Any KYC Data Leaks On Dark Web

Binance Team Rebuffs Any KYC Data Leaks On Dark Web

In the latest development, a github hack leak revealed that Binance’s users’ data might be facing some threats with a large amount of KYC information now available on the dark web platforms. This led to a major buzz in the market forcing the Binance team to respond.

Binance Security Team Assures Saftey

In response to recent concerns raised by users, Binance’s security team has diligently evaluated the situation, as is customary for all potential threats. The team has conclusively confirmed that there is no indication of a leak from Binance systems, and user accounts remain secure.

Binance assures its users that their accounts are safeguarded against various potential risks. The exchange has incorporated multi-layered security measures in place, including Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA), biometrics, and authenticators.

Binance extends its appreciation to users who bring potential bugs and security issues to their attention. The proactive reporting also allows the platform to thoroughly investigate any concerns and, where necessary, take prompt action to enhance user protection. Furthermore, as the cryptocurrency landscape evolves, Binance said that it remains committed to maintaining the highest standards of security for its user base.

Last week, Binance also initiated quick action after freezing $4.2 million worth of XRP, stolen from co-founder Chris Larsen’s account. Binance CEO Richard Teng has affirmed his support for Ripple’s investigations and commitment to closely monitoring the external wallets of the exploiter.

Addressing the Rising Crypto Scams

Last week, Binance raised alarms about a troubling resurgence in cryptocurrency scams exploiting the current market conditions. Notably, scammers are exploiting the identities of industry figures such as Yi He, Binance’s co-founder, and Anndy Lian, a prominent blockchain author.

Impersonators have created deceptive LinkedIn profiles using Yi He’s identity to approach potential victims, offering token listings on Binance in exchange for significant payments. Yi He also emphasized her minimal involvement with LinkedIn and non-participation in listing discussions, urging caution against false claims of insider connections.

Additionally, Anndy Lian disclosed WhatsApp scams where fraudsters impersonate Binance staff, enticing individuals to join cryptocurrency groups with false promises of passive income.

 

Source: https://coingape.com/binance-team-rebuffs-any-kyc-data-leaks-on-dark-web/?utm_source=sidebartabnews

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

The Dark Side Of DAOs: Separating Fact From Fiction

The Dark Side Of DAOs: Separating Fact From Fiction

Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are digital entities that operate on a decentralized platform, such as a blockchain. They are typically governed by a set of rules encoded in smart contracts, and they can be used to manage a wide range of assets and activities.

Experts have varying views on the potential and limitations of DAOs. Some experts believe that it has the potential to revolutionize the way that organizations and communities are managed and governed. They argue that the decentralized and trustless nature can give users greater control and autonomy over their assets and activities and help create more transparent and secure environments for conducting transactions and making decisions. Other experts, however, are more skeptical of its potential. They argue that the complexity and uncertainty surrounding the legal and regulatory framework could limit their adoption and growth. They also highlight the challenges and limitations of using smart contracts and other blockchain-based technologies to manage and govern complex systems and activities.

The views of experts on DAOs are mixed, with some seeing great potential in this technology, while others are more skeptical. As with any new technology, it will likely take time for the full potential and limitations to become clear.

Potential Benefits

DAOs offer an array of tantalizing advantages over their traditional centralized counterparts. One of the most notable advantages lies in their decentralized nature. Because they are not tethered to a single central authority, users wield more control and autonomy over their assets and activities. This unique structure can usher in a more democratic decision-making process and give users a louder voice in managing and using their assets.

Last but certainly not least, security is an invaluable advantage. Decentralized platforms are often more secure than centralized systems, meaning users can enjoy an added layer of security for their assets and activities. This can effectively thwart malicious attacks, fraud, and other types of threats, especially for organizations that handle large amounts of valuable assets.

Potential Challenges

While the concept of a DAO presents many alluring features, it’s essential to acknowledge that there are also challenges and limitations to consider. One potential hurdle is the complexity of their operations. As they operate under rules encoded in smart contracts, this can prove challenging to understand and navigate for users unfamiliar with this technology. This can result in a lack of participation and hinder access to the benefits offered by DAOs.

Another possible challenge is the absence of legal recognition and regulatory clarity. Due to the relatively new and untested nature, there is currently no clear legal framework governing their operations. This can make it difficult to operate consistently and comply with regulations, creating uncertainty for users. In light of this, the operators must weigh the legal and regulatory risks involved in their operations and seek advice from qualified professionals knowledgeable about the intricacies of DAOs. It’s possible that new regulatory frameworks will be developed in the future, but it would require collaboration among regulators, industry experts, and other stakeholders. This effort could lead to clearer and more effective guidelines for its operations. Nevertheless, it’s also conceivable that these changes could take significant time and effort.

Ultimately, the evolution of DAOs will depend on the willingness of regulators to embrace their potential benefits while also addressing the challenges they pose. As they continue to grow in popularity and usage, it’s likely that new solutions and regulations will emerge to support their sustainable growth and ensure their potential is fully realized.

Potential Use Cases

DAOs possess a paradigm-shifting potential to disrupt various industries and use cases. The possibilities for applying are limitless and some of the areas where they can create a colossal impact are governance, finance, and gaming.

It offers a novel approach to governance, where they can manage and oversee an extensive array of assets and activities. In the finance industry, it can bring about revolutionary changes by facilitating various financial transactions such as the transfer of funds or issuance of digital assets. Due to the trustless nature, they offer a secure and transparent platform for conducting financial transactions, leading to more reliable and efficient financial systems. It can be leveraged in the gaming industry to manage and govern virtual worlds, games, and other digital experiences, providing users with more immersive and engaging experiences. The decentralized nature o can create more secure and transparent gaming environments, leading to more engaging and captivating user experiences.

For example, a group of individuals could form a DAO to manage the allocation of funds, vote on decisions, and other activities related to the community or organization. The members could use smart contracts to encode the rules and governance structure and to manage the allocation of funds and other assets. Because it would be decentralized and trustless, the members would not need to rely on a central authority or third party to manage their assets or conduct transactions.

The members could use the DAO to vote on decisions related to the community or organization, such as how to allocate funds, what projects to support, or who should serve on the governing body. Because is it transparent and immutable, the members would be able to trust that their votes would be counted accurately and that the results of the vote would be fair and unbiased. The use cases illustrates how a DAO can manage and govern a community or organization in a decentralized manner. By using smart contracts and other blockchain-based technologies, it can provide users with greater control and autonomy over their assets and activities.

Governance Concerns In Reality

Is the reality of DAO the same as what I have shared above? My straightforward answer is “NO”.

When some people talk about DAO, they immediately mention underlying technology, decentralization, transparency, and revolution. When some project teams talk about it, they speak on things like voting and governance. “Governance tokens” are perhaps the most shameless scam in this industry: “Buy a token, and you’re part of the DAO.” It gives you the illusion that you have the opportunity to “decide” and you are owned part of the project. Even if the price dropped, it became more acceptable because this is your own project.

When a project team has carefully prepared and put a proposal on Snapshot, what choice does the “community” have? First, because of their limited knowledge, energy, connections, and abilities, people cannot propose valuable ideas. Second, voting rights are not as simple as one person, one vote, and you have already experienced that.

The Arbitrum team released their token before the holders did the voting. The Arbitrum Foundation faced backlash from the community after it held a “ratification” vote on decisions it had already implemented, leading to questions about the vote’s meaning and the platform’s decentralized governance structure. The proposal, known as Arbitrum Improvement Proposal (AIP-1), allocates 750 million ARB tokens (around $1 billion) to the Arbitrum Foundation for operational and administrative costs. The foundation has since announced that it will break up the controversial governance voting system and redo the vote after token holders revolted against it. Citing another incident, the ETH miners voted against 1559, but it still goes live -There has never been a victory for the people.

The current state of DAO governance is fraught with several issues that need to be addressed. One of the primary problems is the complexity and opacity of the governance process, which can make it challenging for members to comprehend how decisions are made and participate meaningfully fully. The distribution of decision-making power may not always be fair or transparent, with some members holding more tokens or influence than others.

Another significant issue is that the governance mechanisms are also prone to manipulation or capture by a select few powerful actors. These actors can skew the decision-making process in their favour, undermining the decentralized and community-driven principles that DAOs are meant to embody. Participation and engagement are also problematic, as not all members have the time, resources, or expertise to contribute actively to the governance process. Consequently, decision-making power may be concentrated in the hands of a small group of active members, which may not represent the broader interests of the community.

Do You Still Believe In The Future Of DAOs?

Yes, you should still believe in future.

These issues highlighted above necessitate more transparency, accountability, and inclusiveness in its governance. To address them, innovative governance mechanisms like quadratic voting, liquid democracy, and prediction markets are increasingly necessary. These approaches can foster more effective and equitable decision-making processes. Many experts including myself believe that DAOs represent a promising new model for decentralized governance and organization and will continue to play an important role in the future of blockchain technology and beyond. They are still in their early stages of development, and there are various types of DAOs with different goals and objectives. It is up to the community to critically evaluate the current state and work towards improving their design and governance in order for them to reach their full potential.

The DAOs you see right now maybe not be ideal. Jack Dorsey, the co-founder of Twitter and Square, has expressed concerns about the decentralized nature of Web3 being compromised by VC firms that prioritize profits over the principles of decentralization and blockchain technology. I believe that this issue extends to DAOs as well and that they are also compromised.

Some propose a more decentralized web, which could be called Web4, to address this issue. While the specifics of Web4 are not clear, it is clear that decentralization will be a central focus.

Source: https://www.benzinga.com/23/04/31661985/the-dark-side-of-daos-separating-fact-from-fiction

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j