Europe rises, Asia watches, Bitcoin sideways and gold shines: A world on edge

Europe rises, Asia watches, Bitcoin sideways and gold shines: A world on edge

The recent rebound in risk sentiment and the relief rally in US markets, spurred by the easing of fears surrounding a potential government shutdown. The developments over the past few days paint a fascinating, albeit complex, picture of an interconnected global financial system grappling with uncertainty, inflationary pressures, and shifting geopolitical dynamics.

Let’s dive into the details and unpack what this all means, both for the immediate future and the broader economic landscape.

The S&P 500’s 2.1 per cent surge last Friday was a welcome reprieve after it closed in a technical recession the previous day—a term that, while not officially signalling a full-blown economic downturn, certainly rattled investors. The rally was broad-based, with most sectors finishing in positive territory, reflecting a collective sigh of relief that a government shutdown, which could have paralysed federal operations and dented market confidence, appears to have been averted, at least for now. This kind of market behaviour is classic: when a looming threat dissipates, investors pile back in, eager to capitalise on discounted stocks.

Yet, beneath this optimism lies a more troubling undercurrent—US consumer sentiment has plummeted to its lowest level in over two years. The preliminary March sentiment index dropped to 57.9, a stark indicator that everyday Americans are growing increasingly anxious about the economy. This apprehension isn’t unfounded.

With tariffs looming as a potential disruptor, consumers are bracing for higher prices, a fear underscored by their expectation that inflation will climb to 3.9 per cent annually over the next five to ten years. That’s a significant jump from last month’s 3.5 per cent and the highest long-term inflation expectation in over three decades. It’s hard not to see this as a red flag—when consumers start anticipating sustained price increases, it can become a self-fulfilling prophecy as spending habits shift and businesses adjust accordingly.

Meanwhile, the Federal Reserve finds itself in a delicate balancing act. Despite these inflationary fears and a step-down in economic growth, the Fed is widely expected to hold steady at its Wednesday meeting, signalling patience rather than panic. This isn’t surprising—Fed Chair Jerome Powell has consistently emphasised a data-driven approach, and with inflation still above the two per cent target but not spiraling out of control, a pause makes sense.

However, the bond market tells a slightly different story. The yield on the 10-year US Treasury note ticked up 5 basis points to 4.31 per cent, a subtle but telling sign that investors are demanding higher returns to compensate for perceived risks. It’s a reminder that while equity markets may cheer short-term wins, the fixed-income crowd remains wary of longer-term uncertainties, particularly around fiscal policy and trade disruptions.

Speaking of trade, the commodities market offers another lens into this evolving narrative. Gold, that perennial safe-haven asset, climbed 0.5 per cent to breach the US$3,000-per-ounce mark for the first time—a milestone that speaks volumes about investor unease. With US policy uncertainty intensifying, particularly around tariffs and their potential to upend global supply chains, gold’s ascent feels less like a speculative bubble and more like a rational hedge.

Brent crude, too, edged higher by 0.3 per cent to US$71.61 per barrel, buoyed by the dual forces of tighter supply expectations (thanks to trade war jitters) and OPEC+’s decision to ramp up output. It’s a delicate dance—higher oil prices could stoke inflation further, yet they also reflect a market betting on sustained demand despite economic headwinds.

Across the Atlantic, European equities caught a tailwind from positive political developments in Germany, where Chancellor-in-waiting Friedrich Merz announced a deal with the Green Party on a defense and infrastructure package. This news lifted the EUR/USD pair by 0.3 per cent to 1.0876, suggesting a flicker of confidence in Europe’s economic stability amid its own challenges.

Asia, too, is showing signs of resilience. Equities there regained their footing last Friday and continued to trade higher in early sessions today, March 17, 2025. Investors are laser-focused on China’s upcoming data dump—fixed asset investments, retail sales, industrial production, and home prices—which could provide critical clues about the health of the world’s second-largest economy. Any weakness in these figures could ripple across global markets, especially given China’s role as a manufacturing powerhouse and consumer market. For now, though, the mood in Asia seems cautiously optimistic, mirroring the relief rally in the US.

But let’s pivot to a wildcard in this global financial tapestry: Bitcoin and its contrasting fates in South Korea and the United States. The Bank of Korea (BOK) has firmly rejected the idea of incorporating Bitcoin into its foreign exchange reserves, citing its wild price swings and the hefty transaction costs of converting it to cash.

The BOK’s stance aligns with the International Monetary Fund’s guidelines, which prioritise liquidity and risk management—attributes Bitcoin, with its volatility, struggles to meet. This conservative approach stands in sharp contrast to the US, where President Donald Trump recently signed an executive order establishing a Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

It’s a bold move, signalling America’s willingness to embrace cryptocurrency as a strategic asset, perhaps as a hedge against dollar weakness or a play to attract blockchain investment. The divergence is striking: South Korea sees Bitcoin as a liability, while the US views it as an opportunity.

Then there’s North Korea, stealthily emerging as a major Bitcoin player through the exploits of the Lazarus Group. Their audacious US$1.4 billion heist from Bybit on February 21, 2025—mostly in Ethereum, later partially converted to Bitcoin—has catapulted the rogue state into the ranks of top government holders, with 13,562 BTC valued at US$1.14 billion.

It’s a chilling reminder of how cybercrime can reshape national wealth, turning digital theft into a treasury-building exercise. This development adds another layer of complexity to Bitcoin’s role in global finance, blurring the lines between legitimate investment and illicit gain.

Bitcoin’s price action itself remains a rollercoaster. I am eyeing a key resistance level at US$86,700, with failure to break through potentially sending it tumbling to US$77,859 or even US$71,011 if selling pressure mounts. Last week’s choppy movements reflect a market caught between bullish enthusiasm and bearish caution.

CryptoQuant analyst Darkfost noted on X that Bitcoin’s open interest hit a record US$33 billion in January, only to see nearly US$10 billion wiped out between February 20 and March 4 amid political uncertainty tied to Trump’s actions. This 90-day futures open interest drop of -14 per cent suggests a market reset, clearing out excess leverage and possibly setting the stage for a more stable recovery. It’s a pattern we’ve seen before—painful liquidations paving the way for cautious growth.

I see a world at a crossroads. The relief rally in US markets is a fleeting victory, a sugar high that masks deeper structural concerns. Consumer sentiment’s nosedive and rising inflation expectations signal a populace bracing for tougher times, potentially exacerbated by tariffs that could jack up costs across the board.

The Fed’s patience is prudent, but it risks being perceived as indecision if inflation accelerates unchecked. Gold’s record highs and oil’s upward creep underscore a flight to safety and supply-side worries, while Europe and Asia’s gains hint at a fragile global recovery that could easily falter. Bitcoin’s tale—shunned by South Korea, embraced by the US, and hoarded by North Korea—epitomises the chaos and opportunity of our digital age.

“For investors, it’s a time to tread carefully, balancing short-term gains against long-term risks. For the rest of us, it’s a front-row seat to a high-stakes economic drama where the next act is anyone’s guess.” — Anndy Lian

 

Source: https://e27.co/europe-rises-asia-watches-bitcoin-sideways-and-gold-shines-a-world-on-edge-20250317/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Market recap: Europe gains, crypto falls, and trade fears grow

Market recap: Europe gains, crypto falls, and trade fears grow

The market wrap for February 27, 2025, paints a vivid picture of a world grappling with choppy risk sentiment, spurred by US President Donald Trump’s latest pronouncements on trade policy. His remarks during Wednesday’s cabinet meeting—laden with ambiguity about tariffs on Canada and Mexico, hints of a delay from March to April, and a firm declaration of 25 per cent reciprocal tariffs on European autos—have sent ripples of unease across global markets.

Add to that a slew of economic data points, corporate earnings, and geopolitical developments, and you’ve got a recipe for volatility that’s keeping investors on their toes. Here’s my take on what’s unfolding, grounded in facts and a healthy dose of skepticism about where this all might lead.

Let’s start with Trump’s trade rhetoric, which has once again thrust uncertainty into the spotlight. His contradictory signals about tariffs on Canada and Mexico—major US trading partners—suggest a strategy that’s either deliberately fluid or frustratingly inconsistent.

On one hand, he’s floated a potential delay, pushing the timeline from March to April, which could buy time for negotiations or simply prolong the suspense. On the other, he’s doubled down with a pledge for 25 per cent tariffs on European autos and other goods, a move that’s less about surprise (given his long-standing “tariff man” persona) and more about escalation.

The markets despise ambiguity, and Trump’s words have delivered it in spades. Investors are left parsing his intentions: Is this a negotiating tactic to extract concessions, or a genuine prelude to a broader trade war? The historical precedent from his first term—where tariffs on steel and aluminum roiled markets but often softened in practice—offers little comfort when the stakes now seem higher and the global economy more fragile.

The economic data isn’t helping soothe nerves either. US new home sales took a nosedive in January, dropping 10.5 per cent to 657,000 units. That’s a stark signal of cooling demand in a housing market already battered by high interest rates and affordability woes. For context, this figure undershoots even the most pessimistic forecasts, hinting at deeper structural issues—perhaps a pullback in consumer confidence or a ripple effect from trade-related uncertainty.

Housing is a bellwether for broader economic health, and this bearish turn could amplify growth concerns, especially as Trump’s policies threaten to layer on inflationary pressures via tariffs. It’s no wonder equity markets have been volatile, with traders caught between macroeconomic red flags and the micro-level drama of corporate earnings.

Speaking of earnings, Nvidia’s latest report was the week’s marquee event, and it didn’t disappoint—or rather, it didn’t fully satisfy. The chip giant, a darling of the tech rally, posted results that beat analyst expectations, yet the stock wobbled in after-hours trading. Why? After two years of blowout performances that fuelled AI-driven euphoria, this “modest beat” felt like a letdown.

Investors have grown accustomed to Nvidia shattering ceilings, and anything less sparks doubts about whether the growth story has peaked. The broader MSCI US index eked out a negligible 0.03 per cent gain, buoyed by a 0.8 per cent rise in the Info Tech sector, but the lack of decisive momentum reflects a market wrestling with bigger questions. Are we seeing the limits of tech-led optimism in an environment where tariffs and inflation could crimp corporate margins?

Meanwhile, fixed-income markets offered their own commentary. The benchmark 10-year Treasury yield slipped 4 basis points to 4.25 per cent, a subtle nod to growth fears trumping inflation worries—for now. Lower yields signal a flight to safety, as investors bet on a slowing economy potentially forcing the Federal Reserve to rethink its rate-cut trajectory.

The US Dollar Index, up 0.1 per cent to 106.49, suggests some resilience, likely propped up by Trump’s tariff threats enhancing the greenback’s safe-haven appeal. Gold, too, ticked up 0.1 per cent to US$2,915.92 an ounce, hovering near record territory as a hedge against uncertainty. These moves aren’t dramatic, but they underscore a cautious repositioning amid the noise.

Across the Atlantic, MSCI Europe climbed a solid 1.0 per cent, lifted by a new minerals deal between the US and Ukraine. It’s a rare bright spot, hinting at strategic shifts in resource alliances that could cushion Europe against trade disruptions. But let’s not kid ourselves—European autos, now squarely in Trump’s tariff crosshairs, could drag sentiment down fast. Companies like Volkswagen and Stellantis, with heavy exposure to North American supply chains, face a reckoning if those 25 per cent duties stick. The sector’s already nursing wounds from a post-pandemic slump, and this could be salt in the wound.

Asia, meanwhile, tells a tale of resilience and divergence. The MSCI Asia ex-Japan index rebounded 1.5 per cent, with Hong Kong’s Hang Seng stealing the show at a 3.3 per cent surge. The catalyst? News that China plans to recapitalise its biggest banks, a move that could stabilise a financial system creaking under bad debt and sluggish growth.

It’s a bold step, and the market’s enthusiastic response suggests hope that Beijing’s got more tricks up its sleeve. Yet, early trading today showed Asian indices mixed, and US equity futures point to a softer open stateside. The global mood remains jittery, and China’s bank rescue might be a temporary salve rather than a cure.

Then there’s the cryptocurrency saga, a wild subplot in this market drama. Over US$800 billion has evaporated from global crypto markets in recent weeks, a brutal reversal from the post-election euphoria tied to Trump’s perceived pro-crypto stance. Bitcoin shed 3.6 per cent on Wednesday, hitting US$85,600, while Ethereum took a 4 per cent dive to US$2,275—its lowest since September.

The culprits are manifold: inflation fears, tariff anxieties, a cooling meme coin craze, and a US$1.4 billion hack at the Bybit exchange, linked to the notorious Lazarus group. The forensic fallout confirms it was a targeted attack, not a flaw in Safe Wallet’s smart contracts, but the damage to confidence is real. Crypto’s 4 per cent daily drop mirrors the broader sell-off in risk assets, and Ethereum’s 53 per cent lag from its 2021 peak is a stark reminder of how far the mighty can fall when sentiment sours.

Oil, too, is feeling the heat. Brent crude slipped 0.7 per cent to US$72.71 a barrel, pressured by an unexpected buildup in US fuel inventories and whispers of a Russia-Ukraine peace deal. The latter could ease supply concerns, but the former points to weakening demand—a troubling sign when paired with the housing data. Energy markets are a microcosm of the push-pull between geopolitical hope and economic reality, and right now, reality’s winning.

So, what’s my point of view on all this? I have mentioned this many times in the past few days. I see a world at a crossroads, where Trump’s trade gambit could either spark a manageable reshuffling of global commerce or tip us into a deeper slowdown. The data—housing’s slump, oil’s slide, crypto’s crash—screams caution, yet pockets of strength in Europe and Asia hint at adaptability.

Nvidia’s underwhelming “win” feels symbolic: growth is still possible, but the easy gains are gone. Investors are right to be skittish; tariffs could stoke inflation just as growth falters, a stagflationary nightmare the Fed’s ill-equipped to handle if yields keep dropping. I’m skeptical of Trump’s ability to thread this needle—his track record leans more toward disruption than finesse. But markets are nothing if not resilient, and the next few weeks, with Fed testimony and more tariff clarity looming, will test that resilience to the hilt. For now, I’d say buckle up: this ride’s only getting bumpier.

 

Source: https://e27.co/market-recap-europe-gains-crypto-falls-and-trade-fears-grow-20250227/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

MiCA’s Stablecoin Gamble: How Europe’s Bank Mandate Could Backfire

MiCA’s Stablecoin Gamble: How Europe’s Bank Mandate Could Backfire

The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation marks a pivotal moment in the global regulation of digital assets, particularly concerning stablecoins. This comprehensive framework aims to bring clarity and stability to the burgeoning crypto market within the EU. However, a closer examination of its specific provisions, especially those pertaining to stablecoin reserves, reveals a potentially problematic approach.

As a financial journalist with a keen interest in the intersection of finance and technology and having observed the evolution of digital assets and their regulatory landscapes, I contend that the MiCA stipulation requiring 60% of stablecoin reserves to be held within EU banks could inadvertently introduce instability and hinder the very innovation it seeks to foster. While seemingly aimed at enhancing security, this mandate may instead create new vulnerabilities and fragment the global stablecoin market.

The Stablecoin Landscape

Before dissecting the intricacies of MiCA’s impact, it’s essential to grasp the current dynamics of the stablecoin market. As of early 2024, this sector boasts a market capitalization exceeding $130 billion, a testament to the growing demand for digital assets that offer price stability. Tether remains the dominant player, commanding approximately 70% of this market share. This dominance isn’t accidental; it largely reflects market confidence in Tether’s reserve composition and its consistent ability to maintain its peg to the U.S. dollar.

The success of Tether can be directly attributed to its reserve strategy, which predominantly involves holding U.S. Treasuries and other highly liquid dollar-denominated assets. Tether’s transparency, albeit sometimes scrutinized, through its regular attestation reports provides insights into this strategy.

According to their latest reports, a significant portion, around 85% of their reserves, are held in cash and cash equivalents, with U.S Treasuries forming the lion’s share. This preference for U.S. Treasuries is not arbitrary. These instruments are backed by the full faith and credit of the United States government and offer unparalleled liquidity. The daily trading volumes in the secondary market for U.S. Treasuries routinely average over $910 billion, making them exceptionally easy to buy and sell without significantly impacting their price. This deep liquidity is a crucial factor in maintaining the stability of a stablecoin.

Other significant stablecoins, such as USD Coin, prioritize holding reserves in highly liquid and low-risk assets, including U.S. Treasuries and cash held in regulated financial institutions. This industry-wide preference for U.S. Treasuries underscores their perceived safety and liquidity within the global financial system. The ability to quickly convert reserves into fiat currency during periods of high redemption pressure is paramount for a stablecoin to maintain its peg.

Protectionism Masquerading as Security?

MiCA’s requirement that 60% of stablecoin reserves be held in EU banks appears to be more of a protectionist measure aimed at bolstering the European financial sector than a genuine enhancement of stablecoin security. This assertion becomes particularly compelling when comparing the liquidity of the European bond market to that of U.S. Treasuries. While the EUR government bond market is substantial, it pales compared to the U.S. Treasury market in terms of trading volume and depth. The lower liquidity and often wider bid-ask spreads in European government bonds raise concerns about the ease and cost of liquidating these assets during periods of market stress.

Tradeweb reported in September 2024 that the average daily volume for European government bonds was $49.5 billion. As I do not have the exact average daily trading data from the European Central Bank, I put fair estimated daily trading volumes of around €100 billion for this comparison. This figure is less than one-ninth of the daily trading volume observed in U.S. Treasuries, which is over $910 billion.

This significant liquidity disparity is not merely an academic point; it has real-world implications for stablecoin issuers who need to access their reserves quickly to meet redemption requests. During market turbulence, the ability to quickly and efficiently convert reserve assets into fiat currency is critical for maintaining the stablecoin’s peg. Lower liquidity in the European bond market could translate to higher transaction costs and potential delays in accessing funds, potentially undermining the stability MiCA aims to achieve.

Furthermore, the concentration of reserves within EU banks raises questions about the potential for systemic risk within the European financial system. While diversification is generally considered a prudent risk management strategy, forcing stablecoin issuers to concentrate a significant portion of their reserves within a specific regional banking system could amplify the impact of any localized financial instability.

The Silicon Valley Bank Lesson

The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) in March 2023 is a stark and relevant case study highlighting the inherent risks associated with relying solely on the traditional banking system for stablecoin reserves. When SVB experienced a rapid bank run, Circle’s USD Coin, despite being considered a highly reputable stablecoin, temporarily lost its peg, plummeting to around $0.87. This dramatic event occurred even though only approximately 10% of USD Coin’s reserves were directly affected by the SVB failure. This incident underscored two critical vulnerabilities: firstly, bank deposits, even within seemingly well-regulated institutions, are not entirely risk-free, and secondly, the operational limitations of the traditional banking system, such as weekend closures and processing delays, are fundamentally incompatible with the 24/7 nature of cryptocurrency markets.

Imagine the amplified impact if, under MiCA’s regulations, 60% of a stablecoin’s reserves were caught in a similar situation. The inability to access a significant portion of their reserves during a critical period could have catastrophic consequences, potentially triggering a systemic crisis within the European crypto ecosystem and eroding trust in stablecoins more broadly. The SVB episode demonstrated the speed at which confidence can evaporate in the financial system and the potential for contagion to spread rapidly. MiCA’s banking-centric approach, while intended to provide security, could inadvertently create a single point of failure, making the system more vulnerable to such shocks.

The Liquidity Premium of U.S. Treasuries

U.S. Treasuries have earned their reputation as the world’s premier safe-haven asset for compelling reasons, primarily their unparalleled market depth and liquidity. This deep liquidity ensures minimal price slippage even during periods of large-scale liquidations. During the height of the COVID-19 market panic in March 2020, the U.S. Treasury market remained remarkably robust despite unprecedented volatility across global markets. While bid-ask spreads widened temporarily, the market continued functioning efficiently, allowing investors to buy and sell Treasuries relatively quickly. This resilience during extreme stress underscores the inherent strength and liquidity of the U.S. Treasury market.

Conversely, European government bonds, particularly those issued by smaller EU nations, have experienced significant liquidity challenges during various crises. During the Eurozone crisis of 2011-2012, some sovereign bonds became practically untradeable, highlighting the potential for liquidity to dry up during times of stress. For a stablecoin issuer needing to process large redemption requests quickly, such a scenario could prove disastrous, making it difficult, if not impossible, to access the necessary funds to maintain the peg. The historical data demonstrates U.S. Treasuries’ superior liquidity and stability compared to their European counterparts, making them a more reliable asset for backing stablecoins.

The Banking System’s Inherent Vulnerabilities

MiCA’s reliance on the traditional banking system introduces additional layers of risk beyond just liquidity concerns. The banking turmoil of 2023, which witnessed the failures of both SVB and Signature Bank and First Republic Bank in the United States, serves as a potent reminder that even seemingly well-regulated banks can collapse under stress. European banks are not immune to such vulnerabilities. The forced merger of Credit Suisse with UBS in 2023, orchestrated to prevent a broader financial crisis, stands as a recent and prominent example.

Furthermore, unlike U.S. Treasuries held directly, bank deposits are subject to counterparty risk. If the bank holding the stablecoin reserves faces financial difficulties or even fails, accessing those reserves could become problematic.

Additionally, under EU banking regulations, bank deposits are potentially subject to bail-in provisions. In a crisis, depositors (including stablecoin issuers) could see their funds used to recapitalize the failing bank. This introduces a level of risk that stablecoin issuers cannot directly control, which is not present when holding highly liquid government securities. Banks also typically reinvest deposits in various assets, creating additional layers of risk and complexity that are opaque to the stablecoin issuer.

Market Fragmentation and Innovation Barriers

MiCA’s stringent requirements could lead to fragmentation in the global stablecoin market. Major issuers like Tether, who have established their reserve management strategies based on global liquidity and the reliability of U.S. Treasuries, might find the cost and complexity of complying with MiCA’s requirements prohibitive. They might opt to limit their operations within the EU rather than fundamentally restructure their reserve management strategies. This could create a bifurcated market: globally accessible stablecoins operating largely outside the EU and smaller, potentially less liquid stablecoins operating within the regulatory framework of MiCA.

This fragmentation could hinder the seamless flow of capital and innovation within the European digital asset space. New stablecoin projects seeking to launch in the EU would face significant barriers to entry, needing to establish relationships with EU banks and navigate complex reserve requirements before even launching their product. This could concentrate power in the hands of established financial institutions, potentially stifling the decentralized ethos that underpins much of the cryptocurrency movement. The increased regulatory burden and operational complexity could also make it less attractive for innovative stablecoin projects to establish themselves within the EU, potentially pushing innovation to other jurisdictions with more accommodating regulatory environments.

Alternative Approaches to Foster Stability

Rather than imposing potentially risky banking arrangements, regulators could explore alternative approaches focusing on transparency, risk-based assessments, and a broader acceptance of high-quality collateral. One such approach would be enhancing transparency and mandating stablecoin reserves’ auditing regardless of geographical location. Independent audits conducted by reputable firms could provide greater assurance to users.

Another avenue would be to develop clear and objective standards for assessing the quality of reserve assets, focusing on criteria such as liquidity, credit risk, and market depth. This would allow for a more nuanced approach to reserve management, recognizing assets like U.S. Treasuries’ proven stability and liquidity. Regulators could establish a framework that allows for a more diverse range of high-quality collateral, including U.S. Treasuries and other highly liquid government securities from reputable jurisdictions, provided they meet stringent risk criteria. This approach would acknowledge the stablecoin market’s global nature and certain assets’ established role in maintaining stability.

The data and historical precedent are clear: U.S. Treasuries have consistently demonstrated their value as stable and liquid collateral through multiple periods of financial stress. MiCA’s attempt to artificially promote European alternatives through regulatory mandate does not alter this fundamental market reality. A more pragmatic approach would be to acknowledge the global nature of stablecoins and focus on establishing robust standards for reserve quality and transparency rather than imposing geographically restrictive requirements.

Balancing Innovation and Stability

While MiCA’s underlying intentions to protect consumers and ensure the stability of the stablecoin market are undoubtedly laudable, its current implementation risks achieving the opposite of its intended effect. By compelling issuers to hold a significant portion of their reserves in potentially less liquid and potentially riskier assets within the European banking system, the regulation may inadvertently increase, rather than decrease, systemic risk within the European crypto ecosystem.

The stablecoin market undeniably requires thoughtful and effective regulation. However, such regulation should be grounded in market realities, informed by historical data, and designed to foster innovation while mitigating genuine risks.

As the digital asset industry evolves rapidly, regulatory frameworks must strike a delicate balance between promoting stability and encouraging innovation without erecting artificial barriers that could ultimately harm the very users they are designed to protect. A more globally collaborative and less geographically prescriptive approach to stablecoin regulation would likely be more effective in fostering a stable and innovative digital asset ecosystem.

 

Source: https://intpolicydigest.org/mica-s-stablecoin-gamble-how-europe-s-bank-mandate-could-backfire/

 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j