Tag Archives: may

Investors claim Tether’s $118B reserves may face audit and liquidity risks

Investors claim Tether’s $118B reserves may face audit and liquidity risks

Tether’s lack of third-party audits is raising investor concerns about a potential FTX-like liquidity crisis from the $118 billion stablecoin giant.

Investor concerns are mounting around Tether, the issuer of the world’s largest stablecoin USD₮.

Cyber Capital founder Justin Bons, who shared his concerns about Tether being a potentially bigger scam than FTX, catalyzed the latest wave of concerns.

Bons wrote in a Sept. 14 X post:

“[Tether is] one of the biggest existential threats to crypto as a whole. As we have to trust they hold $118B in collateral without proof! Even after the CFTC fined Tether for lying about their reserves in 2021.”

In 2021, the United States Commodities and Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) fined Tether a $41 million civil monetary penalty for lying about USDT being fully backed by reserves.

Concerns over the stablecoin giant’s influence over the crypto space grew louder recently after data revealed that Tether’s market share surpassed 75% of the entire stablecoin market after a 20% increase over the past two years.

A hypothetical Tether implosion would be banking-driven, unlike the FTX collapse

Part of the concerns are fueled by one of the industry’s most notorious black swan events, the collapse of the FTX exchange, which led to $8.9 billion in lost user funds.

While FTX’s collapse was due to its inability to honor mass customer withdrawals of $6 billion within three days, a hypothetical Tether implosion would be related to its banking partners, according to Sean Lee, the co-founder of IDA Finance.

Lee told Cointelegraph:

“Bear market or not, the possibility of Tether imploding is more about its structural connectivity to its underlying assets and banking rails, not so much market movement.  Otherwise, USDT would’ve suffered during the last bear market, but instead, it was actually [USD Coin] USDC that depegged due to their reliance on Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank.”

In May 2022, Tether honored over $16.7 billion worth of USDT customer withdrawals within 10 days without any issues.

In contrast, Washington Mutual Bank could not honor $16.5 billion worth of withdrawals within 10 days, which led to what became known as the biggest banking failure in the US in September 2008.

Others believe that Tether is too big to fail. Notably, Anndy Lian, author and intergovernmental blockchain expert, doesn’t expect Tether to face issues but warned that generally, large centralized entities could pose a risk for the cryptocurrency space:

“Cryptocurrencies were originally designed to operate without central control, promoting transparency, security, and user autonomy. However, Tether, as a centralized stablecoin issuer, holds significant influence over the crypto market due to its widespread use for trading and liquidity.”

Cointelegraph has approached Tether for comment.

Tether’s business structure and transparency raise concerns

On Sept. 8, Tether invested $100 million in Adecoagro, acquiring a 9.8% stake in the Latin American agricultural giant.

This latest investment gave us the first disclosure into Tether’s governance structure, according to Cyber Capital’s Bons, who wrote:

“The board of Tether Holdings only has 2 members; Giancarlo & Ludovicos. This implies that the USDT reserves are still not segregated in 2024 & these two have absolute control!”

IDA Finance’s co-founder, Lee, was also concerned about Tether’s lack of transparency. He wrote:

“Tether is structured as a business and their insistence on not providing the level of detailed transparency that ensures real trust from the community and institutional players is indeed concerning.”

Despite Tether boasting over $118 billion worth of reserves in its second quarter “independent attestations conducted by BDO,” Cyber Capital’s Bons claims that Tether has yet to submit its reserves for a third-party audit:

“However, an ‘Auditor’s Report’ or an ‘Accountant Report’ is not a formal audit at all! Despite the claims, Tether has never submitted its alleged reserves to a real unrestricted, third-party audit!”

 

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/tether-transparency-business-structure-118b-ftx-concern

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

Ethereum ETF: Investors Wait For May 23 Full of FUD

Ethereum ETF: Investors Wait For May 23 Full of FUD

May 23, 2024 is a key date for Ethereum (ETH) investors across the world. On this day, the U.S. Securities and Exchanges Commission (SEC) will announce its verdict on VanEck’s spot ETH exchange traded funds (ETF) application.

A denial of VanEck’s spot ETH ETF application will likely mean that similar applications from Ark Investment, Grayscale, Franklin Templeton, Invesco Galaxy, and BlackRock will also be rejected later in the year.

An approval from the SEC will likely spark a rally in ETH prices — similar to the ETF-supported Bitcoin (BTC) bull run we saw earlier in 2024.

Key Takeaways

  • VanEck is the first of many spot ETH ETF applicants.
  • The legal status of ETH as a commodity or security continues to be a hot topic of debate.
  • Bitcoin maxi Michael Saylor says altcoins will never get spot ETFs and commodity status.
  • Anndy Lian says ETF rejection could lead to short-term ETH price volatility and decrease in price.
  • Markus Thielen is comfortable holding a short position in ETH.

Pessimism Lingers over SEC Approval for Spot Ethereum ETF

The current mood regarding the launch of spot ETH ETFs in the U.S. is largely pessimistic.

The meeting between the SEC and spot ETH ETF applicants has been “one-sided” so far, insiders told Reuters. According to those who participated in the discussions, the SEC has not discussed “substantive details about the proposed products” nor asked issuers about concerns like they generally do when ETF applications are filed.

Crypto market observers will know that dealing with crypto skeptic SEC chair Gary Gensler is never a straightforward task. Even the recently approved spot BTC ETFs had to endure rejections of over 20 applications from the SEC between 2018 and 2023.

Given the fact that VanEck’s spot ETH ETF application is the first of its kind, CEO Jan van Eck expressed his pessimism at the Paris Blockchain Week crypto event, saying:

“We were the first to file as well for Ethereum in the U.S., and we and Cathy Wood (CEO of Ark Invest), are kind of the first in line for May, I guess, to probably be rejected.”

The Legal Status of ETH Hinders ETF Hopes

Additionally, the legal status of ETH continues to be a hot topic of debate. Despite the initial ETF denials, bitcoin never faced questions on its status as a commodity.

Anndy Lian, a governmental blockchain advisor and expert, told Techopedia:

“BTC has been generally recognized as a commodity by various regulatory bodies, including the CFTC. However, the SEC has not provided a clear stance on ETH’s classification, and recent comments by SEC Chair Gary Gensler have not explicitly categorized ETH as a commodity, which adds to the uncertainty.”

Adding to the fear, uncertainty and doubt was Bitcoin maximalist and co-founder of MicroStrategy, Michael Saylor, who said that it will soon be “very clear” that Ethereum is deemed a security not a commodity when the spot ETH ETF gets rejected in May 2024.

“After that you are going to see that Ethereum, BNB, Solana, Ripple, Cardano – everything down the stack – is just a crypto asset security unregistered. None of them will ever be wrapped by a spot ETF,” Saylor added.

 

“Wen Spot ETH ETF?”

While the growing consensus suggests that VanEck’s application will get rejected on May 23, 2024, industry insiders believe that a spot ETH ETF will eventually be approved later.

We look at the long road to the approval of spot BTC ETF as our reference.

Before its approval in January 2024, the SEC rejected every application placed before it. It was only when crypto fund manager Grayscale won a lawsuit against the SEC that spot BTC ETFs were finally approved in the U.S.

In their petition, Grayscale had argued that the regulation and surveillance that BTC futures ETF traded under were proof that spot BTC ETFs can be traded without fraud and manipulation.

Now market experts believe that the spot ETH ETFs will have to go down the same route to gain SEC approval — litigation.

“The template is likely to be similar to Bitcoin: with futures-based Ethereum ETFs already approved, the SEC (if it denies the approval of spot Ethereum ETFs) is likely to face a legal challenge and eventually lose,” said JPMorgan analysts in a report, as reported by The Block.

What Next for ETH?

Short-term Price Volatility

The market had hoped that positive developments on the spot ETH ETF front would be a major catalyst for ETH prices in 2024.

But now, dashed hopes of ETH ETF approvals coming as early as May 2024 has resulted in bearish ETH price movement (-24%) over the last two months, as of May 10, 2024.

With ETH continuing to underperform large-cap peers such as BTC, Solana (SOL) and BNB in 2024, the second-largest cryptocurrency will have to look for other market catalysts as it plays catch up.

“A rejection could lead to short-term price volatility and possibly a decrease in price as the market adjusts to the news,”  Lian told Techopedia.

Lian added:

“Even if the SEC rejects the spot ETH ETF, Ethereum may not run out of market catalysts. Other potential catalysts for a bull run could include technological advancements, increased adoption, further integration into DeFi, RWA, and the broader crypto market dynamics.”

ETH is the ‘Basket Case of 2024’

Elsewhere, Markus Thielen, founder of 10x Research, called Ethereum the “basket case” of this crypto cycle.

Thielen wrote in an email note to investors that this research firm was “very bullish” on Ethereum earlier in the year, but their view turned bearish when they noticed a sharp decline in Ethereum gas fees that “signaled (near) zero demand for transactions with ETH.”

Thielen also added falling staking yield (2.9% on Lido at the time of writing) and higher on-chain Treasury yields (5.1%) will result in less demand for ETH as “more people realize this.”

“Right now, we would be more comfortable holding a short position in ETH than a long one in BTC as Ethereum’s fundamentals are fragile, which is not yet reflected in ETH prices,” said Thielen.

The Bottom Line

The U.S. SEC under Chair Gensler is known for its hardball approach towards the crypto industry. The securities watchdog has filed multiple lawsuits against prominent crypto companies and personalities including CZ, Binance, Coinbase, Kraken, and Uniswap, over the past year.

Just like Grayscale’s lawsuit, which paved the way for spot BTC ETFs in the US, maybe only a mirrored approach can get spot ETH ETFs across the finish line in 2024.

 

Source: https://www.techopedia.com/ethereum-etf-decision

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

Why Bitcoin ETFs May Outperform Gold ETFs in the Long Run

Why Bitcoin ETFs May Outperform Gold ETFs in the Long Run

Gold and bitcoin are often compared as alternative assets that can hedge against inflation, currency devaluation, and geopolitical risks. Both have limited supply, global demand, and no central authority. Both have also attracted the attention of investors who seek to diversify their portfolios and gain exposure to the potential upside of these assets.

However, gold and bitcoin are not the same. Gold has a long history of being used as a store of value and a medium of exchange, while bitcoin is a relatively new invention that relies on cryptography and blockchain technology. Gold is tangible and physical, while Bitcoin is digital and virtual. Gold is widely accepted and regulated, while bitcoin is still controversial and volatile.

These differences have implications for the performance and prospects of gold and bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which are investment vehicles that track the prices of these assets and allow investors to buy and sell them on stock exchanges. Gold ETFs have been around since 2003, and have grown to more than a $200 billion industry in 2023, with SPDR Gold Shares (NYSE:GLD) being one of the largest. Bitcoin ETFs, on the other hand, have only been approved and launched in the U.S. in January 2024, after years of rejections and delays by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). As of January 13, 2024, there are 19 bitcoin ETFs trading, with ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) being the first and the largest fund.

In this article, I will argue that bitcoin ETFs may outperform gold ETFs in the long run, based on the following reasons:

  • Bitcoin has a higher growth potential and scarcity than gold
  • Bitcoin ETFs have lower fees and higher returns than gold ETFs
  • Bitcoin ETFs have more innovation and diversification than gold ETFs

Bitcoin has a higher growth potential and scarcity than gold

One of the main drivers of the value of gold and bitcoin is their scarcity, which means that their supply is limited and cannot be easily increased. Gold has a finite amount of 190,040 metric tons that can be mined from the earth, of which about 80% has already been extracted. Bitcoin has a fixed supply of 21 million coins, of which about 19 million have already been mined. However, the rate of new supply of gold and bitcoin is not the same. Gold production has been declining in recent years, due to the depletion of reserves, the rising costs of mining, and the environmental and social impacts of the industry. Bitcoin production, on the other hand, is predetermined by an algorithm that halves the reward for miners every four years, until the last bitcoin is mined around 2140. This means that the annual inflation rate of gold is around 1.5%, while the annual inflation rate of bitcoin is around 1.8% and will drop to zero in the future.

This difference in supply dynamics has implications for the demand and price of gold and bitcoin. Gold demand is mainly driven by jewellery, investment, and central bank purchases, which are influenced by factors such as income, wealth, interest rates, inflation, and geopolitical events. Bitcoin demand is mainly driven by speculation, adoption, and innovation, which are influenced by factors such as technology, regulation, network effects, and social sentiment. While both gold and bitcoin have seen increased demand in recent years, due to the global economic and health crisis, the stimulus measures, and the low interest rates, bitcoin has shown faster and stronger growth than gold, due to its novelty, accessibility, and potential. According to the World Gold Council, the annual average gold price rose from $1,481 per ounce in 2019 to $1,769 per ounce in 2020, and then to $1,794 per ounce in 2021, representing a cumulative increase of 21.1%. While data on CoinMarketCap shows that the annual average bitcoin price rose from $7,344 per coin in 2019 to $11,449 per coin in 2020, and then to $46,788 per coin in 2021, representing a cumulative increase of 537.1%.

These trends suggest that bitcoin has a higher growth potential and scarcity than gold, which could translate into higher returns for bitcoin ETFs than gold ETFs in the long run. While gold has a more established and stable market, bitcoin has a more disruptive and dynamic market, which could offer more opportunities and rewards for investors who are willing to take more risks and embrace more changes.

Bitcoin ETFs have lower fees and higher returns than gold ETFs

Another factor that affects the performance of gold and bitcoin ETFs is their fees and returns, which reflect their costs and benefits. Fees are the expenses that investors pay to the fund managers for managing and operating the ETFs, which reduce the net returns that investors receive from the ETFs. Returns are the profits or losses that investors earn or incur from the ETFs, which depend on the price movements of the underlying assets and the dividends or distributions that the ETFs payout.

Generally speaking, bitcoin ETFs have lower fees and higher returns than gold ETFs, which could make them more attractive and profitable for investors. Based ETF Database, the average expense ratio of the 10 gold ETFs trading in the U.S. is 0.42%, while the average expense ratio of the 17 bitcoin ETFs trading in the U.S. is 0.33%. This means that bitcoin ETFs charge less fees than gold ETFs for providing the same service of tracking the prices of the assets. Moreover, according to ETF.com, the average year-to-date return of the 10 gold ETFs trading in the U.S. is -0.76%, while the average year-to-date return of the 17 bitcoin ETFs trading in the U.S. is 7.54%. Again, this means that bitcoin ETFs have generated more profits than gold ETFs for the same period.

These differences in fees and returns can have a significant impact on the long-term performance and compounding of gold and bitcoin ETFs. For example, assuming an initial investment of $10,000 and an annualized return of 7% for both gold and bitcoin ETFs, but a difference of 0.1% in expense ratio, the gold ETF with a 0.4% expense ratio would grow to $38,696 after 20 years, while the bitcoin ETF with a 0.3% expense ratio would grow to $39,346 after 20 years, representing a difference of $650 or 1.7%. This gap would widen even more if the difference in expense ratio or the difference in return is larger.

Therefore, bitcoin ETFs have lower fees and higher returns than gold ETFs, which could make them more attractive and profitable for investors in the long run. While gold ETFs have lower volatility and risk than bitcoin ETFs, bitcoin ETFs have lower costs and higher rewards than gold ETFs, which could outweigh the trade-offs for investors who have a longer time horizon and a higher risk tolerance.

Bitcoin ETFs have more innovation and diversification than gold ETFs

A third factor that affects the performance and prospects of gold and bitcoin ETFs is their innovation and diversification, which reflect their variety and quality. Innovation is the process of creating and introducing new products and services that meet the needs and preferences of customers and markets. Diversification is the strategy of investing in different types of assets and sectors that have low or negative correlation with each other, which can reduce the overall risk and volatility of a portfolio.

Generally speaking, bitcoin ETFs have more innovation and diversification than gold ETFs, which could make them more competitive and resilient for investors. While doing research, I spoke to a gold ETF analyst last week and he based on his point of view and shared the following with me. The gold ETFs trading in the U.S. have only two types of strategies: physical gold ETFs, which hold gold bullion in vaults, and gold miner ETFs, which invest in stocks of companies that mine and produce gold. These ETFs have similar characteristics and performance and are highly correlated with each other and with the gold price. The average correlation coefficient of the gold ETFs trading in the U.S. is 0.94, which means that they move almost in the same direction and magnitude.

On the other hand, the bitcoin ETFs trading in the U.S. have four types of strategies: spot bitcoin ETFs, which hold bitcoin directly in custody, futures bitcoin ETFs, which invest in bitcoin futures contracts, short bitcoin ETFs, which bet against the decline of bitcoin futures, and blockchain and bitcoin ETFs, which invest in stocks of companies and other ETFs with exposure to cryptocurrency and blockchain technology. These ETFs have different characteristics and performance and are less correlated with each other and with the bitcoin price. The average correlation coefficient of the bitcoin ETFs trading in the U.S. is 0.77, which means that they move somewhat in the same direction and magnitude, but not always.

These differences in innovation and diversification can have a significant impact on the long-term performance and stability of gold and bitcoin ETFs.

Bitcoin ETFs have more innovation and diversification than gold ETFs, which could make them more competitive and resilient for investors. For example, spot bitcoin ETFs, such as BlackRock (NYSE:BLK) Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BTCR) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (XBTF), offer the most direct and simple way to invest in bitcoin, as they track the spot price of bitcoin and hold bitcoin in custody with qualified custodians, such as Fidelity Digital Assets and Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) Custody. Futures bitcoin ETFs, such as ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BTF), offer a more indirect and complex way to invest in bitcoin, as they track the futures price of bitcoin and invest in bitcoin futures contracts traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), which are cash-settled and do not involve the delivery of bitcoin. Short bitcoin ETFs, such as Simplify Short Bitcoin Strategy ETF (SBTC) and Direxion Daily Bitcoin Bear 1X Shares (BITD), offer a way to profit from the decline of bitcoin, as they track the inverse of the futures price of bitcoin and invest in short positions of bitcoin futures contracts traded on the CME. Blockchain and bitcoin ETFs, such as Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ), offer a way to invest in the broader cryptocurrency and blockchain industry, as they invest in stocks of companies and other ETFs with exposure to cryptocurrency and blockchain technology, such as Coinbase, MicroStrategy, and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust.

These different types of bitcoin ETFs offer different advantages and disadvantages for investors, depending on their risk appetite, return expectation, and investment objective. For instance, spot bitcoin ETFs have the lowest tracking error and the highest correlation with the bitcoin price, but they also have the highest fees and the highest regulatory uncertainty, as they are subject to the PSA requirements and the potential actions of the SEC. Futures bitcoin ETFs have lower fees and lower regulatory uncertainty, as they are subject to the SFA requirements and the existing rules of the CME, but they also have higher tracking error and lower correlation with the bitcoin price, due to the futures premium, contango, and rollover costs. Short bitcoin ETFs have the potential to generate positive returns when the bitcoin price falls, but they also have the potential to incur unlimited losses when the bitcoin price rises, as well as high fees and high volatility. Blockchain and bitcoin ETFs have the potential to capture the growth and innovation of the cryptocurrency and blockchain industry, but they also have the potential to suffer from the volatility and risk of the stock market, as well as the diversification and dilution of their exposure to bitcoin.

Therefore, bitcoin ETFs have more innovation and diversification than gold ETFs, which could make them more competitive and resilient for investors. While gold ETFs have more simplicity and stability than bitcoin ETFs, bitcoin ETFs have more variety and quality than gold ETFs, which could offer more options and solutions for investors who have different needs and preferences.

Conclusion: Bitcoin ETFs may outperform gold ETFs in the long run

In conclusion, I believe that bitcoin ETFs may outperform gold ETFs in the long run.

While gold ETFs have their own merits and advantages, such as lower volatility, lower risk, and lower correlation with other assets, I think that bitcoin ETFs have more merits and advantages, such as higher growth, higher reward, and higher innovation, which could outweigh the trade-offs for investors who have a longer time horizon and a higher risk tolerance.

I think that bitcoin ETFs are not only a viable alternative to gold ETFs but also a superior one, as they offer more value and opportunity for investors who seek to diversify their portfolios and gain exposure to the potential upside of digital gold.

Source: https://in.investing.com/analysis/why-bitcoin-etfs-may-outperform-gold-etfs-in-the-long-run-200608903

FAQ

Why does the author, Anndy Lian argue that bitcoin ETFs may outperform gold ETFs in the long run?

The author, Mr Anndy Lian argues that bitcoin ETFs may outperform gold ETFs due to Bitcoin's higher growth potential and scarcity, lower fees, and higher returns compared to gold ETFs. Additionally, the author emphasizes the innovative and diversified nature of bitcoin ETFs, suggesting they offer more opportunities for investors.

What factors contribute to the higher growth potential of bitcoin compared to gold, according to the article?

Anndy Lian states that the higher growth potential of bitcoin compared to gold is attributed to the predetermined supply dynamics of both assets. While gold production has been declining, Bitcoin's algorithm-controlled supply and halving reward for miners contribute to its higher growth potential and scarcity.

How does Anndy Lian highlight the cost-effectiveness of bitcoin ETFs over gold ETFs?

Anndy Lian points out that, on average, bitcoin ETFs have lower fees (expense ratios) compared to gold ETFs. The lower fees, coupled with higher returns for bitcoin ETFs, make them more cost-effective and potentially more profitable for investors.

What role does innovation and diversification play in the comparison between gold and bitcoin ETFs?

Anndy Lian suggests that bitcoin ETFs have a competitive edge over gold ETFs in terms of innovation and diversification. Bitcoin ETFs offer different strategies, including spot bitcoin ETFs, futures bitcoin ETFs, short bitcoin ETFs, and blockchain and bitcoin ETFs, providing investors with more variety and potentially better risk management.

How does the author address the potential risks associated with investing in different types of bitcoin ETFs? different types of bitcoin ETFs?oes the author address the potential risks associated with investing in different types of bitcoin ETFs?

Anndy Lian acknowledges that each type of bitcoin ETF comes with its own set of advantages and disadvantages, such as regulatory uncertainty, tracking error, correlation with bitcoin prices, fees, and potential exposure to stock market volatility. The article suggests that investors should carefully consider their risk appetite, return expectations, and investment objectives when choosing among different types of bitcoin ETFs.

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j