New Crypto Trend: Trading Tokens Before Release

New Crypto Trend: Trading Tokens Before Release

A new trend is taking off in the cryptocurrency community — as investors start to purchase tokens before waiting for them to hit the markets.

In a fast-paced industry, being an early investor is a crucial step as it allows individuals to potentially capitalize on significant price appreciation as innovative projects gain traction and adoption.

And now, investors are finding ways to start buying before the firing pistol has signaled the start of the race.

Here’s everything you need to know.

Key Takeaways

  • Investing in tokens before their release allows investors to potentially benefit from significant price increases as projects gain traction.
  • Platforms like AEVO and Hyperliquid have introduced new opportunities to speculate or hedge against future token prices, marking a shift from traditional ICOs to more dynamic pre-token trading environments.
  • Pre-token and point market sales have seen $50 million in trades despite low liquidity.
  • The pre-token and point markets are heavily dominated by buyers, a sign of potential investor confidence.
  • Despite the enthusiasm and high trading volumes, these markets face challenges such as lower liquidity and higher volatility compared to post-TGE markets.

Pre-Token & Point Markets Take Off

Until recently, investors could purchase cryptocurrencies prior to their official launch through their initial coin offering (ICO), a fundraising mechanism used by new decentralized finance (DeFi) projects to raise capital by selling tokens to investors prior to a project’s full development.

This allows anyone to speculate on or hedge against the price of a token before its launch, creating a new era of crypto investing.

In short, pre-token and point markets are platforms that allow people to buy or sell the promise of receiving tokens or points at a future date, often before the official release of the token.

Such markets are divided into two main types: one where trades are settled with cash and another where the actual tokens or points are exchanged. Such a setup lets investors speculate on the future value of tokens or points, potentially profiting from changes in their price before they become available.

According to Anndy Lian, an inter-governmental blockchain adviser, by participating in pre-sales, investors get the opportunity to directly support the development and growth of new projects, as well as create a sense of community and alignment with the project’s goals.

He said:

“This community effect can drive demand as more people become involved and invested in the token’s success. Effective marketing campaigns can generate significant hype around a token before its release, leading to increased demand as investors don’t want to miss out on what is being promoted as a promising opportunity.”

A Keyrock report released on April 30 uncovered that the crypto community has seen a notable surge in interest and participation in these pre-tokens and point markets with $50 million already being traded.

This high level of activity reflects a growing enthusiasm among investors to engage with new crypto projects at an early stage.

The markets predominantly cater to buyers, with the majority of orders coming from users eager to purchase tokens or points ahead of their public release. This eagerness is driven by the potential for high returns on investments as token values can increase significantly upon official launch.

Pre-token & Point Markets See Higher Buyer Dominance

According to the Keyrock report, the markets showed a pronounced buyer dominance, with most tokens analysed displaying a higher buying than selling volume.

This trend suggested that investors were more interested in acquiring tokens rather than selling them, believing in the potential for token value appreciation after their Token Generation Event (TGE).

The report highlighted:

“Most tokens exhibit a buying volume significantly higher than the sell volume. Only 5 out of 57 tokens that have been traded on Whales Market show a selling volume that exceeds the buy volume. Participants in Whale Markets demonstrate a strong preference for buying tokens, points, and runes.”

Data on buying vs selling tokens from Whales Market. Source: Keyrock Data Intelligence
Data on buying vs selling tokens from Whales Market. Source: Keyrock Data Intelligence

Data on buying vs selling tokens from Whales Market. Source: Keyrock Data Intelligence

Liquidity Remains Low

Despite optimistic trading volumes, pre-token and point markets still face challenges related to liquidity.

The Keyrock report highlighted that compared to traditional post-TGE markets, pre-token and point markets are relatively less liquid, meaning they have relatively fewer buyers and sellers, which could lead to price volatility and make it harder to execute larger orders without affecting the market price.

Additionally, sometimes the demand for a pre-release token is driven more by hype and marketing than by the project’s fundamentals, which could lead to an inflated valuation that does not reflect the token’s true worth, Lian explained.

“Projects that prioritize transparency, communication, and community trust are more likely to succeed in pre-release trading. Investors will gravitate toward projects they believe in.”

Technical issues could also serve as a major potential risk in purchasing cryptocurrencies before they fully launch since the technology behind the asset is only just being developed.

The Bottom Line

As the landscape of pre-token and point markets continues to evolve, strategic considerations and forward-thinking approaches are essential for both investors and project developers.

The surge in trading volumes and the enthusiasm observed in these markets suggest a robust interest in early-stage investment opportunities.

According to Lian, this has been an ongoing trend since the beginning of the crypto ICO period, and the act of trading tokens before their official release is likely to continue into the future as well. However, investors should exercise caution when investing in new projects and never invest money they cannot afford to lose.

 

Source: https://www.techopedia.com/news/exploring-crypto-pre-token-and-point-markets

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

AI will also create new ethical and social issues around privacy, bias, accountability, and trust: Anndy Lian

AI will also create new ethical and social issues around privacy, bias, accountability, and trust: Anndy Lian

As part of our rapid fire interview series, Anndy Lian, an Intergovernmental Blockchain Expert shares his quick take on the AI evolution, how it will impact the workforce in APAC, and his favourite thing about AI.

Anndy Lian is an Intergovernmental Blockchain Expert and Best Selling Book Author “NFT: From Zero to Hero”. He has provided advisory across a variety of industries for local, international, public listed companies and governments. He is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur, book author, investor, board member and keynote speaker.

As part of our rapid fire interview series, Anndy shares his quick take on the AI evolution, how it will impact the workforce in APAC, and his favourite thing about AI.

Can you share with us your background and experience?

I have started to look at cryptocurrencies in 2013 and then blockchain in 2017. The first time I got to know what blockchain can do is at a closed door session with a pharma company. Blockchain’s ability to fight counterfeit is very effective. I have then gone full time into this space since. I gave advice to governments, listed companies, leading crypto exchanges and the list goes on.

As a tech leader, what’s the first thing you do when you start your work?

The first thing I do when I start my work is to check the latest news and trends in the tech world, especially in the areas of blockchain, AI, and cybersecurity. I like to keep myself updated on the current developments and challenges in these fields, and how they affect the society and the economy. I also like to connect with other tech leaders and experts, and exchange ideas and insights on how to leverage technology for positive impact.

What does AI evolution mean to you in one sentence?

AI evolution means the continuous improvement and advancement of AI systems and applications, driven by human creativity and curiosity, to solve complex problems and enhance human capabilities.

What is one way in which AI will impact enterprise security?

One way in which AI will impact enterprise security is by enabling more effective and efficient detection and prevention of cyberattacks, such as malware, phishing, ransomware, and DDoS. AI can help analyse large volumes of data, identify patterns and anomalies, and respond to threats in real time. AI can also help automate and optimise security processes, such as authentication, encryption, and backup.

What do you see as the biggest transformation that AI will bring about in the workforce in APAC?

The biggest transformation that AI will bring about in the workforce in APAC is the creation of new jobs and opportunities that require higher levels of skills, creativity, and collaboration. AI will also augment and complement human workers, by taking over repetitive and mundane tasks, and providing insights and recommendations. AI will also enable more flexible and remote work arrangements, as well as lifelong learning and upskilling.

One challenge which AI will pose for the workforce in APAC.

One challenge which AI will pose for the workforce in APAC is the potential displacement and disruption of existing jobs and industries, especially those that rely on low-skilled and manual labor. AI will also create new ethical and social issues, such as privacy, bias, accountability, and trust. Therefore, it is important to ensure that AI is developed and deployed in a responsible and inclusive manner, that respects human rights and values, and that benefits all stakeholders.

What’s your favourite thing about AI?

My favourite thing about AI is its ability to generate novel and innovative solutions and content that can inspire and amaze humans. For example, AI can write poems, stories, songs, code, and more, using its own words and knowledge. I find this aspect of AI very fascinating and exciting, as it shows the potential and diversity of AI creativity.

AI can also improve productivity and efficiency, by automating and optimising various tasks and processes, such as data analysis, decision making, customer service, and more. AI can help humans save time, money, and resources, and focus on more strategic and creative work. AI can also enhance quality and accuracy, by reducing errors and biases, and providing insights and recommendations.

What is one advice you would like to give organisations when it comes to AI adoption ?

One advice I would like to give organisations when it comes to AI adoption is to start small and scale up gradually, by identifying and prioritising the most relevant and valuable use cases and applications of AI for their business goals and customer needs. I would also advise them to involve and empower their employees and customers in the AI journey, by providing them with the necessary training, support, and feedback. Lastly, I would advise them to adopt a culture of experimentation and learning, by testing and iterating their AI solutions, and measuring and improving their outcomes and impacts.

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

What the EU Gets Right with its New AI Rules

What the EU Gets Right with its New AI Rules

The European Union’s latest effort to rein in artificial intelligencethe AI Act, marks a pivotal step towards regulating a technology that is as pervasive as it is potent. With its public unveiling on January 21, the Act lays a framework that seeks to harness AI’s capabilities while safeguarding the fundamental tenets of trust, ethics, and human rights.

As we unpack the Act’s dimensions, we will weigh its merits against its potential impediments to the trajectory of AI, not just within the confines of Europe but as a precedent for the global stage. The discourse around this groundbreaking legislation is as much about its current form as it is about the dialogue it engenders concerning the future interplay of artificial intelligence with our societal mores and economic frameworks.

Does it strike the right balance?

The AI Act introduces a risk-based regulatory schema, categorizing AI systems into unacceptable, high-risk, limited-risk, and minimal-risk. The Act prohibits ‘unacceptable risk’ AI systems, such as manipulative social scoring and covert emotional manipulation, to protect individual rights. ‘High-risk’ AIs, pivotal in healthcare, education, and law enforcement, face rigorous requirements including human oversight. ‘Limited-risk’ AIs, like chatbots, must disclose their AI nature to users. Lastly, ‘minimal-risk’ AIs, like video games, have minimal regulatory constraints, promoting innovation while safeguarding against abuses.

The AI Act is crafted with the dual goals of fostering technological innovation and upholding fundamental rights. The Act’s targeted regulatory focus seeks to minimize undue burdens on AI practitioners by emphasizing the control of applications with the most potential for harm. However, it is not without its detractors. Critics point to its ostensibly broad and ambiguous language, which may leave too much open to interpretation, potentially leading to legal uncertainties.

The Act’s broad definition of AI as a technology-neutral concept, its reliance on subjective terminology like “significant” risk, and the discretionary power it affords to regulatory bodies are seen as potential stumbling blocks, raising concerns over possible inconsistencies and confusion for stakeholders within the EU’s digital marketplace.

A significant challenge the EU’s AI Act faces is ensuring consistent enforcement across all member states. To address this, the Act constructs an elaborate governance structure that includes the European Artificial Intelligence Board and national authorities, bolstered by bodies responsible for market surveillance. The Act stipulates robust penalties for non-compliance, including fines of up to 7% of global annual turnover. Beyond punitive measures, it emphasizes the role of self-regulation, expecting AI entities to undertake conformity assessments and maintain risk management protocols. The Act also recognizes the importance of global cooperation, considering the divergent AI regulatory landscapes outside the EU.

The efficacy of the Act will ultimately hinge on the collective engagement and adherence of all parties to its stipulated frameworks.

Some pros and cons of the AI Act

The AI Act directly addresses the burgeoning field of advanced technologies, focusing on generative AI, biometric identification, and the nascent realm of quantum computing. These technologies hold transformative potential across diverse sectors including healthcare, education, entertainment, security, and scientific research.

Yet, with great potential comes a spectrum of challenges, particularly concerning ethical issues like bias and discrimination, as well as concerns over privacy, security, and accountability. The Act confronts these challenges head-on by instituting rules and obligations tailored to specific AI categories. For instance, generative AI systems — which can create new, diverse outputs such as text, images, audio, or video from given inputs — must adhere to stringent transparency obligations. This is particularly pertinent as generative AIs like ChatGPT and DALL-E find broader applications in content creation, education, and other domains.

The Act acknowledges the potential for malicious use of generative AI, such as spreading disinformation, engaging in fraudulent activities, or launching cyberattacks. To counteract this, it mandates that any AI-generated or manipulated content must be identifiable as such, either through direct communication to the user or through built-in detectability. The goal is to ensure that users are not deceived by AI-generated content, maintaining a level of authenticity and trust in digital interactions.

Additionally, the Act requires AI systems that manipulate content to be designed in such a way that their outputs can be discerned as AI-generated by humans or other AI systems. This provision aims to preserve the integrity of information and preclude the erosion of factual standards in the digital age.

The AI Act is intentionally crafted to harmonize technological progress with the protection of foundational societal norms and values. The Act’s efficacy is predicated on the meticulous application of these regulations, keeping pace with the rapid development of AI technologies.

Turning to biometric identification systems, these tools are capable of recognizing individuals based on unique physical or behavioral traits such as facial features, fingerprints, voice, or even patterns of movement. While they offer enhancements in security, border management, and personalized access, they simultaneously raise substantial concerns for individual rights, including privacy and the presumption of innocence.

The Act specifically addresses the sensitive nature of biometric identification, incorporating stringent controls over its deployment. It notably restricts the use of real-time biometric identification systems in public areas for law enforcement, barring a few exceptions where the circumstances are critically compelling — such as locating a missing child, thwarting a terrorist threat, or tackling grave criminal activity.

In cases where biometric techniques are employed for law enforcement, the Act mandates prior approval from an independent authority, ensuring that any use is necessary, proportionate, and coupled with human review and protective measures. This regulatory stance underlines a commitment to uphold civil liberties even as we advance into an era of increasingly sophisticated digital surveillance tools.

Harnessed from the enigmatic realm of quantum physics, quantum computing emerges as a technological titan capable of calculations that dwarf the prowess of traditional computers. With the power to sift through vast data and unlock solutions to hitherto intractable problems, its potential spans the spectrum from cryptography to complex simulations, and from optimization to machine learning. Yet, this same capability ushers in novel risks: the crumbling of current cryptographic defenses, the birth of unforeseen security breaches, and the potential to tilt global power equilibria. The European Union’s AI Act, while not directly addressing quantum computing, encompasses AI systems powered by such quantum techniques within its regulatory embrace, mandating adherence to established rules based on the assessed risk and application context. Moreover, the Act presciently signals the need for persistent exploration and innovation in this sphere, advocating for the creation of encryption that can withstand the siege of quantum capabilities.

The Act’s influence on the vanguard of technology is paradoxical. It affords a measure of predictability and a compass for AI practitioners and end-users alike, weaving a safety net for the digital citizenry. Conversely, it may erect hurdles that temper the speed of AI progress and competitive edge, leaving a mist of ambiguity over the governance and stewardship of AI. The true measure of the Act’s imprint will reveal itself in the finesse of its enforcement, its interpretative flexibility, and its dance with the ever-evolving tempo of AI innovation.

Ethical considerations

The ethical tapestry of the AI Act is rich and intricate, advocating for an AI that is at once robust, ethical, and centered around human dignity, reflecting and magnifying the EU’s core values. It draws inspiration from the Ethics Guidelines for Trustworthy Artificial Intelligence, which delineate seven foundational requirements for the ethical deployment of AI, from ensuring human agency to nurturing environmental and societal flourishing. These principles are not merely aspirational; they are translated into tangible and binding mandates that shape the conduct of AI creators and users.

This ambitious ethical framework, however, does not come without its conundrums and concessions. It grapples with the dynamic interplay of competing interests and ideals: the equilibrium between AI’s boon and bane, the negotiation between stakeholder rights and obligations, the delicate dance between AI autonomy and human supervision, the reconciliation between market innovation and consumer protection, and the symphony of diverse AI cultures under a unifying regulatory baton. These quandaries do not lend themselves to straightforward resolutions; they demand nuanced and context-sensitive deliberations.

The ethical footprint of the Act will also depend on its reception within the AI community and the wider public sphere. Its legacy will be etched in the collective commitment to trust and responsibility across the AI ecosystem, involving developers, users, consumers, regulators, and policymakers. The vision is a Europe — and indeed, a world — where AI is synonymous with trustworthiness and accountability. This lofty goal transcends legal mandates, reaching into the realm of ethical conviction and societal engagement from every stakeholder.

In an era where artificial intelligence weaves through the fabric of society, the AI Act emerges as a pioneering and comprehensive legislative beacon, guiding AI towards a future that harmonizes technological prowess with human values.

The Act casts a wide net, touching on policy formulation, regulatory architecture, and the ethical lattice of AI applications across and beyond European borders. It stands as a testament to opportunity and foresight, yet it is not without its intricate tapestry of challenges and quandaries. The true measure of its influence lies not in its immediate enactment but in the organic adaptability and robust enforcement as the landscape of AI shifts and expands.

It’s crucial to articulate that this Act doesn’t represent the terminus of regulatory dialogue but inaugurates a protracted era of AI governance. It necessitates periodic refinement in lockstep with the march of innovation and the unveiling of new horizons and prospects. This legislative framework calls for a symphony of complementary endeavors: the investment in research, the enrichment of education, the deepening of public discourse, and the cultivation of global partnerships.

Embarking on this audacious path to an AI domain that is dependable, ethical, and human-centric is a collective venture. It demands a concerted commitment from all corners of the AI sphere — developers, users, policymakers, and citizens alike. It is an invitation to contribute to and bolster this trailblazing expedition into the domain of artificial intelligence — an odyssey that we all are integral to shaping.

 

 

Source: https://intpolicydigest.org/what-the-eu-gets-right-with-its-new-ai-rules/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j