Striking A Balance: Can Decentralized Finance Be Regulated Without Sacrificing Its Core Principles?

Striking A Balance: Can Decentralized Finance Be Regulated Without Sacrificing Its Core Principles?

The rise of decentralized finance has undoubtedly disrupted the financial landscape, offering peer-to-peer transactions recorded on blockchains. However, this newfound anonymity has attracted malicious actors seeking to exploit DeFi for illicit activities like money laundering and sanctions evasion. In response to these challenges, a group of bipartisan U.S. Senators has introduced the Crypto-Asset National Security Enhancement and Enforcement (CANSEE) Act (S. 2355), aiming to subject DeFi services to the same anti-money laundering (AML) and economic sanctions compliance obligations as traditional financial companies.

While it is crucial to protect the financial system from criminal activities, it is equally essential to strike a balance between regulation and innovation in the fast-evolving world of DeFi. The proposed legislation aims to close the loopholes that have been exploited by criminals, such as North Korea, drug cartels, ransomware attackers, and other bad actors. By applying the same national security laws to DeFi as traditional financial institutions, the CANSEE Act intends to ensure DeFi platforms adhere to basic AML programs, customer due diligence, and reporting suspicious transactions to FinCEN.

Are all these feasible?

Understanding The Essence Of DeFi

Decentralized finance has emerged as a game-changing force in the financial world, offering a peer-to-peer alternative that operates without the need for intermediaries. At its core, DeFi aims to make finance more inclusive, providing access to financial services for the unbanked and underserved populations all over the globe. Its open-source nature, transparency, and borderless features have attracted millions of users who seek financial freedom and autonomy.

One of the main advantages of decentralized finance is its ability to bypass traditional intermediaries, like banks or financial institutions. By utilizing blockchain technology, DeFi allows direct transactions between individuals, eliminating the need for a centralized authority to facilitate and validate these transactions. As a result, users can enjoy faster and more efficient transactions while reducing the costs associated with intermediaries.

DeFi’s open-source nature promotes transparency and trust within the system. Anyone can access and review the code behind DeFi protocols, ensuring that there are no hidden agendas or manipulations. This high level of transparency not only fosters trust among users but also encourages continuous innovation through community-led development.

Beyond its disruptive potential in the traditional financial system, DeFi has proven to be a powerful tool for financial inclusion. According to World Bank data, around 1.7 billion adults worldwide still lack access to basic banking services, such as savings accounts or loans. DeFi presents an opportunity to bridge this gap by providing accessible and inclusive financial services on a global scale.

Through decentralized lending platforms for example, individuals without credit history or collateral can access loans based on the value of their digital assets. This stands in stark contrast to traditional lending models, which often exclude those without formal credit histories. Furthermore, stablecoins—cryptocurrencies pegged to fiat currencies like USD—allow individuals in countries suffering from hyperinflation or limited access to stable banking systems to store value and make payments securely through an alternative means.

The borderless nature of DeFi also plays a vital role in extending financial opportunities across geographical boundaries. With just an internet connection and a digital wallet, anyone can participate in various decentralized applications (dApps) that offer features like yield farming, automated market-making (AMM), staking rewards, and more—all designed with accessibility in mind.

Challenges Of Regulating DeFi

Bringing DeFi under the same AML and economic sanctions compliance rules as traditional financial institutions poses a unique set of challenges. A defining aspect of DeFi is its inherent anonymity, empowering users to engage in financial transactions without revealing their identities. This anonymity is one of the reasons why many users trust the system. However, it also opens the possibility for illicit activities.

Regulating DeFi would require finding a delicate balance between preserving user anonymity and complying with AML and economic sanctions rules. Striking this balance is essential to maintain user confidence in the system, as privacy and autonomy are highly valued by DeFi users. But achieving effective regulation is complicated by the decentralized nature of DeFi platforms, which lack a central authority to oversee operations.

To address these challenges, innovative approaches that leverage technology are necessary. For instance, transaction monitoring tools based on blockchain analysis can help identify suspicious activities without compromising individual users’ identities. By focusing on patterns and behaviors rather than personal information, regulators can target potential risks while respecting user privacy.

Effective regulation will require collaboration between regulators, industry participants, and technology experts. Developing robust frameworks for overseeing decentralized platforms will involve bringing together different perspectives to ensure regulations effectively. In the case of CANSEE Act, the legislation recognizes the potential of self-regulation within the DeFi community. Cooperation between regulatory authorities and the DeFi industry can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of DeFi’s intricacies and potential risks. It is crucial for industry participants to proactively educate regulators about DeFi’s benefits and risks, enabling the development of informed and practical policies that protect consumers and promote innovation.

Moreover, the CANSEE Act addresses concerns regarding crypto kiosks, popularly known as crypto ATMs, by requiring operators to verify the identities of each counterparty in transactions. By doing so, the legislation aims to prevent money laundering and other criminal activities facilitated by these kiosks.

As the DeFi space continues to evolve rapidly, it is vital for regulators to remain open to new technologies and flexible in adapting regulatory approaches. While addressing the risks, they must also recognize the transformative potential of DeFi in providing financial services to the unbanked and underserved populations worldwide.

The CANSEE Act is a significant step towards addressing the challenges posed by DeFi. By fostering collaboration between regulatory authorities and the DeFi community, we can create a regulatory framework that protects against illicit activities while nurturing a secure and innovative financial ecosystem.

DeFi’s Anonymity

While it is undeniable that DeFi’s anonymity can pose challenges for regulators, outright subjecting DeFi to traditional regulations may stifle its potential to foster financial inclusion and accessibility. Striking a balance that encourages responsible practices while safeguarding innovation is crucial for the long-term success of DeFi.

The decentralized nature of DeFi makes regulation more challenging compared to traditional financial institutions, it also offers opportunities for experimentation and evolution in regulatory approaches. For instance, regulatory sandboxes or controlled environments could be established to test new compliance methodologies within the DeFi ecosystem before wider implementation.

It’s important to recognize that finding the right balance between regulation and maintaining user confidence will be an ongoing process. As the DeFi industry continues to evolve rapidly, regulators must remain adaptable and responsive to emerging trends while safeguarding the integrity of financial systems.

By proactively addressing these challenges through collaboration, technological innovation, and balanced regulation, we can create a trustworthy environment where DeFi can thrive while effectively combating illicit activities. This approach will be crucial in supporting the growth and legitimacy of this emerging sector.

Implementing AML And KYC Protocols

An important point regarding the regulation of DeFi that should be brought up. Instead of immediately subjecting it to traditional regulations, exploring alternative solutions can be more beneficial. One approach that could strike a balance is requiring DeFi platforms to implement robust AML and Know Your Customer (KYC) protocols.

By introducing verifiable identity checks, suspicious activities can be effectively flagged without compromising the overall privacy of the system. These protocols would allow for increased transparency and accountability within the DeFi space, addressing concerns about illegal activities such as money laundering. Implementing AML and KYC measures in DeFi can help build trust among regulators and traditional financial institutions. It would also provide a level of reassurance to potential users who may be hesitant about adopting decentralized finance due to its perceived lack of safeguards.

By leveraging technologies such as blockchain, these protocols can be implemented in a way that minimizes data breaches or misuse while still complying with regulatory requirements. This approach allows for greater control over illicit activities without stifling innovation or hindering user privacy.

Considering alternative solutions like enhanced AML and KYC protocols demonstrates a willingness to adapt regulations to fit the unique nature of DeFi. This forward-thinking approach encourages dialogue between lawmakers, regulators, and industry participants towards finding effective strategies that foster both innovation and compliance within this emerging space. It’s essential to strike a balance that encourages responsible practices without stifling the potential that DeFi holds for financial inclusion and accessibility. At least for now.

Strengthening Collaboration

I would like to say that fostering collaboration between regulatory authorities and the DeFi community is crucial for the sustainable growth and development of this innovative sector. By working together in a cooperative manner, both parties can benefit from a deeper understanding of each other’s perspectives.

Regulators play a vital role in ensuring that financial systems are secure, transparent, and free from illicit activities. However, it is equally important for them to comprehend the intricacies and potential of DeFi. This will allow them to develop well-informed policies that strike a balance between consumer protection and fostering innovation. On the other hand, the DeFi community has an opportunity to contribute by actively engaging with regulators. By proactively educating authorities about how DeFi works, its benefits, and its potential risks or challenges, industry participants can help shape regulations that are practical yet supportive of innovation.

Self-regulation within the DeFi industry can be an effective way to address concerns related to money laundering and illicit activities. Industry players can collaborate on developing best practices, standards, and guidelines that promote transparency while safeguarding against financial crimes. This proactive approach not only demonstrates commitment towards responsible governance but also builds trust with regulators.

Ultimately, collaboration between regulatory authorities and the DeFi community paves the way for a more inclusive financial ecosystem where innovation thrives under appropriate oversight. It creates an environment where regulators understand evolving technologies like DeFi while allowing industry participants to operate within clear boundaries that protect consumers’ interests. It may sound contradictory to some but I felt that this is one of the many ways we can see DeFi going mainstream.

“By fostering this cooperative approach, we can ensure that DeFi continues to grow responsibly while addressing any potential risks or challenges along the way. Working together, we can create a regulatory framework that fosters innovation, protects users, and ensures the long-term success of decentralized finance.” – Anndy Lian

 

Source: https://www.benzinga.com/markets/equities/23/08/33912604/tesla-shares-set-for-6th-straight-session-in-red-whats-dragging-them

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Are NFT Regulated? What Are The Concerns?

Are NFT Regulated? What Are The Concerns?

The hype around NFT has slowed down. It seemed like NFT was slated for explosive growth in 2022, being named “word of the year” and coming off a record-high volume in January this year. But as it turns out, that was the peak. Looking at Q3 2022 NFT trading volume around the top 8 chains. There is a 76.4% trading volume decrease from Q2 2022 to Q3 2022.

Since then, the trading volume has tumbled 83% from the start of the year, according to Footprint Analytics’s data on CoinGeco. Recent months have logged numbers lower than July 2021, right before NFT summer. Most notably, Ronin and Avalanche have fallen out of the Top 8, replaced by ImmutableX and Panini. Recent sports mania has spilt over to the NFT space, propelling Flow into the Top 3. Solana’s NFT ecosystem doubled its September volume while all its competitors faltered.

During this period of time, where the market is bearish, you will see changes. For example, in Q3 Magic Eden gains grounds on OpenSea dominance. Magic Eden was the only one that saw growth in September, doublings its month-on-month volume and dominance, while the rest of its competitors continued to slip further. Magic Eden (22%) has gained ground on OpenSea’s (60%) dominance, but it remains to be seen if it can sustain its current momentum.

Another factor in sustaining the current momentum is aligning with the regulatory norms. There is still disagreement over how to handle NFTs, which makes it difficult to set clear regulatory norms. NFTs can now be seen in one of three ways: as commodities, securities, or intellectual property. Let’s explore each interpretation in more detail.

Commodities

Commodities are defined by US law as reasonably interchangeable services, goods, and rights, including money and interest rates, that are traded as commercial articles. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) asserts that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, as well as renewable energy credits and other intangible assets, are included in the definition of commodity.

If we take NFTs, they resemble cryptocurrencies in several ways. They may be bought and sold and are based on blockchain technology. In addition, the CFTC emphasises price manipulation and commodities exchanges more than it does on underlying assets and issuers. The Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) may be implemented if it is decided that NFTs should be classified as commodities. The CEA’s rules on manipulative trading may be applicable in this situation.

Securities

Most NFTs with a single owner and only one unique asset are unlikely to be securities. However, under certain situations, they might. If an NFT possesses security-like characteristics or otherwise satisfies the Howey test, such as when money or another kind of compensation is invested with a reasonable expectation that gains will result from others’ efforts, then the NFT may be subject to US securities legislation. A case-by-case Howey analysis is essential to ascertain if a specific NFT is a security. NFTs may, however, violate securities laws in the following situations, depending on the specifics:

  • NFTs are pre-sales of digital assets intended to be used on a platform that has not yet been developed, with the sale’s proceeds going toward developing the platform;
  • Digital assets can be “pooled” or “fractionalised” (for instance, in the case of art, when creators pool resources and divide profits, or where several NFTs reflect different investors’ fractional ownership of a single asset);
  • NFTs are a license to a digital asset (like a song) and a portion of its earnings (e.g., a percentage of sales).

Intellectual Property

NFTs might be covered by intellectual property rights such as copyright, design patents, and trademark protections. As a result, buyers of NFTs should be aware of any associated intellectual property rights. In fact, the license that comes with many or even most NFTs merely allows the NFT buyer to use, copy, and display the NFT.

A clip of renowned basketball star LeBron James’ slam dunk is an excellent illustration. The video was made available as a limited-edition NBA highlight video collector. The NBA collectables are available for purchase and sale on the Top Shot NFTs market. The NBA owns the copyright, nevertheless, and the rules of its licensing agreement continue to apply to any purchased item’s replication.

However, while most NFT producers place limitations on commercial use, other authors grant NFT owners broader rights. Members of the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) have the right to use their “apes” for commercial purposes, which allows them to produce and market hats, T-shirts, mugs, and other items.

Brand owners should consider how current or upcoming design patents can protect against imitations or infringement in addition to trademark and copyright protection. Because they grant owners full ownership of an infringer’s profits rather than just the fraction related to the use of the design, design patents are important intellectual property protections compared to other IP rights.

Fraud Schemes

Despite being a relatively new idea, NFTs are already being utilised to commit numerous forms of fraud. Here, we go over some of the most prominent NFT-related fraud schemes that have occurred:

  • Tokenisation– The process of producing digital tokens that reflect ownership of physical assets is known as tokenisation. This happens when someone steals an artist’s creation without their consent and “mints” it to create an NFT.
  • Wash trading– This is the practice of users manipulating transactions by trading with themselves or others to feign large demand for an NFT, manipulate its price, or enhance its visibility.
  • Insider trading– The practice of using information that is not generally known to benefit personally from it. In recent high-profile situations, employees and executives of NFT companies and markets have engaged in behaviour that may be viewed as unfair or illegal. Various events generate negative press for these organisations. NFT insider trading regulations frequently forbid buying NFTs based on secret information. Similarly, multiple forms of trading in business NFTs that aim to inappropriately manipulate the perceived price or trading volume of such NFTs are prohibited.
  • Anti-Money Laundering– NFTs, especially those with large value, may occasionally be utilised to aid in money laundering. A study on how the art market aids in the financing of terrorism and money laundering was released by the US Department of Treasury. The study covered a variety of topics, including the dangers of financial crimes in relation to digital art and NFTs. The study discovered that the high-value art market has several intrinsic characteristics that could make it susceptible to various financial crimes.

To Conclude

As we can see, the market for NFTs is still growing, and it will take some time until an appropriate regulatory framework for NFTs is put in place. Having said that, governments all over the world have already begun the process of developing NFT norms and standards, proving that they are seriously interested in these digital assets.

Additionally, you should be aware that the phenomenal success of NFTs will undoubtedly result in fraudulent activities. For this reason, it is becoming more and more crucial to conduct your research before purchasing or investing in NFT collections or projects.

 

Source: https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/are-non-fungible-tokens-nft-regulated-what-are-the-concerns/ar-AA13ijBk

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Are Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT) Regulated? What Are The Concerns?

Are Non-Fungible Tokens (NFT) Regulated? What Are The Concerns?

The hype around NFT has slowed down. It seemed like NFT was slated for explosive growth in 2022, being named “word of the year” and coming off a record-high volume in January this year. But as it turns out, that was the peak. Looking at Q3 2022 NFT trading volume around the top 8 chains. There is a 76.4% trading volume decrease from Q2 2022 to Q3 2022.

Since then, the trading volume has tumbled 83% from the start of the year, according to Footprint Analytics’s data on CoinGeco. Recent months have logged numbers lower than July 2021, right before NFT summer. Most notably, Ronin and Avalanche have fallen out of the Top 8, replaced by ImmutableX and Panini. Recent sports mania has spilt over to the NFT space, propelling Flow into the Top 3. Solana’s NFT ecosystem doubled its September volume while all its competitors faltered.

During this period of time, where the market is bearish, you will see changes. For example, in Q3 Magic Eden gains grounds on OpenSea dominance. Magic Eden was the only one that saw growth in September, doublings its month-on-month volume and dominance, while the rest of its competitors continued to slip further. Magic Eden (22%) has gained ground on OpenSea’s (60%) dominance, but it remains to be seen if it can sustain its current momentum.

Another factor in sustaining the current momentum is aligning with the regulatory norms. There is still disagreement over how to handle NFTs, which makes it difficult to set clear regulatory norms. NFTs can now be seen in one of three ways: as commodities, securities, or intellectual property. Let’s explore each interpretation in more detail.

Commodities

Commodities are defined by US law as reasonably interchangeable services, goods, and rights, including money and interest rates, that are traded as commercial articles. The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) asserts that cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum, as well as renewable energy credits and other intangible assets, are included in the definition of commodity.

If we take NFTs, they resemble cryptocurrencies in several ways. They may be bought and sold and are based on blockchain technology. In addition, the CFTC emphasises price manipulation and commodities exchanges more than it does on underlying assets and issuers. The Commodity Exchange Act (CEA) may be implemented if it is decided that NFTs should be classified as commodities. The CEA’s rules on manipulative trading may be applicable in this situation.

Securities

Most NFTs with a single owner and only one unique asset are unlikely to be securities. However, under certain situations, they might. If an NFT possesses security-like characteristics or otherwise satisfies the Howey test, such as when money or another kind of compensation is invested with a reasonable expectation that gains will result from others’ efforts, then the NFT may be subject to US securities legislation. A case-by-case Howey analysis is essential to ascertain if a specific NFT is a security. NFTs may, however, violate securities laws in the following situations, depending on the specifics:

  • NFTs are pre-sales of digital assets intended to be used on a platform that has not yet been developed, with the sale’s proceeds going toward developing the platform;
  • Digital assets can be “pooled” or “fractionalised” (for instance, in the case of art, when creators pool resources and divide profits, or where several NFTs reflect different investors’ fractional ownership of a single asset);
  • NFTs are a license to a digital asset (like a song) and a portion of its earnings (e.g., a percentage of sales).

Intellectual Property

NFTs might be covered by intellectual property rights such as copyright, design patents, and trademark protections. As a result, buyers of NFTs should be aware of any associated intellectual property rights. In fact, the license that comes with many or even most NFTs merely allows the NFT buyer to use, copy, and display the NFT.

A clip of renowned basketball star LeBron James’ slam dunk is an excellent illustration. The video was made available as a limited-edition NBA highlight video collector. The NBA collectables are available for purchase and sale on the Top Shot NFTs market. The NBA owns the copyright, nevertheless, and the rules of its licensing agreement continue to apply to any purchased item’s replication.

However, while most NFT producers place limitations on commercial use, other authors grant NFT owners broader rights. Members of the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) have the right to use their “apes” for commercial purposes, which allows them to produce and market hats, T-shirts, mugs, and other items.

Brand owners should consider how current or upcoming design patents can protect against imitations or infringement in addition to trademark and copyright protection. Because they grant owners full ownership of an infringer’s profits rather than just the fraction related to the use of the design, design patents are important intellectual property protections compared to other IP rights.

Fraud Schemes

Despite being a relatively new idea, NFTs are already being utilised to commit numerous forms of fraud. Here, we go over some of the most prominent NFT-related fraud schemes that have occurred:

  • Tokenisation– The process of producing digital tokens that reflect ownership of physical assets is known as tokenisation. This happens when someone steals an artist’s creation without their consent and “mints” it to create an NFT.
  • Wash trading– This is the practice of users manipulating transactions by trading with themselves or others to feign large demand for an NFT, manipulate its price, or enhance its visibility.
  • Insider trading– The practice of using information that is not generally known to benefit personally from it. In recent high-profile situations, employees and executives of NFT companies and markets have engaged in behaviour that may be viewed as unfair or illegal. Various events generate negative press for these organisations. NFT insider trading regulations frequently forbid buying NFTs based on secret information. Similarly, multiple forms of trading in business NFTs that aim to inappropriately manipulate the perceived price or trading volume of such NFTs are prohibited.
  • Anti-Money Laundering– NFTs, especially those with large value, may occasionally be utilised to aid in money laundering. A study on how the art market aids in the financing of terrorism and money laundering was released by the US Department of Treasury. The study covered a variety of topics, including the dangers of financial crimes in relation to digital art and NFTs. The study discovered that the high-value art market has several intrinsic characteristics that could make it susceptible to various financial crimes.

To Conclude

As we can see, the market for NFTs is still growing, and it will take some time until an appropriate regulatory framework for NFTs is put in place. Having said that, governments all over the world have already begun the process of developing NFT norms and standards, proving that they are seriously interested in these digital assets.

Additionally, you should be aware that the phenomenal success of NFTs will undoubtedly result in fraudulent activities. For this reason, it is becoming more and more crucial to conduct your research before purchasing or investing in NFT collections or projects.

 

Source: https://www.benzinga.com/22/10/29371369/are-non-fungible-tokens-nft-regulated-what-are-the-concerns

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j