India’s ‘back office’ reputation under threat amid rise in sophisticated cyber scams

India’s ‘back office’ reputation under threat amid rise in sophisticated cyber scams
India’s hard-won reputation as the world’s back office, built on trusted call-centre and IT services, is coming under pressure as increasingly sophisticated cyber scam networks emerge within the same digital ecosystem that underpins its outsourcing success.

A police raid late last month on a Hyderabad call centre that allegedly trained tele-callers to mimic Australian accents has sharpened those concerns, with analysts warning that organised fraud rings could erode confidence in India’s service industry.

According to local media reports, the callers had contacted Australian citizens by falsely warning that their computer systems had been hacked or compromised, then coaxed them into handing over remote access that allegedly enabled the criminals to infiltrate bank accounts.

The stolen funds were redirected to other Australian bank accounts before being transferred to India through illegal channels.

“These operations are no longer ‘old school’ crude phishing outfits, but are professional units replete with linguistic training and cross-border coordination, signalling a shift from low-skill fraud to high-sophistication social engineering ecosystems,” said Raj Kapoor, president of the India Blockchain Alliance think tank.

The manner in which the tele-callers were trained to imitate Australian accents suggested a structured fraud economy, complete with training modules and managerial oversight, he said. “This mimics the organised cyber-fraud hubs seen in Southeast Asia.”

Southeast Asia – particularly Cambodia, Myanmar and Laos – has become a global hub for cybercrime due to a convergence of weak rule of law, authoritarian protection and economic desperation.

The stakes for India to prevent such crime are higher than those for other Asian countries because of its thriving US$150 billion outsourcing industry, analysts say.

“The primary threat is reputational damage – global clients may question whether Indian service providers can adequately vet operations and prevent brand impersonation,” said Anndy Lian, a Singapore-based adviser to governments on blockchain and IT.

Fraudsters leveraging India’s cost advantages and skilled workforce for criminal enterprises created a systemic risk for legitimate businesses, he said.

Lian suggested that India introduce measures for call centres such as stringent “know your customer” procedures to verify client identities and financial profiles, and establish a centralised cybercrime intelligence to prevent such offences.

The Chinese criminal gangs behind Southeast Asia’s scam centres

Industry executives say such institutional and technological tools need to be used in tandem with joint law enforcement with other countries because the manner in which the Hyderabad-based call centre secured information about Australian citizens points to a cross-border network.

“This raises serious questions about data brokerage, leaks from private companies, and unsecured digital ecosystems where personal information is traded like a commodity,” Kapoor said.

A UN report from October 2024 estimated that financial losses from online scams targeting victims in East and Southeast Asia were between US$18 billion and US$37 billion in 2023. These operations leverage advanced technology like AI and deepfakes to exploit victims, and challenge weak legal frameworks.

According to Kapoor, cybercrime thrives because it functions like an open market, with scripts and tech tools being bought and sold.

Indian-origin cyber syndicates were increasingly plugging into transnational scam infrastructures, especially those operating out of Myanmar, Cambodia, Laos, and parts of Africa and the Middle East, he said.

“Indian gangs are using these global marketplaces to outsource operations, hire foreign specialists or collaborate with offshore crime-as-a-service providers.”

Experts say such cooperation allows overseas gangs to exploit India’s large labour pool while masking their own footprints.

The establishment of a sophisticated cybercrime network is a worry for India’s rapidly digitising economy. According to an Indian government report in late October, more than 86 per cent of households are now connected to the internet with the aim of easing citizen services that range from payment transactions to healthcare.

India’s Information Technology Act 2000, which serves as the bedrock of the country’s cyber law framework, is aimed at addressing offences such as impersonation and cheating through computer resources, but industry executives warn enforcing the law against sophisticated cyber criminals across the country’s vast and diverse landscape is a task fraught with challenges.

Fake call centres like the one in Hyderabad exploit regulatory gaps, digital anonymity and the ease of VoIP (Voice over Internet Protocol) – which enables phone calls over broadband internet – to mask their geographic origins, according to Amritraj Kaushal, an advocate in India’s Supreme Court.

“Traditional policing tools struggle against such hybrid fraud structures, which merge local recruitment with international command centres,” he said.

Indian authorities say they envision industry-led collaborative centres that would continuously monitor multiple systems and layers within the country’s complex digital ecosystem.

Niharika Karanjawala-Misra, principal associate at law firm Karanjawala and Co, said scaling up public awareness through campaigns would be key to preventing such cybercrimes.

“Once the scam has been committed, no matter how quickly and efficiently authorities act, not only is it close to impossible to recover the full amount taken fraudulently from the victims, the kingpins of such fraud operations often escape punishment, sometimes conducting the operations virtually from foreign countries,” she said.

Industry executives also called for cross-border cooperation between law enforcement agencies to boost crime prevention.

“If criminal networks can globalise, coordinate across continents, and evolve technologically in real time, why are our protective frameworks still confined within outdated borders, old laws and reactive policing?” Kapoor said.

He urged Indian authorities to upgrade their cybersecurity infrastructure against modern digital crime, or risk only firefighting against scammers.

 

Source: https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/economics/article/3335229/indias-back-office-reputation-under-threat-amid-rise-sophisticated-cyber-scams

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Cardano’s NFT Market Resilience Amidst “Ghost Chain” Reputation

Cardano’s NFT Market Resilience Amidst “Ghost Chain” Reputation

Despite a decline in unique NFT buyers on Cardano, labeled the “ghost chain,” recent data from Forkast Labs reveals surprising resilience in the blockchain’s NFT market, outperforming Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon in June.

 

Cardano’s “Ghost Chain” Reputation:

In October 2021, Cardano reached a peak of 254,383 monthly unique NFT buyers, but in June, this figure dropped to 13,559, marking a 10.12% decrease from May.

 

Market Performance Metrics:

Forkast CAR NFT Composite: The index measuring Cardano’s NFT market performance fell by 3.84% to 982.01 in June, reflecting losses for NFT traders in top collections on Cardano.

 

Comparative Losses Across Blockchains:

While the “ghost chain” narrative persists, data indicates that Cardano’s NFT traders suffered fewer losses compared to Ethereum, Solana, and Polygon in June.

 

Ethereum (ETH): Traders on Ethereum experienced an estimated loss of 14.41%.

Solana (SOL): Solana’s NFT market fell by 14.71%.

Polygon (POL): Polygon’s NFT market slumped by 13.49%.

Overall NFT Market: The Forkast 500 NFT Index, representing the overall NFT market, dropped by 16.14%.

 

Cardano’s Position and NFT Ecosystem:

Despite being the world’s eighth-largest cryptocurrency, ADA’s market capitalization is around US$10.4 billion. Cardano ranks sixth in blockchain NFT trading volume, with US$597 million in sales. Despite occasional claims of Cardano’s NFT ecosystem demise, some supporters and projects remain optimistic.

 

Moosa Zaidi, CEO of NFT Hive Club, acknowledges the die-hard Cardano supporters and projects, emphasizing the potential impact of a market bull run.

 

Creators and Enthusiasts:

Despite the decline in buyers, creators continue to release NFT collections on Cardano. Digital artist Mulga’s MulgaKongz NFT collection, launched on June 23, sold out within 48 hours, demonstrating ongoing interest.

 

Challenges and Community Engagement:

Several top Cardano NFT projects remain active, but some have gone silent on social media, sparking discussions within the community about supporting genuine builders.

 

Market Analysis and User Experience:

Anndy Lian, author of “NFT: From Zero to Hero,” highlights Cardano’s user-friendly experience, low transaction fees, and scalability, making it attractive for cost-conscious NFT enthusiasts.

 

Challenges Across Blockchains:

Lian notes that low market liquidity affects NFT market performance across all blockchains, making it challenging for holders to find buyers at desired prices.

 

Community Perspective and Future Outlook:

Despite challenges, Count Stackula, a Space Budz NFT holder, emphasizes Cardano’s overall healthy NFT ecosystem, with developers focusing on building robust infrastructure.

 

While Cardano faces challenges and skepticism, its NFT ecosystem remains active, driven by committed developers and community engagement. The “ghost chain” moniker may not fully capture the blockchain’s ongoing contributions to the NFT space.

 

 

 

Source: https://www.coinlive.com/news/cardano-s-nft-market-resilience-amidst-ghost-chain-reputation

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Op-ed: JPEX – A crypto scandal that shakes Hong Kong’s reputation

Op-ed: JPEX – A crypto scandal that shakes Hong Kong’s reputation

Hong Kong, a global financial hub and a gateway to China, has been rocked by a massive crypto scandal involving JPEX. This Dubai-based cryptocurrency exchange allegedly defrauded thousands of investors of more than $160 million. The case has exposed the regulatory loopholes, the lack of investor protection in Hong Kong’s nascent crypto industry, and the risks of relying on social media influencers to promote unlicensed platforms.

JPEX, which stands for Japan Exchange, claimed to be the world’s first crypto exchange offering its users dividends. It also boasted of partnering with major institutions such as HSBC, Standard Chartered, and Alibaba. It lured investors with promises of high returns and low fees and used aggressive marketing strategies such as billboards, online ads, and influencer endorsements.

Among the influencers who promoted JPEX were Joseph Lam, a barrister turned insurance salesman who called himself Hong Kong’s “Trolling King”, and Chan Yee, a YouTube personality with 200,000 subscribers. They showed their followers how Bitcoin profits could help them buy houses and cars and encouraged them to sign up for JPEX using their referral codes.

The SFC revealed that it had issued a warning letter to JPEX in June 2023, asking it to cease its activities in Hong Kong or apply for a license. However, JPEX ignored the letter and continued to operate illegally. The SFC also said it had no jurisdiction over JPEX’s operations in Dubai, where it was registered.

The Hong Kong police launched an investigation into JPEX after receiving complaints from more than 2,000 investors claiming to have lost HK$1.3 billion ($166 million). The police arrested 11 people, including Lam and Chan, on suspicion of fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy to defraud. The police also seized computers, mobile phones, bank cards, and documents from the suspects’ premises.

The case has sparked public outrage and raised questions about Hong Kong’s regulatory framework for crypto assets. Hong Kong has been trying to position itself as a global hub for innovation and technology, especially after introducing the national security law in 2020 that eroded its autonomy and freedoms. In November 2020, the SFC announced a new licensing regime for virtual asset trading platforms to enhance investor protection and combat money laundering.

The regime only took effect in June 2023, leaving a gap of more than six months for unregulated platforms like JPEX. Moreover, the regime only covers platforms that trade at least one security token, a type of crypto asset representing ownership or rights in an underlying asset or business. Platforms that trade only non-security tokens, such as Bitcoin or Ethereum, are not required to obtain a license from the SFC.

This means there is still a large segment of the crypto market that is unregulated and unsupervised in Hong Kong. According to CoinMarketCap, more than 11,000 crypto assets are in circulation, with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. Many of these assets are highly volatile and speculative; some may be fraudulent or illegal.

The JPEX case also highlights the dangers of trusting social media influencers who endorse crypto products or platforms without proper disclosure or due diligence. Influencers may have ulterior motives or conflicts of interest when they promote certain platforms or tokens. They may also lack the expertise or credibility to provide accurate or reliable information about the risks and rewards of investing in crypto assets.

Investors should be wary of any platform or product that promises unrealistic returns or guarantees without disclosing the risks involved. They should also do their own research and verify the credentials and reputation of any platform or product they intend to use. They should also check whether the platform or product is licensed or regulated by any authority in Hong Kong or elsewhere.

The JPEX case has also drawn attention to the role of Dubai as a crypto haven for shady operators. Dubai, part of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), has been attracting crypto businesses with its low taxes, lax regulations, and friendly attitude.

Dubai has no specific law or authority to regulate crypto assets and does not require crypto platforms to obtain a license or register with any agency. Dubai also does not have an extradition treaty with Hong Kong, making it difficult for the authorities to pursue JPEX or its founders.

However, Dubai’s crypto-friendly stance may come at a cost for its reputation and security. Dubai may become a magnet for scammers, hackers, and terrorists who use crypto assets to evade sanctions, launder money, or finance illicit activities.

Dubai may also face pressure from other countries or international organizations to tighten its crypto industry oversight and compliance. Dubai may have to balance its ambition to become a global leader in innovation and technology with its responsibility to prevent and combat financial crimes and risks.

The JPEX case is not the first nor the last crypto scandal that Hong Kong will face. This is not only a wake-up call for investors but also for regulators and policymakers. As the crypto industry grows and evolves, new challenges and opportunities will emerge for Hong Kong and its stakeholders. Hong Kong needs to learn from the JPEX case and take proactive and preventive measures to safeguard its interests and values.

Hong Kong needs to enhance its regulatory framework, enforcement of the crypto industry, and its education and awareness campaigns for the public. Hong Kong must cooperate and coordinate with other jurisdictions and agencies to combat cross-border crypto crimes and risks.

The JPEX case is a crypto scandal that shakes Hong Kong’s reputation as a global financial hub and a gateway to China. It exposes the regulatory loopholes and the lack of investor protection in Hong Kong’s crypto industry, as well as the risks of relying on social media influencers to promote unlicensed platforms.

Hong Kong needs to strengthen its oversight and enforcement of the crypto industry and its education and awareness campaigns for the public. Hong Kong also needs to balance fostering and regulating the crypto industry and protecting and empowering its investors. Only then can Hong Kong maintain its edge and competitiveness in the global arena.

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/op-ed-jpex-a-crypto-scandal-that-shakes-hong-kongs-reputation/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j