Tag Archives: scrutiny

Will Singapore, Hong Kong step up crypto scrutiny as US cracks down on Binance, Coinbase?

Will Singapore, Hong Kong step up crypto scrutiny as US cracks down on Binance, Coinbase?
  • The moves by the US SEC against Binance, Coinbase spooked investment sentiment just as Hong Kong seeks to establish itself as a trading hub along with Singapore
  • Unlike Singapore and Hong Kong, the US does not have comprehensive regulations for crypto and blockchain firms to operate without fear of regulatory action

US regulatory action against two major cryptocurrency exchanges, Coinbase and Binance, is likely to serve as a reference point for Hong Kong and Singapore as they seek to balance growth with investors’ safety, analysts have said.

The crackdown is the latest in a series of measures by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), which has levied fines and other penalties against crypto-lending firms, following the collapse of one of the most-reliable crypto exchanges FTX last November that sparked public outrage.

The SEC said Coinbase had acted as a broker, exchange and clearing agency for investments without proper registration. The complaint came a day after the regulator sued Binance, alleging it had tried to evade US regulation.

Binance said the enforcement action was unwarranted and alleged it was a regulatory “overreach” that damages the United States’ status as a global financial hub. Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s general counsel, said in a statement that the company would continue operating as usual and had “demonstrated commitment to compliance”, according to Reuters.

The development spooked investment sentiment just as Hong Kong is seeking to frame regulations to establish itself as a trading hub along with Singapore, which already has such a framework.

The two cities may look at the US action as a reference point, which could mean tighter scrutiny even in the Asian hubs, analysts say.

“There will be a fallout for sure. Hong Kong and Singapore are taking measures to regulate the cryptocurrency industry by proposing new licensing regimes for virtual asset trading platforms,” said Anndy Lian, Singapore-based author of the book “NFT: From Zero to Hero”.

Unlike Singapore and Hong Kong, the US has yet to come up with a comprehensive set of regulations that allows cryptocurrency and blockchain firms to operate transparently without fear of regulatory action.

“The war that the US is waging on cryptocurrencies shows no signs of abating, and it will only intensify as time wears on,” said Julian Hosp, the CEO and co-founder of Cake Group, a fast-growing Southeast Asia’s digital assets innovator.

The regulator’s action is part of a larger trend which is likely to continue into the 2024 presidential election, Hosp said.

Industry cautions on overkill

The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) in Hong Kong has requested feedback on a proposal that would require virtual asset trading platform operators to obtain the same type of licences as securities traders, Lian said, adding that it had asked other firms who were not applying to prepare for an orderly closure.

Securities, as opposed to other financial assets, are strictly regulated and require detailed disclosures to inform investors of potential risks.

“These developments indicate that cryptocurrency exchanges seeking approval in Hong Kong and Singapore will have to adhere to new regulatory requirements and may be subject to increased scrutiny from regulators,” Lian said.

But new regulations could help establish the legitimacy of the cryptocurrency industry and potentially attract more investors and businesses at a time people are increasingly wary of the US market, analysts said.

“The SEC’s lawsuit primarily focuses on actions that have taken place in the United States and their impact on American citizens,” said Rajagopal Menon, vice-president of WazirX, India’s leading cryptocurrency exchange.

“As for regulators in Hong Kong, such as the Securities and Futures Commission, and Dubai’s Virtual Asset Regulatory Authority, the SEC’s lawsuit can serve as a point of reference or information. However, it does not automatically alter their regulatory stance or trigger immediate action,” he added.

At the two-day Crypto Expo Asia in Singapore, attendees were unbothered by news about Binance and Coinbase, with little to no mention about the developments.

Though the US action may not have a direct impact on other regions, Menon conceded that it could potentially have some indirect influence on their decision-making processes.

Nizam Ismail, founder of Singapore-based compliance consultancy Ethikom Consultancy, said crypto investors too were likely to be more cautious about risks and the need for due diligence on intermediaries.

“These products will be subject to prudential and consumer protection requirements. In the longer term, regulatory gaps will be addressed and consumer protection measures are likely to be introduced,” he added.

The development also exposed extreme price fluctuations in the digital assets which have made many traditional investors in assets like stocks and bonds cautious about investing in the digital asset.

After initially falling to a three-month low of US$25,750 following the Binance lawsuit, bitcoin has rebounded to around US$27,000 in afternoon trade in Asian hours.

Some investors – typically traditional investors, family offices and high net worth individuals – may have been deterred by the US regulator’s lawsuits, while “die-hards” long time investors “would not care”, said Hayden Hughes, the chief executive office and co-founder of Alpha Impact, a social trading platform.

A key takeaway from the incident for Asian hubs like Hong Kong is to have “regulatory clarity”, he said, adding that Hong Kong’s decision to open up to crypto and implement regulations had been a step in the right direction.

But it is unlikely that the event would deter crypto exchanges from seeking approval from Hong Kong and Singapore authorities, he said, highlighting that the two cities would gain from establishing clear rules and a licensing framework.

“Asian hubs can focus on their core mission of protecting the retail investors. There is absolutely no incentive for regulators to move fast and break things,” Hughes said.

Industry executives urged regulators to strike a balance with the fledgling industry.

Hong Kong and Singapore were unlikely to be impacted by the developments “if there is a will on both sides” and regulators are cautious “to not overkill the opportunity”, said Thomas Tallis, CEO of TVVIN, a firm that takes real-world assets and issues them on the blockchain.

Source: https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/economics/article/3223305/will-singapore-hong-kong-step-crypto-scrutiny-us-cracks-down-binance-coinbase

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

Hong Kong Emerges As An Attractive Hub For The Virtual Asset Industry Amidst Regulatory Scrutiny

Hong Kong Emerges As An Attractive Hub For The Virtual Asset Industry Amidst Regulatory Scrutiny

The virtual asset industry is facing increasing scrutiny and regulatory clampdowns worldwide, leading to the emergence of new hubs for the industry. Hong Kong is one such hub that has proposed rules allowing retail investors to trade certain “large-cap tokens” on licensed exchanges, contrasting with mainland China’s ban on crypto-related transactions. Although the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong has not specified which tokens would be allowed, industry insiders believe Bitcoin and Ether are likely to be among them.

China’s crackdown on crypto trading aimed to protect individual investors from speculative activity. However, the crypto industry’s increasing bankruptcies and layoffs may justify their actions. Despite this, the industry continues to attract investment and talent, making it hard to imagine Beijing sitting idly by while the rest of the world develops new building blocks that could potentially spark a new wave of innovation as big as the current internet itself.

As a result, many of China’s web3 startups have set up new bases in more crypto-friendly locations such as Singapore and Dubai. However, with Hong Kong’s more relaxed regulatory environment for cryptocurrencies, some Chinese-founded web3 companies in exile may consider returning home. Hong Kong’s proposal stipulates that all centralized virtual currency exchanges operating in the city or marketing services to the territory’s investors must obtain licenses from the securities and futures authority.

The proposed requirements cover key areas such as safe custody of assets, know-your-client, conflicts of interest, cybersecurity, accounting and auditing, risk management, anti-money laundering/counter-financing of terrorism, and prevention of market misconduct. Centralized crypto exchanges must ban Hong Kong IP addresses until they obtain the relevant permits to operate in the city. The regulatory requirements are open for consultation until March 31, and the new licensing regime will take effect on June 1. This move by Hong Kong is strategic, as it can attract crypto companies and investments to the city. Implementing clear regulatory frameworks would help the industry gain mainstream adoption and bring in more institutional investors.

AML Crypto Regulations In Hong Kong

The Legislative Council passed the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorist Financing (Amendment) Bill 2022 (AML/CTF Amendment Bill 2022) on December 7, 2022. This bill introduced a licensing regime for virtual asset service providers (VASPs) and imposed anti-money laundering (AML), counter-terrorism financing (CTF), and investor protection obligations upon these actors.

VASPs that are licensed in Hong Kong are subject to a number of AML, CTF, and investor protection obligations. These include:

  • Customer Due Diligence (CDD): VASPs must conduct CDD on their customers, which includes identifying and verifying the identity of the customer, the beneficial owner, and any other person who exercises control over the customer. VASPs must also assess and understand the nature and purpose of the business relationship with the customer.
  • Ongoing Monitoring: VASPs must monitor their customers’ transactions on an ongoing basis to ensure that they are consistent with their knowledge of the customer, the customer’s business, and the risks associated with the customer.
  • Record-Keeping: VASPs must maintain adequate records of their customers, their transactions, and their risk assessments. These records must be kept for a period of at least five years.
  • Reporting: VASPs are required to report suspicious transactions to the Joint Financial Intelligence Unit (JFIU) of Hong Kong. Suspicious transactions include those that are inconsistent with the customer’s profile, those that have no apparent economic or lawful purpose, or those that involve the proceeds of crime.
  • Investor Protection: VASPs must also put in place measures to protect their customers’ assets. This includes measures such as segregation of customer assets from the VASP’s own assets and insurance against losses.
  • Penalties for Non-Compliance: VASPs that fail to comply with the new regulations are subject to a range of penalties, including fines, suspension or revocation of their license, and criminal liability. Individuals who are found guilty of money laundering or terrorist financing may face imprisonment of up to 14 years and fines of up to HKD 5 million.

The new regulations also provide for the imposition of sanctions by the United Nations Security Council or by Hong Kong in respect of breaches of international sanctions.

Licensing And Registration Requirements For VASPs In Hong Kong

Anyone who engages in a virtual asset exchange business in Hong Kong must apply for a license with the SFC. The AML/CTF Amendment Bill 2022 also introduced regulations for VASPs to comply with the Crypto Travel Rule.

The HKMA will only grant licenses to VASPs that meet certain criteria, including:

  • The company must be incorporated in Hong Kong.
  • The company must have a permanent place of business in Hong Kong.
  • The company must have adequate financial resources.
  • The company must have appropriate AML/CTF systems and controls in place.
  • The company must have a compliance officer responsible for ensuring the company’s compliance with the new regulations.

VASPs that fail to obtain a license will be prohibited from providing virtual asset services in Hong Kong.

Complying With The Crypto Travel Rule In Hong Kong

The Crypto Travel Rule will be effective in Hong Kong as of June 1, 2023. The new regulatory regime will provide industries with a grace period to prepare for compliance until that date. In Hong Kong, Travel Rule requirements apply regardless of the transaction amount.

The scope of data to be exchanged varies depending on the threshold of the transaction. For virtual assets that amount to HKD 8,000 or more, the following information needs to be shared: name, account number, and address of the originator, as well as the beneficiary’s name and account number. For virtual assets that amount to less than HKD 8,000, only the name and account number of the originator and beneficiary are required.

There are no differences in customer personally identifiable information (PII) requirements for cross-border transfers and transfers within Hong Kong. However, for wire transfers, the information recorded must include the number of the originator’s account or a unique reference number assigned to the wire transfer by the financial institution.

Non-custodial or self-hosted wallet transactions do not have any specific requirements in Hong Kong. The AML/CTF Amendment Bill 2022 defines virtual asset transfers subject to Crypto Travel Rule requirements as transactions for transferring virtual assets carried out by an institution on behalf of an originator, with a view to making the virtual assets available to the originator or another person at an institution, which may be the ordering institution or another institution.

To sum up, Hong Kong’s plan to permit retail investors to trade large-cap tokens on licensed exchanges is a significant advancement for the worldwide crypto industry. While China’s crackdown on crypto trading was meant to safeguard individual investors from speculative behavior, Hong Kong’s proposed regulatory framework is more lenient and has the potential to lure more crypto companies and investments to the city. The establishment of clear regulatory frameworks would aid in the industry’s adoption by the general public and attract more institutional investors. I hope to witness a harmonious balance between the two approaches.

 

Source: https://www.benzinga.com/23/03/31340390/hong-kong-emerges-as-an-attractive-hub-for-the-virtual-asset-industry-amidst-regulatory-scrutiny

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

Singapore’s crypto players face added scrutiny under new law

Singapore’s crypto players face added scrutiny under new law

SINGAPORE — Singapore on Tuesday passed a law that extends its cryptocurrency regulations to companies with a local presence that provide digital token services outside the city-state, as authorities further tighten rules around the emerging industry.

Lawmakers approved the Financial Services and Markets Bill 2022, which was brought up in parliament for debate on Monday. The law brings digital token service providers created in Singapore but who provide their services elsewhere under the purview of domestic regulators.

The legislation covers industry players who deal in Bitcoin, Ethereum and other digital currencies, facilitate their exchange or offer financial advice on the sale of these tokens, among other activities.

Crypto players operating in Singapore and serving the local market are already regulated by the city-state’s central bank. They are required by law to adhere to licensing requirements as well as be able to guard against money laundering and terrorist financing.

But those who do not provide digital token services in the city-state were not under the same oversight. The new law changes this, requiring all crypto players, whether they serve the local or foreign markets, to come under the same licensing requirements.

“Sad, disappointed — we went 10 steps backwards,” said a member of a crypto lobby group in Singapore who spoke on condition of anonymity. The source questioned the necessity of digital asset players with a base in the city-state being licensed if they do not target domestic consumers, which was a worry for the central bank. “So MAS [the Monetary Authority of Singapore, the city-state’s financial regulator and central bank] is making the assumption that the license is like gold — that everyone will want to get it?”

Alvin Tan, a board member of the MAS, explained the state’s reasoning to parliament on Monday.

“We could be exposed to reputational risks brought by digital token service providers created in Singapore, and which provide services relating to virtual assets such as Bitcoin outside Singapore,” he said. “The FSM Bill seeks to mitigate such risks by licensing these players and imposing AML/CFT requirements on them.”

Singapore is not alone in tightening its scrutiny of the booming crypto sector.

Last month, Thailand issued a ban against payments using cryptocurrencies and other digital assets in a bid to maintain stability in financial markets.

China has banned all cryptocurrency payments and services for disrupting the “economic and financial order.”

In 2019, Japan’s Financial Services Agency imposed stricter information technology requirements on licensed exchanges, following security breaches and hacking incidents that marred the industry.

In January, Singapore published a set of guidelines instructing crypto players to stop marketing or advertising their offerings to retail investors in public spaces, both physical and virtual, calling the trading of such assets “highly risky and not suitable for the general public.”

The law approved on Tuesday has also garnered some positive reactions.

Singapore-based Anndy Lian, chairman of Netherlands-registered crypto trading platform BigONE Exchange, told Nikkei Asia that the city-state’s enhanced regulations are “reasonable.”

“If you walk the ground hard enough, you will see many bad actors and dubious crypto companies using Singapore as a base of their operations,” he said. “We need to properly regulate things so that the bad actors won’t affect this industry’s image.”

Even before the new law hit the books, the MAS had been busy processing license requests. In January it said there were about 180 applications for permits, more than 60 of which were withdrawn or rejected. Only a handful of applicants were successful, though others were awaiting the central bank’s decision.

With the tightened regulations, the central bank is poised to sift through a batch of additional license requests as Singapore-based crypto players that mainly deal overseas are now required to meet the state’s standards if they want to use the city for their operations.

In March, Singapore-based payments company Digital Treasures Center, which provides a platform to facilitate cryptocurrency transactions, said it received in-principle approval from MAS to provide digital payment token services.

Desmond Yong, its chief strategy officer, told Nikkei that crypto players will need to devote additional resources to monitor foreign transactions so as not to run afoul of the new law.

“For companies that are unable to fulfill the AML/CFT requirement, they will need to move out to other countries,” he said. “But with more governments regulating cryptocurrency in different jurisdictions, these companies will soon find it hard to operate.”

 

Original Source: https://asia.nikkei.com/Spotlight/Cryptocurrencies/Singapore-s-crypto-players-face-added-scrutiny-under-new-law

 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j