Pakistani workers in Gulf turn to stablecoins for remittances amid Iran war concerns: report

Pakistani workers in Gulf turn to stablecoins for remittances amid Iran war concerns: report

Migrant workers from South Asia employed in Gulf countries are increasingly turning to stablecoins as an alternative channel for sending money home amid concerns that the US-Iran conflict could disrupt traditional remittance systems linked to the dollar, according to a report by SCMP.

Industry analysts said fears surrounding sanctions, financial restrictions and disruptions in the Strait of Hormuz have pushed some workers toward digital tokens such as USDT and USDC for cross-border transfers.

Millions of workers from Pakistan, India, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka rely on Gulf economies for employment, while remittances remain a major source of foreign exchange for several South Asian countries.

According to the State Bank of Pakistan, workers’ remittances stood at $3.54 billion in April 2026, showing an 11% increase compared to the same month last year, although inflows declined 8% on a monthly basis from March. During the first 10 months of FY26, total remittances reached $33.86 billion, up 8.5% year-on-year.

Analysts, however, pointed to growing dependence on Gulf economies for remittance inflows. Data showed that Saudi Arabia, the UAE and other Gulf Cooperation Council countries collectively accounted for more than $18 billion during 10MFY26, representing more than half of Pakistan’s total remittance receipts.

Saudi Arabia remained the largest source with inflows of $7.93 billion, followed by the UAE at $7 billion.

Experts warned that the concentration of remittances from a single region leaves Pakistan vulnerable to external disruptions, particularly as geopolitical tensions in the Gulf continue to rise amid fears of wider regional conflict.

According to the Global Settlement Network, remittances account for between 3% and 5% of GDP in multiple emerging economies, while the share reaches around 10% in Nepal.

Singapore-based blockchain adviser Anndy Lian said there had been a gradual shift among South Asian migrant workers toward stablecoins following the Iran conflict, although traditional banking and licensed exchange operators still dominate remittance flows.

Lian estimated that stablecoins currently account for around 3% to 4% of remittances sent by Gulf-based workers.

He said one reason for the growing interest in USDT was that it often trades at a premium of around 4% to 5% in markets such as India compared to official dollar exchange rates, allowing recipients to obtain higher value on transfers.

The report said concerns over remittance channels intensified after the United States warned against toll payments to Iran for ship passage through the Strait of Hormuz, which has faced disruptions during the conflict.

According to Raj Kapoor, president of the India Blockchain Alliance, the conflict has also affected treasury operations and financial activities of global banks operating in the Gulf region, creating additional pressure on conventional remittance systems.

Several Gulf states, including the UAE, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, have introduced regulatory frameworks in recent years allowing stablecoins to operate within parts of their financial systems.

Ryan Kirkley, co-founder and co-chief executive officer of Global Settlement Network, said the conflict had affected not only energy markets and dollar liquidity but also remittance flows relied upon by millions of migrant workers and their families.

India received around $125 billion in remittances last year, with Gulf countries contributing roughly one-third of the total, according to the report.

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Iran war pushes Asia’s Gulf migrants to use stablecoins for remittances

Iran war pushes Asia’s Gulf migrants to use stablecoins for remittances
Asian migrant workers in the Gulf are testing stablecoins as a backup channel for sending money home, as the Iran war heightens fears that the risk of US sanctions could disrupt remittances that millions of families and several Asian economies rely on.

Remittances from these workers account for 3 per cent to 5 per cent of gross domestic product in several emerging markets – in Nepal, it is as high as 10 per cent, according to data from the Global Settlement Network.

Concerns over remittance flows have escalated after the US warned against toll payments to Iran for ship passage through the Strait of Hormuz, which has largely been blocked amid the ongoing conflict between the two countries.

“There has been a quiet but noticeable informal pivot among South Asian migrant workers, including a significant number from India, towards digital tokens such as stablecoins in the period following the Iran conflict,” said Anndy Lian, a Singapore-based adviser to governments on blockchain and information technology.

“Rather than routing everything through traditional dollar-linked banking channels, a slice of remittances is now moving via instruments like USDT,” he said, referring to the Tether stablecoin backed by the US dollar.

A stablecoin is a type of cryptocurrency designed to maintain a stable value by pegging it to a reserve asset, which could be a fiat currency or other assets, such as gold.

Stablecoins currently account for about 3 to 4 per cent of overall remittances of Gulf-based workers, according to Lian, suggesting that these workers still mostly prefer to transfer money through banks and licensed operators.

Millions of people from India, Sri Lanka, Pakistan, Bangladesh and other countries have worked in the oil-rich Middle East for years. However, their job uncertainties have increased in recent months as the Iran war entangled other Gulf states.

Lian said a key attraction of the widely used USDT was that it commanded a higher value by about 4 to 5 per cent in markets such as India, compared with the official exchange rate for the US dollar, allowing recipients to get more value.

The prospect of sanctions related to the Iran war has raised fears about disruptions to the dollar-based monetary transfers through traditional modes, although there is no sign that Washington is planning to block legitimate remittances, according to Lian.

Several Gulf countries, such as the UAE, Bahrain and Saudi Arabia, have introduced regulations in recent years to allow stablecoins in their financial systems.

Workers in the Middle East are increasingly turning to stablecoins for remittances, given that such transfers are faster than traditional banking systems, according to Lian.

“The shift is real, but incremental, and is concentrated among the more tech-comfortable, urban-linked segment of the diaspora rather than the broader labour corridors,” he said.

Raj Kapoor, president of the India Blockchain Alliance, said global banks had tightened their Gulf operations due to the Iran war, which had affected their treasury and other functions that underpinned remittance flows.

Stablecoins, particularly the USDT and USDC, have filled the gap for financial settlements in the region, according to Kapoor.

“The Iran war has functioned less as a cause and more as a powerful accelerant of a shift that was already structurally under way,” he added.

Ryan Kirkley, co-founder and co-CEO of Global Settlement Network, said the Iran war had caused disruption not only to energy supplies and dollar liquidity but also remittances.

Countries across South Asia and Southeast Asia are reliant on these monetary transfers, with India alone having received US$125 billion in remittances last year and Gulf nations contributing to a third of the figure, according to Kirkley.

Given their significance, compliance standards for stablecoins and tokenised payments should be enhanced and for migrant workers to have this option to send their money home amid the Iran war, Kirkley said.

“If a Gulf bank pulls back on dollar clearing or a UAE exchange house tightens onboarding because of secondary-sanctions exposure, the first thing to feel it is not the oil tanker, it is the construction worker in [the city of] Sharjah trying to send 2,000 UAE dirhams [US$545] home,” he said.

 

Source: https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/economics/article/3353456/iran-war-pushes-asias-gulf-migrants-use-stablecoins-remittances

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Can You Really Earn Passive Income With Stablecoins? (Spoiler: It’s Not What You Think)

Can You Really Earn Passive Income With Stablecoins? (Spoiler: It’s Not What You Think)

Let’s talk about something that keeps popping up in crypto circles: “You can earn passive income with stablecoins.” It sounds almost too good to be true. Hold a digital dollar, sit back, and watch it grow. But before you rush to move your savings into USDC or DAI, it’s worth slowing down and asking: what’s really going on here?

First, let’s clear up a common misconception. Stablecoins themselves don’t magically generate yield. If you leave USDT sitting in your wallet, it will stay exactly the same amount for years, just like cash under a mattress. The yield doesn’t come from the token; it comes from what you do with it. In other words, “passive” is a bit of a misnomer. True passivity would mean doing nothing and still earning returns. But in practice, you have to actively deploy your stablecoins into systems that put them to work.

So where does this yield actually come from? And more importantly, is it safe?

One of the most straightforward ways to earn yield is through decentralized lending protocols like Aave or Compound. You deposit your stablecoins, they get lent out to borrowers, often traders using leverage, and part of the interest those borrowers pay flows back to you. Right now, typical annual yields on these platforms range from 3% to 9%. During promotional periods, when protocols are trying to attract liquidity, you might even see rates climb to 10% or 12%. These platforms are relatively user-friendly, your funds are usually accessible on demand, and within the DeFi world, they’re considered lower-risk options. That said, “lower risk” doesn’t mean “no risk.” More on that later.

Then there’s a newer category I like to think of as “stablecoins that lay eggs.” These aren’t just placeholders for dollars. They’re designed to automatically accrue yield. Take sDAI, for example, issued by MakerDAO. When you convert your DAI into sDAI, you’re essentially buying a share of Maker’s surplus buffer, which includes income from U.S. Treasury bills and other real-world assets. The current yield sits around 5% to 8% annually. Similarly, sUSDe from Ethena Labs offers yields between 8% and 15%, depending on market conditions. But here’s the twist: sUSDe doesn’t rely on lending. Instead, it uses a delta-neutral strategy, simultaneously holding long positions in Ethereum and short positions in perpetual futures, to capture funding rate spreads without betting on price direction. It’s clever, but it’s also more complex and tied to derivatives markets, which adds layers of risk that aren’t always obvious at first glance.

For those who prefer a more conservative approach, there are stablecoins backed directly by real-world assets, primarily short-term U.S. Treasury bills. Ondo Finance’s USDY and Mountain Protocol’s USDm fall into this bucket, offering steady yields of around 4% to 5%. BlackRock’s BUIDL token is perhaps the purest example: it represents direct fractional ownership of a fund holding actual Treasuries. The catch? It’s largely inaccessible to retail users due to regulatory restrictions. Still, these instruments represent a bridge between traditional finance and on-chain infrastructure. They require no active management, compound automatically, and feel closer to a savings account than a speculative DeFi play. If you’re looking for something truly hands-off and grounded in real economic activity, this is probably your best bet.

Now, if you’re comfortable with higher complexity and volatility, there’s liquidity mining. This involves providing stablecoins to trading pools on platforms like Curve or Uniswap. In return, you earn a cut of the trading fees plus bonus tokens issued by the protocol to incentivize participation. Yields here can look dazzling, often 8% to 30%, sometimes even higher. But remember: those eye-popping numbers usually include volatile incentive tokens whose value can plummet overnight. And because you’re supplying two assets, even if both are stablecoins like USDC and DAI, you’re exposed to impermanent loss if their pegs diverge, even slightly. More advanced strategies layer on additional tools. Pendle lets you split yield into principal and future income streams, while cross-chain bridges like Stargate or Scroll open up opportunities across ecosystems. Each step adds operational complexity and potential failure points.

So, where does all this yield actually originate? It boils down to five main sources: interest from borrowers, fees from traders, rewards from protocol tokens, returns from real-world assets like Treasuries, and profits from derivatives strategies like funding rate arbitrage. None of this is free money. It’s compensation for taking on some form of risk, whether credit, market, or technical.

And that brings us to the critical part: risk. Just because a coin is “stable” doesn’t mean your investment is safe. First, there’s smart contract risk. DeFi runs on code, and code can have bugs. Even audited protocols have been hacked, sometimes through flash loan attacks that exploit economic logic rather than coding errors. Then there’s de-pegging risk. Remember Terra’s UST? It promised stability and high yields, then collapsed in a matter of hours, wiping out tens of billions in value. While today’s major stablecoins like USDC and DAI are far more robust, no system is immune to black swan events.

Liquidity risk is another concern. If everyone tries to withdraw at once, say during a market crash, a protocol might freeze withdrawals or delay redemptions. Regulatory risk looms large, too. The SEC has already signaled skepticism toward many yield-bearing crypto products, and future rules could restrict access or force platforms to shut down certain features. And finally, there’s plain old human error: sending funds to the wrong address, mishandling private keys, or falling for phishing scams. In crypto, mistakes are permanent.

Given all this, how should a typical user approach stablecoin yield? Diversification isn’t just wise. It’s essential. I’d suggest thinking in tiers. For a conservative allocation, park about 40% of your stablecoins in yield-bearing tokens like sDAI or real-world asset-backed options like USDY. These offer modest but reliable returns with minimal ongoing effort. For a balanced approach, allocate another 40% to established DeFi lending protocols like Aave or Compound. Solid infrastructure, transparent reserves, and reasonable yields. Then, if you’re comfortable with volatility and understand the mechanics, you might dedicate the remaining 20% to more aggressive strategies like liquidity mining or cross-chain yield farming. But never go all-in on anything promising double-digit returns without understanding exactly how it works.

A few practical rules can help keep you grounded. Stick to protocols with at least 100 million dollars in total value locked. This isn’t a guarantee of safety, but it suggests a level of market trust and operational maturity. Always diversify across multiple platforms and strategies. Don’t put all your eggs in one basket, especially in a space where baskets can vanish overnight. And be deeply skeptical of any yield above 15%. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. High returns almost always reflect hidden risks, whether counterparty exposure, unsustainable tokenomics, or fragile economic assumptions.

At the end of the day, stablecoins are tools, not magic wands. They can be powerful vehicles for earning yield, but only if you treat them with respect and do your homework. The idea of “passive income” is seductive, but in crypto, true passivity is rare. What looks effortless often rests on layers of active market participants, complex financial engineering, and systemic risk. So before you chase the highest APY, ask yourself: Do I understand where this yield comes from? What could go wrong? And how much am I willing to lose?

Stablecoins may hold their value, but the promise of easy returns rarely does. Approach with curiosity, caution, and a healthy dose of skepticism, and you’ll be far better positioned to navigate this evolving landscape without getting burned.

 

Source: https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/02/50897743/can-you-really-earn-passive-income-with-stablecoins-spoiler-its-not-what-you-think

 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j