Asia-Pacific leads boom in crypto transactions amid regulatory hurdles: report

Asia-Pacific leads boom in crypto transactions amid regulatory hurdles: report

The Asia-Pacific region has become the world’s fastest-growing hub for cryptocurrency transactions, with on-chain activity surging despite inconsistent oversight and varied pathways to adoption, according to a new report.

Analysts say the trend reflects not only diverse use cases – from remittances and savings to gaming and speculative trading – but also regulatory uncertainty across the region, which could limit long-term potential even as momentum builds.

The report, released on Wednesday by blockchain analytics firm Chainalysis, found that during the 12 months ending June 2025, Asia-Pacific had emerged as the fastest-growing region for on-chain crypto activity, with a 69 per cent year-over-year increase in value received.

Total crypto transaction volume in the region grew from US$1.4 trillion to US$2.36 trillion, driven by robust engagement across major markets including India, Vietnam and Pakistan.

Monthly on-chain value received grew from about US$81 billion in July 2022 to peak at US$244 billion in December 2024, a threefold increase over 30 months. Transaction volumes have since remained robust at above US$185 billion per month through mid-2025.

In contrast to North America, where cryptocurrency activity is largely driven by institutional investment, Asia-Pacific’s growth is fuelled by broader, more retail-oriented demand, according to Chengyi Ong, head of Asia-Pacific policy at Chainalysis.

The report cites Japan, Indonesia, South Korea, India and Vietnam as among the nations spearheading transaction growth in the Asia-Pacific, fuelled by a combination of supportive policies to use cases.

“Mature markets like Singapore and Hong Kong remained relatively stable in terms of on-chain value transferred,” Ong said.

In the top market India, the digital currency is meeting a large diaspora’s remittance needs while young adults have embraced crypto trading as supplementary income, the report says.

“India has a large and technologically savvy population where young students experiment with blockchain and coding, and it also has unmet financial needs for income, investments, and cross-border transfers,” Ong said. “These are conditions in which cryptocurrency can gain traction.”

In South Korea, the second-largest Asia-Pacific market, trading in crypto is becoming as common as trading in shares, while new rules like the 2024 Virtual Asset User Protection Act are reshaping activity on major domestic exchanges, according to the report.

Vietnam, in third, showed crypto as everyday infrastructure for remittances, gaming and savings rather than speculation, the report added, while Pakistan added a fourth archetype with a young, mobile-first population embracing cryptos for remittances and investments.

Anndy Lian, a Singapore-based intergovernmental blockchain adviser, noted that key contributors to crypto’s rapid growth included adoption in emerging markets such as India, Pakistan and Vietnam for practical use, such as remittances, to provide a financial tool to unbanked populations – people without their own bank accounts – in the region.

“High mobile penetration and internet expansion have democratised entry, enabling retail investors to engage with centralised exchanges and decentralised protocols amid economic volatility,” Lian said.

Institutional interest in the digital currency has also risen, fuelled by progressive hubs like Singapore and Hong Kong which offer clearer fintech ecosystems, according to Lian, while emerging economies such as Indonesia and the Philippines also use crypto to boost financial inclusion.

Cryptocurrency, which works as a decentralised digital currency using blockchain technology to securely record transactions on a shared, unchangeable digital ledger, is being seen by observers as a means to transparently send money to remote populations with little access to banking.

The region’s uneven approach to regulation of cryptos, however, hampers its potential use, experts warn.

“Regulatory concerns in Apac’s [the Asia-Pacific’s] crypto landscape are pronounced, arising from inconsistent and fragmented frameworks that amplify risks while stifling balanced growth,” Lian said.

While Singapore provides comprehensive licensing for virtual asset providers, India’s levy of a 30 per cent tax on cryptocurrency gains means investors and businesses face uncertainty and systemic risks of over-regulation, according to Lian.

Experts say India’s approach to cryptos stems from anti-money laundering and countering terrorism financing, but the country would gain from broader regulation dealing with consumer protection, financial prudence and market conduct.

Lian noted that there were concerns among policymakers as the Asia-Pacific region had emerged as a hotspot for crypto scams and frauds globally.

“Broader issues include money-laundering vulnerabilities in less-regulated markets like the Philippines or Vietnam, where rapid growth exposes unbanked users to exploitation,” he said.

Crypto rules vary across the region, from rigorous oversight in Japan to light-touch regulation in Indonesia.

Lian warned, however, that the lack of uniformity risked regulatory arbitrage – exploiting differences or gaps in regulations across different jurisdictions – and hampered cross-border compliance,

He called on policymakers to address these issues to mitigate threats without curbing the region’s crypto potential, noting that policy coordination “is essential to streamline crypto transactions, reduce fragmentation, and harness the region’s growth potential sustainably”.

 

Source: https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/economics/article/3326725/asia-pacific-leads-boom-crypto-transactions-amid-regulatory-hurdles-report

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

US Crypto Transactions Face New Tax Reporting Rules

US Crypto Transactions Face New Tax Reporting Rules

According to Cointelegraph, cryptocurrency transactions in the United States will soon be subject to third-party tax reporting requirements, marking a significant shift in regulatory oversight as digital asset valuations continue to rise. Starting in 2025, centralized crypto exchanges (CEXs) and other brokers will be required to report sales and exchanges of digital assets, including cryptocurrencies, as per the final regulation published by the US Internal Revenue Service (IRS). This move is intended to assist investors in filing accurate tax returns related to digital asset transactions and to address potential noncompliance issues within the digital currency sector, according to an IRS report issued in June 2024.

Some investors view this regulatory change as an overreach, potentially driving more users towards decentralized trading platforms. Anndy Lian, an author and intergovernmental blockchain expert, highlighted the risk of users migrating to decentralized platforms like Uniswap or PancakeSwap. Lian noted that this shift could create a paradox where the IRS’s efforts to increase tax revenue might inadvertently push users towards environments where tax enforcement is currently challenging. Reflecting the crypto industry’s backlash, the Blockchain Association filed a lawsuit against the IRS in December 2024, arguing that the rules are unconstitutional as they include decentralized exchanges (DEXs) under the ‘broker’ term, thereby extending data collection requirements to them.

While crypto transactions on decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols are currently difficult for tax authorities to trace due to the absence of central intermediaries, advancements in blockchain analytics could make DeFi transactions more traceable by 2027, according to Lian. He suggested that while decentralized systems pose challenges for tax enforcement now, future developments in blockchain analytics and regulatory measures could alter this landscape. To prevent a potential exodus of users, Lian emphasized the need for specialized tax brackets that consider the high volatility and significant retail participation in the crypto market, arguing that treating crypto gains the same as traditional capital gains may not always be equitable.

The rising valuations of cryptocurrencies have also attracted the attention of other jurisdictions. European retail investors should prepare for taxation following the implementation of the Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) framework, as noted by Dmitrij Radin, founder of Zekret and chief technology officer of Fideum, a regulatory and blockchain infrastructure firm. Radin stated that retail users will be required to provide information and data, which will be scrutinized, leading to increased taxation for most Europeans. MiCA, the world’s first comprehensive regulatory crypto framework, went into full effect for crypto-asset service providers on December 30.

 

Source: https://www.binance.com/en/square/post/01-16-2025-us-crypto-transactions-face-new-tax-reporting-rules-19018556510562

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Decentralized Transactions Challenge Howey Test’s Application to NFTs

Decentralized Transactions Challenge Howey Test’s Application to NFTs
  • The key question is whether NFTs meet the Howey test criteria for classification as securities under federal laws.
  • In the NFT industry, adopting best practices includes transparency, fraud prevention, respecting intellectual property, and ethical conduct.

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are unique digital assets that can represent anything from art and music to virtual land and gaming items. They have exploded in popularity and value in recent years, attracting the attention of celebrities, investors, and regulators alike. The legal status of NFTs remains unclear and controversial, especially in the United States, where the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has the authority to regulate securities and protect investors from fraud and manipulation.

One of the key questions that arises is whether NFTs are securities under the federal securities laws, and specifically, whether they meet the criteria of the Howey test, the legal framework established by the Supreme Court in 1946 to determine whether an instrument is an investment contract and thus a security. Howey test has four elements, I will argue that NFTs are not securities. On top of that, I will also address some of the counterarguments and challenges that NFTs may face in the future, and suggest some possible solutions and recommendations for the industry and the regulators.

NFTs are not investments of money, but rather purchases of digital goods

The first element of the Howey test is whether there is an investment of money or something of value in exchange for the instrument. This element is usually easy to satisfy, as most financial transactions involve some form of payment. However, in the case of NFTs, the payment is not an investment, but rather a purchase of a digital good.

They are not shares, bonds, or derivatives that represent a claim or a right to a future cash flow or a share of profits. Rather, they are digital tokens that prove ownership and authenticity of a unique digital asset. In my point of view, they are similar to other digital goods, such as e-books or music downloads, that consumers buy for personal use and enjoyment, not for investment purposes.

NFTs are not common enterprises, but rather individualized and decentralized transactions

The second element of the Howey test assesses the presence of a common enterprise, where investors’ fortunes are tied to the success of an issuer or third party. However, in the case of NFTs, no such common enterprise exists. Transactions are decentralized and individualized, with various artists and creators minting NFTs across different blockchain networks like Ethereum or Solana. NFT buyers rely on blockchain‘s public ledger to verify authenticity, rather than trusting a specific issuer or promoter.

NFTs do not generate profits, but rather subjective value and utility

The third element of the Howey test concerns whether there’s a reasonable expectation of profits. Unlike traditional investments, NFTs don’t generate income or appreciate based on others’ efforts. Instead, their value comes from subjective qualities like rarity, originality, and cultural significance, rather than anticipated financial returns. NFT buyers don’t expect profits but rather value the assets for their intrinsic qualities and utility.

NFTs are not dependent on the efforts of others, but rather on the creativity and innovation of the creators and the community

The fourth element of the Howey test examines whether profits stem from the efforts of others. Unlike traditional securities, NFT profits aren’t reliant on issuer or third-party services. NFT value is driven by the creativity and innovation of artists and developers, not centralized platforms. Buyers assess and appreciate digital assets based on personal judgment, rather than external influences.

Counterarguments and challenges

Despite the arguments in favor of NFTs, potential challenges from regulators and courts may arise in the future. One such challenge is the classification of certain NFTs as securities under regulatory tests like the Howey or Reves tests. Depending on their characteristics, some NFTs could represent real-world assets or rights, potentially falling under the definition of securities, especially if they promise future cash flows or resemble investment instruments.

Moreover, even if NFTs don’t meet all elements of the Howey test, they might still be deemed securities through a flexible analysis. For instance, if they are marketed as investments or show characteristics of speculative opportunities, they could create expectations of profit, thus falling under securities regulations. Additionally, if buyers pool funds or share risks and rewards, or if the NFTs’ value depends on underlying asset performance, regulators might consider them securities.

Furthermore, beyond securities laws, NFTs could be subject to various other regulations based on their nature and function. Anti-money laundering and sanctions regulations might apply if NFTs facilitate illicit transactions. Tax regulations could come into play if NFT transactions generate taxable income or capital gains. Consumer protection laws might be relevant if NFTs involve deceptive practices or breach contracts. Intellectual property regulations could be triggered if NFTs infringe upon original creators’ rights.

My take: Possible solutions and recommendations

Given the uncertainty and complexity of the legal landscape surrounding NFTs, it is important for the industry and the regulators to work together to find possible solutions and recommendations that can balance the interests and needs of all the stakeholders. Here are some suggestions from me that may help to achieve this goal:

  • Industry stakeholders should adhere to best practices and standards to improve transparency, accountability, and compliance in the NFT market. This includes clear disclosure of terms and conditions for NFT transactions, implementing measures to prevent fraud and illegal activities, and respecting intellectual property rights. Additionally, they should engage in responsible and ethical behavior, avoiding harm to the environment, society, or public interest.
  • Regulators should adopt a flexible approach to regulate the diverse NFT market. Avoiding overly restrictive frameworks is crucial to foster innovation and growth. Recognizing nuances among NFT types and consulting with industry and community for feedback is essential. Continuous monitoring and evaluation of market evolution are necessary to update policies accordingly.

Conclusion

NFTs are a new and exciting phenomenon that has revolutionized the digital economy and culture. They offer unprecedented opportunities and challenges for the creators, consumers, and regulators of the digital assets.

The legal status and implications of NFTs are still unclear and uncertain, and may vary depending on the facts and circumstances of each case. Therefore, it is important to understand and address the potential legal issues and risks that may arise from the creation, distribution, and consumption of NFTs, and to seek appropriate solutions and recommendations that can foster a healthy and sustainable NFT market.

 

Source: https://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/decentralized-transactions-challenge-howey-tests-application-to-nfts/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j