Aave is sitting on up to $230 million in bad debt from the Kelp DAO exploit. The Umbrella safety reserve holds $80 to $100 million, according to analyst estimates. That gap has to come from somewhere, and right now, the options on the table are ugly for everyone involved.
Depositors could take a haircut. stkAAVE stakers could get slashed. Or Kelp DAO could collapse entirely trying to absorb the loss at once.
How do users get their money back?
The Official Plan: Umbrella, Treasury and Unnamed Commitments
Aave’s own service providers are already moving. A formal incident report published on the Aave governance forum on April 20 confirmed the DAO treasury holds $181 million and that indicative commitments from unnamed ecosystem participants are already in place to address the shortfall.
The Umbrella safety reserve, Aave’s built-in backstop, may also be deployed, though it holds an estimated $80 to $100 million, leaving a potential gap if bad debt reaches the worst-case $230 million scenario.
If Umbrella falls short, the next layer is stkAAVE stakers – users who locked their tokens as a protocol backstop and could face slashing to cover residual losses.
Intergovernmental blockchain advisor and analyst Anndy Lian thinks there is a better way.
The Idea: Finance the Debt, Don’t Detonate It
Lian’s proposal centres on a Recovery Token he calls $kRecovery. Instead of forcing an immediate writedown, Kelp DAO would issue $kRecovery to Aave as a structured debt instrument – essentially a promise to repay backed by future protocol revenue.
“Instead of a permanent haircut, Kelp DAO could issue a Recovery Token or Debt IOUs to Aave to cover the $123M–$230M gap,” Lian wrote. “Aave users are made whole over time, and Kelp DAO avoids a total collapse of its token price by financing the debt rather than realizing it all at once.”
Three Ways Kelp Could Actually Pay This Back
This is where the proposal gets specific and credible.
First, Kelp DAO could mint new KELP governance tokens to buy back $kRecovery. It dilutes existing holders but compresses the repayment timeline from decades to one to two years. Lian calls it a “bail-in by the DAO’s shareholders.”
Second, the Arbitrum Security Council has already recovered $71 million. Every dollar recovered accelerates repayment.
Third, and most interesting, is KUSD, Kelp’s stablecoin targeting a 9% yield from institutional finance. If KUSD scales to $500 million in TVL, annual revenue jumps from $4 million to over $20 million. At that rate, even the worst-case $230 million debt clears in under five years from protocol earnings alone.
Why This Matters Beyond Kelp
Lian closes simply: “I have suggested this because I do not want to see retail users get hurt.”
If it works, this is not just a Kelp solution. It is a DeFi precedent – a structured recovery path that keeps protocols alive and users whole instead of choosing who takes the loss.
DeFi has needed that playbook for a long time.
Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.
Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.
An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.
