Bitcoin vs stocks: Why crypto dipped on PPI while S&P 500 hit record highs at 7,444

Bitcoin vs stocks: Why crypto dipped on PPI while S&P 500 hit record highs at 7,444
The April Producer Price Index print arrived like a thunderclap through otherwise complacent markets, registering a 1.4 per cent month-on-month increase and a 6.0 per cent year-on-year surge that dwarfed consensus expectations of 0.5 per cent and 4.9 per cent. This was not a gentle reminder of inflation’s persistence but a stark signal that wholesale price pressures remain deeply embedded across the services and energy sectors, with core PPI advancing 1.0 per cent month-on-month and 5.2 per cent year-on-year.

Bitcoin reacted with characteristic velocity, sliding from the low US$81,000 range to test US$78,704, briefly breaking below the psychologically critical US$80,000 threshold. That move, while modest in percentage terms for an asset known for volatility, triggered approximately US$94 million in Bitcoin long liquidations and roughly US$304 million in long liquidations across the broader crypto complex, compared to just US$71 million in shorts.

This asymmetry reveals a market structure in which leverage, rather than spot demand, often dictates short-term price action. When macro data shifts the narrative, overextended positions unwind sharply, and the resulting cascade can obscure the underlying fundamental picture.

What makes this episode particularly instructive is how directly macroeconomic signals now transmit into cryptocurrency markets. The hotter-than-expected PPI print reinforced expectations that the Federal Reserve may maintain a higher-for-longer interest-rate posture, potentially even reconsidering the timing of future rate cuts. Higher policy rates typically lift bond yields and strengthen the dollar, creating headwinds for risk assets that offer no yield and derive value from future adoption rather than current cash flows.

Bitcoin, despite its growing institutional acceptance, still trades with a high beta to liquidity expectations. The liquidation wave was not merely a technical event but a repricing of rate sensitivity among leveraged participants who had positioned for continued upside without adequately hedging against macro surprises.

This dynamic underscores a critical reality for crypto traders today. You are no longer just analysing on-chain metrics or network adoption. You are implicitly taking a view on inflation trajectories, central bank communication, and the real yield environment. The line between macro trading and crypto speculation has blurred, and those who ignore this convergence do so at their peril.

Interestingly, while Bitcoin absorbed selling pressure from the PPI shock, traditional equity benchmarks demonstrated remarkable resilience, even reaching new records. The S&P 500 gained 0.58 per cent to close at an all-time high of 7,444.25, while the Nasdaq Composite climbed 1.2 per cent to end at 26,402.34, propelled by strength in chipmakers and software names.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average lagged slightly, slipping 0.14 per cent to 49,693.20, but the broader risk appetite remained firmly intact. In Asia, the Straits Times Index extended gains past the 5,000 level, closing up 1.17 per cent at 5,003.96, while Nikkei 225 futures pointed positive near 63,490 as corporate buyback programmes accelerated.

This divergence between crypto and equities following the same inflation print highlights a nuanced market psychology. Equity investors appear to be weighing strong corporate earnings, such as Cisco Systems’ 14 per cent surge on a revenue beat and Blackstone Digital Infrastructure Trust’s US$2.0 billion IPO priced at US$20.00 per share, against macro headwinds.

Crypto traders, by contrast, remain more sensitive to the marginal change in liquidity expectations. The 10-year US Treasury yield surging toward 4.47 per cent, marking new 2026 highs, matters more to Bitcoin’s near-term direction than Alphabet’s 3.94 per cent gain or Tesla’s 3.24 per cent advance, however noteworthy those moves may be.

Bitcoin now trades within a decisive range between US$80,000 and US$82,000, where liquidation heatmaps show dense pockets of stops on both sides. A break below US$80,000 could trigger another wave of long liquidations, while a move above US$82,000 might squeeze shorts and fuel a rapid rebound. This knife-edge setup means that upcoming data releases will carry outsized influence.

The next Consumer Price Index and Personal Consumption Expenditures reports, along with any fresh commentary from Federal Reserve officials, will likely dictate whether the market interprets recent inflation as a temporary flare or a persistent trend. Geopolitical developments also warrant close attention, with global markets monitoring the Beijing meeting between US President Donald Trump and China’s Xi Jinping for signals on trade tariffs and supply chain stability.

In this environment, tracking open interest, funding rates, and liquidation levels becomes as important as analysing macro calendars. The market is not merely pricing in data but positioning for the volatility that data might unleash.

From my perspective, this episode reinforces a broader truth about the current phase of crypto market maturation. Bitcoin is no longer an isolated experiment but an integrated component of the global financial ecosystem, responsive to the same liquidity currents that move equities, bonds, and currencies. Its decentralised nature and finite supply introduce unique dynamics that traditional valuation frameworks struggle to capture.

Legacy regulatory constructs often miss the point when applied to networks that operate without central intermediaries. Similarly, treating Bitcoin purely as a risk-on asset overlooks its emerging role as a hedge against monetary debasement in certain jurisdictions.

The intelligence gap in Web3 persists not because the technology is immature, but because the analytical lens applied to it remains anchored in 20th-century paradigms. Traders who recognise this disconnect and build models that account for both macro sensitivity and network fundamentals will be better positioned to navigate the volatility ahead.

The path forward for Bitcoin will likely be determined by the interplay between sticky inflation, Federal Reserve policy, and the structural leverage embedded in derivatives markets. If inflation data continues to surprise to the upside, forcing a repricing of rate expectations, Bitcoin could face further pressure as real yields rise and the dollar strengthens.

 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Trump vs banks: How stalled crypto legislation is crushing market sentiment

Trump vs banks: How stalled crypto legislation is crushing market sentiment

The cryptocurrency market declined 0.58 per cent over the past 24 hours, settling at a total market capitalisation of US$2.33T. This movement reflects more than routine volatility. It signals a market grappling with regulatory headwinds and a pronounced alignment with traditional risk assets. The 88 per cent correlation with the S&P 500 underscores that crypto no longer trades in isolation. Macro forces now dictate short-term direction, and investors must parse political developments with the same rigour they apply to on-chain metrics.

I view this convergence not as a weakness but as a maturation phase. Digital assets now respond to the same liquidity currents and geopolitical shocks that move equities, while retaining unique optionality that traditional markets cannot replicate.

At the core of the selloff lies stalled United States crypto legislation. On March 3, President Trump publicly pressured banks, stating that the GENIUS Act faces obstruction from financial institutions and urging a compromise to advance the Clarity Act. This deadlock creates a persistent regulatory overhang. Market participants price in the risk that comprehensive market-structure reform may falter, leaving projects in a grey zone where compliance costs rise, and innovation slows.

The absence of a clear legislative path discourages institutional allocation and fuels cautious positioning among retail traders. I have long argued that regulatory clarity accelerates adoption, but only when frameworks respect decentralisation. Legislation that concentrates control or imposes legacy compliance burdens on novel architectures will stifle the very innovation it claims to foster.

Sentiment indicators confirm the psychological pressure. The CMC Fear and Greed Index sits at 19, marking extreme fear and its lowest reading in weeks. Social media amplified this anxiety, particularly after Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson characterised the proposed Clarity Act as deeply flawed legislation that could empower regulators to stifle new projects. This narrative resonated across altcoin communities. ADA declined 4.6 per cent, outpacing the broader market as investors rotated toward perceived safety.

When influential voices question regulatory frameworks, the market reacts swiftly, especially in an environment already primed for risk aversion. I value independent analysis over crowd sentiment. Extreme fear often coincides with attractive entry points for long-term builders, but only for those who distinguish between temporary political noise and enduring technological progress.

From a technical standpoint, the US$2.25T market cap level represents critical support, corresponding to the 78.6 per cent Fibonacci retracement from the recent swing high. Holding this zone keeps the door open for a relief rally should legislative progress emerge. A decisive break below, however, opens a path toward the yearly low near US$2.17T. The tight correlation with equities means crypto traders must monitor the S&P 500 relationship with its 100-day moving average.

When that index closes below key technical levels, as it did recently at 6,816.63, digital assets often follow with amplified volatility due to lower liquidity in overnight sessions. I track these levels not as prophecy but as probabilistic guides. Technical structure matters most when it aligns with fundamental catalysts, and right now, the fundamental catalyst is legislative momentum.

Broader financial markets faced significant downward pressure on March 4, driven by escalating geopolitical conflict in the Middle East. Investors retreated from risk assets amid concerns about potential disruption to global oil supplies and a corresponding spike in inflation. The S&P 500 fell 0.94 per cent to 6,816.63, while the Nasdaq Composite dropped 1.02 per cent to 22,516.69.

European indices suffered steeper losses, with the DAX declining 3.44 per cent and the CAC 40 falling 3.46 per cent. Asian markets extended the selloff, with the Nikkei 225 slumping 3.43 per cent to 54,345.93. Tehran’s threat to close the Strait of Hormuz, a critical artery for roughly 20 per cent of global oil consumption, pushed crude prices higher and forced investors to push back expectations of a Federal Reserve rate cut to September 2026.

In this environment, crypto behaves as a high beta risk asset, not a safe haven. Gold traded above US$5,100, and the US Dollar advanced for a third consecutive day, confirming the flight to quality. I see this dynamic as temporary. Over longer horizons, decentralised networks offer properties that fiat systems cannot match, but short-term price action will continue to mirror macro risk sentiment.

The near-term trajectory hinges on two factors: regulatory developments and technical support. Positive movement on the Clarity Act, such as a Senate Banking Committee markup date or bipartisan compromise language on stablecoin yields, could trigger a relief rally. Conversely, failure to hold the US$2.25T support level risks extending the decline. Traders should monitor ETF flow data for clues on institutional positioning, as these products now serve as a primary conduit for traditional capital entering crypto markets.

A sustained rise in the Fear and Greed Index above 25 would signal a shift from extreme fear, but such a move likely requires concrete legislative progress or a de-escalation in geopolitical tensions. I watch ETF flows closely because they reveal whether institutions are accumulating on weakness or distributing into strength. Right now, the data suggests caution, but caution can reverse quickly with the right catalyst.

This moment tests the resilience of decentralised systems. Regulatory uncertainty will persist as long as policy frameworks treat crypto as an extension of traditional finance rather than a distinct technological paradigm. Independent analysis reveals that markets often overreact to political noise, creating opportunities for those who distinguish between temporary headwinds and structural change.

The convergence of macro pressure, technical levels, and legislative ambiguity demands a disciplined approach. Investors who focus on long-term adoption metrics, on-chain activity, and the steady progression of infrastructure development will navigate this volatility with greater clarity.

I remain convinced that the fusion of artificial intelligence and decentralised networks will unlock new models of value creation that legacy systems cannot replicate. The path forward requires patience, critical thinking, and a commitment to the principles of decentralisation that define the sector’s enduring value. Those who maintain conviction during periods of fear often shape the next cycle of innovation. 

 

Source: https://e27.co/trump-vs-banks-how-stalled-crypto-legislation-is-crushing-market-sentiment-20260304/

 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Bitcoin vs. Gold: Assessing Safe-Haven Assets Amid Market Turmoil

Bitcoin vs. Gold: Assessing Safe-Haven Assets Amid Market Turmoil

A panel discussion titled Bitcoin vs. Gold: Assessing Safe-Haven Assets Amid Market Turmoil brought together industry experts to explore the roles of Bitcoin and gold as safe-haven assets during economic volatility. Moderated by Jameel Ahmad, Chief Analyst at GTCFX, the panel featured Anndy Lian, Intergovernmental Blockchain Advisor and Investor to VulpeFi; Rizwan Shaikh, Regional Manager at ICM.com; Richard Nasr, Crypto Technical Analyst at Tickmill; and Jason Allegrante, Chief Legal & Compliance Officer at Fireblocks. The discussion delved into whether Bitcoin can be considered a viable safe-haven asset compared to gold, the factors driving their price actions, and the broader financial market themes influencing investor sentiment. Below is a comprehensive overview of the insights shared, enriched with direct quotes from the panelists.

Bitcoin as a Safe-Haven Asset: A Polarizing Debate

The panel kicked off with a central question: Can Bitcoin be considered an alternative safe-haven asset? Anndy Lian, a seasoned blockchain advocate, was unequivocally optimistic about Bitcoin’s potential. He highlighted its growing institutional adoption and significant market cap, noting, “If you look at the market cap right now for global assets, I think we are probably top five or top six right now… institutions are really stepping up to look at Bitcoin at another level.” Lian pointed to major players like BlackRock endorsing Bitcoin, suggesting that this institutional backing signals a shift in perception, positioning Bitcoin as a reliable alternative investment. He emphasized its resilience, stating, “Look at it right now, it just passed the all-time high as we speak… it says a lot for the last 10 years.”

Rizwan Shaikh offered a more cautious perspective, acknowledging gold’s historical reliability during economic and geopolitical turmoil. He argued that Bitcoin, which emerged in 2009, still faces challenges like regulatory uncertainty and technological maturation. “Gold gives a solid case, but Bitcoin… will take time to be a safe-haven asset, at least 10 to 15 years,” Shaikh noted, suggesting that Bitcoin’s journey to safe-haven status is still in its infancy.

Richard Nasr, a technical analyst and Bitcoin enthusiast, countered with a compelling case for Bitcoin’s unique attributes. He emphasized its decentralized nature and fixed supply, which provide security and autonomy unmatched by traditional assets like gold. “Bitcoin doesn’t ask for any permission, it just works… no one can freeze it, no one can control it, no one can take it from you,” Nasr stated. He contrasted Bitcoin’s self-custody model with gold’s reliance on banks or vaults, which introduces counterparty risk. Nasr also highlighted a generational divide, noting, “Gen Z prefer Bitcoin… it’s freedom,” while older generations gravitate toward gold’s tangible legacy.

Moderator Jameel Ahmad framed the discussion by referencing recent market events, such as the volatility following Trump’s tariff announcements on April 2, 2025, and the Moody’s downgrade of the U.S. credit rating. He noted that while gold surged to new highs during these periods, Bitcoin’s price action was more erratic, raising questions about its reliability as a hedge or safe haven.

Bitcoin and Gold: Complementary or Competing Assets?

The panelists explored whether investors could be optimistic about both Bitcoin and gold. Lian advocated for a diversified approach, suggesting that a basket of assets, including Bitcoin, Ethereum, and physical assets like gold, could form an effective hedge. “If you can have a basket of other assets, I think including Bitcoin, that would be a very good hedge,” he said, acknowledging Bitcoin’s volatility but emphasizing its upward momentum driven by institutional support.

Shaikh agreed, viewing Bitcoin more as an investment than a pure safe haven. He cited its impressive historical returns, noting, “From 2012 to 2022, it’s like 3,000%,” but stressed the need for diversification to mitigate risk. Nasr echoed this sentiment, arguing that gold protects capital while Bitcoin grows it. “Gold is a store of value, Bitcoin is an investment… gold for your future and Bitcoin for your kids’ future,” he quipped, suggesting that the two assets serve complementary roles in a portfolio.

Financial Market Themes Driving Sentiment

The discussion shifted to the broader financial market themes influencing Bitcoin and gold. Lian highlighted the impact of high-profile events, such as a Trump-themed dinner attended by crypto influencers like Justin Sun, which could drive retail attention to cryptocurrencies. “All these small little fun events can actually trigger a lot more retail attention… as compared to CPI or Fed announcements,” he remarked, underscoring the power of narrative-driven market movements in the crypto space.
Shaikh focused on geopolitical trends, particularly de-dollarization, as a key driver for both assets. “Big economies like China, India, Russia are moving away from USD… it will affect, and people will be more into Bitcoin and alternative ways of cross-border payments,” he predicted. He also pointed to upcoming U.S.-China trade settlements as a potential catalyst for volatility in both Bitcoin and gold.

Nasr emphasized the role of institutional inflows, particularly through Bitcoin ETFs and strategic reserves. He referenced the transformative impact of gold ETFs in 2004, which led to a 700% surge over seven years, and suggested that Bitcoin ETFs, approved recently, could drive similar growth. “ETFs bring money, bring inflows, volume… this is what we saw for Bitcoin in the last couple of months,” he noted.

Why Gold Outperformed Bitcoin During Recent Volatility

The panel addressed why gold surged to all-time highs during the market turmoil in April 2025, while Bitcoin lagged. Lian attributed this to gold’s entrenched position among institutional and central bank holders, which allows for greater price stability. “A lot of powerhouses are actually holding on to gold… they could always do a different kind of manipulation,” he explained, contrasting this with Bitcoin’s nascent stage.

Shaikh pointed to gold’s lower volatility as a key factor. “When there is geopolitical or economic disagreement, people look for the asset which is less volatile… that was the reason that gold jumped,” he said. Nasr offered a cyclical perspective, suggesting that investors flock to gold during panic but shift to Bitcoin once the fear subsides. “In panic mode, everyone goes to what they know… when the panic fades, they start looking for what’s next, and that’s where Bitcoin steps in,” he explained.

Price Predictions and Future Outlook

The panelists shared their expectations for Bitcoin and gold price action in the near term. Lian predicted Bitcoin could reach $150,000–$160,000 by the end of 2025, driven by institutional buying and market dynamics. Shaikh was slightly more conservative, forecasting $115,000–$120,000 for Bitcoin and $3,700–$3,900 for gold within the next few months. Nasr, leveraging technical analysis, projected Bitcoin hitting $135,000 in the short term, with a potential peak of $268,500 by the end of the cycle, though he cautioned about a possible correction due to external events like exchange bankruptcies.

The Role of U.S. Policy and Global Trends

The panelists also discussed the impact of U.S. President Donald Trump’s campaign pledge to make America the “crypto capital of the world.” Lian viewed this as a bullish signal, noting, “Since America is open to famous guys like [Justin Sun], I think the regulations are really very clear… let’s move the market.” Shaikh agreed, suggesting that favorable crypto policies could boost innovation and government revenue through taxation. Nasr, however, cautioned that initial market reactions to Trump’s presidency were mixed, with profit-taking causing a temporary dip. He noted, “Now we are in greed… next will be extreme greed,” predicting further upside as optimism grows.

For gold, the panelists identified central bank buying, inflation, and geopolitical tensions as key drivers of its 30% rally in 2025. Nasr highlighted Russia and China’s aggressive gold purchases, while Shaikh emphasized industrial and retail demand. Lian added that gold’s immediate exchangeability makes it a preferred safe haven in crisis-hit regions.

Looking Ahead: Risks and Opportunities

As the discussion concluded, the panelists outlined key themes for investors to monitor in the second half of 2025. Lian urged caution due to potential corrections but saw opportunity in Bitcoin’s volatility. “If you are able to catch the next wave, you could make some really good money,” he advised. Shaikh anticipated greater stability due to trade settlements, while Nasr predicted a strong summer for Bitcoin, with June and July being particularly bullish, followed by a correction in August or September.

Conclusion

The Bitcoin vs. Gold panel at Crypto Expo Dubai 2025 offered a nuanced perspective on the evolving roles of these assets in turbulent markets. While gold’s historical stability and institutional backing make it a go-to safe haven, Bitcoin’s growing acceptance and unique attributes position it as a compelling alternative for the next generation. As Jameel Ahmad summarized, “2025 has already been very eventful… with erratic headlines and incredible volatility.” The panelists’ insights underscored the importance of diversification, vigilance, and understanding market cycles to navigate the opportunities and risks ahead.

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j