September’s market curse: Are you ready for the volatility storm?

September’s market curse: Are you ready for the volatility storm?

Traders across Wall Street pushed stocks higher on Tuesday, demonstrating remarkable resilience in the face of unsettling developments at the Federal Reserve.

The S&P 500 climbed by a modest but significant 0.42 per cent, clawing back the losses from Monday and hovering tantalisingly close to its recent peaks just shy of 6500. This uptick came even as news broke of a dramatic overhaul at the Fed, where President Trump moved to oust Governor Lisa Cook amid allegations of mortgage fraud, marking an unprecedented intervention in the central bank’s governance.

Investors appeared to dismiss the potential for instability, focusing instead on the broader economic signals that suggested stability amid uncertainty. This shakeup, the first time in the Fed’s 111-year history that a president has fired a governor, has sparked legal battles and widespread concern among economists about the erosion of the institution’s independence.

Cook has vowed to challenge the dismissal in court, arguing that it violates the Federal Reserve Act’s protections against removals without cause. The market’s reaction stayed muted, with buyers stepping in to support equities and prevent a deeper slide.

Technical tensions in US stocks

This Fed turmoil unfolds against a backdrop of mixed technical indicators for stocks. The S&P 500 has struggled to dip below its 20-day moving average of 6392, a key support level that has held firm since the lows in April. Bulls have defended this threshold aggressively, underscoring the short-term upward bias in prices.

However, momentum oscillators tell a different story. The Relative Strength Index and Moving Average Convergence Divergence have formed lower highs compared to the overbought peaks seen in July, signalling a clear negative divergence from the price action. Such patterns often indicate exhaustion among buyers, where the enthusiasm that drove the rally begins to wane, setting the stage for a period of consolidation or correction.

History supports this cautionary view, as August and September have long earned notoriety as the most volatile months for US equities, with September posting the weakest average returns of any month. Over the past century, the S&P 500 has declined in September more often than not, with an average loss of about 0.7 per cent, driven by factors like end-of-quarter portfolio rebalancing and seasonal slowdowns in economic activity.

As summer winds down, traders brace for erratic swings, and this year proves no exception, with the VIX volatility index spiking by an average of 8.4 per cent in August alone based on data stretching back to 1990.

Global markets react cautiously

Global markets reflected this tentative mood, with movements remaining largely subdued as of mid-morning in Tokyo. Japan’s Topix index slipped by 0.2 per cent, reflecting ongoing concerns about yen strength and export competitiveness.

In contrast, Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 edged up by 0.2 per cent, buoyed by gains in mining stocks amid stable commodity prices. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng advanced 0.3 per cent, supported by tech sector rebounds, while mainland China’s Shanghai Composite dipped 0.1 per cent on worries over slowing manufacturing data.

European futures pointed to a modest opening, with Euro Stoxx 50 contracts rising 0.3 per cent, as investors awaited further clarity on monetary policy from the European Central Bank. These incremental shifts highlight a world economy grappling with uneven recovery, where regional divergences persist amid shared pressures from inflation and geopolitical tensions.

Currencies stay range-bound

Currencies traded in a narrow range, underscoring the lack of decisive momentum in foreign exchange markets. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index held steady, as traders weighed the implications of the Fed’s internal strife against hints of potential rate adjustments.

The euro remained unchanged at US$1.1633, finding support near its recent lows but failing to break higher amid eurozone growth concerns. The Japanese yen weakened by 0.2 per cent to 147.65 per dollar, continuing its slide as carry trades unwound.

Meanwhile, the offshore yuan showed little movement at 7.1492 per dollar, stabilised by People’s Bank of China interventions but vulnerable to US tariff threats. These currency dynamics reflect a broader wait-and-see approach, where participants hold back from bold positions until the dust settles on US policy directions.

Crypto turbulence intensifies

Cryptocurrencies faced sharper headwinds, with Bitcoin holding flat at US$111,294.45 after a bruising week that exposed the sector’s vulnerability to macroeconomic shifts. Ether dropped 0.6 per cent to US$4,562.26, pulling back from its recent highs. The primary cryptocurrency endured a gruelling decline last week, sliding gradually before plummeting to a multi-week low just under US$112,000 on Friday, ahead of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s much-anticipated speech at the Jackson Hole symposium.

Powell’s remarks, which hinted at forthcoming rate reductions to support a cooling labor market while maintaining inflation targets, initially ignited a surge in Bitcoin, propelling it above US$117,000 within minutes. However, the gains proved fleeting, as the asset retraced to around US$115,000 over the weekend.

The real shock arrived Sunday evening, when Bitcoin tumbled several thousand dollars to below US$111,000, a level last visited on July 10. This abrupt drop wiped out roughly US$200 billion from the cumulative market capitalisation of all cryptocurrencies, bringing it to US$3.930 trillion.

Alternative coins followed suit, with Ethereum retreating from a fresh all-time high of US$4,950 to just over US$4,600, and Ripple struggling below the US$3 mark after rejection at US$3.1. Assets like Solana, Cardano, Tron, Dogecoin, Stellar, and Chainlink posted similar declines, while Sui, Litecoin, Aave, Pepe, Ena, Mantle, Okb, Uniswap, and Ethereum Classic suffered steeper losses of up to eight per cent.

Powell’s speech shifts market sentiment

Powell’s address provided critical context for these movements, emphasising a shift in risks where upside inflation pressures have diminished but downside employment threats have grown. He declared that the time has arrived for policy adjustments, with the direction toward easing clear, though the pace remains data-dependent.

Unemployment stands at 4.3 per cent, up from early 2023, but job gains persist, and inflation has cooled to 2.5 per cent over the past year. This dovish tilt initially fuelled optimism in risk assets, including cryptocurrencies, as lower rates typically encourage investment in speculative sectors.

Yet, the subsequent pullback in Bitcoin and its peers illustrates the market’s sensitivity to perceived over-optimism, with traders locking in profits amid fears of delayed cuts due to the Fed’s ongoing boardroom drama.

A precarious moment for markets

In my opinion, this moment feels precarious. Traders have shrugged off the Fed shakeup for now, but history warns against complacency. When presidents encroach on central bank autonomy, as Trump has by targeting Cook and nominating allies like Stephen Miran, it risks politicising decisions that should prioritise economic data over electoral timelines.

Past attempts to influence the Fed, such as during the Nixon era, led to inflationary spirals and eroded public trust. If Cook’s legal challenge succeeds or drags on, it could paralyse the board, delaying critical actions like rate cuts and amplifying volatility.

Stocks may remain buoyant near records, but the negative divergences in technicals suggest a digestion phase is looming, especially in the notoriously choppy August-September window. Investors should trim risk now, avoiding aggressive bets on equities until clarity emerges.

In cryptocurrencies, the volatility serves as a stark reminder of the asset class’s immaturity. Bitcoin’s wild swings around Powell’s speech mirror patterns from 2021 and 2024, where dovish signals sparked brief euphoria followed by sharp corrections. The sector’s US$3.93 trillion market cap, while impressive, remains dwarfed by traditional markets and prone to sentiment-driven dumps.

Ethereum’s retreat from its peak highlights how even strong performers falter when broader risk appetite wanes. That said, if the Fed delivers cuts in September despite the turmoil, crypto could rebound strongly, as cheaper borrowing often funnels capital into high-growth areas.

My advice aligns with the prudent strategy outlined in recent analyses: steer clear of over-leveraged positions in the near term, but position to capitalise on any volatility-induced dips ahead of the historically favourable October-to-March period for stocks and digital assets alike. The Fed’s independence hangs in the balance, and markets that ignore this do so at their peril.

Ultimately, sustainable growth demands policy rooted in expertise, not executive fiat, and the current path threatens to undermine that foundation.

 

Source: https://e27.co/septembers-market-curse-are-you-ready-for-the-volatility-storm-20250827/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Powell’s pivot: How Jackson Hole reshaped markets and what comes nex

Powell’s pivot: How Jackson Hole reshaped markets and what comes nex

The financial landscape presents a compelling narrative of shifting tides and strategic recalibration as we navigate the final stretch of August. Recent developments emerging from Jackson Hole have fundamentally reshaped market expectations, creating a domino effect across asset classes that demands careful dissection.

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s carefully calibrated remarks last Friday did far more than hint at potential policy shifts; they effectively slammed the door on prolonged restrictive monetary policy while opening a wide window for immediate easing.

This pivot represents a significant departure from the Fed’s previous stance and carries profound implications for investors globally. Market participants responded with characteristic speed, pushing major US indices to fresh record highs as the S&P 500 gained 1.52 per cent and the tech-heavy Nasdaq surged 1.88 per cent.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average joined this upward trajectory, climbing 1.89 per cent to touch uncharted territory, a development underscored by the US government’s strategic investment in a major semiconductor manufacturer, which provided additional tailwinds for industrial and technology sectors.

Inflation cools, optimism rises

This renewed optimism stems directly from Powell’s acknowledgement that inflation has sufficiently cooled to warrant policy adjustment. His speech deliberately avoided the cautious hedging that characterised previous communications, instead emphasising the Fed’s readiness to act decisively should inflation continue its descent toward the two per cent target.

The immediate market reaction proved remarkably consistent across fixed income and currency markets. Treasury yields tumbled across the curve with the benchmark 10-year note falling 7.4 basis points to 4.254 per cent, while the two-year note dropped 9.5 basis points to 3.696 per cent. This yield compression reflects investor conviction that the current restrictive policy stance is temporary.

Concurrently, the US Dollar Index retreated 0.92 per cent as capital flowed toward risk assets while gold prices rebounded one per cent on the dual catalysts of dollar weakness and heightened rate cut anticipation. These movements collectively signal a powerful shift in market psychology where the so-called Fed put, the implicit promise of central bank support during market stress, has been reactivated with unusual clarity.

Earnings season exposes a split reality

The earnings season provides a critical counterpoint to this macro optimism, revealing a more nuanced corporate reality beneath the surface. While the much-discussed Magnificent Seven technology giants delivered robust results exceeding lowered expectations, the broader market tells a different story. Analysis of S&P 500 earnings revisions shows a troubling pattern of downward adjustments for the remaining 493 companies.

This bifurcation creates a dangerous illusion where headline index performance masks underlying weakness in the economic mainstream. Investors now turn their attention to the final wave of quarterly reports from key technology players, including Nvidia, CrowdStrike, Snowflake, and Autodesk, alongside consumer stalwarts Lululemon and Dollar General.

These results will serve as crucial stress tests for both the technology sector’s growth trajectory and consumer resilience amid persistent inflationary pressures. The market eagerly awaits these reports not merely for individual company performance but for what they reveal about broader economic health and corporate pricing power.

Asia’s liquidity pressures and regional sentiment

Asian markets present their own complex dynamics, particularly Hong Kong’s interbank rate market, which has exhibited unusual volatility. The one-month Hong Kong Interbank Offered Rate Hibor has surged dramatically from 1.0 per cent on August 11 to 2.77 per cent as of August 22.

This sharp increase reflects significant tightening in short-term liquidity conditions, likely driven by seasonal funding demands and potential regulatory adjustments. Such movements warrant close monitoring as they can transmit stress through global financial channels.

Despite these regional headwinds, Asian equity markets opened higher during early trading sessions today, suggesting regional investors remain influenced by the broader risk-on sentiment emanating from Powell’s comments. Yet US equity index futures currently indicate a potential pullback at today’s open, introducing an element of caution that underscores the market’s fragile equilibrium.

Crypto’s reaction: from Bitcoin to Ethereum

The cryptocurrency sector experienced particularly dramatic fluctuations following Powell’s speech, creating a fascinating case study in market psychology and whale behaviour. Bitcoin initially surged above US$67 000 following the dovish Fed commentary as traders anticipated lower interest rates would boost risk asset valuations.

However, this rally proved short-lived with the digital asset subsequently declining approximately two per cent. Blockchain analytics firms identified significant movement by large holders shifting substantial Bitcoin positions into Ethereum, a trend that accelerated over the weekend.

Lookonchain data revealed one prominent wallet recently converted part of its 100,784 Bitcoin holdings to acquire 62,914 Ethereum tokens while simultaneously establishing a large derivatives position. This strategic rotation by major players suggests a fundamental reassessment of digital asset allocation priorities, where Ethereum increasingly appears as the preferred vehicle for institutional exposure to the crypto ecosystem.

Ethereum’s technical indicators present both opportunity and warning signs that demand careful interpretation. The cryptocurrency’s 30 day Market Value to Realised Value MVRV ratio has reached 15 per cent a threshold historically associated with profit taking and potential corrections.

Analytics firm Santiment explicitly warns that this constitutes a danger zone that could trigger selling pressure if Ethereum fails to break US$5,000 in the near term. Yet this short-term caution contrasts with the more favourable long-term MVRV ratio of 58.5 per cent, indicating substantial unrealised gains for patient holders.

Additional bullish signals include the declining supply of Ethereum held on exchanges, which suggests growing investor confidence and reduced immediate selling pressure. Combined with rising staking participation and expanding decentralised finance DeFi activity, these fundamentals position Ethereum as the structural cornerstone of the crypto economy rather than merely a speculative alternative.

Strategic imperatives for investors

For investors navigating this complex environment, several strategic imperatives emerge clearly.

First, the renewed viability of the Fed puts creates a tactical opportunity to accumulate quality assets during periods of volatility. Well-capitalised investors should view market pullbacks as entry points for fundamentally strong companies, particularly those demonstrating pricing power and resilient cash flows.

Second, the rotation from Bitcoin to Ethereum observed among major holders warrants serious consideration as it reflects a maturation of institutional crypto strategies. Dollar cost averaging into Ethereum provides a prudent approach to managing volatility while maintaining exposure to the asset’s long-term potential.

Third, investors should actively hedge existing cryptocurrency positions using options or futures contracts to protect against potential corrections, especially given the current MVRV warning signals.

Fourth, attention must remain fixed on Ethereum’s technological roadmap, where continued protocol upgrades like further implementation of EIP 4844 will drive sustainable value creation beyond mere speculation.

The road ahead: Volatility and value

The coming weeks will test the durability of this optimistic market posture as investors confront key data points, including the August CPI inflation report, consumer sentiment figures, and potential developments on trade policy. Historical precedent suggests September often brings increased market volatility; the current environment differs significantly from past cycles due to the Fed’s explicit commitment to policy normalisation.

While technical indicators show investor positioning has become somewhat extended, introducing near-term correction risks, the fundamental backdrop of potential rate cuts, combined with resilient corporate earnings, supports continued market advancement. The critical distinction this time involves the quality of the underlying assets driving the market.

Unlike previous cycles, where broad-based speculation fuelled gains, the current environment rewards careful stock selection focused on companies with demonstrable earnings power and sustainable competitive advantages.

This nuanced market landscape demands intellectual rigour and disciplined analysis from investors. The days of indiscriminate buying are over, replaced by an era requiring a granular understanding of both macroeconomic currents and individual company fundamentals.

Powell’s Jackson Hole speech has reset market expectations in profound ways, creating both opportunity and risk that will define investment outcomes for the remainder of 2024. Investors who combine patience with strategic precision while avoiding emotional reactions to short-term volatility will best position themselves to navigate the complex months ahead.

The market’s message is unambiguous: lower rates are coming, but their arrival does not guarantee universal gains. Success will belong to those who recognise that the Fed’s policy shift merely creates favourable conditions; the real work of identifying enduring value remains squarely the investor’s responsibility.

As we move toward September’s pivotal Federal Reserve meeting, the financial world watches with bated breath, knowing that the decisions made in the coming weeks will reverberate through markets for years to come.

 

Source: https://e27.co/powells-pivot-how-jackson-hole-reshaped-markets-and-what-comes-next-20250825/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Keep Calm: Hong Kong’s Stablecoin Rules Explained

Keep Calm: Hong Kong’s Stablecoin Rules Explained

Let’s be clear about Hong Kong’s new stablecoin regime. After months of poring over statutes, speaking with regulators, and sifting the louder myths from the quieter facts, the signal is finally audible through the noise. Much of the commentary mistakes a drizzle for a monsoon. If you’ve been fretting about whether Tether suddenly needs a Hong Kong license, or whether buying USDT at a neighborhood shop has become illicit, exhale. What follows is a plain-English guide to what the rules actually do—no hedging, no techno-mystique, just the architecture as written. Think of it as a field note from someone who’s read the fine print so you don’t have to.

Here’s the frame: the Stablecoins Ordinance took effect on August 1. Serious teams moved ahead of that date because the Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) spent years laying the groundwork and finalized its guidance only recently. The core principle is straightforward. If you’re issuing new fiat-referenced stablecoins—think USDT or USDC-style instruments pegged to a sovereign currency—you need the HKMA’s blessing. No license, no minting in Hong Kong. Full stop.

The biggest misconception is scope. These rules are not a blanket on every imaginable interaction with a stablecoin. They are tightly aimed at issuance—the moment a token is created and enters circulation. When the law describes “regulated activity,” it means minting, not downstream trading. If baking bread is issuance, groceries and restaurants are secondary markets. The ordinance regulates the bakery, not the bodega. Swapping USDT at a Hong Kong OTC desk or trading it on a local exchange does not, by itself, breach the rulebook. A great many people have been panicking over the wrong thing.

Which brings us to Tether and Circle, the familiar elephants in the room. Do USDT and USDC need Hong Kong licenses? No. And it’s not a matter of corporate intransigence; it’s baked into the statute. The ordinance targets stablecoins issued in Hong Kong and pegged to the Hong Kong dollar. USDT and USDC are minted offshore and reference the U.S. dollar. Unless those firms decide to launch a brand-new HKD-pegged product from within Hong Kong—a prospect for which they’ve shown no appetite—they fall outside the framework as written. That’s not defiance; it’s design.

So what counts as “in Hong Kong”? Not where someone clicks “mint” on a laptop. The analysis looks at the whole enterprise: legal domicile, where operations are run, where reserves are held, and how and to whom the product is marketed. A Cayman-registered firm that runs its day-to-day from a central office, holds reserves with local institutions, and pushes its product to Hong Kong users is very likely within the HKMA’s remit. Blockchains may be borderless; businesses are not.

That naturally leads to the term “active promotion.” The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) has long drawn a line here: marketing to Hong Kong residents without the right approvals is risky. But “active promotion” is more than merely having a website that loads in Kowloon. It looks like targeted campaigns at Hong Kong users, accepting local payment rails, publishing Chinese-language materials aimed at this market, running roadshows or community events here, and regularly pitching local platforms or investors. If your sales team courts Hong Kong exchanges and you host meetups in central, that’s active promotion. If your site is globally visible but you do nothing to cultivate Hong Kong users, you’re far less exposed. Intent matters; you can’t “accidentally” market to Hong Kong.

Another point lost in the rumor mill: the HKMA can’t conjure new obligations by fiat. Any expansion of regulated activities must be announced through the Hong Kong Gazette. This is not creeping, back-channel rulemaking. It’s a transparent process with public notice. So if someone warns you that “OTC desks might be randomly banned next month,” they’re trading in speculation, not law. The ordinance sets the perimeter; widening it requires due procedure.

On licensing, this is where theory meets practice. Unlike many financial licenses, you don’t just download an application packet and hit “submit.” You first sit down—formally—with the HKMA. That pre-application conversation is a filter. Supervisors will test your model: how you mint and redeem, how reserves are safeguarded, how audits work, and how you’d handle stress. Why the gatekeeping? Because Hong Kong doesn’t intend to franchise dozens of interchangeable issuers. The HKMA has said as much: the market cannot sustain a crowd of “USDC-but-with-a-new-name” projects. They want serious operators with real systems, not façades.

Teams that have gone through these preliminaries report a consistent hierarchy of concern: protect users first, everything else second. Reserve quality sits at the top—cash and cash equivalents that are liquid, high-grade, and cleanly custodied. Segregation is scrutinized: are customer assets bankruptcy-remote? Redemption mechanics are stress-tested: can users get out, at par, under pressure? One applicant spent multiple meetings walking through their audit pipeline—frequency, independence, scope. The message is blunt: if you cannot prove, not merely promise, that your token is fully and transparently backed, don’t queue up.

What about non-HKD stablecoins? The current rules are deliberately narrow: they explicitly target HKD-pegged products. A U.S. dollar-referenced coin issued from Hong Kong is not automatically captured unless it’s being actively marketed here as a payment instrument. That leaves a gray band that the HKMA will almost certainly address over time. For now, a euro-pegged token issued in Hong Kong but aimed solely at European users likely sits outside the scope. Start touting it to Hong Kong consumers as a way to pay for dim sum, and you’ve crossed into regulated territory.

This targeted approach distinguishes Hong Kong from the EU’s MiCA, which sweeps far more broadly. Hong Kong’s priority is the stability and credibility of the Hong Kong dollar. That’s strategically sensible. You do not want a proliferation of unofficial “digital HKD”s fragmenting the monetary system. It also means day-to-day usage of the big, dollar-referenced incumbents—USDT among them—remains largely unaffected. Markets haven’t convulsed because, for most users, little changes in the near term. The sharper impact will be on would-be issuers of local-currency tokens.

Timing matters. The ordinance cleared LegCo in May and took legal effect on August 1. With the law now in force, the pre-application and formal filing process is underway. Expect the first approvals, if any, to arrive no earlier than early 2026. The HKMA has signaled—as clearly as regulators ever do—that speed will not be the metric. That’s a feature, not a bug. Fast-tracked licensing has gone poorly elsewhere; Hong Kong is opting for methodical vetting.

For ordinary residents, the near-term impact is modest. Your ability to buy USDT or USDC is not suddenly curtailed. The meaningful change will come if local firms begin offering HKD-pegged tokens for everyday payments. Those products will require HKMA approval, and rightly so. Imagine taxi apps, supermarkets, or utility providers each pushing their own “digital HKD.” Without guardrails, you’d get fragmentation and confusion. The ordinance is an anti-chaos measure as much as a pro-innovation one.

A final plea against absolutism: this framework is neither an existential threat to crypto nor a magic wand for financial modernization. It is a pragmatic, bounded attempt to protect monetary stability while creating a lane for credible innovation. When the HKMA says the market can support only a handful of issuers, it isn’t stinginess; it’s prudence. You don’t need twenty digital Hong Kong dollars. You need one or two that the public can trust.

The deeper story is cultural. Hong Kong is pivoting from crypto spectacle to institutional plumbing. After the carnage of 2022, the city is choosing guardrails first and productization later. That may feel slow to the “move fast and break things” set, but ask anyone burned by opaque reserves and imploding pegs whether deliberation is a vice or a virtue. This is what learning looks like.

So, practical advice. First, map your activity honestly against the ordinance: are you issuing or merely facilitating use? Second, if issuance is anywhere in scope, start or continue the pre-application dialogue with the HKMA now; it’s already in effect. Third, treat Telegram lore and X threads as background noise and rely on the published guidance. The statute itself reads like legal spaghetti, but the HKMA’s plain-language materials are, refreshingly, actually plain.

The regime is not perfect—no regime is—but it is necessary. Stablecoins now function as critical rails for the broader digital-asset economy; leaving them ungoverned invites familiar disasters. By focusing on the HKD, Hong Kong is protecting its monetary core without strangling optionality elsewhere. The real test will come when the first applications are approved or rejected. That’s when we’ll see just how tight the screws really are. Until then, trade the anxiety for accuracy. When the subject is money, clarity isn’t a luxury—it’s the whole point. We’ve done enough guessing. It’s time to deal in facts.

 

Source: https://intpolicydigest.org/keep-calm-hong-kong-s-stablecoin-rules-explained/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j