The recent US military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, announced by President Donald Trump on Saturday, have thrust the ongoing Iran-Israel conflict into a new and dangerous phase, sending ripples of uncertainty through global markets. Investors, already grappling with mixed signals from US stock performance and upcoming economic indicators, are now forced to weigh the potential fallout of this unprecedented escalation.
In my view, this moment represents a critical juncture—not just for financial markets, but for the broader trajectory of global stability and economic health. Below, I’ll unpack the myriad factors at play, offering a detailed exploration of how these developments are shaping the world as we know it.
The geopolitical powder keg: US strikes and Iran’s retaliation
The announcement that the United States had directly entered the Iran-Israel conflict by launching attacks on three Iranian nuclear sites—Fordo, Natanz, and Isfahan—caught markets and analysts off guard. This operation, executed in coordination with Israel and involving over 125 aircraft and bunker-buster munitions, marks a significant departure from the US’s previous role as a diplomatic and indirect supporter in this regional standoff.
These strikes targeted key components of Iran’s nuclear program, a move that signals a bold escalation aimed at curbing Tehran’s nuclear ambitions. The immediate aftermath has been anything but reassuring. Iran responded swiftly with missile and drone attacks on Israeli cities, coupled with threats to target US military bases in the Gulf. This tit-for-tat retaliation has heightened fears of a broader conflict that could engulf the Middle East, a region already fraught with tension.
This escalation is a double-edged sword. On one hand, the US and Israel may view it as a necessary step to deter Iran’s nuclear progress, potentially stabilising the region in the long term by weakening a perceived threat. On the other hand, the immediate risk of miscalculation or overreaction could plunge the region—and by extension, the global economy—into chaos.
The Middle East is a linchpin for global oil markets, and any disruption here could send shockwaves far beyond its borders. As an observer, I can’t help but feel a sense of unease about how delicately balanced this situation is and how quickly it could spiral out of control depending on Iran’s next move.
Market reactions: A mixed bag of caution and resilience
The financial markets have responded to these developments with a blend of caution and measured resilience, reflecting the uncertainty that defines this moment. On Friday, before the US strikes were announced, US stock markets closed with mixed results: the Dow Jones Industrial Average eked out a modest gain of 0.08 per cent, while the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite slipped by 0.22 per cent and 0.51 per cent, respectively.
This uneven performance hints at investor hesitation even before the weekend’s bombshell news. By Monday, as the new trading week began, Asian equities opened lower, and US equity index futures pointed to a downward start for Wall Street, suggesting that the geopolitical shock is starting to weigh more heavily on global risk sentiment.
What strikes me here is the flight to safety that’s becoming evident in other asset classes. US Treasury yields, for instance, were mostly lower on Friday, with the 10-year yield dipping to 4.37 per cent and the 2-year yield falling to 3.90 per cent. This decline in yields—a drop of more than 1 basis point for the 10-year and over three basis points for the two-year—signals that investors are piling into government bonds, traditionally seen as a safe haven during times of uncertainty.
Gold, another classic refuge, held steady at US$3,368.68 per ounce, showing little movement, while Brent crude oil unexpectedly fell by 2.33 per cent to US$77.01 per barrel. The muted reaction in oil prices surprised me, given the Middle East’s critical role in global energy supplies. It suggests that, for now, investors aren’t pricing in a significant disruption, but that could change in an instant if the conflict intensifies.
Cryptocurrencies: A barometer of risk appetite
The cryptocurrency market, often a bellwether for risk appetite, has not been immune to the turbulence. Bitcoin, the world’s largest cryptocurrency by market value, took a sharp dive on Sunday, dropping 4.13 per cent to US$99,237 by mid-morning Eastern Time. Ether, the second-largest, fared even worse, plummeting 8.52 per cent to US$2,199. This sell-off sent Bitcoin below the psychological US$100,000 support level, a threshold that traders watch closely.
Popular trader Cas Abbe, in a post on X, warned that Bitcoin could slide further to the US$93,000–US$94,000 range before finding a bottom. The weakness didn’t stop with Bitcoin; it dragged other major altcoins, such as ETH, XRP, SOL, and HYPE, below their respective support levels, signalling a broader souring of sentiment in the cryptocurrency space.
Yet, there’s a glimmer of hope—or perhaps speculative optimism-in Bitcoin’s late-Sunday recovery, as it climbed back above US$101,000. To me, this rebound, alongside the modest moves in gold and subdued reactions in oil and equity futures, hints that some traders are betting on a contained conflict rather than a sustained geopolitical crisis.
Still, the volatility in cryptocurrencies underscores a broader risk-off mood. As someone who has closely followed these markets, I see this as a reflection of how intertwined digital assets have become with global events—once seen as a fringe phenomenon, they’re now a real-time gauge of investor sentiment.
Economic data: The next piece of the puzzle
Amid this geopolitical maelstrom, the US economic calendar is poised to deliver critical data that could either calm or inflame market jitters. Tonight, we’ll see the preliminary S&P Global US PMI readings for June, which measure the health of the manufacturing and service sectors, alongside existing home sales data for May, a key indicator of consumer confidence and the vitality of the housing market.
A strong PMI could signal that the US economy is holding up despite external pressures, potentially buoying investor confidence. Conversely, a weak reading might stoke fears of a slowdown, amplifying the uncertainty already swirling around the Iran-Israel conflict.
The housing data, meanwhile, offers a window into how American consumers are faring. A drop in existing home sales could suggest that high interest rates and economic uncertainty are eroding confidence, while a robust figure might counterbalance some of the geopolitical gloom.
Personally, I’m inclined to think these numbers will be pivotal—not just for markets, but for the Federal Reserve’s next moves, which I’ll explore shortly. In a world where every data point is scrutinised, tonight’s releases feel like a potential tipping point.
The Fed’s delicate dance: Rates, inflation, and oil
Speaking of the Federal Reserve, Fed Governor Christopher Waller’s recent comments have added another layer to this intricate narrative. On Friday, he noted that inflation was softening to a level where the Fed could contemplate cutting interest rates at its July meeting.
This dovish tilt sent US Treasury yields lower and contributed to a 0.20 per cent decline in the US Dollar Index to 98.71. For me, Waller’s remarks are a ray of light in an otherwise stormy outlook—lower rates could stimulate an economy facing headwinds from tariffs and now geopolitical risks. But here’s the catch: the Iran-Israel conflict could upend this calculus.
If the conflict disrupts oil supplies—say, through Iranian retaliation targeting Gulf infrastructure or the Strait of Hormuz—oil prices could surge. Analysts from JPMorgan have cautioned that an all-out conflict might push oil above US$100 per barrel, a level not seen since 2022.
Higher energy costs would act like a tax on consumers and businesses, potentially reigniting inflation just as the Fed hopes to tame it. In my view, this puts the Fed in a bind: cut rates to support growth and risk fueling inflation, or hold steady and risk choking an economy already under strain. It’s a tightrope walk, and the geopolitical wild card makes it all the more precarious.
The bigger picture: Global economic risks and opportunities
Zooming out, the implications of this conflict extend far beyond immediate market swings. The Middle East accounts for a substantial portion of global oil production, and any prolonged disruption could significantly impact economies that rely heavily on energy imports.
Higher oil prices would squeeze consumer spending, slow economic growth, and possibly tip the world into a stagflationary spiral, characterised by stagnant growth paired with rising prices. For the US, already navigating Trump’s tariff-driven economic policies, this could compound existing challenges, creating a perfect storm of inflationary pressures and reduced demand.
Yet, there’s a flip side. If the conflict de-escalates, perhaps through diplomatic breakthroughs or a mutual stand-down, markets could stabilise, and attention might shift back to economic fundamentals. A contained outcome could even spur long-term shifts, such as accelerated investments in renewable energy or alternative oil sources, thereby reducing dependence on the volatile Middle East.
I see both peril and potential here: the risk of a downturn is real, but so is the chance for resilience and adaptation if cooler heads prevail.
My take: A call for vigilance
In my opinion, we’re at a crossroads where vigilance is paramount. The US strikes on Iran have upped the ante, and while markets haven’t yet priced in a worst-case scenario, the potential for escalation looms large. Investors should keep a close eye on Iran’s response, tonight’s economic data, and the Fed’s July meeting.
For now, the flight to safety, into Treasuries and, to a lesser extent, gold, makes sense, but the muted oil reaction and Bitcoin’s partial recovery suggest a fragile hope that this won’t spiral out of control.
Personally, I’m torn. Part of me fears the domino effect of a broader conflict: higher oil prices, stalled growth, and a Fed with its hands tied. Another part wonders if this could be a catalyst for overdue shifts in global energy and geopolitical strategies.
Either way, the stakes are sky-high, and the coming days will tell us much about where this road leads. For investors and ordinary folks alike, staying informed and agile is the best defence against a world that feels increasingly unpredictable.
Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.
Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.
An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.
