Tariffs, tech crashes, crypto dips, and gold’s record run: Why markets are in chaos today

Tariffs, tech crashes, crypto dips, and gold’s record run: Why markets are in chaos today

This week, the interplay of US-Japan trade talks, US-China tariff escalations, and new restrictions on chip exports has kept markets on edge. Meanwhile, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s measured response to the turmoil has dashed hopes for immediate intervention, leaving investors to grapple with volatile asset prices and shifting risk sentiment.

The current market landscape is a complex tapestry of competing forces, from Bitcoin’s resilience to Ethereum’s technical signals, US equities’ performance, and gold’s safe-haven allure. Below, I offer my perspective on these developments, weaving together the broader macroeconomic context, asset-specific dynamics, and the implications for investors navigating this fraught environment.

The tentative global risk sentiment reflects the high stakes of ongoing tariff negotiations, particularly between the US and its major trading partners. The advancement of US-Japan trade talks, marked by President Trump’s optimistic claim of “big progress,” provided a modest lift to Japanese equities, with the Nikkei 225 gaining slightly. However, the yen weakened as investors priced in the likelihood of a deal that could avert higher US levies on Japanese goods, particularly in the auto sector. This development underscores Japan’s delicate balancing act: while a trade agreement could stabilise its export-driven economy, a stronger US dollar against the yen could pressure Japanese manufacturers’ competitiveness. The Bank of Japan, already grappling with a low-yield environment, may face further constraints if US tariffs dampen economic growth, as Governor Kazuo Ueda recently hinted.

For investors, the yen’s trajectory and Japan’s market performance hinge on the specifics of any deal—whether it prioritises market access or imposes new non-tariff barriers.

The US-China trade war, however, remains the epicentre of market anxiety. The White House’s confirmation of a staggering 245 per cent cumulative tariff rate on Chinese imports, following China’s retaliatory 125 per cent levies on US goods, signals a deepening economic standoff. This tit-for-tat escalation, coupled with new US restrictions on chip exports by Nvidia and AMD, has battered technology stocks and fueled fears of disrupted global supply chains. The chip export curbs, targeting Nvidia’s H20 and AMD’s MI308 AI chips, are a strategic move to limit China’s access to advanced technology, but they come at a cost: Nvidia estimates a US$5.5 billion hit to its revenue, and its shares slumped nearly seven per cent.

The broader tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite fell 3.1 per cent, contributing to the MSCI US index’s 2.2 per cent decline. These developments highlight the fragility of the tech sector, which has been a cornerstone of US market performance but is now vulnerable to geopolitical shocks.

China’s response has been multifaceted, blending defiance with pragmatism. Beijing’s vow to “fight to the end” against US tariffs is tempered by signals of openness to negotiations, suggesting a desire to avoid a complete collapse of trade relations. However, China’s reported sale of confiscated cryptocurrency holdings, including Bitcoin, amid an economic slowdown, adds another layer of complexity.

This move, likely driven by the need to bolster fiscal reserves, has sparked speculation about its impact on crypto markets. Remarkably, Bitcoin has shown resilience, holding above US$84,000 despite the sales. This strength can be attributed to Bitcoin’s growing perception as a hedge against macroeconomic uncertainty, particularly as central banks and investors seek alternatives to traditional assets amid trade war volatility. Posts on X reflect this sentiment, with some users noting Bitcoin’s 64 per cent market dominance—a level not seen since early 2021—as evidence of its safe-haven appeal.

Ethereum, by contrast, has struggled, slipping below US$1,600 and entering a technically bearish phase. An analysis by CryptoQuant’s abramchart offers a nuanced perspective, suggesting that Ethereum’s current price near its realised price of US$1,585 could signal a deep-value accumulation zone. Historically, such levels have preceded major bull runs as long-term holders re-enter the market. However, technical indicators paint a mixed picture: Ethereum’s breach of its 20-day moving average and its position well below the 200-day average confirm a strong downtrend, while the relative strength index near 40 indicates weak momentum.

The compressed Bollinger Bands suggest a potential breakout, but the direction remains uncertain. For investors, Ethereum’s current dynamics present both opportunity and risk. While the realised price level hints at undervaluation, the broader market’s risk-off mood and trade war headwinds could delay a rebound.

The Federal Reserve’s role in this turbulent environment cannot be overstated. Chair Jerome Powell’s remarks this week, emphasising a wait-and-see approach to tariffs, have quashed expectations of a “Fed put”—a swift policy response to stabilise markets. Powell’s caution is rooted in the dual risks of higher inflation and slower growth, which tariffs are “highly likely” to exacerbate. His acknowledgement that the Fed faces a “highly uncertain outlook” underscores the central bank’s dilemma: cutting rates could fuel inflation while holding or raising rates risks stifling growth and employment. The Fed’s benchmark rate, currently between 4.25 per cent and 4.5 per cent, reflects this holding pattern, with traders still betting on cuts by June despite Powell’s reticence. The Fed’s data-dependent stance, coupled with solid economic indicators like March’s 228,000 job additions, suggests that any policy shift will hinge on clearer evidence of tariff-related economic fallout.

Fixed-income markets have also felt the strain, with US Treasury yields edging lower as investors reassess growth prospects. The 10-year yield fell 5.6 basis points to 4.28 per cent, and the two-year yield dropped 7.5 basis points to 3.77 per cent, reflecting concerns about a potential recession. The US dollar index’s 0.8 per cent decline, reaching its lowest level since April 2022, signals waning confidence in US assets as investors pivot to safe-haven currencies such as the Japanese yen and Swiss franc. Gold, meanwhile, has surged 3.5 per cent to a record US$3,339 per ounce, with ANZ Bank forecasting a rise to US$3,600 by year-end.

This rally, driven by central bank purchases and haven demand, underscores gold’s role as a bulwark against geopolitical and economic uncertainty. Brent crude’s 1.8 per cent rise to around US$65 per barrel, spurred by US sanctions on Chinese importers of Iranian oil, highlights the ripple effects of trade policies on commodity markets.

US equities, particularly the energy sector, have shown pockets of resilience, with energy stocks gaining 0.8 per cent amid higher oil prices. However, the broader MSCI US index’s 2.2 per cent tumble reflects the tech sector’s drag and broader tariff fears. Asian equities, trading in a tight range, have been buoyed by hopes of Chinese stimulus, but volatility persists as negotiation headlines dominate. US equity futures, pointing to a 0.4 per cent higher open, suggest a tentative recovery, but the market’s direction remains contingent on trade developments.

From my perspective, the current market environment demands a disciplined, long-term approach. The escalation of US-China tariffs and chip export restrictions poses significant risks to global growth, particularly for the tech and manufacturing sectors. However, opportunities exist in assets such as Bitcoin and gold, which are benefiting from their safe-haven status. Ethereum’s technical setup, while bearish, suggests potential for accumulation by patient investors.

Powell’s cautious stance, while frustrating for those seeking immediate relief, is a prudent response to an unprecedented policy shock. Investors should focus on diversification, prioritising assets with strong fundamentals and resilience to geopolitical volatility. The road ahead is fraught with uncertainty, but those who navigate it with clarity and conviction may find opportunities amid the storm.

In conclusion, the global markets are at a crossroads, shaped by the interplay of trade tensions, monetary policy, and shifting investor sentiment. The US-China tariff war, US-Japan trade talks, and the Fed’s watchful stance are driving volatility across equities, currencies, and commodities. Bitcoin’s resilience, Ethereum’s accumulation potential, and gold’s surge highlight the divergent paths assets are taking in this environment. As negotiations unfold and economic data clarifies the tariff impact, investors must remain agile, balancing risk and opportunity in a rapidly evolving landscape.

 

Source: https://e27.co/why-markets-are-in-chaos-today-20250417/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

After Terra, Luna crashes, regulators count cost of crypto

After Terra, Luna crashes, regulators count cost of crypto

Spectacular collapse of stablecoin puts focus on regulatory frameworks in South Korea and Singapore.

Taipei, Taiwan – As the crypto winter deepened this month, one wealth-destroying event – the collapse of the TerraUSD (UST) and Luna coins – has brought the human cost of unstable cryptocurrency projects to the surface.

UST, a so-called “algorithmic stablecoin,” plummeted over the last week as it lost its peg against the US dollar and sent its sistercoin Luna crashing to zero, erasing about $45bn. The crash wiped out the savings of untold numbers of investors overnight.

“I felt my heart sink watching Luna go into that downward spiral,” Hank Kennedy, a factory worker in Chicago, told Al Jazeera. “It (the crash) has had a huge impact on my life.

“Now I’m behind on all my bills, and I’ve lost $40,000, which was everything I had in my savings,” Kennedy added. “I was actually thinking that I would be able to make enough money to pay my home off, but instead, I’ve lost everything.”

The incident epitomises regulators’ nightmare scenario of crypto projects going wrong and prompted US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen to call for regulation of stablecoins – whose selling point is their supposed stability due to being pegged to another currency or commodity – by year’s end. Former lawyers at the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) say the agency is probably already investigating the case.

In Asia, regulators may also have impetus to act.

Do Kwon, the creator of the cryptos, is a South Korean national, while Terraform Labs and the Luna Foundation Guard, the organisations that support the digital coins, are both registered in Singapore.

South Korean authorities launched an “emergency investigation” into the case this week. Investors in Singapore have filed police reports, although authorities have yet to make any move.

Kwon wrote on Twitter last week that he was “heartbroken” about the pain his invention had brought investors and that neither he nor the companies associated with the project had sold UST or Luna to profit from the crash. The statements came after the founder earlier that day proposed a “revival plan” to restart the network and distribute ownership of the project via one billion new tokens issued to holders of the collapsed currency. Kwon and the Luna Foundation Guard did not respond to requests for comment before publication.

The crash comes amid a rethink of the city state’s regulatory approach to digital assets as it tries to position itself as a responsible crypto hub. Singapore’s response could set a precedent as the social and economic costs of poorly managed projects come into sharper focus.

Singapore
Singapore is trying to position itself as a responsible crypto hub [File: Ore Huiying/Bloomberg]

“The government of Singapore is not going to be impressed that a firm registered in its country, with no real material ties to the city-state, has caused such damage to investors around the world,” Sam Reynolds, a Taipei-based crypto analyst at CoinDesk, told Al Jazeera.

“This is likely to lead to a further tightening of rules surrounding crypto firms registered in Singapore for jurisdictional preference yet conducting business primarily abroad,” he added.

Singapore’s parliament had already passed a law last month to increase oversight of firms like Luna that are domestically registered crypto companies but mainly operate abroad.

Under its Payments Services Act 2019, entities that offer payment instruments, such as algorithmic stablecoins, require a Digital Payment Token Services (DPTS) licence. Though Singapore has only issued a DPTS licence to a handful of firms, it has granted many more companies temporary exemptions from the law.

Yet when billions went up in smoke up this month, Kwon’s organizations had neither a DPTS licence nor an official exemption, according to Singapore’s Financial Institutions Directory.

Its failure to register is the first of three interrelated factors that lay compelling grounds for legal intervention by the city-state, according to Anndy Lian, a Singaporean crypto thought leader and author of Blockchain Revolution 2030.

“The second (factor) is this was a stablecoin,” Lian said, noting that since it was advertised as having parity with the US dollar and boasted 20 percent yields, it appealed to investors looking to stake their savings over time. This differentiates it from other cryptocurrencies whose price floats freely and are conducive to speculative trading.

“That means many retail investors got hurt on the pretext they had bought into the project because it is a stablecoin,” said Lian.

“From a Singaporean perspective, if you are a retail investor and you feel that you have been a victim of fraud, and have lost a certain amount of dollars on paper even though you held your investment and did not sell … that is a possible lawsuit Singaporeans can pursue or the government can pursue,” he said.

Cooperation with foreign regulators

The third reason is Kwon’s planned “fork” – the closing of the original network and launching a substitute – which has been put forth to revive the currency. Lian said such a move would  “dilute all the shareholders” and redistribute the tokens in a way that is likely to be highly inequitable.

“I think the Singaporean government will surely take some action after the fork is attempted,” he said.

South Korea’s Financial Supervisory Service (FSS) said this week that increased cooperation with foreign authorities is needed to regulate crypto after the Luna crash.

Lian believes Singapore may coordinate with foreign regulators on the case, too.

“Because this is a global event, there might be a common interest for the US and Singapore to work together on this case,” he said.

Lian said any action should not set the wrong precedent by insulating crypto investors from all losses.

“It would be misleading if investors believed they can claim losses from all altcoins. This was different since this was a stablecoin. We need to make that demarcation very clear,” he said.

“I think more regulatory clarity would need to be established before crypto-specific cooperation with countries could happen,” Reynolds said, referring to the continuing lawsuit between Terraform Labs and the SEC that seeks to establish if the financial watchdog has jurisdiction over the project.

Even if the company were found liable, it is unclear whether it has the assets to repay investors.

“The question would be, what assets would Terraform Labs and the Luna Foundation Guard have to repay investors?” Reynolds said.

“The Luna Foundation Guard, with its current balance sheet, could only pay out pennies on the dollar. And aside from those balances, it is unlikely that Terraform Labs has material assets sufficient to pay out any claims against it in a meaningful way,” he added.

“Before this happens, we would also need a determination if the collapse happened because of fraud, negligence, a coordinated attack, or market rejection of the platform. Right now, that’s not clear.”

Do Kwon
Terraform Labs founder Do Kwon is a South Korean national who registered his company in Singapore [File: Woohae Cho/Bloomberg]

Lian said regulators will look for a strong expression of shared grievances to justify moving forward with a case in Singapore.

In recent days, an online community in South Korea named “Victims of Terra-Luna coin” has been formed for this purpose.

Kennedy, the US worker who lost his funds, said he would readily join a class action lawsuit against Kwon.

“(This is) the reason why people like me try to talk with him on Twitter every day … to get some type of answers,” he said.

As regulators mull over their next move, the saga has offered industry players a moment of pause to reflect on what constitutes good governance and sound investing.

“It will take time to get the trust back,” Lian said, adding the case has spooked institutional investors in Singapore.

“I think we need to rethink what decentralisation means. What will happen next with Luna will not be based on any consensus formed among its community.”

Reynolds said investors should do their research and ensure they have diversified their assets.

“On paper, algorithmic stablecoins were a good idea but the industry is coming dangerously close to a ‘2008 moment’ as a result of one project’s outsized ambition,” he said. “The VCs that backed Terra need to have a serious think about how we got to this moment.”

SOURCE: AL JAZEERA

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j