October 21st, 2023

Coinbase’s MPI License: A Game-Changer For Crypto In Singapore, But A Challenge For Competitors

Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the US, has recently obtained a Major Payment Institution (MPI) licence from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the country’s central bank and financial regulator. This licence will allow Coinbase to offer regulated digital payment token (DPT) products and services in Singapore, such as buying and selling cryptocurrencies, storing them in wallets, and transferring them to other users.

They not the first crypto exchange to receive an MPI licence from MAS. In June 2023, two other platforms, Crypto.com and Circle, were also granted full licences after obtaining in-principle approvals in 2021. However, Coinbase is arguably the most prominent and influential one among them, given its global reach, market capitalization, and reputation.

Coinbase’s entry into the Singaporean market is seen by many as a positive sign for the crypto industry in the region, as it reflects the country’s openness and support for innovation and digital finance. Singapore has been widely regarded as a crypto-friendly jurisdiction, with a clear and progressive regulatory framework for DPT service providers under the Payment Services Act (PSA) that came into effect in 2020.

According to the PSA, any entity that provides DPT services in Singapore must obtain a licence from MAS, either as a standard payment institution (SPI) or as an MPI. The difference between the two types of licences lies in the scale and scope of their operations. SPIs can provide any combination of regulated payment services, but are subject to transactional volume or e-money limits. MPIs have no such limits, but are subject to more stringent requirements, such as safeguarding customer funds, complying with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing rules, and submitting regular audits and reports to MAS.

By obtaining an MPI licence, Coinbase has demonstrated its ability and willingness to meet the high standards set by MAS for DPT service providers. This could give it a competitive edge over other crypto exchanges that operate in Singapore, especially those that have not yet obtained a licence or are still waiting for approval.

As mentioned on MAS’s website, there are currently 170 entities that have applied for a licence under the PSA, but only three have been granted full licences so far (Coinbase, Crypto.com, and Circle). Among the applicants are some of the most popular and well-known crypto exchanges in Singapore, such as Binance, Kraken, Coinhako, Gemini, and Independent Reserve. These exchanges have been allowed to continue their operations while their applications are being processed by MAS, under a grace period that was initially supposed to end on July 28, 2021. However, due to the large number of applications and the complexity of the assessment process, MAS has extended the grace period for most applicants until January 28, 2023.

This means that these exchanges have less than four months left to obtain their licences from MAS, or they will have to cease their DPT services in Singapore. This could pose a significant challenge and risk for them, as they may lose their market share and customer base to Coinbase and other licensed platforms.

Competitive Challenges For Other Crypto Exchanges

While Coinbase’s MPI license is undoubtedly a boon for the company, it also presents a competitive challenge for other crypto exchanges operating in Singapore. Here are some key challenges they are likely to face:

Regulatory Compliance Pressure: The foremost challenge for competitors is the need to meet the stringent regulatory standards set by MAS. Coinbase’s compliance with these standards sets a high bar, and other exchanges will need to invest significant resources to achieve similar levels of regulatory approval.
Increased Competition: Coinbase’s entry into the Singaporean market intensifies competition. As a well-established global exchange, Coinbase has a strong brand presence and the resources to invest in marketing, user acquisition, and product development. Competitors will need to step up their game to compete effectively.
User Trust and Confidence: Coinbase’s MPI license not only signifies regulatory compliance but also implies a higher degree of trust and confidence from users. Competitors will need to work harder to gain the trust of customers and differentiate themselves in a market where regulatory compliance and security are paramount.

Recommendations For Success In The Singaporean Crypto Market

To thrive in this evolving landscape and address the challenges posed by Coinbase’s MPI license, crypto exchanges in Singapore should consider several strategic approaches:

Collaborate with Local Partners: Building relationships with local financial institutions, fintech companies, and government agencies can help crypto exchanges navigate the complex regulatory landscape in Singapore. Collaborations can also open doors to new markets and customer segments.
Innovate New Products and Services: To stand out in a competitive market, exchanges should focus on innovation. Developing new products and services that cater to the unique needs and preferences of Singaporean users can help differentiate them from Coinbase and other competitors.
Educate Customers and Regulators: Crypto exchanges should actively engage in educational initiatives aimed at both customers and regulators. Providing resources and information on responsible crypto use, security practices, and the benefits of blockchain technology can help build trust and bridge knowledge gaps.
Adapt to Changing Market Conditions: The crypto industry is known for its rapid evolution. Exchanges must remain agile and adaptable to changing market conditions, regulatory updates, and technological advancements. Staying ahead of the curve can be a key differentiator.
Foster Regulatory Relationships: Building positive relationships with regulators is essential. Exchanges should actively engage with regulatory authorities, participate in industry consultations, and contribute to the development of fair and effective crypto regulations.
Emphasize Security and Compliance: Like Coinbase, prioritizing security measures and regulatory compliance is non-negotiable. Exchanges should invest in robust security infrastructure and continuously monitor for potential vulnerabilities or risks.
Customer-Centric Approach: To succeed in a competitive market, exchanges should prioritize the needs and concerns of their customers. Providing excellent customer service, transparent fee structures, and responsive support channels can help build loyalty and trust.
Diversify Product Offerings: Beyond trading, exchanges should consider diversifying their product offerings. This could include services like staking, lending, or even non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Diversification can attract a broader user base and increase revenue streams.

In Conclusion

Coinbase’s MPI license from MAS is a watershed moment for the cryptocurrency industry in Singapore. It signifies not only the legitimization of digital assets but also the importance of regulatory compliance and security within the sector. While this development poses competitive challenges for other crypto exchanges operating in the country, it also sets a high standard that can benefit the entire industry.

Success in the Singaporean crypto market will require a combination of regulatory adherence, innovation, customer education, and adaptability. By focusing on these aspects and strategically positioning themselves, other exchanges can thrive alongside Coinbase in this dynamic and rapidly evolving sector. Ultimately, the success of these exchanges will contribute to the broader adoption and acceptance of cryptocurrencies in Singapore and around the world.

Source: https://www.nasdaq.com/articles/coinbases-mpi-license:-a-game-changer-for-crypto-in-singapore-but-a-challenge-for

Anndy Lian

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com

j j j

October 20th, 2023

Asian nations more cautious of crypto regulation after Hamas taps digital assets for Israel strike

The use of crypto by Hamas is a warning for Asian nations looking to regulate digital assets, and highlights the need for standardised laws, analysts say
In Asia, just Singapore and Hong Kong have regulated cryptocurrency markets but scandals and collapses of crypto exchanges continue to test investors’ faith

The use of cryptocurrency by Hamas to fund its strike on Israel is likely to raise red flags in Asian countries that are framing regulations to govern the digital currency, and underscores the need for harmonising standards, analysts have said.

According to a report in The Wall Street Journal, three militant groups – Hamas, Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), and their Lebanese ally Hezbollah – received large amounts of crypto funds in the year leading up to the October 7 attack.

“It is a kick on the backside for most governments. All regulatory bodies will take a closer look at crypto regulation. Governments will need to start implementing new rules and regulations,” said Raj Kapoor, founder of India Blockchain Alliance.

At the G20 summit in New Delhi last month, a joint declaration called for the regulation, supervision and oversight of crypto assets, among other things, with the bloc saying it would support “a coordinated and comprehensive policy and regulatory framework”.

Kapoor, who was a speaker at one of the G20 committee meetings on cryptocurrency assets, said the statement had not been translated into action. It was time to revisit the declaration and come up with solutions to back it, he said.

Digital-currency wallets that Israeli authorities linked to the PIJ received as much as US$93 million in cryptocurrency between August 2021 and June this year, the WSJ report said, citing analysis by crypto researcher Elliptic.

Wallets connected to Hamas received about US$41 million over a similar time period, the report added, citing research by crypto analytics and software firm BitOK that is based in Tel Aviv.

“Some countries may bring up the narrative that banning cryptocurrencies is the way forward,” said Anndy Lian, Singapore-based author of the book NFT: From Zero to Hero.

“I would argue that banning cryptocurrencies would not stop terrorist financing, but rather drive it underground and make it harder to trace and stop,” he added. “Cryptocurrencies can be traced and tracked, while fiat (currency) such as US dollars cannot.”

Singapore and Hong Kong have regulated cryptocurrency markets, but most of the governments in the region are just beginning to understand the power of cryptocurrencies that could open up new financing opportunities.

However, investors’ faith has been time and again been tested by scandals and collapses of digital exchanges.

Hong Kong’s cryptocurrency sector was recently hit by a JPEX scandal in which more than HK$1.5 billion (US$192 million) went missing, prompting complaints against an ostensibly Hong Kong-based exchange, run by people who have still not been identified.

The revelation about Hamas funding could add to public discomfort, analysts said.

“The disclosure about Hamas could potentially lead to stricter regulations and enhanced scrutiny of crypto transactions in Singapore. It may prompt the MAS to enhance its oversight and enforcement of the crypto sector, as well as to collaborate more closely with other countries to prevent and disrupt terrorist financing through digital assets,” Lian said, referring to Singapore’s central bank.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) has been taking measures to regulate the cryptocurrency industry, and has been one of the first to regulate the sector in Asia. Hong Kong has been following Singapore’s lead.

“While the government recognises the economic and social potential of cryptocurrency, it is also cautious about identifying and managing risks involved, such as consumer protection and anti-money-laundering/counter-financing of terrorism,” Lian added.

But cryptocurrencies could easily be tracked down “so this may not be the best way for terrorist organisations”, said Singapore-based Branson Lee, who runs custody solution provider Custodize.com.

“Finally, there are many tools to track and trace these funds. Overall, the crypto industry remains aware of these risks and has done well since to conform to many regulations from FATF (Financial Action Task Force) to jurisdictional compliance,” he said.

Southeast Asia, with nearly 700 million residents, has one of the world’s fastest-growing populations, with some 480 million of them as active internet users.

Consumers in countries like Vietnam and India have been among the fastest worldwide to adapt to cryptocurrencies, but authorities in many other places have not yet found a path to govern the ecosystem effectively.

India does not have any specific cryptocurrency regulations in place, but has been working on introducing legislation.

Earlier this month, local media reported that a probe by Indian police brought to light a case where 3 million rupees (US$36,000) in cryptocurrency was stolen from the digital wallets of a Delhi-based businessman and transferred to the accounts of Hamas.

Manhar Garegret, India head at digital wallet Liminal, highlighted that Hamas had launched campaigns on social media to raise funds through cryptocurrency, but Israel used its technical know-how to block the crypto accounts.

The case of digital theft in Delhi together with the report on Hamas funding showed why each country needed to have standards for cryptocurrency regulation and use technical know-how to integrate into a global standard, Kapoor said.

“Criminals are always one step ahead, but if you reverse-engineer processes, then you can have some solutions,” he said. “Every country is vulnerable to some extent or the other.”

Source: https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/economics/article/3238397/asian-nations-more-cautious-crypto-regulation-after-hamas-taps-digital-assets-israel-strike

Anndy Lian

www.anndy.com

j j j

October 18th, 2023

Anndy Lian: The Rise of Crypto ETFs and Regulatory Considerations

Crypto assets have been gaining popularity and legitimacy in recent years, attracting the attention of investors, regulators, and policymakers worldwide.

One of the most significant developments in the crypto space is the emergence of crypto exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which are investment vehicles that track the performance of a basket of crypto assets or related products.

Crypto ETFs offer several advantages for investors who want to gain exposure to the crypto market without dealing with the technical and operational challenges of buying, storing, and securing crypto assets directly. They also provide more liquidity, transparency, diversification, and tax efficiency than other forms of crypto investment.

However, several regulatory challenges and uncertainties may limit their growth potential and market acceptance. I will explore the rise of crypto ETFs, their mechanics, regulatory hurdles, and their potential to reshape the investment landscape.

What is a Crypto ETF and How Does It Work?

An ETF is a type of fund that trades on a stock exchange like a regular stock. It typically holds a portfolio of assets that track an underlying index or benchmark, such as a stock index, a commodity, a currency, or a sector. Investors can buy and sell shares of an ETF through a broker or an online platform, just like any other stock.

A crypto ETF is a type of ETF that tracks the performance of a basket of crypto assets or related products. There are different types, depending on how they obtain exposure to the crypto market. Some examples are:

Physical-backed crypto ETFs: They hold actual crypto assets in custody and issue shares that represent a proportional ownership of the underlying assets. For example, a Bitcoin ETF would hold Bitcoin (BTC) in a secure vault and issue shares that reflect the value of Bitcoin.
Futures-based crypto ETFs: They use futures contracts or other derivatives to gain exposure to the price movements of crypto assets without holding them directly. For example, a Bitcoin futures ETF would buy and sell Bitcoin futures contracts on a regulated exchange and issue shares that reflect the value of the contracts.
Synthetic crypto ETFs: They use swaps or other complex financial instruments to replicate the performance of crypto assets without holding them directly or indirectly. For example, a Bitcoin synthetic ETF would enter into an agreement with a counterparty to exchange the returns of Bitcoin for another asset or index.
Crypto-related ETFs: They invest in companies or sectors that are involved in or benefit from the development and adoption of crypto assets and technologies. For example, a blockchain ETF would invest in companies that provide blockchain solutions or services.

Why are Crypto ETFs Popular?

They are popular because they offer several benefits for investors who want to access the crypto market in a convenient and cost-effective way. Some of these benefits are:

Liquidity: Trade on regulated stock exchanges with high volumes and low spreads, which means investors can buy and sell them easily and quickly at any time during market hours. This contrasts with buying and selling crypto assets directly on unregulated or illiquid platforms, which may involve delays, fees, or risks.
Transparency: Disclose their holdings, fees, and performance on a regular basis, which means investors can monitor their investments and make informed decisions. This contrasts with buying and selling crypto assets directly on platforms that may lack adequate disclosure or oversight.
Diversification: Allow investors to diversify their portfolios across different types of crypto assets or related products, which may reduce their overall risk and volatility. This contrasts with buying and selling individual crypto assets directly, which may expose investors to high concentration risk.
Tax efficiency: May offer tax advantages for investors who hold them in certain jurisdictions or accounts. For example, in some countries, investors may defer capital gains taxes on crypto ETFs until they sell them, whereas they may have to pay taxes on every transaction involving direct ownership of crypto assets.
Accessibility: Allow investors to access the crypto market without having to deal with the technical and operational challenges of buying, storing, and securing crypto assets directly. For example, investors do not need to set up digital wallets, manage private keys, or worry about hacks or thefts.

What are the Regulatory Challenges for Crypto ETFs?

Despite their popularity and benefits, crypto ETFs also face several regulatory challenges and uncertainties that may limit their growth potential and market acceptance. Some of these challenges are:

Lack of global harmonization: Crypto assets and related products are subject to different and evolving regulatory frameworks across different jurisdictions, which may create inconsistencies, gaps, or conflicts for crypto ETFs. For example, some countries may allow or ban certain types of crypto ETFs, while others may have different definitions, classifications, or requirements for them.
Lack of clear guidance: Such products are often novel and complex, which may pose difficulties for regulators to understand, monitor, and supervise them. For example, regulators may have questions or concerns about the valuation, custody, liquidity, risk management, or governance of crypto ETFs.
Lack of investor protection: They are often volatile, speculative, and risky, which may expose investors to potential losses or frauds. For example, investors may face market manipulation, cyberattacks, operational failures, or counterparty defaults involving crypto ETFs or their underlying assets or products.
Lack of market infrastructure: It often relies on emerging or untested technologies, platforms, or services, which may lack adequate standards, safeguards, or interoperability for crypto ETFs. For example, crypto ETFs may face challenges or risks in accessing, verifying, or transferring crypto assets or products across different systems or networks.

What is the Potential Impact of Crypto ETFs?

They have the potential to reshape the investment landscape by creating new opportunities and challenges for investors, regulators, and policymakers. Some of the possible impacts are:

Increased adoption and innovation: May increase the adoption and innovation of crypto assets and technologies by making them more accessible and attractive to a wider range of investors, especially institutional and retail investors who may otherwise be reluctant or unable to enter the crypto market directly.
Increased competition and integration: May increase the competition and integration between the traditional and crypto financial systems by creating new products and services that bridge the gap between them. For example, crypto ETFs may enable investors to trade crypto assets on stock exchanges or use them as collateral for loans or derivatives.
Increased regulation and supervision: May increase the regulation and supervision of crypto assets and related products by bringing them under the purview of existing or new regulatory frameworks and authorities. For example, crypto ETFs may require registration, authorization, disclosure, reporting, auditing, or compliance with certain rules or standards.
Increased education and awareness: May increase the education and awareness of crypto assets and technologies by providing more information and resources for investors to learn about them. For example, crypto ETFs may offer educational materials, webinars, podcasts, or newsletters to explain their features, benefits, risks, or performance.

The Bottom Line

Crypto ETFs are a growing phenomenon in the crypto space that offer several advantages for investors who want to gain exposure to the crypto market in a convenient and cost-effective way.

However, it faces several regulatory challenges and uncertainties that may limit their growth potential and market acceptance. They have the potential to reshape the investment landscape by creating new opportunities and challenges for investors, regulators, and policymakers.

Many of my friends are looking forward to the regulated crypto ETFs together with the Bitcoin halving next year. They believe that the real bull run will start from there. Do you feel the same too?

Source: https://www.techopedia.com/anndy-lian-the-rise-of-crypto-etfs-and-regulatory-considerations