Tag Archives: crypto

Bitcoin holds US$71K as Ethereum surges 15%: What’s driving the US$2.44T crypto rally

Bitcoin holds US$71K as Ethereum surges 15%: What’s driving the US$2.44T crypto rally

The digital asset market edged higher, climbing 0.63 per cent to reach a total capitalisation of US$2.44T over the past 24 hours. This modest advance reflects a market searching for direction amid competing forces, with momentum in the Ethereum ecosystem and institutional staking flows providing the primary lift. The move shows a moderate 50 per cent correlation with the S&P 500, which itself rose 0.5 per cent to approximately 6,591.90, suggesting that macro drivers continue to influence both traditional and digital asset classes.

Ethereum’s ecosystem stands out as the clear leader, with its market capitalisation surging by 15.58 per cent over the past 24 hours. This outperformance stems from concrete institutional activity rather than speculative fervour. BitMine Immersion Technologies launched MAVAN, an institutional Ethereum staking platform that now holds over 3.14M ETH, representing roughly US$6.8B in committed capital. This development matters because it channels yield-seeking institutional money into the network, reducing immediate sell pressure and reinforcing Ethereum’s role as a core settlement layer. The ongoing dialogue around Ethereum’s L1 and L2 strategy further strengthens this narrative, positioning the network as foundational infrastructure rather than merely a speculative vehicle. When large players allocate billions toward staking, they signal confidence in the protocol’s long-term value accrual, and that confidence tends to ripple through the broader market.

Derivatives data support a healthier backdrop for this advance. Total open interest rose 3.34 per cent while Bitcoin liquidations fell 49 per cent to US$44.92M, indicating that the recent squeeze on over-leveraged positions has eased. The average funding rate remains positive at 0.0017 per cent, indicating balanced leverage rather than excessive bullish speculation. Meanwhile, the Fear and Greed Index ticked up to 36, still in Fear territory but a notable improvement from extreme levels. These metrics suggest that spot buying and staking activity, not leveraged gambling, drive the current uptick. I view this as a constructive shift because markets advance more sustainably when grounded in real demand rather than fleeting leverage. A sustained drop in liquidation volumes and stabilisation of funding rates would further confirm that the market foundation is strengthening.

The near-term trajectory hinges on clear technical levels and upcoming catalysts. Bitcoin must hold above US$71,000 to maintain bullish momentum, while the total market cap needs to stay above the 50 per cent Fibonacci retracement support at US$2.41T. A confirmed break above the US$2.49T resistance, which aligns with the 23.6 per cent Fibonacci level, could open a path toward US$2.56T. Conversely, failing to hold US$2.41T would invalidate the bounce and likely trigger a retest of lower support near US$2.33T. The potential launch of Morgan Stanley’s spot Bitcoin ETF, ticker MSBT, represents a key upcoming catalyst that could influence institutional flows. I watch these levels closely because they reflect not just price action but the market’s collective assessment of risk and opportunity. Technical structure matters most when it aligns with fundamental drivers, and right now, Ethereum staking inflows provide that alignment.

Traditional markets provided a supportive backdrop for this crypto advance. The Dow Jones Industrial Average gained 0.7 per cent, adding 305.43 points to close at 46,429.49, while the Nasdaq Composite advanced 0.8 per cent to 21,929.83, supported by strength in AI-related technology stocks like Nvidia and AMD. European indices posted strong gains, with the FTSE 100 rising 1.42 per cent, the DAX advancing 1.41 per cent, and the CAC 40 climbing 1.33 per cent. Asian markets showed mixed but generally positive performance, with the Nikkei 225 surging 3.08 per cent to 53,860 points, the Straits Times Index gaining 1.10 per cent, and the Hang Seng rising 0.88 per cent. This global equity strength reflects cautious optimism about geopolitical developments, including reports that the United States delivered a potential ceasefire plan to Iran, easing some immediate fears of a wider Middle East conflict. I note that crypto’s moderate correlation with equities means it can benefit from this risk-on sentiment while still responding to its own unique catalysts.

Commodity and currency markets added nuance to the macro picture. Brent Crude rose slightly to US$102.97 per barrel, up 0.74 per cent on the day, indicating that energy supply concerns persist even as geopolitical tensions ease. The 10-year Treasury yield reached 4.38 per cent, reflecting investor expectations that interest rates may remain elevated for longer, which typically pressures risk assets. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index rose 0.2 per cent as the euro and pound weakened slightly against the greenback, suggesting some safe-haven demand for the US currency. Bitcoin traded around US$70,727, up one per cent, aligning with the broader crypto market advance. I see these cross-asset moves as important context because they shape the liquidity environment in which digital assets operate. When Treasury yields rise and the dollar strengthens, crypto faces headwinds, and the current advance shows that ecosystem-specific catalysts can offset broader macro pressure.

Labour market data and global economic outlooks also influence investor positioning. US initial jobless claims were expected at 211K, signalling a cooling but still resilient labour market, which affects Federal Reserve policy expectations. The OECD released its Interim Economic Outlook, highlighting the shift towards embedded finance as a structural market driver, a trend that directly intersects with blockchain and digital asset adoption. I view embedded finance as a critical frontier because it represents the seamless integration of financial services into everyday digital experiences, and blockchain technology enables the transparency and efficiency that this integration demands. When major institutions acknowledge these structural shifts, it reinforces the long-term case for decentralised infrastructure, even if short-term price action remains volatile.

The key question centres on whether institutional staking demand continues to grow and whether Bitcoin can sustain its key support levels amid ongoing macro uncertainty. Will Ethereum’s role as a yield-generating asset attract enough capital to offset broader headwinds from elevated Treasury yields and a strong dollar? For now, the data supports a constructive but measured outlook, with clear levels to watch and catalysts to monitor as the market navigates this complex macro landscape.

 

Source: https://e27.co/bitcoin-holds-us71k-as-ethereum-surges-15-whats-driving-the-us2-44t-crypto-rally-20260326/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

Crypto falls 1.29% to US$2.34T as geopolitical fear triggers risk-asset selloff

Crypto falls 1.29% to US$2.34T as geopolitical fear triggers risk-asset selloff

The global financial system faced a harsh reality check as trading commenced on Monday, March 23, 2026. Investors woke up to a landscape defined by fear and uncertainty, with escalating tensions in the Middle East colliding with a stubbornly hawkish monetary policy environment. The result was a broad-based selloff that touched nearly every corner of the market, from traditional equities to digital assets. This was not merely a routine correction but a fundamental reassessment of risk in an increasingly unstable world.

The numbers tell a stark story of investor anxiety. The Dow Jones Industrial Average shed 443.96 points to close at 45,577.47, a 0.96 per cent decline. The broader S&P 500 fared worse, dropping 100.01 points or 1.51 per cent to settle at 6,506.48. Technology stocks bore the brunt of selling pressure, with the Nasdaq Composite plunging 443.08 points, a 2.01 per cent decline, to 21,647.61. These losses extended a grim streak for US markets, which finished the previous week with their fourth consecutive weekly decline. The momentum clearly favours the bears, and bulls find themselves with little ammunition to fight back.

The catalyst for this market turmoil stems from a dangerous geopolitical flashpoint. US President Donald Trump issued a 48-hour ultimatum to Iran demanding the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz, a critical chokepoint for global oil supplies. This ultimatum entered its critical phase as markets opened, with the Iran conflict now in its fourth week. The threat to this vital maritime passage sent shockwaves through energy markets, pushing Brent crude toward US$111 per barrel while West Texas Intermediate hovered near US$98 per barrel. Such elevated oil prices feed directly into inflation concerns, complicating the already difficult task facing central bankers.

The contagion spread far beyond American shores. Asian markets tumbled in sympathy with Wall Street’s woes. Japan’s Nikkei index plummeted three per cent, while South Korea’s Kospi dropped over four per cent. This synchronised global selloff demonstrates how interconnected modern financial markets have become. When fear strikes in one region, it ripples across time zones with devastating speed. The universal nature of this decline suggests investors are not discriminating between regions or sectors but rather fleeing risk assets wholesale.

Technology stocks faced particular pressure following a brutal rout that saw the Nasdaq 100 hit a 23-month low on March 20. The sector’s vulnerability reflects its sensitivity to interest rate expectations and risk appetite. With traders significantly scaling back expectations for interest rate cuts, the environment has turned hostile for growth stocks that depend on cheap capital. Some markets now do not price in US monetary easing before mid-2027, a stark revision from earlier expectations. This hawkish repricing forces investors to confront the reality that the era of easy money may remain dormant far longer than anticipated.

The cryptocurrency market offered no refuge from the storm. The total crypto market capitalisation fell 1.29 per cent to US$2.34T over a 24-hour period, demonstrating that digital assets remain firmly in the risk-sensitive category despite narratives about their independence from traditional finance. The Ethereum ecosystem suffered particularly severe damage, plunging 14.91 per cent amid accelerating profit-taking and sector rotation. Large holders with wallets containing over 100K ETH found themselves back in profit, a condition that historically precedes rallies but can trigger short-term selling pressure.

What makes this moment particularly noteworthy is the correlation between crypto and traditional safe havens. Over the past 7 days, cryptocurrency has shown a 95 per cent correlation with gold, suggesting both assets are responding to the same uncertainty-hedge dynamics. This is ironic given that gold itself suffered its worst weekly performance since 2011 in the prior week. Even traditional havens are not immune to the volatility gripping markets. The technical picture for crypto looks precarious, with the market testing the 78.6 per cent Fibonacci retracement at US$2.29T. A break below this level could extend losses toward the yearly low of US$2.17T, while recovery above US$2.38T would suggest the selloff is abating.

The commodity complex reflects the tension between growth concerns and supply fears. While oil prices surge on geopolitical risk, the broader commodity picture remains mixed. Gold’s struggle to maintain its safe-haven premium despite war jitters suggests investors are prioritising liquidity and dollar strength over traditional inflation hedges. This dynamic creates a challenging environment for portfolio construction, as the usual diversification benefits appear to be breaking down under stress.

The path forward depends heavily on developments in the Strait of Hormuz and the Federal Reserve’s response to elevated oil prices. If oil holds above US$95 per barrel, inflation fears will continue to pressure risk assets. The market needs clarity on both the geopolitical front and the monetary policy outlook before it can find a stable footing. Flash PMI data and any escalation in the Middle East will dictate the next macro move. US Bitcoin ETF flow data on March 24 will provide insight into institutional sentiment, with sustained outflows confirming the cautious stance prevailing among professional investors.

This moment represents more than a routine market pullback. It reflects a fundamental tension between geopolitical instability and monetary policy constraints that will likely persist for weeks if not months. Investors must navigate a landscape where traditional relationships break down, correlations spike, and both risk assets and safe havens can decline simultaneously. The coming days will test whether this represents a buying opportunity or the beginning of a more severe adjustment. For now, caution remains the only rational response to a market caught between war and tight money.

 

Source: https://e27.co/crypto-falls-1-29-to-us2-34t-as-geopolitical-fear-triggers-risk-asset-selloff-20260323/

 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

Stablecoin Yield Ban Deal Clears Path for Landmark Crypto Law in April

Stablecoin Yield Ban Deal Clears Path for Landmark Crypto Law in April

The recent bipartisan agreement on stablecoin yields marks a pivotal moment for United States crypto regulation, and it demands careful scrutiny from those who understand both the technical realities of decentralized finance and the political pressures shaping this legislation. Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks have reached an agreement in principle with the White House to restrict yield on passive stablecoin balances, a compromise that resolves a major standoff between traditional banks and crypto innovators. This development removes a critical roadblock to the CLARITY Act, potentially enabling a committee markup in the second half of April, with a target window of April 14 to 20 for Senate Banking action.

The core of this compromise centers on how stablecoin rewards can be paid, specifically targeting yield paid on idle balances. Reports indicate the deal would bar rewards on passive stablecoin balances, addressing banks’ fears that high on-chain yields could drain deposits, while possibly still allowing activity-based rewards on certain products. Senator Alsobrooks framed the agreement as protecting innovation while preventing widespread deposit flight, while Senator Tillis stressed that industry still needs to vet the language before it becomes locked in. This distinction between passive and active yields matters tremendously for how users interact with digital assets. A person who holds stablecoins simply to preserve value faces different constraints than someone actively participating in liquidity provision or governance. The technical challenge lies in defining these categories without creating arbitrary boundaries that stifle legitimate innovation or push activity offshore. Having examined similar regulatory frameworks globally, I recognize that the devil truly resides in these implementation details.

This yield dispute represented one of the primary reasons the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act remained stalled in the Senate Banking Committee, despite versions advancing through other legislative channels. With this compromise in place, Senate Banking leaders now prepare for an April markup and potential mid April vote, giving the CLARITY Act its first real path forward in months. If the bill progresses, it can move to the Senate floor and be reconciled with earlier work, potentially delivering the first broad United States market structure law for crypto on top of the 2025 GENIUS Act stablecoin framework. This timeline creates both opportunity and pressure. Legislative windows can close quickly, and the details finalized in committee often determine a bill’s ultimate impact more than its broad intentions. For those watching institutional adoption trends, this sequence matters because regulatory clarity often precedes significant capital allocation decisions.

The CLARITY Act aims to spell out federal jurisdiction, giving the SEC and CFTC defined roles and establishing rules for trading platforms, custody, tokens and stablecoins. Limiting yield on passive stablecoin balances would likely constrain United States based park and earn stablecoin products, while still giving room for more regulated, bank compatible designs if they tie rewards to activity. This tradeoff reflects a fundamental tension in crypto regulation. Users seeking yield on idle assets represent a significant portion of retail participation, and restricting these options could reduce domestic engagement with digital assets. At the same time, traditional financial institutions require certain guardrails before committing substantial resources to this emerging sector. The challenge involves creating a framework that protects consumers without eliminating the very features that make decentralized finance attractive. Having analyzed market liquidity patterns and derivatives volume as indicators of sentiment, I observe that regulatory uncertainty often suppresses participation more than any specific rule might.

Other open issues, including DeFi treatment and ethics rules on officials holding crypto, could significantly affect how permissive or restrictive the final regime becomes for on chain finance and institutional participation. The definition of passive balances remains particularly crucial because it determines which activities fall under restriction. Does providing liquidity in a decentralized pool count as passive or active? What about staking tokens to secure a network? These questions cannot be answered through political compromise alone. They require technical expertise and a genuine understanding of how blockchain systems function. Having served in government advisory roles related to blockchain technology, I recognize the difficulty of translating technical concepts into legislative language. Getting this translation wrong risks creating rules that either fail to address real risks or inadvertently harm legitimate innovation.

This compromise represents progress but not a finished solution. This is mentioned in my previous article too. The United States stands at a crossroads where it can either lead in shaping a thoughtful regulatory environment for digital assets or cede that leadership to jurisdictions with more flexible approaches. The CLARITY Act’s potential to define federal rules for exchanges, custody and stablecoins offers a foundation for broader institutional comfort with digital assets. The tradeoff of tighter limits on easy stablecoin yield in exchange for regulatory certainty requires careful evaluation. For users who value financial sovereignty, the distinction between passive and active yields may feel arbitrary when the underlying technology treats all transactions with equal transparency. The risk involves creating a system that favors incumbent financial structures over emerging decentralized alternatives, potentially slowing the very innovation that could enhance financial inclusion and resilience.

Watch for the published committee draft, the exact wording on passive balances, and DeFi language, because those details will decide whether this framework becomes mainly a compliance burden or a foundation for larger, safer crypto adoption in the United States. The April markup window provides a critical opportunity for industry stakeholders to engage with lawmakers on these technical nuances. Having followed the evolution of crypto regulation across multiple jurisdictions, I observe that the most effective frameworks emerge from ongoing dialogue between policymakers and technologists. The stablecoin yield compromise removes a significant obstacle, but the journey toward comprehensive crypto market law requires continued attention to how rules affect real world usage patterns. For those building the next generation of financial infrastructure, the stakes extend beyond immediate compliance to the long term viability of decentralized systems within a regulated environment.

The political dynamics surrounding this legislation reflect broader tensions about the future of money and financial power. A bipartisan deal that addresses bank concerns while preserving some room for crypto innovation demonstrates the possibility of constructive compromise. The ultimate test will be whether the resulting framework enables the United States to harness the benefits of blockchain technology while managing its risks. The flow from compromise to committee markup to potential floor vote creates a sequence where each step offers opportunities for refinement or regression.

No matter what happens, I will still believe in the decentralized future, the next evolution of the internet.

 
 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j