New legislation to protect cryptocurrency exchange users faces mixed reactions

New legislation to protect cryptocurrency exchange users faces mixed reactions

South Korea’s Financial Services Commission (FSC) introduced new legislation last week to bolster state-led oversight of the local cryptocurrency sector and enhance user protection despite concerns among industry leaders.

While South Korea’s burgeoning cryptocurrency market attracts increasing interest from global blockchain enterprises, recent high-profile incidents such as the collapse of Terra — a South Korean-led blockchain platform — point to the continued lack of centralized measures to safeguard the users’ assets.

The South Korean government’s pledge to improve its regulatory framework by enacting the Act on the Protection of Virtual Asset Users is, in part, a response to such concerns.

However, experts told Korea Pro that the country’s new legal measure comes with a significant risk, contradicting the fundamental allure of the cryptocurrency market — decentralization.

THE NEW LAW

Scheduled to take effect from July 19, after being passed by the National Assembly last June, the primary aim of the Act on the Protection of Virtual Asset Users is to oversee and protect participants in the burgeoning virtual assets market.

The law’s core objective is to protect individuals engaged in various activities within this domain, including trading, exchanging, transferring, storing, or managing virtual assets. Essentially, it serves as a regulatory framework designed to uphold the integrity of cryptocurrency transactions while prioritizing the security of users’ assets.

Under the legislation, virtual assets are defined as “electronic proofs” — assets that possess economic value and are tradable or transferable electronically. The law also delineates entities excluded from virtual assets, such as in-game currencies, and imposes obligations on virtual asset service providers (VASPs) to manage users’ deposits and assets securely.

In particular, regulations mandate that a significant portion of user assets must be stored in secure offline storage — known as cold wallets — to mitigate the risk of hacking and security breaches.

It also establishes criteria for insurance coverage or reserve fund accumulation to address risks stemming from hacking or system failures, stating that companies must have insurance or reserves to compensate users. The amount of insurance coverage required depends on the value of assets the company holds.

To address issues concerning the disclosure of vital information, insider trading, and the blocking of user assets, the legislation prohibits unjustifiable blocking of user deposits and assets, mandating crypto exchanges monitor abnormal transactions and impose severe fines for unfair trading practices.

Oh-hoon Kwon, a representative attorney at Cha & Kwon, told Korea Pro that the new act will still apply to fraudulent activities overseas if their effects are felt domestically.

“This means that foreign VASPs conducting business targeting Korea are also subject to this act,” Kwon said.

The new legislation follows the implementation of a similar law on regulating uniformity for crypto-assets in the European Union, enacted last June.

However, Kwon noted to Korea Pro that Seoul’s new law on crypto exchanges differs from the EU’s Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulations (MiCA) law in that MiCA has a broader target scope, regulating various aspects of crypto-assets across different operational domains while Seoul’s new legislation is more narrowly tailored, specifically targeting activities within virtual asset exchanges.

RECENT CONTROVERSIES

The act was prompted by a significant industry shakeup involving Terraform Labs, the start-up behind Terra, a blockchain protocol and payments platform, and its founder, Do Kwon.

Terra blockchain specialized in algorithmic stablecoins, which are cryptocurrencies backed by reserve assets such as fiat currencies like the U.S. dollar and aim to maintain a 1:1 peg with the underlying currency.

However, terraUSD (UST), instead of being backed directly by fiat currency reserves, relied on algorithmic equations and its sister cryptocurrency, LUNA, to stabilize its supply and demand, thereby maintaining its value at $1 as it fluctuated alongside the U.S. dollar.

Before its crash, Terra had gained significant attention within the crypto community. However, in May 2022, concerns about Do Kwon’s alleged involvement in illicit activities and questionable business practices emerged, triggering a sell-off of UST and LUNA tokens.

This also caused UST to “de-peg” from the dollar, meaning its value was no longer fixed at $1 and fluctuated independently. Consequently, both cryptocurrencies experienced a collapse in value.

Thousands of investors lost over $400 billion in investments, highlighting the necessity for transparency, accountability and regulatory compliance in the virtual asset market and prompting governments to forge newer regulations to protect against such incidents.

Edward Dhong, a senior foreign attorney at Yoon & Yang, told the Asia Law Business Journal that the country’s insufficient regulations to safeguard virtual asset users did not align with South Korea’s substantial scale of crypto transactions in 2021.

A STEP IN THE RIGHT DIRECTION?

Amid fears of a collapse similar to the one seen with Terra and to ensure user protection, the new law targets cryptocurrency exchanges based in South Korea, mandating they store user assets through banks in bond and offline to enhance user security.

Third-party management operations are also barred, and service providers must hold assets identical in amount and type to those entrusted by users.

The new act is the latest in the National Assembly’s continued efforts to streamline legislation in line with unconventional currencies, such as tabling a bill to oversee digital assets independently in Nov. 2022.

In the past, the legal system was subject to more regulatory gaps, as cryptocurrencies were under the jurisdiction of the Capital Markets Act, which is designed for a broader financial market.

Experts told Korea Pro that Seoul’s effort to protect virtual investor assets has been a necessary step forward, considering user concerns about the emerging crypto market.

Anndy Lian, an inter-governmental blockchain advisor based in Singapore, lauded the new law as a catalyst for nurturing a transparent legal environment conducive to the growth and innovation of virtual assets.

He told Korea Pro that it could potentially “attract more investment and participation from domestic and foreign entities.”

Lian also anticipated a “smoother integration of virtual assets into the existing financial system,” allowing for more efficient transactions and services and an improvement in the standards of market practice in South Korea.

While attorney Kwon echoed Lian’s views, outlining that the law provides the groundwork for restraining fraudulent virtual asset trading activities within the market, he also highlighted the need for the law to incorporate additional guidelines offering clarity on its clauses.

“While this legislation targets fraudulent virtual asset trading activities, such as unfair trading, it lacks specific details regarding the various forms of fraudulent behavior,” Kwon explained.

Lian also acknowledged this, noting several significant hurdles the legislation must overcome to successfully exercise its projected role in the South Korean virtual asset market.

He noted that the stringent regulations could potentially cause VASPs to exit the South Korean market and restrict crypto services for South Korean users, as the costs and guidelines required by South Korean jurisdiction may prove too challenging.

“We need to understand that we are dealing with innovation and it changes very fast. Creating a baseline and having backup correction plans along the journey would be a more protective method for the South Korean market,” according to Lian.

 

Source: https://koreapro.org/2024/02/new-legislation-to-protect-cryptocurrency-exchange-users-faces-mixed-reactions/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Exchange token listing scams resurface after crypto market thaw

Exchange token listing scams resurface after crypto market thaw

Crypto exchange listing scams are making a comeback amid a broader market recovery.

According to a Jan. 29 post by Yi He — a co-founder of Binance and the spouse of the exchange’s former CEO, Changpeng Zhao — a LinkedIn impersonator is using her name and position to offer token listings in exchange for payment.

“I do have a LinkedIn account, but I have long forgotten the password,” said He. “I am also not in charge of discussing with projects for a potential listing; please be wary of those who claim to be close to me and discuss with you about investments or listing.”

In a separate post, blockchain author Anndy Lian also revealed screenshots of WhatsApp users pretending to pose as Binance staff, with offers of free money for joining cryptocurrency discussion groups. “Binance does not have such groups that offer you passive income,” Lian wrote.

Binance’s customer support later clarified that users should use links from the official site to check if individuals reaching out with unsolicited offers are, in fact, from Binance. “It can be used for the website link, email address, phone number, WeChat ID, Twitter account, or Telegram ID,” it stated. “Please do not contact any unofficial/non-verified sources or reveal your account details to them.”

Exchange listing scams became widespread in the last bull market. An August 2022 Cointelegraph investigation revealed that scammers typically reach out to project developers and co-founders using seemingly legitimate professional LinkedIn profiles from reputable exchanges. Once the victim has been tricked, scammers require an initial “deposit,” which can be upward of 250,000 USDT to commence the listing process. Of course, once the victim pays the deposit, the token is never listed.

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/exchange-token-listing-scams-resurface-after-crypto-market-thaw

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Is There a Need for a Third Exchange License in Hong Kong?

Is There a Need for a Third Exchange License in Hong Kong?

The Securities and Futures Commission (SFC) of Hong Kong is indeed committed to developing a digital asset center in Hong Kong. The SFC’s proactive approach towards regulating and embracing digital assets is a significant step towards enhancing Hong Kong’s role as a major financial hub. By providing clear regulatory guidelines and granting licenses to digital asset exchanges, the SFC is fostering a secure and regulated environment for digital asset trading. This not only attracts more institutional investors to the digital asset market but also strengthens investor confidence in digital assets. The SFC’s initiatives are expected to further promote the growth and development of the digital asset industry in Hong Kong.

The SFC’s decision to embrace crypto trading has enabled more licensed players in the Hong Kong scene. The recent approval of the Hong Kong Virtual Asset Exchange (HKVAX) as the third licensed crypto exchange in Hong Kong marks a significant step in Hong Kong’s evolving crypto landscape. The journey to establish Hong Kong as a robust crypto and digital asset hub has been met with challenges, but the emergence of new players like HKVAX raises questions about the need for a third exchange license and the potential financial viability of another player in the market.

Overview of the current exchanges

HashKey Exchange is Hong Kong’s first licensed retail virtual asset exchange. It provides a safe and reliable crypto trading platform for BTC, ETH, and other cryptocurrencies. HashKey Exchange is licensed by the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong (SFC) with Type 1 (Dealing in securities) license & Type 7 (Providing automated trading services) license. It also holds a TCSP license (Certification No. TC006486).

OSL is a digital asset platform that provides regulated solutions for institutions, corporates, and professional investors. They are also granted Type 1 & 7 digital asset licenses by the SFC in Hong Kong. On August 3, 2023, OSL received an SFC license uplift, enabling retail investors to trade Bitcoin and Ethereum.

On the one hand, it could be argued that the existing two exchanges, HashKey Exchange and OSL, are already meeting the demand for crypto trading services in Hong Kong. These exchanges offer a wide range of features and services, including spot trading, margin trading, and derivatives trading. They also have a good reputation for security and compliance.

On the other hand, there are a number of factors that could suggest that there is still room for another exchange in Hong Kong. First, the crypto market is still growing rapidly, and there is a demand for more choice and competition among exchanges. Second, the existing exchanges are not without their critics. Some have accused them of being too restrictive in their trading policies, while others have raised concerns about their security practices.

Whether or not there is a need for a third exchange licence in Hong Kong is a matter of opinion. However, the approval of HKVAX suggests that the SFC believes that there is still room for growth in the crypto market in Hong Kong.

Is there enough room for growth?

The answer to this question depends on a number of factors, including the size of the crypto market in Hong Kong, the fees charged by exchanges, and the level of competition.

The crypto market in Hong Kong is still relatively small, but it is growing rapidly. In 2022, the total trading volume of cryptocurrencies in Hong Kong was estimated to be around $100 billion. This is expected to grow to over $200 billion by 2025.

The fees charged by exchanges vary, but they are typically around 0.1% to 0.2% of the trading volume. This means that an exchange with a trading volume of $100 billion would generate around $100 million in fees per year.

The fees are not the only determining factor. While the regulatory framework prioritizes consumer protection, it’s important to consider whether the balance between safeguarding investors and fostering innovation is being adequately struck. The current regulatory limitations, such as the 12-month cooling-off period for token listings, restrictions on crypto derivatives, staking, airdrops, and the ban on stablecoins, appear to hinder the development of a comprehensive digital asset market. This would also mean that the exchanges will miss out the current hype and revenue from newly hyped-up tokens.

Is there enough liquidity depth for Hong Kong Dollar pair? That is another issue totally. The level of competition in the crypto exchange market in Hong Kong is also growing. In addition to the three licensed exchanges, there are a number of unlicensed exchanges operating in the city. This competition could drive down fees and make it more difficult for new entrants to make a profit.

Conclusion

Overall, it is difficult to say definitively whether or not there is enough money to be made for one more player in the crypto exchange market in Hong Kong. However, the factors discussed above suggest that there is a good possibility that a third exchange could be successful.

Maybe a final comment from my end is from an economic viability point of view. With the emergence of HKVAX as the third licensed exchange, questions arise about the potential profitability of additional players in the market. While having a competitive landscape can drive innovation and enhance user experience, it’s essential to assess whether the existing demand for crypto trading services can sustain another entrant. The revenue potential, user base growth, and differentiated offerings are factors that should be considered before granting further licenses.

The approval of HKVAX as the third licensed crypto exchange in Hong Kong is a significant milestone for the city’s crypto industry. It suggests that the SFC is committed to creating a favorable regulatory environment for crypto businesses. However, it remains to be seen whether there is enough demand and profit potential to support another exchange in Hong Kong.

 

 

Source: https://www.securities.io/is-there-a-need-for-a-third-exchange-license-in-hong-kong/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j