The S&P 500, currently trading in the high 6700s as of late October 2025, hovers just below the psychologically significant 7000 threshold. A credible and durable US-China trade agreement could propel the index toward that level by year-end, a move representing a 2.8 per cent upside from current levels.
Such optimism remains contingent on tangible outcomes rather than mere rhetoric. The market’s advance hinges not only on macro diplomacy but also on the micro-level performance of 177 companies reporting earnings this week. Only consistent beat-and-raise guidance, where firms exceed earnings expectations and raise forward-looking forecasts, will sustain the fragile momentum. Without such confirmation, the rally risks unravelling under the weight of its own narrow breadth and elevated leverage.
Gold continues to serve as a strategic hedge amid rising macro uncertainty. Technical analysis points to structured accumulation zones at 3700 dollars and 3500 dollars, levels that have repeatedly attracted institutional and algorithmic buying. Despite an environment of loose monetary conditions and accelerating inflation expectations, correlated at plus 28 per cent with M2 money supply growth, portfolio allocations to gold remain strikingly low.
Only 2.4 per cent of fund managers hold more than five per cent of their assets in gold, suggesting significant room for reallocation if inflation proves persistent or if geopolitical tensions escalate. The metal’s recent consolidation near US$4113 per ounce reflects this tension between fundamental tailwinds and tepid institutional demand, a divergence that often precedes sharp re-pricing.
China’s evolving economic strategy adds another layer of complexity. The 15th Five-Year Plan for 2026 to 2030 formally pivots away from the old growth model centred on property and infrastructure toward human capital development and domestic consumption. This shift is more than semantic. The term consumption appears four times in the latest Communist Party Plenum Communiqué, compared to just once in 2020, signalling a deliberate policy recalibration.
Property, once the engine of Chinese growth, remains under regulatory scrutiny and is unlikely to receive meaningful stimulus, especially as exports continue to outperform. Instead, Beijing prioritises technological self-reliance and innovation, aiming for a sustainable 4.5 per cent annual growth rate through productivity gains rather than debt-fuelled asset bubbles. For global investors, this transition implies that Chinese equities may offer value but with heightened volatility tied to policy execution and external trade dynamics.
The US equity market, in contrast, has become increasingly concentrated. Performance is now effectively a binary bet on the success of artificial intelligence monetization within the MAG7 cohort, those mega-cap tech firms generating multi-billion-dollar free cash flows. Public AI plays appear safer than their private counterparts, like OpenAI or Anthropic, which remain unprofitable and lack a clear killer app to justify their valuations.
Even among public firms, the path to AI-driven revenue remains elusive. This narrow leadership amplifies systemic risk, particularly as leveraged ETFs magnify both upside and downside moves. A barbell strategy, pairing large-cap growth exposure with high-dividend yield stocks, remains prudent, especially when considering Japan’s continued commitment to Abenomics 3.0 under Prime Minister Takaichi, which supports regional diversification.
This week’s volatility triggers are unusually dense. Beyond the FOMC decision and Big Tech earnings, markets must navigate Donald Trump’s visit to Asia, Jensen Huang’s keynote at a major AI conference, and most critically, the Trump-Xi bilateral meeting on October 30 during the APEC summit in South Korea. Early signals suggest progress.
Chinese officials report a preliminary consensus on export controls, fentanyl trafficking, and maritime levies. These incremental steps have already fuelled a cross-asset rally, with Asian equities up 1.5 per cent and US index futures pricing in a 0.6 per cent gap-up at the open. Copper and Brent crude have surged on improved global growth expectations, while the US Dollar Index holds steady at 98.95, reflecting balanced risk sentiment.
The crypto market has surged in tandem, rising 3.62 per cent in 24 hours and 5.91 per cent over the week. This move stems from three reinforcing narratives. First, macro liquidity expectations have intensified as US bank reserves at the Federal Reserve declined to 2.93 trillion dollars, the lowest level since early January, and what analysts like Adam Livingston describe as nearing a danger zone. Historically, such reserve contractions in 2019, 2020, and 2023 preceded Fed interventions and sharp Bitcoin rallies. Markets now price in a 96.7 per cent probability of a 25-basis-point rate cut at the October 28 to 29 FOMC meeting, reinforcing the liquidity pivot thesis.
Second, institutional demand is accelerating. South Korea’s Bitplanet has initiated daily Bitcoin purchases targeting 10,000 BTC, following Metaplanet’s earlier treasury move of 25,555 BTC. Simultaneously, US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded over 600 million dollars in net inflows last week, drawing approximately 62,000 BTC from exchange cold storage and tightening supply dynamics. This absorption of available supply reduces float and increases scarcity, particularly as Bitcoin dominance dips slightly to 58.84 per cent, indicating capital rotation into altcoins like Ethereum, which gained six per cent against BTC.
Third, technical momentum has ignited a leverage reset. Bitcoin’s breakout above 115,000 dollars, a level confirmed by multiple sources, triggered 350 million dollars in short liquidations, forcing leveraged bears to cover positions rapidly. Open interest in derivatives markets has climbed 6.95 per cent to 903 billion dollars, reflecting renewed speculative activity. However, funding rates have spiked by 105 per cent in 24 hours, and the RSI sits at a neutral 47.49, suggesting the rally may pause for consolidation rather than accelerate further immediately.
In summary, today’s market environment reflects a delicate balance between hope and reality. Macro optimism, fueled by potential US-China détente and anticipated Fed easing, has aligned with institutional crypto accumulation and technical breakouts to drive risk assets higher. The sustainability of this move depends on concrete outcomes: a credible trade deal, consistent earnings beats, and actual monetary policy accommodation.
If the Fed under-delivers or corporate guidance falters, the leveraged nature of current positioning could trigger a sharp reversal. Investors should monitor Bitcoin’s 113,500 dollar support and Ethereum’s 4,000 dollar level as near-term barometers of sentiment. The week ahead will not merely test market resilience. It will define the narrative for the final quarter of 2025.
Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.
Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.
An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.
