JPEX:一起撼动香港声誉的加密丑闻

JPEX:一起撼动香港声誉的加密丑闻

香港,作为全球金融中心和通往中国的门户,被涉及JPEX的一起大规模加密货币丑闻所震惊。这家总部位于迪拜的加密货币交易所据称欺诈了数千名投资者,涉及金额超过1.6亿美元。这起案件揭示了香港新兴加密货币行业中的监管漏洞、投资者保护的不足以及依赖社交媒体影响者推广无牌平台的风险。

JPEX,即 “日本交易所”,声称是世界上第一家向用户提供分红的加密货币交易所。它还自夸与汇丰、渣打银行和阿里巴巴等主要机构合作。它承诺高回报和低费用吸引了投资者,并采用了激进的营销策略,如广告牌、在线广告和影响者背书。

在宣传JPEX的影响者中,有Joseph Lam,一位曾经是大律师现为保险销售员的人,自称是香港的“Trolling King”,还有Chan Yee,一个有20万订阅者的YouTube名人。他们向追随者展示了比特币利润如何帮助他们购买房屋和汽车,并鼓励他们使用他们的推荐代码注册JPEX。

然而,事情开始在2023年9月出现问题,当时JPEX宣布面临“流动性短缺”并暂停提款。许多投资者无法访问他们的资金或联系到该平台的客户服务。一些人还发现,JPEX在香港的证券及期货事务监察委员会(SFC)没有许可证的情况下运营,而该机构负责监管虚拟资产交易平台。

SFC透露,他们在2023年6月曾向JPEX发出警告信,要求其停止在香港的活动或申请许可证。然而,JPEX无视了该信函并继续非法运营。SFC还表示,他们对JPEX在迪拜注册的经营活动没有管辖权。

香港警方在接到来自2000多名投资者的投诉后,对JPEX展开了调查,这些投资者声称损失了13亿港元(1.66亿美元)。警方以涉嫌欺诈、洗钱和共谋欺诈的罪名逮捕了11人,包括Lam和Chan。警方还从嫌疑人的住所查获了计算机、手机、银行卡和文件。

这起案件引发了公众的愤怒,并引发了对香港加密资产监管框架的质疑。自2020年实施国家安全法以来,香港一直试图将自己定位为创新和技术的全球中心,尤其是在2020年11月,SFC宣布了一项新的虚拟资产交易平台许可制度,以增强投资者保护和打击洗钱。

该制度直到2023年6月才生效,给像JPEX这样的无监管平台留下了超过六个月的空白期。此外,该制度仅覆盖至少交易一种安全代币的平台,这种代币代表了底层资产或业务的所有权或权利。仅交易非安全代币(如比特币或以太坊)的平台不需要从SFC获得许可证。

这意味着在香港仍存在一个大规模未受监管和无监督的加密市场领域。根据CoinMarketCap的数据,目前有超过11,000种加密资产在流通,总市值超过2万亿美元。其中许多资产具有极高的波动性和投机性,一些可能是欺诈性的或非法的。

Anndy 指出JPEX案件还突显了信任社交媒体影响者在没有适当披露或尽职调查的情况下背书加密产品或平台的危险。影响者在推广某些平台或代币时可能有不可告人的动机或利益冲突。他们也可能缺乏投资加密资产的风险和回报的准确可靠信息的专业知识或信誉。

投资者应谨慎对待任何承诺不切实际回报或未披露风险的平台或产品。他们还应进行自己的研究,验证他们打算使用的任何平台或产品的资质和声誉,以及该平台或产品是否受到香港或其他地方任何机构的许可或监管。

JPEX案件还引起了对迪拜作为不正当操作商的加密天堂的角色的关注。迪拜是阿联酋的一部分,以其低税收、宽松的监管和友好的态度吸引了加密业务。迪拜没有专门的法律或机构来监管加密资产,也不要求加密平台获得许可证或向任何机构注册。迪拜还与香港没有引渡条约,这使得当局难以追究JPEX或其创始人的责任。

然而,迪拜的加密友好立场可能会对其声誉和安全造成代价。迪拜可能会成为欺诈者、黑客和恐怖分子的磁石,他们使用加密资产来逃避制裁、洗钱或资助非法活动。迪拜还可能面临来自其他国家或国际组织的压力,要求其加强对加密行业的监管和合规性。迪拜可能需要在促进和监管加密行业与保护和赋权投资者之间取得平衡,这是实现其在全球领域保持竞争优势的责任。

JPEX案件不是香港将面临的第一起也不是最后一起加密丑闻。这不仅是对投资者的警钟,也是对监管机构和政策制定者的警醒。随着加密行业的不断发展,香港和其相关利益相关者将面临新的挑战和机遇。香港需要从JPEX案件中吸取经验教训,采取积极和预防性的措施来保护其利益和价值观。

香港需要加强对加密行业的监管框架、执法力度以及向公众进行教育和宣传。香港必须与其他司法管辖区和机构合作协调,以打击跨境加密犯罪和风险。

“JPEX案件是一起撼动香港声誉的加密丑闻” Anndy 在采访中提到,“香港作为全球金融中心和通往中国的门户,JPEX的恶性欺诈事件揭示了香港加密行业中的监管漏洞和投资者保护不足,以及依赖社交媒体影响者推广无牌平台的风险。香港需要加强对加密行业的监管和执法,并向公众传达教育和意识。香港还需要在促进和监管加密行业与保护和赋权投资者之间取得平衡。只有这样,香港才能在全球竞技场上保持竞争优势。”

 

 

 

Source: https://cn.investing.com/analysis/article-200480876

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

JPEx醜聞为香港加密監管敲响警鐘

JPEx醜聞为香港加密監管敲响警鐘

Anndy Lian對最近JPEx的倒閉發表意見,該加密貨幣平台據稱詐騙了數千名投資者超過14億港元(1.8億美元)。JPEx的崩潰揭示了香港加密行業的陰暗面,並對其監管框架提出了嚴重疑問。

JPEx聲稱自己是一家獲得許可並受監管的平台,以華麗的廣告、名人背書和高回報的承諾吸引了投資者。它提供了自己的本地代幣JPC,只能在其平台上交易,還提供了比特幣和泰達幣等其他熱門加密貨幣。

然而,2023年9月,JPEx突然停止了服務,宣布正在接受香港警方對涉嫌洗錢和詐騙的調查。該平台的網站和社交媒體帳戶被關閉,其客戶服務熱線被中斷。許多投資者發現自己無法訪問資金或提取資產。

JPEx醜聞並不是一個孤立的事件。事實上,這是近年來困擾香港的一系列加密詐騙中的最新事件。2022年,另一個名為Black Cell Technology的平台因進行非法首次代幣發行(ICO)而被證券期貨事務監察委員會(SFC)關閉,該ICO從投資者那裡籌集了3,000萬美元。2021年,一個名為MyCoin的平台從3,000多名投資者那裡消失,携款3億港元(3.87億美元)。

這些案例突顯了香港在努力成為全球加密創新和應用中心時所面臨的風險和挑戰。儘管這個城市擁有充滿活力和多樣性的加密生態系統,市場上運營著100多個平台,但它也面臨著缺乏明確和一致的監管,使投資者容易受到欺詐和操縱的威脅。

香港目前對加密貨幣監管的方法基於“同風險,同監管”的原則。這意味著屬於現有證券法律範圍的加密活動受到SFC的監督和執法,而不屬於該範圍的則基本上不受監管。例如,SFC已經為提供安全代幣交易的平台發布了指南,這些數位代幣代表了底層資產或企業的所有權或經濟權益。這些平台必須向SFC申請許可,並遵守反洗錢、投資者保護、網絡安全和審計等各種要求。

然而,香港的大多數平台不處理安全代幣,而是處理交換代幣(如比特幣)或實用代幣(如JPC)。根據香港法律,這些代幣不被視為證券,因此不在SFC的監管範圍之內。結果,這些平台在法律上存在一個灰色地帶,它們不需要獲得許可或遵守任何特定的規則。

這創造了一個漏洞,允許不誠實的平台利用投資者的無知和貪婪。通過聲稱獲得許可或受到監管,這些平台可以在投資者中建立虛假的安全感和合法性,這些投資者可能不理解安全代幣和其他類型的代幣之間的區別。通過提供高回報或獎勵,這些平台可以吸引投資者投資於其本地代幣或其他無實質價值或市場流動性的陌生加密貨幣。通過使用複雜和不透明的機制,這些平台可以操縱其代幣或加密貨幣的價格和交易量,創造人工需求或供應。

JPEx醜聞是香港在追求金融創新過程中更深層次問題的一個症狀。儘管這個城市支持加密發展,並推出了各種促進金融科技增長的倡議,如監管沙箱和跨境合作,但它在應對加密活動所帶來的新風險和挑戰方面也顯得緩慢和被動。

香港需要採取更積極和全面的加密監管方法,平衡創新和保護。香港應考慮制定一個新的監管框架,涵蓋所有類型的加密資產和服務提供商,而不是依賴可能無法涵蓋全部加密活動的現有證券法律。

這樣的框架應該旨在實現以下四個主要目標:第一,防止洗錢和恐怖主義融資;第二,保護投資者免受詐騙和操縱;第三,確保公平競爭和市場完整性;第四,促進金融包容和教育。
為實現這些目標,香港應考慮實施以下一些措施:

要求所有加密平台在香港運營或為香港投資者提供服務之前向SFC或其他指定機構註冊或獲得許可。對加密平台的最低標準,包括資本適足性、風險管理、治理、披露、審計和報告方面的要求。建立一個監測和監管加密平台活動和交易的機制,包括它們對穩定幣或其他形式的數位貨幣的使用。對加密廣告和市場營銷實施嚴格的規則,特別是在社交媒體平台上,因為影響力者可能對投資者的決策產生重大影響。要求加密平台對因為其疏忽、不當行為或違約而導致投資者遭受的損失或損害負責。要求影響力者對其在加密平台或產品方面所作的虛假或誤導性陳述負責。教育投資者有關加密投資的風險和利益,以及他們作為消費者的權利和責任。鼓勵加密平台和服務提供商之間的自我監管和行業最佳實踐,例如採用行為準則、道德標準和爭端解決機制。

通過採取這些措施,香港可以增強其作為一個促進創新和應用的領先加密中心的聲譽,同時確保保護和穩定。香港還可以將自己定位為其他國家在處理加密領域的相似問題和挑戰時的典範。

JPEx醜聞是香港警覺並改革其加密監管的警鐘。這個城市不能承擔失去競爭優勢或在全球金融市場中失去信譽的代價。現在就是行動的時候。

 

Source: https://hk.investing.com/analysis/article-106191

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Op-ed: JPEX – A crypto scandal that shakes Hong Kong’s reputation

Op-ed: JPEX – A crypto scandal that shakes Hong Kong’s reputation

Hong Kong, a global financial hub and a gateway to China, has been rocked by a massive crypto scandal involving JPEX. This Dubai-based cryptocurrency exchange allegedly defrauded thousands of investors of more than $160 million. The case has exposed the regulatory loopholes, the lack of investor protection in Hong Kong’s nascent crypto industry, and the risks of relying on social media influencers to promote unlicensed platforms.

JPEX, which stands for Japan Exchange, claimed to be the world’s first crypto exchange offering its users dividends. It also boasted of partnering with major institutions such as HSBC, Standard Chartered, and Alibaba. It lured investors with promises of high returns and low fees and used aggressive marketing strategies such as billboards, online ads, and influencer endorsements.

Among the influencers who promoted JPEX were Joseph Lam, a barrister turned insurance salesman who called himself Hong Kong’s “Trolling King”, and Chan Yee, a YouTube personality with 200,000 subscribers. They showed their followers how Bitcoin profits could help them buy houses and cars and encouraged them to sign up for JPEX using their referral codes.

The SFC revealed that it had issued a warning letter to JPEX in June 2023, asking it to cease its activities in Hong Kong or apply for a license. However, JPEX ignored the letter and continued to operate illegally. The SFC also said it had no jurisdiction over JPEX’s operations in Dubai, where it was registered.

The Hong Kong police launched an investigation into JPEX after receiving complaints from more than 2,000 investors claiming to have lost HK$1.3 billion ($166 million). The police arrested 11 people, including Lam and Chan, on suspicion of fraud, money laundering, and conspiracy to defraud. The police also seized computers, mobile phones, bank cards, and documents from the suspects’ premises.

The case has sparked public outrage and raised questions about Hong Kong’s regulatory framework for crypto assets. Hong Kong has been trying to position itself as a global hub for innovation and technology, especially after introducing the national security law in 2020 that eroded its autonomy and freedoms. In November 2020, the SFC announced a new licensing regime for virtual asset trading platforms to enhance investor protection and combat money laundering.

The regime only took effect in June 2023, leaving a gap of more than six months for unregulated platforms like JPEX. Moreover, the regime only covers platforms that trade at least one security token, a type of crypto asset representing ownership or rights in an underlying asset or business. Platforms that trade only non-security tokens, such as Bitcoin or Ethereum, are not required to obtain a license from the SFC.

This means there is still a large segment of the crypto market that is unregulated and unsupervised in Hong Kong. According to CoinMarketCap, more than 11,000 crypto assets are in circulation, with a total market capitalization of over $2 trillion. Many of these assets are highly volatile and speculative; some may be fraudulent or illegal.

The JPEX case also highlights the dangers of trusting social media influencers who endorse crypto products or platforms without proper disclosure or due diligence. Influencers may have ulterior motives or conflicts of interest when they promote certain platforms or tokens. They may also lack the expertise or credibility to provide accurate or reliable information about the risks and rewards of investing in crypto assets.

Investors should be wary of any platform or product that promises unrealistic returns or guarantees without disclosing the risks involved. They should also do their own research and verify the credentials and reputation of any platform or product they intend to use. They should also check whether the platform or product is licensed or regulated by any authority in Hong Kong or elsewhere.

The JPEX case has also drawn attention to the role of Dubai as a crypto haven for shady operators. Dubai, part of the United Arab Emirates (UAE), has been attracting crypto businesses with its low taxes, lax regulations, and friendly attitude.

Dubai has no specific law or authority to regulate crypto assets and does not require crypto platforms to obtain a license or register with any agency. Dubai also does not have an extradition treaty with Hong Kong, making it difficult for the authorities to pursue JPEX or its founders.

However, Dubai’s crypto-friendly stance may come at a cost for its reputation and security. Dubai may become a magnet for scammers, hackers, and terrorists who use crypto assets to evade sanctions, launder money, or finance illicit activities.

Dubai may also face pressure from other countries or international organizations to tighten its crypto industry oversight and compliance. Dubai may have to balance its ambition to become a global leader in innovation and technology with its responsibility to prevent and combat financial crimes and risks.

The JPEX case is not the first nor the last crypto scandal that Hong Kong will face. This is not only a wake-up call for investors but also for regulators and policymakers. As the crypto industry grows and evolves, new challenges and opportunities will emerge for Hong Kong and its stakeholders. Hong Kong needs to learn from the JPEX case and take proactive and preventive measures to safeguard its interests and values.

Hong Kong needs to enhance its regulatory framework, enforcement of the crypto industry, and its education and awareness campaigns for the public. Hong Kong must cooperate and coordinate with other jurisdictions and agencies to combat cross-border crypto crimes and risks.

The JPEX case is a crypto scandal that shakes Hong Kong’s reputation as a global financial hub and a gateway to China. It exposes the regulatory loopholes and the lack of investor protection in Hong Kong’s crypto industry, as well as the risks of relying on social media influencers to promote unlicensed platforms.

Hong Kong needs to strengthen its oversight and enforcement of the crypto industry and its education and awareness campaigns for the public. Hong Kong also needs to balance fostering and regulating the crypto industry and protecting and empowering its investors. Only then can Hong Kong maintain its edge and competitiveness in the global arena.

Source: https://cryptoslate.com/op-ed-jpex-a-crypto-scandal-that-shakes-hong-kongs-reputation/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j