Binance cracks down on market makers: What traders need to know now

Binance cracks down on market makers: What traders need to know now

Binance just announced stricter rules for market makers and token issuers, and this move deserves careful attention from anyone watching how crypto markets mature. The exchange now requires projects to disclose their market maker identity, legal entity, and key contract terms covering inventory and fee handling. It explicitly bans profit-sharing and guaranteed-return arrangements between projects and market makers, as well as opaque token lending that permits broad, undefined use of borrowed tokens. These structures often hide incentives that drive manipulative behaviour.

They will also monitor market maker activity more closely, watching for selling that conflicts with vesting schedules, one-sided quote provision, or trading that artificially inflates volume. The platform reserves the right to blacklist firms that engage in these practices. Bloomberg separately notes a prohibition on any revenue-sharing models tied to market-making on Binance. This is not a minor policy tweak. It represents a fundamental shift toward transparency in a part of crypto markets that has long operated in the shadows.

Market makers play a vital role in healthy trading environments. They tighten spreads and provide depth, allowing traders to enter and exit positions without excessive slippage. But when market makers receive payments to pump volumes or support price levels at all costs, they create fake liquidity that misleads traders about real demand. The new Binance rules aim to separate genuine market making from arrangements designed to manufacture the appearance of activity. By forcing disclosure of who the market maker is and what they can do, and by banning profit-sharing and price-manipulation deals, Binance tries to reduce conflicts of interest and wash trading that drew criticism after past market meltdowns. Tokens that relied on aggressive, opaque market making to appear healthier than they truly were could see wider spreads or lower volumes in the near term. Projects with organic demand and clean arrangements may stand out more clearly once the noise fades. This short-term discomfort could actually help investors distinguish between substance and spectacle.

The real test of these new rules will be enforcement. Binance says it will take swift, decisive action against misconduct, including blacklisting market makers. But it remains unclear whether blacklisted entities will be publicly named or only handled internally. Transparency about enforcement would strengthen the credibility of this policy shift. Without public accountability, bad actors could simply migrate to less scrutinised venues while continuing similar practices. Watch how liquidity metrics change, especially for smaller or recently listed tokens. Persistent widening spreads or sharp drops in reported volume could signal that prior activity depended heavily on now-constrained arrangements.

Also, watch whether rival exchanges adopt similar policies or position themselves as more flexible alternatives. If Binance’s stricter stance becomes an industry norm, it could reduce room for aggressive market making across the entire ecosystem, not just on one venue. That would represent meaningful progress toward more honest price discovery.

These changes reflect a necessary evolution in how crypto markets operate. I have seen how opaque arrangements can undermine trust. When market makers and projects hide their relationships, they create information asymmetry that harms retail participants the most. Requiring disclosure does not eliminate all manipulation, but it raises the cost of deceptive behaviour and makes it easier for observers to spot red flags. Banning profit sharing between projects and their market makers removes a powerful incentive to coordinate trades that serve internal interests rather than genuine supply and demand. This aligns with a broader principle I hold: decentralised systems work best when incentives are transparent and aligned with long-term network health, not short-term price engineering.

That said, I approach these rules with measured optimism. Regulation and self-regulation in crypto must balance market integrity with innovation. Overly rigid constraints could push legitimate market-making activity offshore or into decentralised venues where oversight is minimal. The goal should not be to eliminate market making but to ensure it serves real liquidity needs rather than marketing narratives. Binance’s focus on specific harmful practices, such as front-running token release schedules or providing one-sided quotes, shows a nuanced understanding of where manipulation occurs. This targeted approach is more promising than blanket restrictions that might stifle useful activity. I also believe that traditional financial tests, such as the Howey test, often fail to capture the realities of decentralised systems. Similarly, market-making rules designed for traditional equities may not translate perfectly to crypto. Binance appears to be crafting rules specific to the dynamics of digital asset markets, which is the right direction.

 

Source: https://e27.co/binance-cracks-down-on-market-makers-what-traders-need-to-know-now-20260326/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Market crash or buying opportunity? What investors need to know now

Market crash or buying opportunity? What investors need to know now

United States indices closed Tuesday with modest losses, relinquishing early gains as crude prices resumed their ascent. The S&P 500 fell 0.37 per cent to 6,556.37, while the Nasdaq Composite dropped 0.84 per cent to 21,761.89, pressured by weakness in software names and the so-called Mag 7 technology leaders. The Dow Jones Industrial Average shed 84.41 points, or 0.18 per cent, to settle at 46,124.06. These movements reflect a market grappling with conflicting signals.

De-escalation narratives boost risk appetite while persistent inflation concerns keep the Federal Reserve on a hawkish footing. Technology stocks, which have led gains in prior months, now face scrutiny as higher-for-longer interest rate expectations compress valuation multiples. Investors who chased early Tuesday strength found themselves caught on the wrong side of a late-session reversal, a reminder that liquidity can vanish quickly when macro headlines dominate.

Asia-Pacific markets displayed sharper divergence. South Korea’s KOSPI surged 3.06 per cent at Wednesday’s open, fuelled by reports of a potential 15-point US-Iran de-escalation plan. This optimism contrasted with earlier heavy losses in Japan’s Nikkei and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng, both of which fell more than three per cent as energy prices spiked.

The regional split underscores how rapidly sentiment shifts when geopolitical headlines dominate, leaving traders to parse signal from noise in real time. Energy-dependent economies feel these swings most acutely, as oil price volatility directly impacts trade balances and corporate earnings forecasts. The KOSPI’s sharp rebound also highlights how local markets can decouple temporarily from global risk trends when catalyst-specific news emerges, creating both opportunity and whipsaw risk for cross-border capital.

The cryptocurrency market has stabilised after intense volatility, though it remains acutely sensitive to macroeconomic currents. Bitcoin trades around US$70,950, holding modest gains after rebounding from February lows. Ethereum hovers near US$2,130-US$2,160, recently underperforming Bitcoin amid heightened institutional selling pressure in ETH exchange-traded funds. Among altcoins, Solana holds steady near US$88-US$89, while XRP remains around US$1.42-US$1.45.

Market drivers remain anchored in geopolitical uncertainty. Recent liquidations of nearly US$550 million in short positions helped Bitcoin reclaim the US$71,000 threshold, demonstrating how leverage and sentiment can amplify moves in digital asset markets. This dynamic reveals a maturing yet still fragile ecosystem in which traditional finance flows increasingly intersect with decentralised protocols, creating new channels for volatility transmission.

Commodities reflect the same tug-of-war. Brent crude fell more than four per cent to drop below US$100 a barrel at Wednesday’s open on hopes of a de-escalation, after hitting highs near US$119 last week. The Federal Reserve held its benchmark rate at 3.5 per cent to 3.75 per cent this month and signalled only one rate cut for the remainder of 2026, while raising its inflation outlook to 2.7 per cent. Gold trades around US$4,550 per ounce, retaining some safe-haven appeal despite rising bond yields.

These moves highlight how traditional stores of value and inflation hedges respond to the same geopolitical and policy forces shaping equities and crypto. Oil’s sharp pullback from US$119 shows how quickly risk premiums can evaporate on diplomatic headlines, but the Fed’s cautious stance reminds markets that underlying inflation pressures have not disappeared.

This market environment reveals the intelligence gap that persists in Web3 and traditional finance alike. While institutional players react to Federal Reserve signals and Middle East headlines, decentralised networks continue processing transactions without pause. The US$550 million in short liquidations that propelled Bitcoin higher demonstrates how legacy market structures can create asymmetric opportunities for those who understand on-chain dynamics.

Ethereum’s underperformance relative to Bitcoin, driven by ETF selling pressure, reminds us that institutional adoption does not always align with network fundamentals. I see these moments not as noise but as data points in a larger transition toward more resilient, human-centric financial infrastructure. The current volatility underscores why true decentralisation matters. Systems that depend on single points of failure, whether geopolitical or institutional, remain vulnerable to sudden regime shifts.

The path forward demands more than reactive trading. It requires visionary architecture that anticipates the next cycle of innovation while respecting the lessons of past volatility. Markets will continue to oscillate between fear and hope, but the foundational shift toward open, programmable, and user-owned infrastructure represents a structural trend that transcends daily price action. Those who focus on building rather than merely speculating will define the next era of financial technology.

 

 

Source: https://e27.co/market-crash-or-buying-opportunity-what-investors-need-to-know-now-20260325/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Why crypto market cap falls to US$2.53T despite regulatory clarity win and 6-day ETF streak?

Why crypto market cap falls to US$2.53T despite regulatory clarity win and 6-day ETF streak?

The US stock market closed higher as investors processed the Federal Reserve’s decision to maintain interest rates and absorbed fresh inflation data. The S&P 500 rose 0.25 per cent to settle at 6,716.09 while the Nasdaq Composite gained 0.47 per cent, ending the session at 22,479.53. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 46.85 points, a modest 0.10 per cent increase, to close at 46,993.26. This measured optimism reflected a market carefully balancing the Fed’s cautious stance against lingering inflationary pressures. Policymakers held the federal funds target range steady at 3.50 per cent to 3.75 per cent, a move widely anticipated by the CME FedWatch tool. Earlier in the day, the Producer Price Index for February revealed evidence of sticky inflation at the wholesale level, reinforcing the central bank’s data-dependent approach. Markets have now shifted expectations for the first rate cut toward June, a subtle but significant recalibration that underscores the delicate path ahead for monetary policy.

While traditional equities found modest gains, the cryptocurrency market told a different story. The total crypto market cap declined 0.92 per cent over 24 hours, settling at US$2.53T. This move showed a low correlation with the S&P 500 (-7 per cent) and Gold (six per cent), signalling an independent, crypto-specific dynamic rather than a broad risk-off sentiment. The primary driver behind this dip was a muted reaction to long-awaited US regulatory clarity, combined with downward price target revisions from a major bank. On March 17, the SEC and CFTC jointly announced that most crypto assets are not securities, a landmark decision that many had anticipated would spark a rally. Instead, the market executed a classic sell-the-news event. Concurrently, Citigroup slashed its 12-month Bitcoin target by US$31,000, citing slower-than-expected legislative progress. This institutional caution outweighed the positive regulatory development, suppressing bullish momentum and reminding participants that clarity alone does not guarantee immediate price appreciation.

Secondary factors amplified the downward pressure. Derivatives data revealed over US$1B in Bitcoin short interest clustered between US$74,670 and US$76,300, creating a liquidation wall that capped upward movement. This technical resistance meant that any attempt to push prices higher faced immediate selling pressure from leveraged positions. Meanwhile, sector-specific weakness emerged in privacy and meme tokens, with notable losers like Zcash down four per cent and Pippin down 25 per cent. These isolated declines highlight concentrated profit-taking in overextended narratives rather than a fundamental crisis across the entire sector. The market dip was therefore a confluence of technical overhead, institutional scepticism, and rotational selling, not a broad-based loss of confidence. This distinction matters because it suggests the underlying structure of demand remains intact even as short-term volatility persists.

Amid this caution, a powerful countervailing force has emerged: spot Bitcoin ETF inflows. These products have reportedly recorded six straight days of net inflows, signalling persistent institutional demand. Aggregate assets under management for spot Bitcoin ETFs now stand at approximately US$97B, up from about US$94B just 1 week ago. This increase of several billion dollars in regulated BTC exposure over a short period demonstrates that large-scale investors continue to accumulate despite near-term price headwinds. The consistency of these inflows provides a structural bid beneath the market, offering support that may not be immediately visible in daily price action but remains crucial for medium-term stability. This institutional accumulation through regulated channels represents a maturation of crypto market infrastructure, one that decouples long-term conviction from short-term speculative noise.

The impact of these ETF flows extends beyond Bitcoin itself. Over the same week, the total crypto market capitalisation climbed from about US$2.37T to roughly US$2.54T, an increase of more than seven per cent. Bitcoin’s dominance in this market remains high at 58 per cent-59 per cent but has edged down slightly, while the altcoin rotation index has moved into the middle of its range. This suggests that capital is beginning to rotate into higher-risk assets even as Bitcoin continues to attract steady ETF-driven demand. Derivatives open interest has also risen by approximately eight per cent to nine per cent week-on-week, indicating additional speculative positioning layered on top of spot ETF demand. This combination of institutional accumulation and growing speculative activity creates a complex market environment in which support and volatility can coexist, demanding careful navigation by participants.

Looking ahead, the near-term market direction likely hinges on whether Bitcoin can decisively break above the US$74,670-US$76,300 resistance zone. A clean breakout above this level, potentially fuelled by positive ETF flow data released on March 18, could propel the total market cap toward the next Fibonacci extension at US$2.65T. Conversely, a rejection here could trigger a consolidation phase, testing the 23.6 per cent retracement support near US$2.48T. The key variables to monitor include whether the ETF inflow streak persists or flips to net outflows, how ETF assets under management behave around psychological round numbers such as US$100B, and the balance between ETF-led Bitcoin accumulation and rising activity in altcoins and derivatives. Reversals after strong inflow runs have previously coincided with local Bitcoin pullbacks, making the continuity of this streak a critical signal.

Also Read:

Vietnam’s new crypto regulations: What startups and investors need to know this year

Vietnam’s new crypto regulations: What startups and investors need to know this year

From my perspective, this market moment reflects a healthy, if uncomfortable, maturation process. The crypto ecosystem is no longer moving in lockstep with traditional equities or reacting in simplistic ways to regulatory headlines. Instead, it is developing its own internal dynamics shaped by institutional flows, derivatives positioning, and narrative rotation. The muted response to regulatory clarity does not diminish its long-term importance; rather, it highlights how markets price in expectations well in advance. Similarly, institutional price target revisions should be viewed as one input among many, not as definitive verdicts on asset viability. What matters most is the persistent accumulation through regulated channels, which signals a deepening of market infrastructure and a growing recognition of digital assets as a distinct asset class.

Investors should watch for sustained ETF flow data as a gauge of institutional conviction, monitor Bitcoin’s ability to overcome the liquidation wall between US$74,670 and US$76,300, and observe whether altcoin participation strengthens without excessive leverage. The upcoming FOMC meeting and continued evolution of regulatory frameworks will provide additional context, but the crypto market’s independent trajectory suggests it will increasingly march to its own drum. This divergence is not a cause for concern but rather evidence of a market finding its footing amid complex macroeconomic currents.

 
 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j