The Stablecoin in the Headlines Is Not the Stablecoin I Know

The Stablecoin in the Headlines Is Not the Stablecoin I Know

When you scroll through the financial news these days, you meet one stablecoin. The articles describe a digital dollar, a boring token that hugs the greenback, and a shiny new tool for Wall Street. Then you open a DeFi app and meet something else entirely, a lively instrument that moves at 3 a.m. on a Sunday and settles in seconds.

My complaint with the coverage is simple. The media keeps flattening three different animals into one word, and that word hides the parts I care about most. So let me separate the animals, because a public-chain stablecoin, a private-chain stablecoin, and a tokenized deposit do not share much beyond a family resemblance.

The Public-Chain Stablecoin

Start with the creature crypto natives know first. A typical stablecoin in our world is a fiat-collateralized token, and the idea is refreshingly simple. For every digital token an issuer mints on a blockchain, one real dollar sits in a bank account or in a short-term U.S. Treasury bill.

USDT and USDC dominate this market, and together with the rest of the field, they push the total stablecoin market cap past $300 billion in 2026. Traders use these tokens as the base pair for everything, parking value between bets without touching a bank. I use them for what I love most, which is DeFi.

They fuel lending markets on Aave, for instance, and they let anyone with a phone and a wallet earn, borrow, and settle without asking a branch manager for permission.

That permissionless quality is the whole point, and it is also the part the headlines skip. A public-chain stablecoin lives on Ethereum, Solana, or TRON and follows smart-contract code that anyone can read. You hold it in your own wallet with your own keys. You send a million dollars to a friend on another continent at 2 a.m. on a Sunday, and no bank approves the trip.

Every transaction is printed on a public ledger that anyone can audit with a block explorer. That transparency cuts both ways, and it is why regulators actually love these ledgers as tools for tracking illicit finance, but it also means the system answers to mathematics before it answers to a committee.

The Private-Chain Version

Now meet the second animal, the one Wall Street prefers. Banks can also mint dollar tokens, but they do it on private blockchains where only approved clients participate. JPMorgan runs JPM Coin on its own internal ledger, and the bank now moves billions of dollars a day for corporate clients through that system.

The industry calls this a wholesale stablecoin or a tokenized deposit, and the GENIUS Act, which President Trump signed in July 2025, explicitly lets licensed banks build on private chains with built-in controls. The differences from the public version are not cosmetic.

A corporation does not want rivals watching its treasury flows, a bank wants the power to freeze or reverse a mistaken transfer, and nobody wants to pay public gas fees that spike without warning. So the private chain trades openness for control, and it serves interbank settlements and large corporate payments rather than you and me.

The Third Animal Is Different

The third animal is not a stablecoin at all, even though journalists keep calling it one. The dollar balance you see in your PayPal or Venmo app is a stored-value liability under state money-transmitter law, and the balance in your Chase app is a commercial bank deposit insured by the FDIC up to $250,000.

The Federal Reserve’s FedNow rail, which launched in 2023, settles bank dollars instantly around the clock without any ledger technology. Federal law draws a bright line here. To earn the name stablecoin, a digital dollar must exist as a token on a distributed ledger, and the law does not care whether that ledger is public or private.

Off-chain database dollars fall under older banking and electronic-money rules, and they come with fractional-reserve lending rather than the strict one-to-one reserve mandate that the GENIUS Act sets for payment stablecoins.

What Washington Sees

Notice what Washington sees in all of this, because the government views stablecoins through a completely different lens than either crypto natives or bankers do. Treasury officials cheer dollar-backed stablecoins as hungry buyers of short-term U.S. debt, and Tether alone holds roughly $140 billion in Treasuries, a stake that ranks it ahead of countries like South Korea and the United Arab Emirates.

Lawmakers wrote the GENIUS Act to turn stablecoin issuers into something like narrow banks that must hold cash and Treasuries one-to-one, publish audited reserve reports, and freeze tokens when law enforcement flags a wallet.

The law also strips stablecoins of any interest payment, and a separate executive order blocks the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency. Washington therefore anoints the private, regulated stablecoin as America’s digital dollar, treating the token more like a digital cashier’s check than Bitcoin.

Why Reserve Quality Matters

That legal carve-out explains why the government refuses to call a payment stablecoin a security or a commodity. The SEC and the CFTC police bets on rising prices, and a token that stays at one dollar and pays no yield gives nobody an expectation of profit.

Banking regulators like the OCC and the Federal Reserve take the stablecoin file instead, because a run on a big issuer would spill into real banks and the Treasury market, while a crash in a speculative coin mostly burns its own holders. The 2022 collapse of TerraUSD perfectly illustrates risk.

That algorithmic coin had no real reserves backing it, and when trust evaporated, it fell from $1 to a few cents, wiping out about $45 billion in market value in days. Reserve quality is the entire game, and the law now writes that lesson into statute.

Where I Plant My Flag

Here is where I plant my flag. The private-chain version and the tokenized deposit do real work for corporate treasurers, and I welcome the clarity the GENIUS Act brings. I still root for the public one because openness compounds.

A permissionless dollar token lets a freelancer in Manila collect wages from Berlin in seconds for pennies, lets an unbanked teenager hold digital cash that no one can freeze with a phone call, and lets developers compose money into code the way they compose software.

DeFi turns those tokens into credit markets, savings tools, and insurance pools that run in the open, and every transaction leaves a public trail that any citizen can check. The private rails optimise for institutional comfort, while the public rails optimise for user dignity.

So the next time a headline calls stablecoins “boring digital dollars,” ask which animal the writer actually means. The answer changes everything about the risk you hold, the rights you keep, and the future you get. I know which one I hold, and I know which one I cheer for.

 

Source: https://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/the-stablecoin-in-the-headlines-is-not-the-stablecoin-i-know/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Wall Street May Embrace Tokenized Stocks, But Not on Public Blockchains

Wall Street May Embrace Tokenized Stocks, But Not on Public Blockchains

Many crypto enthusiasts dream of trading traditional equities around the clock on public blockchains. They imagine a decentralized utopia where anyone can buy fractional shares of major corporations without traditional brokers.

This vision fundamentally misunderstands how institutional finance operates. In my opinion, major tokenized stocks will never migrate to public networks. The future of twenty-four-hour equity trading belongs exclusively to private or semi-private blockchain architectures.

Regulatory Signals Fuel the Narrative

The United States Securities and Exchange Commission recently proposed rescinding two key rules under Regulation National Market System.

These rules require trades to be routed to the national best price and prohibit locked or crossed quotes across venues. Analysts like Alex Thorn note that automated market makers on public chains conflict with these requirements because they execute against isolated liquidity pools without checking off-chain quotes. Removing the rules could theoretically open the door to compliant on-chain trading of tokenized United States equities.

However, this remains a medium-term structural adjustment rather than an immediate green light. The proposal still faces a lengthy comment process, and platforms would still need to register as exchanges or alternative trading systems, satisfy clearing obligations, and ensure token holders retain voting and dividend rights.

Traditional market groups also warn that removing the rules could reduce price transparency and fragment markets.

Operational Constraints of Public Blockchains

Even with favorable regulations, public blockchains present significant operational hurdles for institutional equity trading. Gas fee volatility remains a primary deterrent. A surge in retail activity can congest public networks and sharply increase transaction costs.

Institutions cannot risk large equity settlements being delayed or becoming more expensive because of unrelated retail traffic. Traditional finance requires deterministic execution.

A bank executing a large block trade needs certainty around cost and settlement timing. Institutional traders require millisecond precision and reliable finality. Public networks prioritize openness and censorship resistance over the predictable throughput global capital markets demand.

Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) presents another critical barrier. Public blockchains broadcast pending transactions in a public mempool before execution. Sophisticated actors deploy bots to scan this information and front-run large orders by manipulating transaction ordering.

Billions of dollars have been extracted through these practices in recent years. This directly conflicts with the fiduciary obligations of traditional brokers and institutional mandates requiring best execution. Financial institutions are unlikely to embrace a system that permits such extraction from client order flow.

Privacy, Compliance, and Control Requirements

Privacy and compliance requirements further strengthen the case against public ledgers. Traditional finance operates under strict Know Your Customer and Anti-Money Laundering regulations.

Public blockchains expose transaction data to everyone. Institutions cannot broadcast their strategic positioning or client holdings on a transparent ledger. Regulators also require the ability to freeze assets or reverse transactions under specific legal circumstances. Public blockchains generally resist these interventions, creating challenges when compliance frameworks require administrative control.

Private networks provide the logical solution. A private blockchain functions as a shared, cryptographically secure ledger maintained by a trusted group of regulated institutions.

This architecture delivers many of the benefits of distributed ledger technology without the unpredictability of public networks. Competitors cannot observe order flows, trade sizes, or account balances. Transactions remain confidential between authorized participants and regulators.

These networks can also streamline clearing and settlement by enabling institutions to transact directly with one another. This lowers costs, reduces counterparty risk, and supports continuous settlement. Enterprise networks further offer dedicated support and contractual service guarantees that public protocols do not provide.

Institutional Adoption Is Already Underway

Major financial institutions already recognize this reality. J.P. Morgan operates its Onyx platform for tokenized intraday repurchase agreement trades and payments. Goldman Sachs uses its Digital Asset Platform to issue and trade digital bonds and other institutional instruments.

HSBC’s Orion platform supports tokenized gold and digital bond issuance. These examples demonstrate that financial institutions view blockchain primarily as infrastructure for automation, synchronization, and efficiency within controlled environments.

The Direction of Tokenized Equities

Market participants continue to pursue the vision of trading major corporate shares on public decentralized exchanges. Yet the structural, regulatory, and operational realities of global finance point elsewhere.

The Securities and Exchange Commission may eventually adapt market rules for digital assets, but the infrastructure itself will remain largely in private hands.

Tokenized equities are far more likely to thrive on secure, permissioned networks designed for institutional performance and compliance than on fully public chains. The future of financial innovation is not public exposure. It is private, efficient infrastructure built to meet the demands of modern capital markets.

 

 

Source:

https://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/wall-street-may-embrace-tokenized-stocks-but-not-on-public-blockchains/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Public sector IT strategies 2024: Leveraging AI and Blockchain for transforming governance

Public sector IT strategies 2024: Leveraging AI and Blockchain for transforming governance

As we look to the future, it’s clear that the public sector IT leaders who successfully navigate the integration of AI and blockchain will be well-positioned to deliver transformative changes in governance.

We’re seeing a huge shift in how governments are using technology. It’s not just about upgrading computers anymore, it’s about using powerful tools like AI and blockchain to completely change how things work. This is a chance to make governments more efficient, transparent, and trustworthy.

Think of all the ways AI is already being used: streamlining welfare, making immigration decisions fairer, catching fraudsters, planning cities, and even helping doctors. And this is just the beginning!

But there are worries too. Can we trust AI to be fair and unbiased? That’s where blockchain comes in. It’s like a digital ledger that keeps track of everything, making sure AI decisions are transparent and accountable.

Imagine a world where:

  • Every government decision made by AI is recorded and can be checked by anyone, ensuring fairness and stopping corruption.
  • AI analyses huge amounts of data to help governments understand what citizens need and provide better services.
  • Cities use AI and blockchain to manage traffic, energy, and waste more efficiently

The adoption of AI in government operations has already begun to yield significant benefits across various domains. From streamlining welfare payments to optimising immigration decisions, AI’s impact is far-reaching. Public servants are harnessing its capabilities to detect fraud, plan infrastructure projects, respond to citizen queries, assist in bail hearings, triage healthcare cases, and even establish drone paths. These applications merely scratch the surface of AI’s potential in the public sector.

However, the integration of AI into existing systems is not without its challenges. Concerns about transparency, accountability, and the potential for bias in AI decision-making processes have led some governments to approach this technology with caution. This is where blockchain technology enters the picture, offering a solution that addresses these concerns while amplifying the benefits of AI.

Incorporating Blockchain into AI-driven government systems

Blockchain, with its inherent characteristics of immutability, transparency, and decentralisation, provides a robust framework for ensuring the integrity and traceability of AI-driven processes. By keeping an unalterable record of all changes and decisions made by AI systems, blockchain technology can serve as a crucial accountability mechanism. This symbiotic relationship between AI and blockchain has the potential to create a new paradigm in public sector IT – one that combines the efficiency and insights of AI with the trust and transparency of blockchain.

The AI Strategy for Government, as outlined by various forward-thinking administrations, presents a vision where government agencies leverage AI to deliver high-impact outcomes in their core business. This strategy typically encompasses five key recommendations:

  • Identifying common AI applications that can be proliferated across different departments and agencies.
  • Pinpointing signature AI use cases to demonstrate tangible impact and build public confidence.
  • Productionising AI tools by building centralised infrastructure and resources.
  • Proliferating AI capabilities by broadening and deepening technical expertise within the public sector workforce.
  • Strengthening trust in the government’s use of AI by establishing robust governance frameworks.

These recommendations provide a solid foundation for the integration of AI into public sector operations. However, the addition of blockchain technology can significantly enhance this strategy, addressing some of the key concerns associated with AI adoption in government.

One of the primary advantages of incorporating blockchain into AI-driven government systems is the establishment of an immutable audit trail. Every decision made by an AI system can be recorded on the blockchain, creating a transparent and tamper-proof record. This not only ensures accountability but also allows for thorough scrutiny of AI decision-making processes, helping to identify and mitigate potential biases or errors.

The use of smart contracts on blockchain platforms can help align AI systems with their primary tasks and objectives. Smart contracts can be programmed to enforce specific rules and conditions, ensuring that AI systems operate within predefined parameters. This creates a system of checks and balances, mitigating the risk of AI systems deviating from their intended purposes or making unauthorised decisions.

The synergy between AI and blockchain extends beyond mere record-keeping and accountability. AI can analyse the vast amounts of data stored on blockchain networks to derive valuable insights for policymaking. By processing citizen feedback, transaction data, and other relevant information stored on the blockchain, AI systems can help governments make more informed, data-driven decisions that are responsive to the needs and preferences of their citizens.

Transforming public services with AI and Blockchain

This data-driven approach to governance has the potential to transform how public services are delivered. For instance, AI algorithms could analyse blockchain-stored data on citizens’ interactions with various government services to identify bottlenecks, inefficiencies, or areas for improvement. This information could then be used to optimise service delivery, potentially leading to more personalised, responsive, and anticipatory public services.

In the area of policy-making and planning, the combination of AI and blockchain can provide governments with unprecedented capabilities. AI’s predictive analytics, when applied to the wealth of data securely stored on blockchain networks, can offer more accurate forecasts and deeper insights into societal trends. This could enable governments to anticipate future challenges, from demographic shifts to economic fluctuations, and develop proactive policies to address them.

The potential applications of this technology duo are vast and varied. In the field of public finance, for instance, AI could analyse blockchain-recorded transaction data to detect patterns indicative of fraud or tax evasion, while the immutability of blockchain ensures the integrity of financial records. In healthcare, AI could process anonymised patient data stored on blockchain networks to identify public health trends or predict disease outbreaks, all while maintaining patient privacy and data security.

In the domain of smart cities, the convergence of AI, blockchain, and spatial computing presents exciting possibilities. AI algorithms could analyse data from IoT devices recorded on blockchain networks to optimise traffic flow, energy consumption, and waste management. The immutability and transparency of blockchain would ensure the integrity of this data, while smart contracts could automate various city operations based on predefined conditions.

It’s crucial to acknowledge that the integration of AI and blockchain in public sector IT is not without challenges. Technical hurdles, such as scalability issues in blockchain networks and the computational demands of AI systems, need to be addressed. There are also important ethical considerations, particularly around data privacy and the potential for surveillance. The successful implementation of these technologies requires significant investment in infrastructure and human capital. Governments need to prioritise the development of AI and blockchain expertise within their workforce, potentially through partnerships with academic institutions and the private sector.

Public acceptance and trust are also critical factors. Governments must be transparent about how they’re using these technologies and provide clear explanations of how AI-blockchain systems make decisions that affect citizens’ lives. Public education initiatives may be necessary to help citizens understand the benefits and limitations of these technologies.

In Conclusion

Despite these challenges, I believe the potential benefits of integrating AI and blockchain in public sector IT far outweigh the obstacles. This technological convergence offers a path towards more efficient, transparent, and responsive governance – a goal that should be at the forefront of any public sector IT strategy.

As we look to the future, it’s clear that the public sector IT leaders who successfully navigate the integration of AI and blockchain will be well-positioned to deliver transformative changes in governance. By harnessing the analytical power of AI and the trust-building capabilities of blockchain, governments can create a new paradigm of public service – one that is more efficient, more accountable, and more attuned to the needs of citizens.

In conclusion, the focus on integrating AI with existing systems and adopting blockchain technology in the public sector represents a forward-thinking approach to governance in the digital age. This strategy has the potential to enhance decision-making, improve service delivery, optimise internal operations, and strengthen public trust in government institutions. As these technologies continue to evolve and mature, we can expect to see increasingly sophisticated applications that redefine the relationship between citizens and their governments.

The journey towards fully realising the potential of AI and blockchain in public sector IT will undoubtedly be complex and challenging. It will require sustained commitment, significant resources, and a willingness to embrace change and innovation. However, for those governments willing to embark on this journey, the rewards promise to be transformative – ushering in a new era of smart, responsive, and trustworthy governance that is well-equipped to meet the challenges of the 21st century.

 

 

Source: https://ciosea.economictimes.indiatimes.com/blog/public-sector-it-strategies-2024-leveraging-ai-and-blockchain-for-transforming-governance/113050118

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j