Can You Really Earn Passive Income With Stablecoins? (Spoiler: It’s Not What You Think)

Can You Really Earn Passive Income With Stablecoins? (Spoiler: It’s Not What You Think)

Let’s talk about something that keeps popping up in crypto circles: “You can earn passive income with stablecoins.” It sounds almost too good to be true. Hold a digital dollar, sit back, and watch it grow. But before you rush to move your savings into USDC or DAI, it’s worth slowing down and asking: what’s really going on here?

First, let’s clear up a common misconception. Stablecoins themselves don’t magically generate yield. If you leave USDT sitting in your wallet, it will stay exactly the same amount for years, just like cash under a mattress. The yield doesn’t come from the token; it comes from what you do with it. In other words, “passive” is a bit of a misnomer. True passivity would mean doing nothing and still earning returns. But in practice, you have to actively deploy your stablecoins into systems that put them to work.

So where does this yield actually come from? And more importantly, is it safe?

One of the most straightforward ways to earn yield is through decentralized lending protocols like Aave or Compound. You deposit your stablecoins, they get lent out to borrowers, often traders using leverage, and part of the interest those borrowers pay flows back to you. Right now, typical annual yields on these platforms range from 3% to 9%. During promotional periods, when protocols are trying to attract liquidity, you might even see rates climb to 10% or 12%. These platforms are relatively user-friendly, your funds are usually accessible on demand, and within the DeFi world, they’re considered lower-risk options. That said, “lower risk” doesn’t mean “no risk.” More on that later.

Then there’s a newer category I like to think of as “stablecoins that lay eggs.” These aren’t just placeholders for dollars. They’re designed to automatically accrue yield. Take sDAI, for example, issued by MakerDAO. When you convert your DAI into sDAI, you’re essentially buying a share of Maker’s surplus buffer, which includes income from U.S. Treasury bills and other real-world assets. The current yield sits around 5% to 8% annually. Similarly, sUSDe from Ethena Labs offers yields between 8% and 15%, depending on market conditions. But here’s the twist: sUSDe doesn’t rely on lending. Instead, it uses a delta-neutral strategy, simultaneously holding long positions in Ethereum and short positions in perpetual futures, to capture funding rate spreads without betting on price direction. It’s clever, but it’s also more complex and tied to derivatives markets, which adds layers of risk that aren’t always obvious at first glance.

For those who prefer a more conservative approach, there are stablecoins backed directly by real-world assets, primarily short-term U.S. Treasury bills. Ondo Finance’s USDY and Mountain Protocol’s USDm fall into this bucket, offering steady yields of around 4% to 5%. BlackRock’s BUIDL token is perhaps the purest example: it represents direct fractional ownership of a fund holding actual Treasuries. The catch? It’s largely inaccessible to retail users due to regulatory restrictions. Still, these instruments represent a bridge between traditional finance and on-chain infrastructure. They require no active management, compound automatically, and feel closer to a savings account than a speculative DeFi play. If you’re looking for something truly hands-off and grounded in real economic activity, this is probably your best bet.

Now, if you’re comfortable with higher complexity and volatility, there’s liquidity mining. This involves providing stablecoins to trading pools on platforms like Curve or Uniswap. In return, you earn a cut of the trading fees plus bonus tokens issued by the protocol to incentivize participation. Yields here can look dazzling, often 8% to 30%, sometimes even higher. But remember: those eye-popping numbers usually include volatile incentive tokens whose value can plummet overnight. And because you’re supplying two assets, even if both are stablecoins like USDC and DAI, you’re exposed to impermanent loss if their pegs diverge, even slightly. More advanced strategies layer on additional tools. Pendle lets you split yield into principal and future income streams, while cross-chain bridges like Stargate or Scroll open up opportunities across ecosystems. Each step adds operational complexity and potential failure points.

So, where does all this yield actually originate? It boils down to five main sources: interest from borrowers, fees from traders, rewards from protocol tokens, returns from real-world assets like Treasuries, and profits from derivatives strategies like funding rate arbitrage. None of this is free money. It’s compensation for taking on some form of risk, whether credit, market, or technical.

And that brings us to the critical part: risk. Just because a coin is “stable” doesn’t mean your investment is safe. First, there’s smart contract risk. DeFi runs on code, and code can have bugs. Even audited protocols have been hacked, sometimes through flash loan attacks that exploit economic logic rather than coding errors. Then there’s de-pegging risk. Remember Terra’s UST? It promised stability and high yields, then collapsed in a matter of hours, wiping out tens of billions in value. While today’s major stablecoins like USDC and DAI are far more robust, no system is immune to black swan events.

Liquidity risk is another concern. If everyone tries to withdraw at once, say during a market crash, a protocol might freeze withdrawals or delay redemptions. Regulatory risk looms large, too. The SEC has already signaled skepticism toward many yield-bearing crypto products, and future rules could restrict access or force platforms to shut down certain features. And finally, there’s plain old human error: sending funds to the wrong address, mishandling private keys, or falling for phishing scams. In crypto, mistakes are permanent.

Given all this, how should a typical user approach stablecoin yield? Diversification isn’t just wise. It’s essential. I’d suggest thinking in tiers. For a conservative allocation, park about 40% of your stablecoins in yield-bearing tokens like sDAI or real-world asset-backed options like USDY. These offer modest but reliable returns with minimal ongoing effort. For a balanced approach, allocate another 40% to established DeFi lending protocols like Aave or Compound. Solid infrastructure, transparent reserves, and reasonable yields. Then, if you’re comfortable with volatility and understand the mechanics, you might dedicate the remaining 20% to more aggressive strategies like liquidity mining or cross-chain yield farming. But never go all-in on anything promising double-digit returns without understanding exactly how it works.

A few practical rules can help keep you grounded. Stick to protocols with at least 100 million dollars in total value locked. This isn’t a guarantee of safety, but it suggests a level of market trust and operational maturity. Always diversify across multiple platforms and strategies. Don’t put all your eggs in one basket, especially in a space where baskets can vanish overnight. And be deeply skeptical of any yield above 15%. If it sounds too good to be true, it probably is. High returns almost always reflect hidden risks, whether counterparty exposure, unsustainable tokenomics, or fragile economic assumptions.

At the end of the day, stablecoins are tools, not magic wands. They can be powerful vehicles for earning yield, but only if you treat them with respect and do your homework. The idea of “passive income” is seductive, but in crypto, true passivity is rare. What looks effortless often rests on layers of active market participants, complex financial engineering, and systemic risk. So before you chase the highest APY, ask yourself: Do I understand where this yield comes from? What could go wrong? And how much am I willing to lose?

Stablecoins may hold their value, but the promise of easy returns rarely does. Approach with curiosity, caution, and a healthy dose of skepticism, and you’ll be far better positioned to navigate this evolving landscape without getting burned.

 

Source: https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/02/50897743/can-you-really-earn-passive-income-with-stablecoins-spoiler-its-not-what-you-think

 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

AI stocks soar while crypto bleeds: What’s really driving the great market divergence?

AI stocks soar while crypto bleeds: What’s really driving the great market divergence?

Despite a wave of optimism in mainstream financial markets following Nvidia’s robust earnings report and bullish forward guidance, the cryptocurrency market has charted a markedly different course. While the S&P 500, NASDAQ, and Dow Jones posted modest but clear gains, crypto traders navigated a landscape of institutional retreat, forced deleveraging, and growing scepticism around altcoin fundamentals.

The disconnect between AI-driven equity euphoria and crypto caution underscores a critical juncture. As traditional markets celebrate the next phase of artificial intelligence integration, digital asset markets confront a confluence of macro headwinds and structural vulnerabilities.

Crypto’s recent underperformance lies in a record-breaking institutional outflow. BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust recorded a single-day withdrawal of US$523 million, the largest since its January 2024 debut. This outflow did not occur in isolation. US spot Bitcoin ETFs collectively shed US$1.3 billion in assets under management over the past week, a direct response to diminishing hopes for a December Federal Reserve rate cut.

Market participants now assign only a 27 per cent probability to such a move, a sharp reversal from the more dovish expectations held just weeks prior. For a market increasingly tethered to traditional financial sentiment, with crypto-equity correlations hovering near 0.65, the withdrawal of institutional capital has stripped away a critical support layer. When institutions step back, retail traders rarely fill the void with sufficient conviction, especially in volatile environments.

Compounding this institutional caution is a cascade of leveraged liquidations. Over US$127 million in Bitcoin long positions were forcibly closed in a short window, intensifying downward price pressure as Bitcoin dipped below the psychologically significant US$90,000 mark. This deleveraging occurred against a backdrop of rising open interest in crypto derivatives, which climbed 10.4 per cent to US$889 billion, suggesting that many new positions were opened on borrowed capital.

When volatility spikes or sentiment shifts, such positions become vulnerable. The result is a feedback loop. Price drops trigger margin calls, which force more selling, which pushes prices lower still. The market’s emotional state reflects this stress. The Crypto Fear and Greed Index plummeted to 15, entering the Extreme Fear zone, the lowest reading since March 2025. Technical indicators like the RSI14 at 37.95 signal oversold conditions, but they provide no clear reversal signal, leaving traders in a state of anxious limbo.

Altcoins have fared even worse, revealing the fragility of speculative narratives when liquidity dries up. Solana, once heralded as a high-throughput alternative to Ethereum, plunged 11.47 per cent over the week after Forward Industries, its largest corporate holder, transferred US$201 million worth of SOL to Coinbase Prime. Such large movements of tokens to exchange wallets are often interpreted as preludes to selling, igniting panic among retail holders. BNB and XRP mirrored these losses, declining 4.81 per cent and 12.14 per cent, respectively.

The Altcoin Season Index now stands at 27, well below the 75 threshold that typically signals a broad-based rally in alternative cryptocurrencies. This metric confirms what price action already suggests. It is firmly Bitcoin’s market, and even Bitcoin is struggling to hold ground.

Meanwhile, the macroeconomic backdrop offers little comfort. US Treasury yields remain elevated, with the 10-year at 4.14 per cent and the 2-year at 3.59 per cent. Fed officials have openly pushed back against rate-cut expectations, and the delay in key US jobs data further clouds the policy outlook.

In foreign exchange markets, the US dollar remains firm, while the Japanese yen hovers near 157.2, perilously close to levels that could trigger government intervention. Gold, often a refuge in uncertain times, holds just above US$4,000, reflecting a mixed risk environment where some investors hedge while others chase AI-linked equities.

The divergence between traditional tech and crypto markets raises a fundamental question. Is AI optimism truly a rising tide that lifts all boats, or does it primarily benefit assets with deep institutional integration and clear cash flow narratives? Nvidia’s forecast, projecting US$203 billion in annual revenue, speaks to tangible, near-term AI infrastructure demand.

Its chips power the data centres that train large language models and run inference workloads. Bitcoin and Solana, by contrast, offer no earnings, no dividends, and uncertain regulatory pathways. In a regime of higher-for-longer rates, such assets become less attractive relative to yield-bearing instruments or equities with demonstrable growth.

For investors, the path forward demands discipline. In equities, tech exposure remains compelling but warrants selectivity. In crypto, the current environment favours caution. Traders should monitor Bitcoin ETF flows closely. A reversal from outflows to inflows could signal renewed institutional appetite, especially if softer jobs data revives rate-cut hopes.

Similarly, sustained negative funding rates in perpetual futures markets might indicate capitulation and a potential short-term bottom. Until then, the market’s Extreme Fear reading is not just a metric. It is a warning. The AI boom may be real, but its benefits are not yet flowing into digital asset markets. Instead, crypto finds itself caught in a perfect storm of macro uncertainty, institutional hesitation, and speculative excess unwinding. The rally elsewhere is a reminder of what crypto could be, but not what it is today.

 

Source: https://e27.co/ai-stocks-soar-while-crypto-bleeds-whats-really-driving-the-great-market-divergence-20251120/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Going back to basics. Do I really need another picture of an ape? NFT market slumps in August

Going back to basics. Do I really need another picture of an ape? NFT market slumps in August

The article did reflect some of my views but also did not. The core message that I was trying to say is that the NFT market is at the rebuilding stage right now. The previous highs that were in the bull market are in a challenging stage. The prices were unsustainable, and it will continue this way as the macro environment is not looking too optimistic now.

There are many contributing factors to this current state but is this the end of the NFT markets? It is not.

Right now there are more projects in the markets working hard behind the scene working on content, books, music, and better gaming assets and experiences. The speculation market has died down, and this is actually very healthy for all of us to grow.

This is a time to go back to basics. We can look at the 5Ps of marketing- Product, Price, Promotion, Place, and People.

When we are in the bull market, whatever products can sell without doing anything. But in the current times, we need to look at the product. Is it value for money?

Pricing is another factor to look at. PFP in the good times can start at a 1 ETH floor price. We should watch our pricing more carefully right now. Take my NFT book, for example, I choose to launch it on Bybit NFT Marketplace at $2.99, not $29.99. This decision was made after looking at the market and the demand from my communities.

Lastly, I think people and community are what we should be building too. If you do not have this, this is the best time to look into it now. This will also help you to get better results when the market turns better.

Anndy Lian

 

Do I really need another picture of an ape? NFT market slumps in August

The NFT hype from earlier in the year is dying off as the market continues its downward path into the final third of the year. Fire sale coming for apes and cats?

The number of unique non-fungible token (NFT) buyers in August fell below 500,000 for the first time in a year and extended the drop in purchasers to four consecutive months, according to NFT aggregation site CryptoSlam.

Due to an increase in Ethereum prices in early August, total sales rose to US$730 million from July’s US$650 million, but remain a long way short of this year’s January peak of US$4.5 billion.

Yehudah Petscher, NFT relations strategist for CryptoSlam, said the NFT market has caught up with the rest of the world, as traditional markets have been hammered by concerns about rising inflation and interest rates, as well as other global developments.

“People are being much more selective with what they buy and questioning, ‘Do I really want to buy this picture of an ape or a cat for $500?’” Petscher told Forkast in an interview. “You used to give no pause before and you would buy that and you were happy to. And now no, now you need a product. You need something more than just the picture.”

The previous high prices in the NFT market were unsustainable, said Anndy Lian, author of the new book “NFT: From Zero to Hero,” in an email response to questions. The “[NFT] environment is not looking too optimistic,” he said, though added that price retrenchments are also when companies build anew.

The Merge

One event on the horizon could further disrupt the NFT market — Ethereum’s Merge planned for later in September.

The Merge will see the world’s second-largest blockchain, which has a market cap of just under US$200 billion and accounted for almost 70% of all NFT transactions in August, move from a proof-of-work (PoW) consensus algorithm to proof-of-stake (PoS).

The buzz around the Merge, saw Ethereum prices almost double in a month to reach as high as US$2,022 in mid-August. Ethereum Classic, the original blockchain from which Ethereum was forked, also more than doubled in the same period to a five-month high of US$45.51.

Both have since fallen back, with Ethereum trading at US$1,587 on Friday in Asia and Ethereum Classic at US$32.67.

Petscher said the Merge might “introduce a little chaos” to the market.

As part of the Merge, all NFTs currently hosted on the PoW blockchain must be replicated on the new PoS network to become the “official” versions of the NFTs.

OpenSea, by far the industry’s largest marketplace, announced Thursday that they will only be supporting the PoS versions of NFT collections, but that doesn’t mean a market for the PoW versions won’t emerge, Petscher said.

Deja vu?

This situation is not without precedent. A debate emerged earlier this year surrounding the authenticity of CryptoPunks – one of the market’s leading collections with over US$2 billion in sales – as the current collections are actually re-issues designed to fix a bug in the original run, now known as V1 CryptoPunks.

While the CryptoPunks creators, Lava Labs, originally sought to discredit the V1 collection, collectors pushed back and now V1 CryptoPunks are traded in their own right as a piece of NFT history — though with much smaller total sales of US$75 million.

Aside from the Merge, Petscher said it will take a significant catalyst from outside the NFT industry to shake off the current market slump. One example could be Apple Inc. releasing its long-awaited virtual reality (VR) headset, which Petscher says has huge potential for NFT integration.

“It’s going to require something big like that,” he said. “Unless, of course, the world changes; if  suddenly the war ends and the traditional stock market starts improving, that would lead to the good times again.”

“But I don’t think anybody sees that on the horizon right now.”

 

Source: https://forkast.news/picture-ape-nft-market-slumps-august/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j