Tariffs, tech crashes, crypto dips, and gold’s record run: Why markets are in chaos today

Tariffs, tech crashes, crypto dips, and gold’s record run: Why markets are in chaos today

This week, the interplay of US-Japan trade talks, US-China tariff escalations, and new restrictions on chip exports has kept markets on edge. Meanwhile, Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s measured response to the turmoil has dashed hopes for immediate intervention, leaving investors to grapple with volatile asset prices and shifting risk sentiment.

The current market landscape is a complex tapestry of competing forces, from Bitcoin’s resilience to Ethereum’s technical signals, US equities’ performance, and gold’s safe-haven allure. Below, I offer my perspective on these developments, weaving together the broader macroeconomic context, asset-specific dynamics, and the implications for investors navigating this fraught environment.

The tentative global risk sentiment reflects the high stakes of ongoing tariff negotiations, particularly between the US and its major trading partners. The advancement of US-Japan trade talks, marked by President Trump’s optimistic claim of “big progress,” provided a modest lift to Japanese equities, with the Nikkei 225 gaining slightly. However, the yen weakened as investors priced in the likelihood of a deal that could avert higher US levies on Japanese goods, particularly in the auto sector. This development underscores Japan’s delicate balancing act: while a trade agreement could stabilise its export-driven economy, a stronger US dollar against the yen could pressure Japanese manufacturers’ competitiveness. The Bank of Japan, already grappling with a low-yield environment, may face further constraints if US tariffs dampen economic growth, as Governor Kazuo Ueda recently hinted.

For investors, the yen’s trajectory and Japan’s market performance hinge on the specifics of any deal—whether it prioritises market access or imposes new non-tariff barriers.

The US-China trade war, however, remains the epicentre of market anxiety. The White House’s confirmation of a staggering 245 per cent cumulative tariff rate on Chinese imports, following China’s retaliatory 125 per cent levies on US goods, signals a deepening economic standoff. This tit-for-tat escalation, coupled with new US restrictions on chip exports by Nvidia and AMD, has battered technology stocks and fueled fears of disrupted global supply chains. The chip export curbs, targeting Nvidia’s H20 and AMD’s MI308 AI chips, are a strategic move to limit China’s access to advanced technology, but they come at a cost: Nvidia estimates a US$5.5 billion hit to its revenue, and its shares slumped nearly seven per cent.

The broader tech-heavy Nasdaq Composite fell 3.1 per cent, contributing to the MSCI US index’s 2.2 per cent decline. These developments highlight the fragility of the tech sector, which has been a cornerstone of US market performance but is now vulnerable to geopolitical shocks.

China’s response has been multifaceted, blending defiance with pragmatism. Beijing’s vow to “fight to the end” against US tariffs is tempered by signals of openness to negotiations, suggesting a desire to avoid a complete collapse of trade relations. However, China’s reported sale of confiscated cryptocurrency holdings, including Bitcoin, amid an economic slowdown, adds another layer of complexity.

This move, likely driven by the need to bolster fiscal reserves, has sparked speculation about its impact on crypto markets. Remarkably, Bitcoin has shown resilience, holding above US$84,000 despite the sales. This strength can be attributed to Bitcoin’s growing perception as a hedge against macroeconomic uncertainty, particularly as central banks and investors seek alternatives to traditional assets amid trade war volatility. Posts on X reflect this sentiment, with some users noting Bitcoin’s 64 per cent market dominance—a level not seen since early 2021—as evidence of its safe-haven appeal.

Ethereum, by contrast, has struggled, slipping below US$1,600 and entering a technically bearish phase. An analysis by CryptoQuant’s abramchart offers a nuanced perspective, suggesting that Ethereum’s current price near its realised price of US$1,585 could signal a deep-value accumulation zone. Historically, such levels have preceded major bull runs as long-term holders re-enter the market. However, technical indicators paint a mixed picture: Ethereum’s breach of its 20-day moving average and its position well below the 200-day average confirm a strong downtrend, while the relative strength index near 40 indicates weak momentum.

The compressed Bollinger Bands suggest a potential breakout, but the direction remains uncertain. For investors, Ethereum’s current dynamics present both opportunity and risk. While the realised price level hints at undervaluation, the broader market’s risk-off mood and trade war headwinds could delay a rebound.

The Federal Reserve’s role in this turbulent environment cannot be overstated. Chair Jerome Powell’s remarks this week, emphasising a wait-and-see approach to tariffs, have quashed expectations of a “Fed put”—a swift policy response to stabilise markets. Powell’s caution is rooted in the dual risks of higher inflation and slower growth, which tariffs are “highly likely” to exacerbate. His acknowledgement that the Fed faces a “highly uncertain outlook” underscores the central bank’s dilemma: cutting rates could fuel inflation while holding or raising rates risks stifling growth and employment. The Fed’s benchmark rate, currently between 4.25 per cent and 4.5 per cent, reflects this holding pattern, with traders still betting on cuts by June despite Powell’s reticence. The Fed’s data-dependent stance, coupled with solid economic indicators like March’s 228,000 job additions, suggests that any policy shift will hinge on clearer evidence of tariff-related economic fallout.

Fixed-income markets have also felt the strain, with US Treasury yields edging lower as investors reassess growth prospects. The 10-year yield fell 5.6 basis points to 4.28 per cent, and the two-year yield dropped 7.5 basis points to 3.77 per cent, reflecting concerns about a potential recession. The US dollar index’s 0.8 per cent decline, reaching its lowest level since April 2022, signals waning confidence in US assets as investors pivot to safe-haven currencies such as the Japanese yen and Swiss franc. Gold, meanwhile, has surged 3.5 per cent to a record US$3,339 per ounce, with ANZ Bank forecasting a rise to US$3,600 by year-end.

This rally, driven by central bank purchases and haven demand, underscores gold’s role as a bulwark against geopolitical and economic uncertainty. Brent crude’s 1.8 per cent rise to around US$65 per barrel, spurred by US sanctions on Chinese importers of Iranian oil, highlights the ripple effects of trade policies on commodity markets.

US equities, particularly the energy sector, have shown pockets of resilience, with energy stocks gaining 0.8 per cent amid higher oil prices. However, the broader MSCI US index’s 2.2 per cent tumble reflects the tech sector’s drag and broader tariff fears. Asian equities, trading in a tight range, have been buoyed by hopes of Chinese stimulus, but volatility persists as negotiation headlines dominate. US equity futures, pointing to a 0.4 per cent higher open, suggest a tentative recovery, but the market’s direction remains contingent on trade developments.

From my perspective, the current market environment demands a disciplined, long-term approach. The escalation of US-China tariffs and chip export restrictions poses significant risks to global growth, particularly for the tech and manufacturing sectors. However, opportunities exist in assets such as Bitcoin and gold, which are benefiting from their safe-haven status. Ethereum’s technical setup, while bearish, suggests potential for accumulation by patient investors.

Powell’s cautious stance, while frustrating for those seeking immediate relief, is a prudent response to an unprecedented policy shock. Investors should focus on diversification, prioritising assets with strong fundamentals and resilience to geopolitical volatility. The road ahead is fraught with uncertainty, but those who navigate it with clarity and conviction may find opportunities amid the storm.

In conclusion, the global markets are at a crossroads, shaped by the interplay of trade tensions, monetary policy, and shifting investor sentiment. The US-China tariff war, US-Japan trade talks, and the Fed’s watchful stance are driving volatility across equities, currencies, and commodities. Bitcoin’s resilience, Ethereum’s accumulation potential, and gold’s surge highlight the divergent paths assets are taking in this environment. As negotiations unfold and economic data clarifies the tariff impact, investors must remain agile, balancing risk and opportunity in a rapidly evolving landscape.

 

Source: https://e27.co/why-markets-are-in-chaos-today-20250417/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Why Bitcoin ETFs May Outperform Gold ETFs in the Long Run

Why Bitcoin ETFs May Outperform Gold ETFs in the Long Run

Gold and bitcoin are often compared as alternative assets that can hedge against inflation, currency devaluation, and geopolitical risks. Both have limited supply, global demand, and no central authority. Both have also attracted the attention of investors who seek to diversify their portfolios and gain exposure to the potential upside of these assets.

However, gold and bitcoin are not the same. Gold has a long history of being used as a store of value and a medium of exchange, while bitcoin is a relatively new invention that relies on cryptography and blockchain technology. Gold is tangible and physical, while Bitcoin is digital and virtual. Gold is widely accepted and regulated, while bitcoin is still controversial and volatile.

These differences have implications for the performance and prospects of gold and bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs), which are investment vehicles that track the prices of these assets and allow investors to buy and sell them on stock exchanges. Gold ETFs have been around since 2003, and have grown to more than a $200 billion industry in 2023, with SPDR Gold Shares (NYSE:GLD) being one of the largest. Bitcoin ETFs, on the other hand, have only been approved and launched in the U.S. in January 2024, after years of rejections and delays by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). As of January 13, 2024, there are 19 bitcoin ETFs trading, with ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) being the first and the largest fund.

In this article, I will argue that bitcoin ETFs may outperform gold ETFs in the long run, based on the following reasons:

  • Bitcoin has a higher growth potential and scarcity than gold
  • Bitcoin ETFs have lower fees and higher returns than gold ETFs
  • Bitcoin ETFs have more innovation and diversification than gold ETFs

Bitcoin has a higher growth potential and scarcity than gold

One of the main drivers of the value of gold and bitcoin is their scarcity, which means that their supply is limited and cannot be easily increased. Gold has a finite amount of 190,040 metric tons that can be mined from the earth, of which about 80% has already been extracted. Bitcoin has a fixed supply of 21 million coins, of which about 19 million have already been mined. However, the rate of new supply of gold and bitcoin is not the same. Gold production has been declining in recent years, due to the depletion of reserves, the rising costs of mining, and the environmental and social impacts of the industry. Bitcoin production, on the other hand, is predetermined by an algorithm that halves the reward for miners every four years, until the last bitcoin is mined around 2140. This means that the annual inflation rate of gold is around 1.5%, while the annual inflation rate of bitcoin is around 1.8% and will drop to zero in the future.

This difference in supply dynamics has implications for the demand and price of gold and bitcoin. Gold demand is mainly driven by jewellery, investment, and central bank purchases, which are influenced by factors such as income, wealth, interest rates, inflation, and geopolitical events. Bitcoin demand is mainly driven by speculation, adoption, and innovation, which are influenced by factors such as technology, regulation, network effects, and social sentiment. While both gold and bitcoin have seen increased demand in recent years, due to the global economic and health crisis, the stimulus measures, and the low interest rates, bitcoin has shown faster and stronger growth than gold, due to its novelty, accessibility, and potential. According to the World Gold Council, the annual average gold price rose from $1,481 per ounce in 2019 to $1,769 per ounce in 2020, and then to $1,794 per ounce in 2021, representing a cumulative increase of 21.1%. While data on CoinMarketCap shows that the annual average bitcoin price rose from $7,344 per coin in 2019 to $11,449 per coin in 2020, and then to $46,788 per coin in 2021, representing a cumulative increase of 537.1%.

These trends suggest that bitcoin has a higher growth potential and scarcity than gold, which could translate into higher returns for bitcoin ETFs than gold ETFs in the long run. While gold has a more established and stable market, bitcoin has a more disruptive and dynamic market, which could offer more opportunities and rewards for investors who are willing to take more risks and embrace more changes.

Bitcoin ETFs have lower fees and higher returns than gold ETFs

Another factor that affects the performance of gold and bitcoin ETFs is their fees and returns, which reflect their costs and benefits. Fees are the expenses that investors pay to the fund managers for managing and operating the ETFs, which reduce the net returns that investors receive from the ETFs. Returns are the profits or losses that investors earn or incur from the ETFs, which depend on the price movements of the underlying assets and the dividends or distributions that the ETFs payout.

Generally speaking, bitcoin ETFs have lower fees and higher returns than gold ETFs, which could make them more attractive and profitable for investors. Based ETF Database, the average expense ratio of the 10 gold ETFs trading in the U.S. is 0.42%, while the average expense ratio of the 17 bitcoin ETFs trading in the U.S. is 0.33%. This means that bitcoin ETFs charge less fees than gold ETFs for providing the same service of tracking the prices of the assets. Moreover, according to ETF.com, the average year-to-date return of the 10 gold ETFs trading in the U.S. is -0.76%, while the average year-to-date return of the 17 bitcoin ETFs trading in the U.S. is 7.54%. Again, this means that bitcoin ETFs have generated more profits than gold ETFs for the same period.

These differences in fees and returns can have a significant impact on the long-term performance and compounding of gold and bitcoin ETFs. For example, assuming an initial investment of $10,000 and an annualized return of 7% for both gold and bitcoin ETFs, but a difference of 0.1% in expense ratio, the gold ETF with a 0.4% expense ratio would grow to $38,696 after 20 years, while the bitcoin ETF with a 0.3% expense ratio would grow to $39,346 after 20 years, representing a difference of $650 or 1.7%. This gap would widen even more if the difference in expense ratio or the difference in return is larger.

Therefore, bitcoin ETFs have lower fees and higher returns than gold ETFs, which could make them more attractive and profitable for investors in the long run. While gold ETFs have lower volatility and risk than bitcoin ETFs, bitcoin ETFs have lower costs and higher rewards than gold ETFs, which could outweigh the trade-offs for investors who have a longer time horizon and a higher risk tolerance.

Bitcoin ETFs have more innovation and diversification than gold ETFs

A third factor that affects the performance and prospects of gold and bitcoin ETFs is their innovation and diversification, which reflect their variety and quality. Innovation is the process of creating and introducing new products and services that meet the needs and preferences of customers and markets. Diversification is the strategy of investing in different types of assets and sectors that have low or negative correlation with each other, which can reduce the overall risk and volatility of a portfolio.

Generally speaking, bitcoin ETFs have more innovation and diversification than gold ETFs, which could make them more competitive and resilient for investors. While doing research, I spoke to a gold ETF analyst last week and he based on his point of view and shared the following with me. The gold ETFs trading in the U.S. have only two types of strategies: physical gold ETFs, which hold gold bullion in vaults, and gold miner ETFs, which invest in stocks of companies that mine and produce gold. These ETFs have similar characteristics and performance and are highly correlated with each other and with the gold price. The average correlation coefficient of the gold ETFs trading in the U.S. is 0.94, which means that they move almost in the same direction and magnitude.

On the other hand, the bitcoin ETFs trading in the U.S. have four types of strategies: spot bitcoin ETFs, which hold bitcoin directly in custody, futures bitcoin ETFs, which invest in bitcoin futures contracts, short bitcoin ETFs, which bet against the decline of bitcoin futures, and blockchain and bitcoin ETFs, which invest in stocks of companies and other ETFs with exposure to cryptocurrency and blockchain technology. These ETFs have different characteristics and performance and are less correlated with each other and with the bitcoin price. The average correlation coefficient of the bitcoin ETFs trading in the U.S. is 0.77, which means that they move somewhat in the same direction and magnitude, but not always.

These differences in innovation and diversification can have a significant impact on the long-term performance and stability of gold and bitcoin ETFs.

Bitcoin ETFs have more innovation and diversification than gold ETFs, which could make them more competitive and resilient for investors. For example, spot bitcoin ETFs, such as BlackRock (NYSE:BLK) Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BTCR) and VanEck Bitcoin Trust (XBTF), offer the most direct and simple way to invest in bitcoin, as they track the spot price of bitcoin and hold bitcoin in custody with qualified custodians, such as Fidelity Digital Assets and Coinbase (NASDAQ:COIN) Custody. Futures bitcoin ETFs, such as ProShares Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BITO) and Valkyrie Bitcoin Strategy ETF (BTF), offer a more indirect and complex way to invest in bitcoin, as they track the futures price of bitcoin and invest in bitcoin futures contracts traded on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME), which are cash-settled and do not involve the delivery of bitcoin. Short bitcoin ETFs, such as Simplify Short Bitcoin Strategy ETF (SBTC) and Direxion Daily Bitcoin Bear 1X Shares (BITD), offer a way to profit from the decline of bitcoin, as they track the inverse of the futures price of bitcoin and invest in short positions of bitcoin futures contracts traded on the CME. Blockchain and bitcoin ETFs, such as Amplify Transformational Data Sharing ETF (BLOK) and Bitwise Crypto Industry Innovators ETF (BITQ), offer a way to invest in the broader cryptocurrency and blockchain industry, as they invest in stocks of companies and other ETFs with exposure to cryptocurrency and blockchain technology, such as Coinbase, MicroStrategy, and Grayscale Bitcoin Trust.

These different types of bitcoin ETFs offer different advantages and disadvantages for investors, depending on their risk appetite, return expectation, and investment objective. For instance, spot bitcoin ETFs have the lowest tracking error and the highest correlation with the bitcoin price, but they also have the highest fees and the highest regulatory uncertainty, as they are subject to the PSA requirements and the potential actions of the SEC. Futures bitcoin ETFs have lower fees and lower regulatory uncertainty, as they are subject to the SFA requirements and the existing rules of the CME, but they also have higher tracking error and lower correlation with the bitcoin price, due to the futures premium, contango, and rollover costs. Short bitcoin ETFs have the potential to generate positive returns when the bitcoin price falls, but they also have the potential to incur unlimited losses when the bitcoin price rises, as well as high fees and high volatility. Blockchain and bitcoin ETFs have the potential to capture the growth and innovation of the cryptocurrency and blockchain industry, but they also have the potential to suffer from the volatility and risk of the stock market, as well as the diversification and dilution of their exposure to bitcoin.

Therefore, bitcoin ETFs have more innovation and diversification than gold ETFs, which could make them more competitive and resilient for investors. While gold ETFs have more simplicity and stability than bitcoin ETFs, bitcoin ETFs have more variety and quality than gold ETFs, which could offer more options and solutions for investors who have different needs and preferences.

Conclusion: Bitcoin ETFs may outperform gold ETFs in the long run

In conclusion, I believe that bitcoin ETFs may outperform gold ETFs in the long run.

While gold ETFs have their own merits and advantages, such as lower volatility, lower risk, and lower correlation with other assets, I think that bitcoin ETFs have more merits and advantages, such as higher growth, higher reward, and higher innovation, which could outweigh the trade-offs for investors who have a longer time horizon and a higher risk tolerance.

I think that bitcoin ETFs are not only a viable alternative to gold ETFs but also a superior one, as they offer more value and opportunity for investors who seek to diversify their portfolios and gain exposure to the potential upside of digital gold.

Source: https://in.investing.com/analysis/why-bitcoin-etfs-may-outperform-gold-etfs-in-the-long-run-200608903

FAQ

Why does the author, Anndy Lian argue that bitcoin ETFs may outperform gold ETFs in the long run?

The author, Mr Anndy Lian argues that bitcoin ETFs may outperform gold ETFs due to Bitcoin's higher growth potential and scarcity, lower fees, and higher returns compared to gold ETFs. Additionally, the author emphasizes the innovative and diversified nature of bitcoin ETFs, suggesting they offer more opportunities for investors.

What factors contribute to the higher growth potential of bitcoin compared to gold, according to the article?

Anndy Lian states that the higher growth potential of bitcoin compared to gold is attributed to the predetermined supply dynamics of both assets. While gold production has been declining, Bitcoin's algorithm-controlled supply and halving reward for miners contribute to its higher growth potential and scarcity.

How does Anndy Lian highlight the cost-effectiveness of bitcoin ETFs over gold ETFs?

Anndy Lian points out that, on average, bitcoin ETFs have lower fees (expense ratios) compared to gold ETFs. The lower fees, coupled with higher returns for bitcoin ETFs, make them more cost-effective and potentially more profitable for investors.

What role does innovation and diversification play in the comparison between gold and bitcoin ETFs?

Anndy Lian suggests that bitcoin ETFs have a competitive edge over gold ETFs in terms of innovation and diversification. Bitcoin ETFs offer different strategies, including spot bitcoin ETFs, futures bitcoin ETFs, short bitcoin ETFs, and blockchain and bitcoin ETFs, providing investors with more variety and potentially better risk management.

How does the author address the potential risks associated with investing in different types of bitcoin ETFs? different types of bitcoin ETFs?oes the author address the potential risks associated with investing in different types of bitcoin ETFs?

Anndy Lian acknowledges that each type of bitcoin ETF comes with its own set of advantages and disadvantages, such as regulatory uncertainty, tracking error, correlation with bitcoin prices, fees, and potential exposure to stock market volatility. The article suggests that investors should carefully consider their risk appetite, return expectations, and investment objectives when choosing among different types of bitcoin ETFs.

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Bitcoin’s bullish run: Will it continue in 2023?

Bitcoin’s bullish run: Will it continue in 2023?

Bitcoin is a digital currency that operates in a decentralized manner, meaning that it does not rely on a central authority or financial institution to operate. It was created in 2009 by an individual or group of individuals who used the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. Bitcoin’s unique feature is that it uses blockchain technology, a distributed ledger that records all transactions in the network.

One of the advantages of Bitcoin is that it provides a high degree of privacy and anonymity. Transactions are recorded on the blockchain and are visible to anyone, but the parties’ identity is not revealed. This has made Bitcoin a popular choice for people who want to keep their financial transactions private.

Bitcoin has experienced significant price swings, with periods of rapid growth followed by sharp declines. In late 2017, Bitcoin’s price peaked at nearly $20,000, attracting significant media attention and mainstream interest. However, the bubble eventually burst, and the price fell dramatically, leaving many investors with losses.

Since then, Bitcoin’s price has been on a rollercoaster ride, with significant price fluctuations happening over short periods. The cryptocurrency market is notoriously volatile, and the price of Bitcoin is no exception. In recent years, Bitcoin’s price has been influenced by several factors, including regulatory developments, adoption by institutional investors, and media coverage.

The cryptocurrency market has been experiencing significant growth over the past year, with Bitcoin leading the way. According to Coinmarketcap, Bitcoin’s market capitalization increased from around $560 billion in January 2021 to over $1.2 trillion in March 2023.

I believe the current state of the cryptocurrency market and its potential future performance is worth considering. Bitcoin has had an impressive year-to-date performance, with a 42% increase, but its price has also been volatile, with significant fluctuations happening over short periods. Bitcoin’s price has been volatile, with significant price fluctuations occurring within short periods, leading many investors to question whether the rally is over or if Bitcoin’s price will continue to rise.

Several factors could impact Bitcoin’s price in 2023. I believe that one of the significant factors is the performance of US and Chinese stocks. As of March 2023, the US and Chinese stock markets exhibit different trends. The S&P 500, representing the top 500 US companies, has risen by around 3% year-to-date, while the Shanghai Composite, representing the top 300 Chinese companies, has risen by around 7.5%. However, the recent price signals from the US macro landscape warrant more caution in the short term. For instance, the recent spike in inflation and the US Federal Reserve’s tightening monetary policy could negatively affect the stock market and, consequently, Bitcoin’s price. In my perspective, if either US or Chinese stocks perform well, investing in Bitcoin could be attractive.

Another factor that could positively affect Bitcoin’s performance is the annual parliament session in China, which is scheduled to open on March 5, 2023. The government will likely announce a growth target of 5% to 6% for this year, which could further boost the ongoing rally in Asian stocks. Additionally, Hong Kong has positioned itself as Asia’s crypto hub, which may benefit Bitcoin’s price.

I also observe that Bitcoin and Nasdaq’s correlation is trading near its lowest level since December 2021. This breakdown in correlation means that holding long crypto exposure may be more beneficial than holding US-listed technology shares, which are more impacted by macroeconomic data. However, recent price signals from the US macro landscape warrant more caution in the short term.

In conclusion, I think that various factors, such as the performance of US and Chinese stocks, policies in China, and Hong Kong’s rise as Asia’s crypto hub, could influence Bitcoin’s performance in 2023. I believe exercising caution and using stop-level strategies to minimize potential losses when investing in the cryptocurrency market is essential. These are my opinions on the cryptocurrency market and its potential future performance.

 

Source: https://blockcast.cc/editors-picks/bitcoins-bullish-run-will-it-continue-in-2023/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j