Washington’s Pivot From Policing Crypto to Owning It

Washington’s Pivot From Policing Crypto to Owning It

The year 2026 will likely be remembered as the moment the American financial apparatus finally stopped trying to build a wall around the digital asset derivatives market and instead decided to build a regulated highway through it.

For years, the United States watched from the sidelines as trillions of dollars in liquidity migrated to offshore jurisdictions, driven by a domestic regulatory vacuum that left “perpetual futures,” the lifeblood of crypto trading, in a frustrating gray area. As the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) prepares to unveil a definitive framework for these products, we are now witnessing a high-stakes land grab. Major players like Kraken, Coinbase, and even prediction markets such as Polymarket are no longer merely preparing; they are mobilizing vast amounts of capital to ensure they own the infrastructure of this new era. This is not simply a technical adjustment to the rulebook—it is a fundamental shift in how the U.S. understands financial innovation and risk.

The numbers provide a staggering sense of why this shift is happening now. In 2025, perpetual futures trading volume reached $61.7 trillion, dwarfing the $18.6 trillion recorded in spot trading. For the uninitiated, the “perp” is the ultimate trading instrument because it never expires, allowing traders to maintain positions indefinitely while using significant leverage. Until recently, U.S. regulators viewed this as a retail catastrophe waiting to happen. By forcing these trades offshore, the U.S. did not protect its citizens; it merely exported both tax revenue and oversight. The current urgency from CFTC Chairman Michael Selig, who in March signaled that a framework could arrive within weeks, is a tacit admission that the policy of “regulation by enforcement” has failed to stem global demand.

To understand the scale of this ambition, one need only look at the checkbooks of the industry’s giants. Kraken’s parent company, Payward, recently executed a $550 million acquisition of Bitnomial, a U.S.-regulated derivatives venue. This was not a purchase of technology so much as a purchase of time and legitimacy. By acquiring an entity that already holds the necessary “full stack” of CFTC licenses—specifically the Designated Contract Market (DCM) and Derivatives Clearing Organization (DCO) designations—Kraken has effectively bypassed the grueling 180-day application process and positioned itself to offer “true” perps the moment the ink dries on the new rules. Coinbase has been equally aggressive, though more creative, offering “perpetual-style” five-year contracts with 10x leverage as a placeholder. This tactical maneuvering makes clear that the industry no longer views regulation as an obstacle to avoid, but as a moat to build.

The path to entry for new exchanges is far steeper than it was in the early, unregulated days of the crypto boom. The 2026 regulatory landscape, shaped by the CLARITY and GENIUS Acts of late 2025, demands a level of institutional fortification that will likely gatekeep the market to only the most well-capitalized firms. To operate as a DCM, an exchange must now demonstrate it has a 12-month runway of projected operating expenses funded by liquid financial assets. If that exchange also wishes to act as a DCO—clearing and settling its own trades—the capital requirements become even more stringent. It must maintain sufficient resources to withstand a default by its largest participant under extreme market conditions. This “full-stack” requirement is a deliberate move by the CFTC to ensure that the flash crashes and contagion events of the previous decade remain a relic of the past.

The financial barriers do not stop at operating expenses. The introduction of specific capital charges for crypto assets held by Futures Commission Merchants (FCMs) marks a new era of “haircut” mathematics. Under the guidelines, any FCM holding proprietary Bitcoin or Ethereum inventory must take a 20% capital charge to account for volatility. Even the use of payment stablecoins as collateral, while a welcome advancement for liquidity, comes with variable haircuts reviewed monthly. This creates a revealing paradox: the U.S. is finally allowing perpetual futures, but only by wrapping them in the same heavy-duty armor worn by traditional Wall Street clearinghouses. For the retail trader, this means more security; for the exchange, it means a significantly higher cost of doing business.

The most intriguing development may be the entry of prediction markets like Polymarket and Kalshi into the leveraged trading space. In April, these platforms announced plans to expand into perpetuals, signaling a convergence between event-based betting and traditional financial derivatives. This emerging 24/7 trading environment for tech stocks and crypto, which Polymarket is championing, challenges the very notion of market hours that has governed the New York Stock Exchange for more than a century. If a trader can hedge exposure to a tech stock via a perpetual contract on a Sunday afternoon in response to a geopolitical shock, the traditional Monday morning opening bell begins to look increasingly obsolete. This is the “perpetual motion” of modern finance—a market that never sleeps, governed by code and cleared by heavily regulated domestic entities. For context, I remain skeptical of this shift.

Critically, the debate over investor protection remains the primary friction point. There is ample reason for concern about the risks of 50x leverage being marketed to retail investors. While the new framework is expected to include mandatory risk tests and knowledge requirements—similar to those pioneered by Robinhood in Europe—the question of whether retail traders should have access to such leverage at all remains unresolved. The CFTC’s 23 Core Principles for DCMs, which include strict market surveillance and safeguards against manipulation, are designed to protect the integrity of the market. They cannot, however, protect traders from their own miscalculations. The move toward monthly proof-of-reserves reporting and the issuance of 1099-DA tax forms suggests that the shadow elements of crypto are being pulled into the light, but the underlying volatility of these assets cannot be regulated away.

The gray area that Bitnomial exploited in 2025 through the self-certification process proved to be a necessary catalyst. It demonstrated that a U.S. platform could offer these products without systemic collapse, provided it adhered to the Commodity Exchange Act. That precedent has forced the SEC and CFTC into a degree of regulatory harmonization that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago. By classifying assets like BTC and ETH as digital commodities, the U.S. has finally provided the jurisdictional clarity institutional investors have long demanded. This clarity does not merely benefit exchanges; it anchors liquidity within the U.S. legal system, where it is subject to stress testing and audit requirements.

In my view, the aggressive positioning of these exchanges reflects a broader vote of confidence in the American regulatory system’s ability to eventually get it right. The capital requirements—such as the 8% client asset buffer for bank-affiliated FCMs—are steep, but they are the price of admission to the world’s most lucrative financial marketplace. We are moving away from a world of loosely defined crypto exchanges toward one of digital asset derivatives powerhouses that resemble the Chicago Mercantile Exchange more than the offshore platforms of 2021. This transition will likely accelerate market consolidation, as smaller players struggle to meet the 12-month capital reserves and rigorous cybersecurity safeguards now required.

As we look toward the formal rollout of the CFTC framework in the coming weeks, the narrative is no longer about whether crypto will be integrated into the U.S. financial system, but how quickly that integration will occur. The perpetual nature of these contracts offers a fitting metaphor for the industry itself: a market that has sustained itself through pressure and volatility, now seeking permanence within a formal system. The race is on, the capital is committed, and for the first time in a decade, the rules of the game are being written in plain view.

 

Source: https://intpolicydigest.org/washington-s-pivot-from-policing-crypto-to-owning-it/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

The inflation ripple effect: From Wall Street to cryptocurrency to Washington

The inflation ripple effect: From Wall Street to cryptocurrency to Washington

The story begins with the latest inflation report, a document that has sent shockwaves through financial markets worldwide. In June, the US headline Consumer Price Index (CPI) climbed by 2.7 per cent year-over-year, surpassing economists’ estimates of 2.6 per cent.

Core inflation, which strips out the often erratic swings in food and energy prices, held steady at 2.9 per cent year-over-year, aligning with expectations. At first glance, these numbers might seem like mere statistics, but they carry profound weight.

Inflation is the heartbeat of an economy, and the Federal Reserve monitors it closely to calibrate interest rates. When prices rise too quickly, the Fed might tighten policy to cool things down; when they lag, it might ease rates to spur growth.

This time, the higher-than-anticipated headline CPI signals that tariff-related price pressures are starting to bite, pushing out hopes for rate cuts this year.

This development is a double-edged sword. On one hand, it reflects the real-world impact of trade policies, like tariffs, which ripple through supply chains and hit consumers in the wallet.

On the other hand, it complicates the Fed’s delicate balancing act. With inflation stubbornly above the Fed’s two per cent target, the central bank faces pressure to keep rates elevated, a stance that could dampen economic momentum just as growth shows signs of faltering.

Analysts I’ve followed suggest that earlier optimism for rate cuts this year is fading rapidly, replaced by a resigned expectation that the Fed will hold firm to prevent inflation from deepening. This shift is significant because it affects everything from mortgage rates to corporate investment, shaping the economic landscape for months to come.

Market reactions: A tale of divergence

The markets didn’t take this news lying down. In the US, the reaction was a study in contrasts. The S&P 500 dipped by 0.4 per cent, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average took a steeper hit, falling 1.0 per cent. Yet the NASDAQ, defying the gloom, edged up by 0.2 per cent, buoyed by reports of resumed chip sales to China.

This split fascinates me. It shows how different sectors digest the same data differently. The tech-heavy NASDAQ likely received a boost from the chip news, a lifeline for semiconductor firms in a tense trade environment. Meanwhile, the broader S&P 500 and Dow, with their mix of industries, seemed more rattled by inflation’s implications for interest rates and costs.

The bond market echoed this unease. US Treasuries stumbled, with the 10-year yield rising 4.8 basis points to 4.481 per cent and the two-year yield climbing 4.0 basis points to 3.940 per cent. Higher yields signal that investors are seeking a higher return for holding government debt, a classic response to inflation fears or expectations of tighter monetary policy.

I see this as a sign of markets bracing for a Fed that’s less dovish than hoped, a shift that could ripple into borrowing costs everywhere.

Currency markets told a similar story. The US Dollar Index, which tracks the dollar against major currencies, surged 0.6 per cent to 98.62, its highest level in three years. This strength makes sense: if the Fed holds rates steady while others cut, the dollar becomes a magnet for capital.

In contrast, the Japanese Yen slumped 0.8 per cent to 148.88, its weakest level since early April, as it was dragged down by a sell-off in Japan’s bond market. To me, this divergence highlights the interconnected yet fragmented nature of global markets, which each react to local cues within a shared economic web.

Across the Pacific, Asia offered a mixed bag. China’s real GDP growth remained steady at 5.2 per cent year-over-year, a respectable figure; however, nominal GDP growth declined to 3.0 per cent, the slowest pace since 2023. June data painted a grimmer picture: retail sales slowed, fixed asset investment weakened, and home prices and property investment took a deeper dive.

Yet Hong Kong’s tech stocks shone, driving regional gains even as Asian equity indices wavered in early trading. I find this resilience in tech intriguing, a glimmer of optimism amid China’s broader economic clouds. It suggests that investors still see value in innovation, even when domestic demand falters.

Then there’s the cryptocurrency market, which has taken a bruising. US-listed crypto stocks like Canaan Inc., down over 10 per cent, Circle, off nearly five per cent, and Riot Platforms and CleanSpark, each shedding more than three per cent, felt the heat.

Big names like Coinbase, Robinhood, and MicroStrategy weren’t spared either. This sell-off, sparked by the CPI data and the Fed’s steady-rate stance, stripped away a hoped-for boost for Bitcoin.

I’ve always viewed crypto as a wild card: touted as an inflation hedge, yet hypersensitive to interest rate shifts. Here, higher rates made safer assets, such as bonds, more appealing, dimming the allure of crypto. It’s a reminder of how volatile this space remains, tethered to macroeconomic tides.

Political drama: The GENIUS Act’s stumble

While markets churned, Washington delivered its drama. The US House of Representatives hit a wall when a procedural motion to advance the GENIUS Act, alongside the CLARITY Act and the Anti-CBDC Act, failed with 196 votes in favour and 222 against. Dubbed “Crypto Week,” this was intended to be a landmark moment for crypto regulation, but it ultimately ended in a stalemate.

The GENIUS Act, short for “Generating Efficient Networks for Innovation and Utility in Stablecoins,” aims to clarify the rules for stablecoins, digital currencies tied to assets such as the US dollar. The CLARITY Act aims to clarify the legal standing of crypto, while the Anti-CBDC Act opposes the development of a central bank digital currency (CBDC). These bills could shape America’s crypto future, either fostering innovation or reining it in.

The snag came from within the Republican ranks. Some GOP lawmakers balked at the GENIUS Act’s lack of a full CBDC ban, fearing it left room for a digital dollar they see as a privacy nightmare. Marjorie Taylor Greene voiced this worry, arguing the bill indirectly props up a CBDC framework, a sentiment echoed by others in her party.

This internal rift derailed the vote, despite President Donald Trump’s plea to support the bill and solidify US crypto leadership. His words fell flat, exposing a GOP at odds with itself.

Democrats, led by Maxine Waters, pounced. They mocked Republican disarray and doubled down on their opposition to the GENIUS Act, citing insufficient safeguards and risks of unchecked financial experimentation. Their earlier “Anti-Crypto Corruption Week” had already telegraphed this stance.

To me, this clash is more than partisan theatre. It’s a microcosm of a bigger struggle: how to regulate a technology that’s outpacing policy. I lean toward clarity in regulation, believing it could unlock crypto’s potential while curbing its excesses. But I get the skepticism, too, the fear of opening Pandora’s box without knowing what’s inside.

My take

Economically, the inflation spike and the Fed’s response signal more challenging times ahead. I worry about the squeeze on households and businesses if rates remain high, yet I see the logic in taming inflation before it spirals out of control.

Markets, with their choppy reactions, reflect this uncertainty, a tug-of-war between fear and opportunity. In Asia, China’s slowdown hints at deeper structural woes, though tech’s tenacity offers hope.

Politically, the GENIUS Act’s flop is a missed chance, but it’s not the end. I think the US risks falling behind if it can’t sort out crypto rules soon, especially as other nations race ahead. The GOP’s split and Democrats’ resistance highlight how ideology and caution can stall progress. I’d argue for a middle path: regulate enough to protect, but not so much as to stifle. Trump’s vision of crypto dominance is bold, but it needs a united front to work.

Looking forward, the Fed’s next moves and Congress’s retry on crypto will be pivotal. Markets will stay jittery, and I suspect volatility is our new normal.

For now, we’re left with questions: Can the US balance economic stability and innovation? Will political will align with technological reality? I’ll keep digging for answers, but one thing’s clear: this week’s turbulence is just the start.

 

Source: https://e27.co/the-inflation-ripple-effect-from-wall-street-to-cryptocurrency-to-washington-20250716/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j