Tag Archives: your

Why your portfolio is down: The Fed’s hawkish hold explained

The Federal Reserve delivered a sobering message that sent shockwaves through equities, cryptocurrencies, and commodities alike. Chair Jerome Powell and the Federal Open Market Committee kept interest rates steady at 3.50 per cent to 3.75 per cent, but simultaneously raised their 2026 inflation forecast to 2.7 per cent from the previous 2.4 per cent projection. This hawkish hold shattered hopes for aggressive monetary easing and forced investors to recalibrate their expectations for the remainder of the year.

The immediate market reaction proved severe and widespread. United States equities bore the brunt of the selloff, with all eleven S&P 500 sectors closing in negative territory. The S&P 500 index fell 1.36 per cent to settle at 6,624.70 while the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropped 1.63 per cent to 46,225.15. The technology-heavy Nasdaq declined 1.46 per cent to 22,152.42 as growth stocks faced renewed pressure from the prospect of higher-for-longer interest rates. Consumer Staples led the decline with a 2.44 per cent drop, followed closely by Consumer Discretionary, down 2.32 per cent, as investors worried that persistent inflation would erode household purchasing power and dampen retail sentiment.

European markets offered no refuge from the turmoil. The FTSE 100 slipped 0.94 per cent to 10,305.29 while Germany’s DAX 40 fell 0.96 per cent to 23,502.25. The synchronised global selloff reflected a fundamental reassessment of risk as traders priced out expectations for multiple rate cuts in 2026. The Fed’s updated dot plot now signals only one rate cut for the remainder of the year, a dramatic shift from previous expectations that had fuelled earlier market rallies.

Adding fuel to the fire, geopolitical tensions in the Middle East escalated dramatically with reports of military strikes targeting Iranian natural gas facilities in South Pars. Brent Crude surged toward the US$110 to US$120 per barrel range as supply concerns mounted. This energy shock created a particularly pernicious dynamic where rising oil prices threatened to further entrench inflation, potentially forcing central banks to maintain restrictive monetary policy for an extended period. The correlation between traditional markets and alternative assets became strikingly evident as cryptocurrencies moved in lockstep with equities and gold, showing an 89 per cent correlation with the S&P 500 and a remarkable 96 per cent correlation with gold.

The cryptocurrency market experienced its own cascade of selling pressure, declining 3.63 per cent to US$2.44 trillion in market capitalisation over twenty-four hours. This macro-driven selloff triggered a brutal liquidation event that wiped out over US$151 million in Bitcoin long positions within a single day. The forced closures represented a 127 per cent increase in liquidations and served as an accelerant, intensifying the downward spiral. Bitcoin traded near the critical pivot zone at US$70,283, while the broader crypto market showed vulnerability within its yearly downtrend. The Fear and Greed Index held at 33, firmly in Fear territory, reflecting the anxiety permeating digital asset markets.

Treasury markets reflected uncertainty, with the 10-year yield settling around 4.22 per cent after earlier gains were pared following the Fed announcement. The US Dollar strengthened as traders adjusted their expectations for monetary policy easing. Gold held relatively steady near the US$5,000 mark as safe-haven demand balanced against rising real yields, which typically pressure the non-yielding metal. This tug-of-war between geopolitical risk and monetary policy tightness created a complex environment in which traditional hedges struggled to find a clear direction.

The market faces critical technical levels that will likely determine the near-term trajectory. The cryptocurrency market must hold above the key Fibonacci 50 per cent retracement level at US$2.38 trillion to avoid deeper losses. A break below this support could extend the decline toward US$2.29 trillion, potentially triggering another wave of liquidations. The path forward hinges on several key factors, including upcoming US economic data releases, particularly the Personal Consumption Expenditures inflation reading, and the progress of the Clarity Act through the Senate Banking Committee, with markup expected in April.

The current corrective phase appears to be a necessary purge of excessive leverage and overoptimistic positioning rather than a fundamental breakdown of the broader uptrend. Investors must remain vigilant as the combination of sticky inflation, elevated energy prices, and restrictive monetary policy creates a challenging environment for risk assets. Those who maintain positions must prepare for continued volatility as markets digest the reality that the Federal Reserve prioritises price stability over growth support, even at the cost of short-term market pain. The coming weeks will test whether this selloff represents a buying opportunity or the beginning of a more sustained downturn.

Market participants should watch for stabilisation in funding rates and a decline in liquidation volume as signals that selling pressure may be exhausting. A weekly close below US$2.38 trillion would confirm deeper correction risk, while a reclaim of US$2.48 trillion could restore bullish momentum. The interplay between macro data and regulatory developments will likely dictate the next major move. For now, the message from policymakers remains clear. Inflation control takes precedence, and markets must adapt to a reality where liquidity conditions tighten further before any meaningful relief arrives. 

 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

Extreme fear grips crypto: What 15 Fear Index reading means for your portfolio

Extreme fear grips crypto: What 15 Fear Index reading means for your portfolio

When US and Israeli forces launched coordinated strikes on Iranian targets over the weekend, including reports of the Supreme Leader’s death, markets reacted with immediate severity. Investors fled risk assets en masse, seeking refuge in gold, the $, and short-duration Treasuries.

Crypto, contrary to its early narrative as digital gold or an uncorrelated hedge, moved firmly in risk-off territory. This moment underscores a maturing reality: digital assets now trade as part of the global macro complex, not apart from it.

The data confirms this integration. Crypto’s seven-day correlation with the S&P 500 currently sits at 78 per cent. This tight linkage means that when equities stumble on geopolitical shock or inflation fears, crypto rarely decouples. The selloff was not driven by protocol failures, regulatory crackdowns, or technical breakdowns specific to blockchain networks. Instead, it reflected a broad-based retreat from risk. Leverage amplified the move.

Traders holding overextended long positions faced forced exits, with US$130 million in BTC liquidations recorded in a single day. This cascade illustrates how derivative markets can amplify spot price moves during stress events. It also reveals participants’ psychological state. The CoinMarketCap Fear and Greed Index registered a reading of 15, firmly in extreme fear territory and near its lowest level this year. When sentiment reaches this extreme, reflexive selling often overshadows fundamental analysis, creating both vulnerability and opportunity.

Geopolitical escalation remains the primary catalyst. Operation Epic Fury, the weekend bombardment of Iranian facilities, has raised credible fears of a wider regional conflict. Iran has pledged a strong response, and the Strait of Hormuz, a maritime chokepoint carrying 20 per cent of global oil supply, now faces immediate disruption risk.

Energy markets reacted with their most volatile opening in over a year. Analysts warn that Brent crude could test US$100 to US$120 per barrel if shipping lanes are threatened. This energy shock matters profoundly for crypto. Higher oil prices feed inflationary pressures just as markets were digesting hotter-than-expected US producer price data. The Federal Reserve’s path toward potential rate cuts in March now appears more complicated. Hawkish signals from policymakers could add another layer of pressure on risk assets, including digital tokens. Crypto does not operate in a vacuum. It absorbs the same macro currents that move equities, commodities, and currencies.

Technical levels now provide the framework for near-term price action. The market’s yearly low at US$2.17 trillion represents critical support. A sustained break below this level could open the door to deeper losses, potentially testing the 200-day moving average near US$3.3 trillion. Conversely, holding above US$2.17 trillion might allow for consolidation, with initial resistance at the 50 per cent Fibonacci retracement level of US$2.41 trillion. These levels matter because they anchor trader psychology and algorithmic execution. In a macro-driven environment, technicals often act as a self-fulfilling prophecy when liquidity thins and sentiment sours. The path forward hinges less on blockchain fundamentals and more on geopolitical headlines. Statements from US and Iranian officials, movements in oil prices, and shifts in equity futures will likely dictate crypto’s direction in the coming sessions.

I view this moment through a lens shaped by years of navigating crypto’s evolution. The narrative that digital assets would instantly serve as safe havens during crises was always oversimplified. True decentralisation and resilience take time to build, both technologically and in market structure. What we see today is not a failure of crypto’s promise but a reflection of its current integration into global finance. The 78 per cent correlation with equities is not permanent. It is a snapshot of a market still discovering its role amid evolving monetary regimes and geopolitical fragmentation. Those who dismiss crypto because it fell alongside stocks miss the deeper story. The infrastructure for sovereign-grade financial alternatives continues to develop beneath the surface. Stress events like this one test that infrastructure, revealing weaknesses but also accelerating necessary adaptations.

The broader macro backdrop adds complexity. Before the Middle East escalation, markets already grappled with sticky inflation signals and valuation concerns in the AI sector. The energy price spike now threatens to reignite broad-based inflationary pressures, potentially delaying central bank easing cycles.

For crypto, this means the liquidity environment could remain restrictive longer than bulls hoped. History suggests that periods of extreme fear often precede meaningful inflexion points. The current Fear and Greed reading of 15 indicates capitulation sentiment, which has frequently marked local bottoms in past cycles. This does not guarantee an immediate rebound, but it warrants attention. Traders watching the US$2.17 trillion to US$2.41 trillion range will find clues about whether sellers are exhausting or whether further deleveraging lies ahead.

Looking ahead, the key question centres on whether crypto can defend its major support levels while geopolitical uncertainty persists. A de-escalation in the Middle East could spark a relief rally, potentially pushing market cap back toward US$2.41 trillion. Further conflict or disruptive moves in oil markets could push prices toward lower support levels. I believe the long-term trajectory of digital assets remains intact, but the near-term path will be volatile and macro-dependent. This environment demands discipline from participants. It rewards those who distinguish between structural progress in blockchain technology and short-term price action driven by headlines. It also favours strategies that account for crypto’s current role as a high-beta risk asset while preparing for its eventual evolution toward greater autonomy.

In conclusion, today’s selloff reflects a rational, if severe, repricing of risk amid escalating geopolitical tensions. Crypto’s tight correlation with equities and sensitivity to macro drivers are features of its current maturation phase, not bugs. The US$2.17 trillion support level now serves as a critical line in the sand. Holding it could stabilise sentiment and set the stage for consolidation. Breaking it could invite a deeper test of market resilience.

For those building the next generation of financial infrastructure, these moments reinforce the importance of robust design, prudent risk management, and a clear-eyed view of macro interdependencies. The path to true decentralisation includes navigating periods where crypto moves with the tide, not against it. How the market responds to the current juncture will inform not only price direction but also the broader narrative about digital assets’ role in an increasingly fragmented global economy.

 

Source: https://e27.co/extreme-fear-grips-crypto-what-15-fear-index-reading-means-for-your-portfolio-20260302/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

Why Your USDT Is A Tool, Not An Interest-Bearing Bond

Why Your USDT Is A Tool, Not An Interest-Bearing Bond

The digital asset market is often clouded by a fundamental misunderstanding of the products we use daily. Recently, during a discussion on an X Space hosted by members of a Chinese crypto community, a guest speaker passionately argued that Tether (CRYPTO: USDT) holders are entitled to a share of the interest generated by Tether Limited’s massive reserves. This sentiment is growing, fueled by a desire for passive income in a volatile market. However, this perspective represents a dangerous conflation of financial concepts. We must be clear: 1 USDT is equivalent to $1 USD in terms of purchasing power within the ecosystem, but it is fundamentally not the same as holding a US dollar in a savings account or a Treasury Bill. To demand a direct share of Tether’s corporate interest is to fundamentally misunderstand the architecture of stablecoins and the laws that govern them.

When you exchange your fiat currency for USDT, you are not making a deposit into a bank; you are purchasing a product. Tether Limited operates as a private entity that issues a digital token backed by a basket of assets. The primary value proposition of USDT is liquidity and stability, the ability to move value across borders and between exchanges at the speed of the blockchain. Forgoing your fiat in exchange for USDT is a voluntary trade-off. You give up the sovereign protections and the interest-bearing potential of the traditional banking system in exchange for the utility of a digital asset. To expect the issuer to then hand back its corporate profits is akin to asking a privately owned bank to distribute its quarterly earnings directly to every person holding its banknotes. It is a logical fallacy that ignores the operational costs and risks assumed by the issuer.

The data regarding Tether’s revenue generation is transparent, yet often misinterpreted. As of 2026, Tether continues to manage one of the world’s largest reserve portfolios. The majority of these reserves, roughly 74% to 77%, are held in U.S. Treasury Bills. The remaining assets are diversified across Reverse Repurchase Agreements (11-12%), secured loans (8%), and strategic holdings in precious metals and Bitcoin (12-14%). Tether has become one of the largest global holders of U.S. debt. The interest generated from these trillions of dollars in T-bills belongs to Tether Limited. This income covers their operational expenses, legal defense funds, and provides the capital necessary to maintain the 1:1 peg even during market de-pegging events. This profit is the reward for the company’s management of risk and liquidity; it is not a communal pot for token holders.

Furthermore, we must address the “No Native Staking” reality. Unlike Ethereum or Solana, USDT is not a native token of a proof-of-stake blockchain. It is an asset issued on top of other networks like Tron, Ethereum, and TON. Because USDT does not secure the underlying network through a consensus mechanism, there is no technical “work” being done by a holder simply by letting the tokens sit in a wallet. Without providing a service to the network, such as validating transactions or providing liquidity, there is no logical or technical basis for a “reward.” The concept of “staking” USDT is a misnomer; what people are actually doing is lending, which is a different financial activity entirely.

This leads us to the critical role of CeFi and DeFi intermediaries. If a holder wants to earn interest on their USDT, they must enter the arena of “risk”. Platforms like Binance Earn or decentralized protocols like Aave allow users to generate yield. However, this yield does not come from Tether’s T-bills. It comes from other market participants who are willing to pay a premium to borrow your USDT for leverage or liquidity. In this scenario, the middleman, whether it is a centralized exchange (CEX) or a smart contract, takes a cut for facilitating the match. This is a “fair logic” ecosystem. You are compensated for the counterparty risk you assume. While U.S. Treasury Bills are considered “risk-free” as long as the U.S. government stands, lending USDT on a platform carries the risk of platform insolvency or smart contract failure. You cannot have the “risk-free” rate of a T-bill without actually owning the T-bill.

Looking toward the horizon of 2026, the regulatory landscape is finally catching up to these nuances. The latest draft of the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act provides a definitive answer to the guest speaker’s demands. The Act explicitly states that platforms cannot pay yield simply for “parking” stablecoins. This is a move to prevent stablecoins from being classified as unregistered securities. According to the draft, rewards are only permissible when a user is “active”, meaning they must be providing liquidity or contributing to the operation of a network. This reinforces the journalist’s point: the law itself is being written to prevent the very “mix-up in concept” that the Chinese group was advocating for. If Tether were to pay interest directly to holders, USDT would legally transform into a security, subjecting it to a level of regulation that would likely destroy its utility as a global medium of exchange.

However, the future does hold a potential evolution for Tether. As Tether moves toward launching and scaling its own proprietary blockchain, the distribution of rewards could change legitimately. On its own chain, Tether could implement a system where rewards are distributed to those who help secure the network or facilitate its decentralized operations. In this context, the “interest” is rebranded and restructured as a “network reward.” This is not a payout of T-bill interest; it is compensation for the utility provided to the new ecosystem. Until that fruition, demanding interest for simply holding the token remains a fundamental misunderstanding of the difference between an asset and an investment contract.

The psychological drive behind the speaker’s demand is understandable; everyone wants a piece of the massive profits Tether is generating. But in the world of high-level finance and digital assets, desire does not dictate structure. If you want the interest from U.S. Treasuries, the path is simple: hold USD and buy the Treasuries. If you want the flexibility of the world’s most liquid stablecoin, you hold USDT and accept that the “cost” of that flexibility is the interest you forgo. You cannot trade your fiat for a tool and then demand the tool act like a bank account.

Ultimately, the distinction between 1 USDT and $1 USD is one of “ownership of yield.” When you hold $1 USD in a sophisticated financial setup, you own the potential yield of that dollar. When you hold 1 USDT, you own a digital certificate of value that Tether Limited promises to redeem for $1 USD. The yield generated by the backing of that certificate belongs to the issuer who maintains the system. This is the bedrock of the stablecoin economy. To twist this concept is to invite regulatory crackdowns and economic instability. And to mislead your followers with the wrong concept is also causing instability. Communities must be equipped with the right knowledge, learn from the best and not from the loudest.

As we navigate the complexities of 2026 and beyond, we must remain disciplined in our definitions: USDT is for movement and utility; USD is for savings and interest. Mixing the two serves only to create a “yield mirage” that the law and common sense will eventually evaporate.

 

Source: https://www.benzinga.com/Opinion/26/01/50010512/why-your-usdt-is-a-tool-not-an-interest-bearing-bond

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j