Quantum computing threat looms over Asia’s financial systems: ‘we are not secure’

Quantum computing threat looms over Asia’s financial systems: ‘we are not secure’

Swathes of Asia’s financial systems are vulnerable to potential disruption from quantum computing technology, including those hosting secure transactions, industry executives have warned.

Only a handful of major economies in the region, such as China, Japan, South Korea and Singapore, have embarked on strategies to safeguard their systems, but most financial institutions across the region are vulnerable to quantum attacks because they are ill prepared, experts say.

The threat looms even as digital wallets and real-time payment systems are widely being used and deeply integrated into the financial systems. Quantum computing is a new branch of processing which can solve complex problems within minutes or hours that might take a classical computer thousands of years to crack.

While it will allow scientists to test and discover new medicines speedily, build climate modelling systems and accelerate scientific research, the system also has the ability to break public-key cryptography or security systems of digital tokens such as bitcoin.

“Asia’s financial systems face an existential threat from quantum computing’s ability to break widely used public-key cryptographic protocols” which underpin digital signatures and enable secure communications, according to Anndy Lian, a Singapore-based intergovernmental blockchain adviser.

Once sufficiently powerful quantum computers emerge – expected within five to 10 years – they could attack stored financial data, forge digital identities and compromise interbank settlements, experts warn.

Such disruptions “could destabilise trust in digital finance”, Lian said.

“In Asean alone, where digital payment adoption is accelerating, the absence of quantum-safe infrastructure leaves trillions of transactions exposed,” he said. “Moreover, the interconnectedness of Asian financial markets means a breach in one jurisdiction could cascade regionally.”

The Asia-Pacific region is poised to become the fastest-growing market for quantum computing, driven by strong government support, significant investments and rapid digital transformation across key countries such as China, Japan, South Korea and India.

Yet regulatory frameworks lagged behind technological developments, with nations in the region lacking a coordinated strategy, Lian said.

Banks in Asia including HSBC, DBS Bank, OCBC and UOB had launched quantum computing initiatives addressing cybersecurity threats and exploring applications in areas such as trading, risk management and fraud detection, industry executives said.

The use of quantum computing across businesses and other applications is expected to become prevalent from the 2030s, according to Alexandra Beckstein, CEO of QAI Ventures, a global venture capital firm focused on quantum technology, which recently established its presence in Singapore.

Banks in the region were worried because passwords might not be safe any more, she said. “Everyone can enter the system, and this will, of course, tremendously damage the capital markets.”

Beckstein predicted that it would be possible to decrypt all the data currently stored in the early 2030s. “So every data you produce right now is potentially prone to threat, so we are not secure now, just because quantum is not happening yet,” she said.

A lot of the banks were currently implementing classical algorithms that would make it harder for a quantum computer to break encryption, she added.

Uneven safeguards

Other industry executives noted, however, that the implementation of security systems across Asia was uneven.

“Asia has bright spots where supervisors and industry are already experimenting with quantum-safe measures, yet region-wide readiness remains nascent,” said Raj Kapoor, founder and chairman of India Blockchain Alliance, noting that most institutions in Asia were only at the stage of building awareness.

According to Kapoor, Singapore is among the most well-prepared countries for the transition to quantum computing in the Asian region, while mainland China has also made significant progress in developing infrastructure. In India and Hong Kong, the momentum is building, but the preparedness is mixed.

But each major Asian market needed to set a clear timetable for developing a common framework to prevent a messy “big-bang switchover”, Kapoor said.

Experts have repeatedly urged the need for greater coordination of cyber policies in Asia, one of the fastest-growing internet markets which has also emerged as a global hotspot for cybercrime.

“Quantum computing will not immediately equip cybercriminals in Southeast Asia with quantum machines, as those remain years away from practical, widespread use. However, it fundamentally alters the threat landscape,” Lian said.

He warned that large-scale quantum computers would expose “vast troves of currently encrypted data”.

“Cybercriminals operating from the region may not wield quantum computers directly, but they will certainly exploit the fallout” by manipulating data decrypted by others, Lian said.

 

Source: https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/economics/article/3330673/quantum-computing-threat-looms-over-asias-financial-systems-we-are-not-secure

 

j j j

The great decoupling: Bitcoin breaks from Nasdaq as macro forces reshape crypto

The great decoupling: Bitcoin breaks from Nasdaq as macro forces reshape crypto

The global risk sentiment appears buoyed by positive signals in US-China trade diplomacy and tangible progress in artificial intelligence deployment across enterprise and consumer sectors. These developments have provided a psychological cushion for equity markets, which responded with record-breaking closes across all three major US indices. The S&P 500 edged up 0.2 per cent, the Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 0.3 per cent, and the Nasdaq Composite led the charge with a 0.8 per cent gain, driven largely by technology stocks that continue to benefit from AI-related earnings momentum and investor enthusiasm.

Beneath this surface calm lies a more complex reality. Consumer confidence, while technically beating consensus expectations at 93.4, has nonetheless slumped to its lowest level in six months. This subtle but significant detail suggests that household sentiment is fraying even as financial markets climb. The divergence between Wall Street and Main Street has rarely been more pronounced.

Meanwhile, the bond market tells its own story of caution. US Treasuries closed narrowly mixed on Tuesday, with the 10-year yield slipping 1.4 basis points to 3.983 per cent and the yield curve flattening, a classic signal of economic uncertainty. Investors appear to be pricing in a near-term rate cut but remain wary of the Federal Reserve’s longer-term inflation outlook and policy trajectory beyond 2025.

The US Dollar Index, which measures the greenback against a basket of six major currencies, slipped 0.1 per cent to close at 98.67. This modest decline reflects sustained risk appetite among global investors, but also growing anticipation ahead of the Federal Open Market Committee’s upcoming decision. With markets almost fully pricing in a 25-basis-point rate cut, the focus has shifted from the magnitude of the move to the tone of the accompanying statement and Chair Powell’s press conference. Any hint of a less dovish stance than expected could trigger a sharp reversal in risk assets.

Commodities, too, betray underlying stress. Spot gold fell 0.7 per cent to settle at US$3,951.56 per ounce, marking a three-week low. This retreat from safe-haven assets typically signals confidence in risk markets, but in this context, it may also reflect dollar strength expectations or portfolio rebalancing ahead of the Fed.

More telling is the slide in oil prices. Brent crude tumbled 2.0 per cent to US$64.40 per barrel, pressured by persistent concerns over global demand and mounting evidence of oversupply. Weakness in crude often foreshadows broader economic softness, especially when it coincides with flattening yield curves and declining consumer sentiment.

Turning to crypto, the market declined 1.55 per cent over the past 24 hours, a move driven less by idiosyncratic factors and more by macro crosscurrents. Traders, wary of potential volatility around the Fed decision, shifted capital into stablecoins, a classic risk-off manoeuver in digital asset markets.

This flight to safety drained liquidity from spot and derivatives markets alike, exacerbating price sensitivity. The result was a cascade of forced liquidations, totalling US$552 million in just one day. Of that, US$122 million came from long positions in Ethereum, underscoring the fragility of leveraged bets in altcoins during periods of macro uncertainty.

This derivatives shakeout reveals a critical vulnerability in the current market structure. Perpetual futures funding rates plunged by 76 per cent, indicating a rapid unwinding of bullish leverage. When funding turns deeply negative or collapses in magnitude, it often signals that speculative longs have been flushed out, leaving the market in a more balanced but also more fragile state.

Ethereum’s 3.8 per cent underperformance relative to Bitcoin during this episode highlights a recurring theme. In times of stress, capital rotates toward the perceived safety of BTC, while altcoins bear the brunt of deleveraging.

Technically, Bitcoin’s rejection at the US$116,000 level proved decisive. The failure to sustain a breakout above this psychological and structural resistance triggered a cascade of stop-loss orders and algorithmic selling, which spilled over into the broader altcoin complex. The asset subsequently lost the US$114,200 support zone, breaking a key bullish trendline that had held since early October.

The total crypto market capitalisation now hovers near US$3.94 trillion, which aligns with the 50-day simple moving average, a critical inflection point. The Relative Strength Index at 52.66 suggests neutral momentum, neither oversold nor overbought, leaving the path of least resistance unclear.

What makes this juncture particularly delicate is the shifting correlation between crypto and traditional equities. Historically, Bitcoin and the Nasdaq have moved in tandem, especially during risk-on regimes. But recent data shows that correlation has flipped to negative 0.53, signaling a rare decoupling. This divergence suggests that crypto is no longer simply riding the coattails of tech stocks but is instead responding to its own set of macro and micro drivers, most notably Fed policy expectations, on-chain liquidity dynamics, and derivatives positioning.

From a strategic standpoint, the next 48 hours will be pivotal. The Federal Reserve’s communication today will likely set the tone for asset allocation decisions across all markets. A dovish cut accompanied by clear forward guidance could reignite risk appetite and catalyse a buy the dip rally in crypto, especially if liquidity returns from stablecoins to volatile assets.

Conversely, a hawkish tilt, perhaps emphasising sticky inflation or a higher-for-longer rate path, could trigger another leg down in crypto, with Bitcoin testing the US$112,000 support level and Ethereum struggling to hold above US$3,950.

For long-term participants, this volatility may represent opportunity rather than threat. The current flush of leverage creates a cleaner market structure, reducing the risk of cascading liquidations in the near term. Moreover, the macro backdrop still contains supportive elements, including AI-driven productivity gains, improving US-China relations, and a Fed that remains inclined toward easing, albeit cautiously.

The question is not whether these tailwinds exist, but whether they can overcome the immediate headwinds of policy uncertainty and technical fragility.

The market stands at a crossroads. The data paints a picture of cautious optimism tempered by real economic anxieties. Crypto, once again, finds itself caught between its aspirational narrative as a new asset class and its practical reality as a highly sensitive barometer of liquidity and risk sentiment.

The resolution of this tension will depend less on technical levels or liquidation metrics and more on the Federal Reserve’s ability to navigate the narrow path between inflation control and growth preservation. Until then, expect volatility, watch price action at key supports, and prepare for either a relief rally or a deeper correction. Both remain plausible in this finely balanced macro environment.

 

Source: https://e27.co/the-great-decoupling-bitcoin-breaks-from-nasdaq-as-macro-forces-reshape-crypto-20251029/

j j j

The real reason crypto fell while Wall Street celebrated — The quiet correction

The real reason crypto fell while Wall Street celebrated — The quiet correction

On one hand, encouraging signals from preliminary US-China trade talks have lifted risk assets, with Wall Street closing at record highs and Asian equities starting the week on a strong note. On the other hand, the crypto market has pulled back modestly, shedding 1.24 per cent over the past 24 hours after a solid seven-day rally of 2.86 per cent.

This divergence reflects not a collapse in sentiment but rather a recalibration driven by three interlocking forces: derivatives deleveraging, airdrop-driven sell pressure, and shifting macro policy dynamics. Together, they underscore a market in transition, one that remains fundamentally intact but temporarily adjusting to new layers of complexity.

The most immediate catalyst for the crypto dip lies in the derivatives market. Open interest in perpetual futures contracts fell by 4.25 per cent to US$834 billion, accompanied by a 35 per cent drop in funding rates. This decline follows a dramatic 100 per cent surge in derivatives volume, which spiked to US$1.48 trillion, a clear sign that speculative activity had reached overheated levels.

When funding rates turn excessively positive and open interest balloons without proportional spot market support, the setup becomes ripe for a deleveraging event. Traders, sensing vulnerability or simply taking profits, began unwinding positions, triggering cascading liquidations that totalled US$869 billion. While such corrections can feel abrupt, they serve a necessary function. They purge excess leverage from the system, reducing the risk of a disorderly unwind later.

The current spot-to-perpetuals ratio of 0.23 remains low, confirming that price action continues to be driven more by leveraged derivatives than by underlying spot demand. If open interest continues to bleed and falls below the US$800 billion threshold, further downside pressure could materialise. But for now, this appears to be a healthy reset rather than a structural breakdown.

Compounding this technical adjustment is a wave of airdrop-related selling. New token launches, specifically Enso (ENSO) and Anoma (XAN), plummeted by 12 per cent to 13 per cent as recipients of free allocations rushed to monetise their holdings.

In the case of Dego Finance (DEGO), the impact was even more severe, with a 43 per cent crash following US$650,000 in long liquidations and coordinated whale sell-offs. This pattern has become increasingly common in 2025, where projects launch with low circulating supply but extremely high fully diluted valuations (FDVs). The result is a fragile equilibrium. Early participants, often incentivised through airdrops rather than organic belief in the protocol, have little reason to hold.

When large percentages of a token’s initial supply, typically 10 per cent to 20 per cent , hit the market all at once, demand simply cannot absorb the shock. The sell-off is not a reflection of project quality per se but of misaligned tokenomics and distribution mechanics. Until the industry develops more sustainable models for initial distribution, perhaps through vesting, utility gating, or community staking commitments, this post-TGE volatility will remain a recurring feature of the crypto landscape.

Meanwhile, macro policy developments are introducing a new layer of uncertainty that is beginning to decouple crypto from traditional equities. For the past week, Bitcoin and the broader market had moved in near lockstep with the S&P 500, but that correlation has now turned negative, registering at -0.56. This shift coincides with two significant regulatory signals from Asia.

First, China’s central bank issued fresh warnings about the systemic risks posed by stablecoins, echoing its long-standing skepticism toward private digital currencies. Second, Japan approved its first yen-backed stablecoin, JPYC, signalling a more proactive but tightly controlled approach to digital money.

These contrasting stances highlight a growing bifurcation in global regulatory philosophy. While some jurisdictions seek to suppress decentralised finance, others aim to co-opt it within state-sanctioned frameworks. For crypto markets, this creates a dual-edged effect. On one side, regulatory clarity in Japan could foster institutional adoption and stablecoin innovation.

On the other, China’s warnings inject caution, particularly among Asian retail participants and miners who remain sensitive to Beijing’s policy shifts. The net result is a temporary decoupling from equities, as crypto prices now reflect not just macro liquidity conditions but also jurisdiction-specific regulatory risk.

Despite these headwinds, the broader context remains supportive. Global risk sentiment has improved markedly following US-China trade overtures, with President Trump expressing optimism ahead of his October 30 meeting with President Xi.

This diplomatic thaw has lifted equities worldwide. The S&P 500 rose 1.2 per cent , the Nasdaq surged 1.9 per cent , and Asian benchmarks like South Korea’s KOSPI jumped 2.57 per cent . Even the US dollar softened slightly, with the DXY index slipping 0.2 per cent to 98.78, ahead of the Federal Reserve’s October 31 policy decision.

Treasury yields reflect this mixed outlook. Two-year yields ticked up 2 basis points to 3.5 per cent , while the 10-year yield dipped one basis point to 3.99 per cent , suggesting markets are pricing in both near-term resilience and longer-term caution. In commodities, gold’s sharp three per cent drop to US$3,980.55 per ounce underscores the retreat from safe-haven assets, while Brent crude held steady near US$65.75 per barrel despite OPEC+ output concerns.

Within this environment, crypto’s modest pullback appears corrective rather than ominous. The Fear & Greed Index sits at a neutral 42 out of 100, indicating neither panic nor euphoria. Bitcoin dominance remains stable at 59 per cent , suggesting that capital is not fleeing the sector but rotating within it.

Technically, the total market cap has retested the US$3.85 trillion pivot level, with the 14-day RSI cooling to 49.86 from overbought territory. This provides room for consolidation without triggering deeper bearish momentum. The critical support to watch is the seven-day simple moving average at US$3.77 trillion. Holding above this level would preserve the short-term bullish structure.

To sum up, today’s crypto dip is best understood as a convergence of technical, microeconomic, and macro forces, not a reversal of trend. Derivatives markets are shedding unsustainable leverage, airdrop economics are punishing poorly structured launches, and regulatory developments are temporarily disrupting crypto’s correlation with equities. The underlying macro backdrop remains favourable, with improving US-China relations, strong corporate earnings, and a dovish-leaning Fed on the horizon.

For investors, this moment offers a reminder that crypto’s path to maturity will be nonlinear, marked by volatility born not of weakness but of growing pains. The market is not breaking. It is adapting. And in that adaptation lies opportunity for those who can distinguish noise from signal.

j j j