February 13th, 2025

Ethereum Layer 2: A Forensic Analysis of Growth, Challenges, and Economic Impact

Key Points:

– Ethereum Spot ETF Performance: Ethereum spot ETFs saw significant inflows last week, with BlackRock’s ETHA and Fidelity’s FETH leading with $287 million and $97.28 million respectively, boosting their total assets to $4.4 billion and $1.51 billion.
– Layer 2 Controversy: The surge in ETF inflows hasn’t directly boosted Ethereum’s market performance. The Ethereum community criticizes Layer 2 networks for being “parasitic”, causing inflation by profiting from transaction fees while relying on Ethereum’s security.
– Layer 2 Sequencer Profits: Layer 2 networks like Arbitrum earn substantial profits from sequencer operations, highlighted by a $1.04 million daily revenue on February 4, with minimal cost to Ethereum, sparking debates over centralization and profit motives.
– Decentralization Challenges: Layer 2’s struggle with decentralizing sequencers is noted, with most still controlled by development teams. This central control is a significant point of contention, as sequencers are lucrative due to transaction fees, MEV, and interest.
– Base’s Sequencer Revenue: Base, part of the Ethereum network, has been accused of transferring all sequencer gains to Coinbase, with little transparency on how these profits are handled, leading to community suspicion about ETH sales.
– Vitalik’s Response: Vitalik Buterin has acknowledged the issues surrounding Layer 2’s economic models, calling for these networks to contribute back to Ethereum to ensure ETH’s value doesn’t diminish in a Layer 2-dominated ecosystem.

Ethereum Spot ETFs Surge, But Layer 2 Controversy Clouds Market Optimism

Ethereum spot ETFs saw a net inflow of $420 million last week, and all nine ETFs had no net outflow. Among them, the net inflow of BlackRock’s ETHA reached 287 million U.S. dollars, allowing ETHA to exceed 4.4 billion U.S. dollars. Fidelity’s FETH also received a net inflow of 97.28 million U.S. dollars, reaching 1.51 billion U.S. dollars thus far. However, despite the strong growth in capital inflows from Ethereum Spot ETFs, they have not significantly contributed to Ethereum’s market performance or quelled many controversies in the Ethereum ecosystem, especially regarding the Layer 2 operating model.

Recently, many netizens have criticised on “X” that Layer 2 network is actually “parasitic” on Ethereum, becoming the main source of its inflation. While Layer 2 brings scalability and efficiency to Ethereum, the economic model and operational mechanisms behind it are increasingly being questioned. This analysis combines current market data with community voices to take a look at the current Layer 2 controversy within the Ethereum ecosystem. Or is it actually Ethereum layer 2 or bad actors?

In the current cycle, the performance of ETH has lagged significantly behind the market as a whole, and some people attribute it to the heavy load of layer 2’s and some blame the Ethereum Foundation (EF)! This weekend, Layer 2’s became the object of community criticism. On February 9, Andre Cronje, co-founder of Sonic, posted on X, expressed significant public protest that Layer 2’s made a lot of money by continuing to sell sequencer earnings and had become a parasite on Ethereum. “Becoming Layer 2 – running a centralised sorting machine – charging a fee of $120 million – paying Ethereum another $10 million for DA and security – then selling $110 million for a profit – then claiming to be the “Ethereum Alliance.” I don’t understand how the Ethereum community convinced itself to accept this logic.Layer2 has become the main cause of Ethereum inflation again.”

Explaining Sorters & Collators Layer 2 – Layer 2’s Sorter Gains

Layer 2’s sequencer revenue controversy has become a commonplace topic. The collator has an indispensable role within Layer 2 architecture, and its main utility is as follows:

Collect user transactions and package them into batches in a specific order.
Provide users with instant transaction confirmation before the transaction is finally on the chain.
Submission of transaction data compression to Layer 1 to reduce gas costs.

In Layer2’s decentralised vision, the decentralisation of the sorter operation is an essential step. However, the reality is that almost all of Layer2’s collators are run by the development team, which is one of the biggest criticisms about Layer 2’s.

Why are Layer 2’s unable to complete the decentralisation of the sorter?

There are certain technical and operational reasons for this, but another big reason that cannot be ignored is that in the real world, sorting machines are a very profitable business. The primary sources of direct revenue from the operation of the sorting machine include: 1) transaction fee differences; 2) MEV capture; 3) Funds deposit interest.

DeepSeek provides Oracle on the other actors to blame and the following: How profitable is business?

We can take a cursory look through data from a single day on February 4 (Arbitrum) On February 4, because of the collective volatility of the market, Arbitrum charged $1.04 million at the Layer 2 level in a single day, while paying Layer 1 a final settlement cost of less than $20,000 – meaning that in just one day, the chain made millions of dollars in gains from trading fee spreads. (DeepSeek, 2025)

A look at Base again!

First with Winter Mute now on Layer 2. As the most active Layer 2 network on the Ethereum mainnet ecosystem, Base has long been at the centre of relevant public opinion. As the debate about the benefits of Layer 2 sorters intensified, the community began to take aim at Base. Lucidity CIO ,Mr. Santisa took the lead on X, accusing Base of transferring all the sequencer gains to Coinbase since the launch of its own network, and there is reason to suspect that this ETH has definitely been sold off. “Since its launch, BASE has been transferring sorter fees to Coinbase. We don’t know if they sold it, but we do know that they didn’t deploy the funds on Base or keep them on-chain. In the absence of further transparency, we can reasonably assume that they have sold off. They don’t agree with Ethereum’s stance.” (Santisa, 2025)

The figure shows the Base sorter income address

(0xEc8103eb573150cB92f8AF612e0072843db2295F) Close analysis, combined with Coinbase’s earnings data was used to analyse whether Base had sold the ETH in question. Thorough post mortem analysis and on-chain data showed that Base had earned significant income through sorters within the past 12 months. Over $100 million in revenue, with a profit margin of over 90%, all of these fees have been transferred to the exchange via the Base-Ethereum-Coinbase network path. According to Coinbase’s public earnings data, as of June 30, 2023 Coinbase held about $230 million in ETH on its balance sheet, when the price of ETH was $1,934, which means Coinbase held 118,924 ETH; As of September 30, 2024, Coinbase held 119696 ETH on its balance sheet. Suspicious indeed.

Suspiciously since the launch of Base, Coinbase only added 772 ETH to its balance sheet, so where did the hundreds of millions of dollars of Base sequencer revenue go? There seems to be only one answer! One might question that Base’s revenue, as a (notionally) independent network, and should not be counted on Coinbase’s balance sheet, this is unreasonable, as Coinbase has highlighted Base’s increased revenue in multiple financial statements. “The Ethereum community is proud of their Layer 2, but what Layer 2 does every day is transfer fee revenue from Layer 2 to Layer 1 and then to Coinbase to sell. This is the frontrunner of the Ethereum ecosystem. The Ethereum community wake up.” Base (Coinbase) on SOL with wintermute and now with Ethereum Layer 2.

Vitalik is Overwhelmed!

As of the posting, Vitalik has not responded to the accusations made by netizens other Ethereum community members, but in his January 24 self-written article, under the pressure of public opinion, Vitalik sends out a message calling out L2 proprietors: “Back for ETH,” a permutation of Vitalik’s frustration with the current state of Layer2’s operations is visible.

Vitalik said in the article that it is necessary to clarify the economic model of ETH to ensure that ETH continues to accumulate value in a Layer2-intensive world.

On an executive level, Vitalik encourages Layer 2 to support ETH by contributing a percentage of its fees, providing a permanent support mortgage and donating the proceeds to Ethereum mainnet.

By @LarryMetaTrust CSO, HashAi and @anndylian, Blockchain Expert & Author / Graphics by @Crypt0JayBear

Source: https://x.com/OfficialHashAI/status/1889758949681090841

j j j

February 12th, 2025

How upcoming CPI data could influence fed policy and cryptocurrency prices

Key points:

– Federal Reserve’s Caution: The Fed, led by Powell, holds rates steady, awaiting CPI data. Strong labor market and slightly high inflation delay rate cut expectations to mid-year.
– Market Shifts: US Treasuries sold off; 10-year yields hit 4.54%, 2-year at 4.28%. US Dollar Index fell 0.3%, gold steady at US$2,900/oz. Consumer staples up 0.9%, Asian markets down.
– Energy Risks: Brent crude rose 1.5% after US inventory increase, but sanctions on Russian oil exports add geopolitical uncertainty.
– Crypto Challenges: Bitcoin at US$97,053.0, down slightly due to tariffs, CPI wait. High US rates pressure crypto; World Liberty Financial’s token reserve aims to stabilize.
– Investment Outlook: Fed caution, trade disputes boost gold, consumer staples. Cryptocurrencies resilient, CPI data key for future strategies.

I watched closely monitoring the global economic landscape and the recent developments, particularly the Federal Reserve’s cautious approach to monetary policy, which provided a compelling narrative regarding the nuanced relationship between central bank decisions, investor sentiment, and the burgeoning sector of digital currencies.

On February 12, 2025, the atmosphere surrounding global risk was notably cautious, a direct consequence of Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell’s recent comments suggesting a period of patience before further interest rate reductions would be considered. This stance has set the stage for investors now eagerly awaiting the release of the upcoming Consumer Price Index (CPI) data, which could offer critical insights into inflation trends, potentially influencing the Fed’s next steps in monetary policy.

The Federal Reserve’s choice to maintain current interest rates is a calculated move, aiming to observe more concrete advancements in reducing inflation before taking action. This decision is set against a backdrop where the labor market remains strong, and inflation, while trending downward, still slightly exceeds the Fed’s target.

It’s understandable, therefore, that market participants have adjusted their forecasts, now anticipating a potential rate cut, perhaps not until mid-year. This shift in expectation was reflected in market movements on Tuesday, where US Treasuries saw a sell-off across various maturities, with the yield on the 10-year Treasury note increasing by 3.9 basis points to 4.54 per cent and the two year note by 0.9 basis points to 4.28 per cent. These yield changes indicate that while money markets still anticipate one rate cut by the Fed this year, the timing has become less certain.

The US Dollar Index experienced a modest decrease of 0.3 per cent, signalling a consolidation phase as the market absorbs the implications of the Fed’s policy direction. Traditionally viewed as a refuge during times of uncertainty, gold held steady near US$2,900 per ounce, demonstrating its resilience despite the Fed’s indication of no immediate rate adjustments.

In the energy market, Brent crude oil prices found stability, rising by 1.5 per cent after reports highlighted a significant increase in US crude inventories. However, this stability was somewhat tempered by US sanctions impacting Russian oil exports, introducing an element of geopolitical risk into the equation.

In the equity markets, the MSCI US index concluded the day unchanged, with the consumer staples sector leading the pack with a 0.9 per cent gain, suggesting a move towards sectors considered less volatile in uncertain economic times. Conversely, Asian stock markets started the day on a lower note, indicative of broader global economic concerns, while US equity futures suggested a flat opening, reflecting an indecisive market sentiment.

Shifting the focus to the cryptocurrency sector, Bitcoin, the leading digital currency, saw a slight decrease, trading at US$97,053.0 by mid-morning. This minor decline continues a trend of subdued performance, influenced by the ongoing trade tensions sparked by tariffs from President Donald Trump and the anticipation of the forthcoming inflation data.

Since last week, when concerns about a global trade war escalated due to China’s retaliatory tariffs and Trump’s subsequent tariffs on steel and aluminium, Bitcoin has been confined to tight trading ranges, signalling investor hesitance. The market’s attention is now fixed on the imminent CPI data release, which could provide clarity on the Federal Reserve’s future rate decisions, particularly after its hawkish posture in December.

This cautious environment has somewhat offset the previous optimism that had propelled Bitcoin to a peak above US$108,000, driven by hopes of a more crypto-friendly regulatory environment under Trump.

A recent article by Reuters indicated that the Federal Reserve might postpone additional rate cuts until the following quarter, driven by concerns over inflation potentially rising due to recent trade policies. Economists, who had previously forecasted a rate cut in March, have revised their predictions, suggesting the Fed might adopt a more conservative approach in response to inflation risks.

Elevated US interest rates can have a dampening effect on cryptocurrencies by diminishing the allure of riskier investments, increasing the cost of holding non-interest-bearing assets like Bitcoin, and bolstering the US dollar, which typically exerts pressure on crypto valuations.

In an interesting development, World Liberty Financial (WLF), a new platform in the cryptocurrency space with a financial interest from President Donald Trump, announced the launch of a strategic token reserve. This initiative is designed to support Bitcoin, Ethereum, and other cryptocurrencies, positioning them as pivotal in the transformation of global finance.

WLF’s statement on X highlighted that this reserve would help in mitigating market fluctuations, enable investments in cutting-edge decentralised finance projects, and establish a robust financial reserve. Furthermore, WLF plans to forge strategic alliances with financial institutions to enhance its reserve with tokenised assets.

From my perspective, this cautious economic climate presents a complex scenario for investors. The Federal Reserve’s deliberate approach, combined with uncertainties arising from international trade policies, creates an environment where traditional safe-haven assets like gold and sectors like consumer staples gain traction.

However, initiatives like WLF’s strategic token reserve could signify a maturation in the cryptocurrency market, offering stability against volatility and encouraging innovation in decentralised finance, potentially offsetting some negative impacts of higher interest rates on digital currencies.

Moreover, the ongoing trade disputes highlight the necessity for alternative financial systems, which cryptocurrencies are well-poised to fulfil. Despite its recent subdued performance, Bitcoin’s resilience in facing macroeconomic pressures is noteworthy. It continues to act as a hedge against inflation and currency devaluation, especially in a global economy where traditional financial policies might struggle under geopolitical strains.

In summary, as we approach the release of the CPI data on February 12, 2025, the financial markets are in a state of watchful anticipation, balancing between conventional economic indicators and the potential of digital currencies.

The Fed’s cautious stance, alongside geopolitical manoeuvres, crafts an investment landscape that demands vigilance, flexibility, and an openness to the evolving story of global finance, where cryptocurrencies might increasingly play a significant role. This intricate relationship between policy decisions, market sentiment, and technological innovation continues to redefine investment strategies, presenting both challenges and opportunities.

Source: https://e27.co/how-upcoming-cpi-data-could-influence-fed-policy-and-cryptocurrency-prices-20250212/

j j j

February 12th, 2025

Elon Musk, Crypto Leaders Laud ‘Unplugging’ Of CFPB, Critics Push Back

Elon Musk and the chiefs of some of the cryptocurrency industry’s key organizations have lauded the work being done by the Trump administration to “shut down” the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB).

However, some crypto users decried the move, saying they were concerned about the Americans’ financial protection.

There has been increasing pushback from Democrats over the closure of the CFPB office announced by Acting Director Russell Vought. He told staffers to not come to the office and “not perform any work tasks” as the headquarters will be closed “this week.”

Musk, crypto leaders react

As news about Vought’s announcement spread, Musk took to X over the weekend to bid farewell to the CFPB. “CFPB RIP,” he wrote. Political commentator Gunther Eagleman commented, saying it was just another agency whose name had “nothing to do with what they do.”

The Tesla CEO responded, saying the financial watchdog “did above zero good things, but still need to go.”

Brian Armstrong, the CEO of crypto exchange giant Coinbase, said it was “the right call” to shut down the agency.

“The CFPB is unconstitutional on the face of it,” alleging further that it was “an activist organization that has done enormous harm to the country.”

Blockchain expert Anndy Lian said the CFPB was also “over reaching with other agencies.”

“Less bureaucracy, more freedom,” said veteran Bitcoiner Thutski.

Gemini exchange co-founder Tyler Winklevoss, known for his and his twin brother’s generous Bitcoin donation to U.S. President Donald Trump’s presidential campaign last year, posted a photo that showed the CFPB website with a 404 error. “CFPB Unplugged,” Winklevoss wrote.

Riot Platforms VP of Research Pierre Rochard said the CFPB “did not stop SBF and he is now in jail for fraud.”

SBF, or Sam Bankman-Fried, is serving 25 years for his role in the shocking collapse of the FTX exchange, which wiped out billions from the crypto market.

Warren protests with staffers outside the CFPB office

Since the Trump administration moved to cripple the agency, protests were staged outside the CFPB headquarters, with employees and supporters attending the demonstrations, including Sen. Warren.

Standing behind a podium, where the sign “hands off our CFPB” reads, Warren said the “fight” to retain the agency was for Americans who don’t want to get “scammed,” get chased off their homes in an “illegal foreclosure,” and for students who need to borrow money for their education “without getting defrauded.”

Behind the Massachusetts lawmaker were demonstrators holding up signs that read, “No one voted for Elon Musk,” “Elon bought the United States,” and many more to call out the crackdown.

Warren reiterated that only Congress — not Trump, nor Musk — had the power to “fire the financial cops.”

Trump slams CFPB, says Warren ‘used’ the agency

During Monday night’s question and answer session with the media, Trump was asked about his thoughts on Warren’s pushback over the CFPB’s shutdown.

“She used that [CFPB] as her little personal agency to go around and destroy people,” the president said.

Trump insisted that targeting the financial agency was “the right thing” to do.

“There was a bad group of people running it, but it was also a waste,” he added.

Some X users, crypto holders are divided over the move

While an increasing number of crypto leaders and figures have expressed support for the Trump administration’s move, some users on X are unsure whether it would be beneficial for the American public.

“Come on Brian. Great call for you and your billionaire friends, terrible for hardworking Americans who are barely protected already,” one crypto holder said in response to Armstrong’s post.

“It has done no harm. You probably never heard of it until a couple of days ago,” another said.

Project management expert Laurence Boorstein criticized Armstrong for claiming that the CFPB was an “unconstitutional” agency, saying the Coinbase CEO made such comments “based on self interest.”

One Bitcoiner slammed Winklevoss for making such comments about the agency’s shutdown, saying it only proved that the Gemini co-founder doesn’t care about clients.

It remains to be seen whether the CFPB will actually be shut down, or if the Trump admin will opt for an overhaul of the agency that ensures compliance in the U.S. financial realm.

Source: https://www.ibtimes.com/elon-musk-crypto-leaders-laud-unplugging-cfpb-critics-push-back-3763220

j j j