Posts from the 'Op-Ed' Category

8 Ways Blockchain Can Revolutionize IP Licensing for AI Firms

8 Ways Blockchain Can Revolutionize IP Licensing for AI Firms

Generative AI, with its ability to create text, images, audio, and other forms of content, has ushered in a new era of technological innovation. It also faces a severe intellectual property (IP) licensing crisis. Generative AI firms often struggle with copyright infringement risks and unauthorized data usage issues due to opaque and inefficient traditional licensing systems, which pose significant legal and ethical challenges. As blockchain technology continues to evolve, it offers a promising solution to address the IP licensing dilemmas of generative AI firms. Below is a detailed exploration of this topic in my perspective.

The IP Crisis in Generative AI

Generative AI systems require vast amounts of data for training, often sourcing it from platforms like the internet. A significant portion of this data is protected by IP rights, and the data usage permissions are often unclear. Generative AI algorithms analyze massive volumes of unstructured data, such as news articles and images, to identify patterns and relationships. During this process, details like IP rights and compensation terms are frequently overlooked, raising concerns among content creators. The Getty Images lawsuit against Stability AI is a prime example. In 2023, Getty Images filed a case against Stability AI of unlawfully copying and processing millions of copyrighted images to train its software for commercial gain, seeking up to $1.8 trillion in damages.

The traditional IP licensing system worsens these issues. It is often opaque, inefficient, and lacks transparency. For instance, creators may struggle to track how their works are used by generative AI firms and whether they receive fair compensation. Meanwhile, AI firms may inadvertently infringe on IP rights due to complex and lengthy licensing procedures, leading to legal disputes. I was at a conference early this year and I remember the speaker said that over 60% of generative AI firms have encountered IP licensing-related challenges, with 30% facing legal lawsuits. If this is true, someone or some tech got to try to fix this. The first thing I can think of would be “blockchain”.

Blockchain’s Core Strengths

Blockchain technology, characterized by decentralization, security, and transparency, can effectively address the inefficiencies and trust deficits in current IP licensing models. Blockchain operates as a distributed ledger where all transaction records are stored across multiple nodes, making data tamper-proof and immutable. This ensures the authenticity and traceability of IP ownership and usage rights. Additionally, blockchain employs advanced cryptographic techniques to protect data security, preventing unauthorized access and tampering.

Smart contracts, a key feature of blockchain, enable the automation of licensing agreements. Once predefined conditions are met, smart contracts automatically execute the terms of the agreement, reducing reliance on intermediaries and minimizing human intervention. This ensures the objectivity and fairness of the licensing process while lowering administrative costs.

Blockchain Solutions for Generative AI’s IP Licensing Issues

1. Smart Contracts for Automated Licensing

Blockchain-based smart contracts can automate licensing agreements, ensuring that creators are promptly and fairly compensated while helping AI firms easily comply with licensing requirements. For example, when a photographer’s image is used in generative AI training, a smart contract can automatically trigger a payment to the photographer once the image is accessed. This eliminates the need for lengthy negotiations and manual payments, reducing costs and improving efficiency. Based on my observations, smart contracts could probably reduce IP licensing costs by 30%–50% while enhancing transparency and fairness. This is a win-win scenario.

2. Immutable Provenance for Ownership Clarity

Blockchain’s immutable ledger permanently records data ownership and licensing history, providing a reliable basis for resolving IP disputes. Each piece of data on the blockchain carries a unique digital signature and timestamp, making it easy to trace its origin and usage history. This prevents unauthorized use and infringement, protecting creators’ rights. For instance, when a dataset is licensed to a generative AI firm, the blockchain records every detail of the licensing process, including the licensing party, terms, and duration. Any unauthorized use of the dataset can be quickly identified and addressed.

3. Decentralized Marketplaces for Cost Reduction

Blockchain enables the creation of decentralized IP licensing marketplaces where creators and AI firms can directly engage in peer-to-peer transactions, bypassing intermediaries and reducing costs. Traditional licensing often involves multiple middlemen, such as licensing agencies and law firms, which increases costs and complexity. On a blockchain-based decentralized marketplace, creators can directly publish and license their works, while AI firms can browse and purchase licenses based on their needs. This not only reduces licensing costs but also increases revenue for creators. For example, there are decentralized data marketplaces that allow data owners to control access to their data and receive compensation.

4. Enhanced Security Against Fraud

Blockchain’s cryptographic security mechanisms ensure the integrity and authenticity of licensing records, preventing fraud. All licensing information on the blockchain is encrypted and verified by multiple nodes, making it nearly impossible to forge or tamper with. This protects both creators and AI firms from false claims and ensures the reliability of each transaction. Another example that I would like to quote-  fake licenses cannot be validated on the blockchain, preventing AI firms from suffering losses due to fraudulent licenses and safeguarding creators’ rights.

5. Transparency to Build Accountability

The open and transparent nature of blockchain makes all licensing transactions visible to all parties, fostering trust and simplifying compliance for AI firms and regulators. Creators can track the usage of their works in real time, while AI firms can demonstrate compliance with licensing agreements to regulators and the public. This transparency helps build trust between creators and AI firms, fostering collaboration. Take the European Union’s Artificial Intelligence Act for instance, which took initial effect in August 2024, requires generative AI models to disclose the copyrighted works used during training. A blockchain-based platform could provide detailed records of training data sources and usage, helping AI firms meet regulatory requirements.

6. Tokenization for Flexible Licensing

Through tokenization, blockchain can transform IP assets into digital tokens, enabling flexible and scalable licensing models. Creators can issue tokens representing the usage rights to their works and sell them on blockchain platforms. AI firms can purchase the tokens they need based on their requirements. This not only provides creators with new revenue streams but also offers AI firms greater flexibility in accessing data. A musician could tokenize the licensing rights to their songs and sell them to generative AI firms. These firms could then use the songs to train music generation models while paying the musician via token-based payments.

7. Global Scalability and Compliance

Blockchain technology operates across borders, enabling generative AI firms to manage IP licensing on a global scale while complying with international regulations. Different countries have varying IP laws and regulations, making cross-border licensing complex. Blockchain’s standardized protocols and rules can simplify cross-border licensing processes, reduce legal risks, and facilitate global collaboration. Blockchain platforms could manage datasets licensed from multiple countries, ensuring compliance with each country’s IP laws while streamlining licensing procedures.

8. Future-Proofing for AI’s Evolution

Blockchain’s adaptability allows it to address emerging IP challenges as generative AI evolves, offering a long-term solution. As generative AI technologies advance, new IP issues may arise, such as ownership disputes over AI-generated content. Blockchain’s smart contracts and decentralized architecture can evolve to meet these new challenges. Future smart contracts could define usage rights and revenue-sharing mechanisms for AI-generated content, ensuring fair compensation for all stakeholders.

Existing Challenges and Prospects

Despite blockchain’s potential to resolve generative AI’s IP licensing issues, several challenges remain. First, technical barriers need to be overcome. Blockchain technology is still evolving, and its integration with generative AI systems requires significant technical effort. Achieving real-time tracking and recording of data usage in generative AI training while ensuring blockchain performance and scalability is a complex technical challenge.

Second, regulatory uncertainty persists. The legal status of blockchain-based IP licensing and the regulatory requirements for smart contracts remain unclear in many countries. This creates uncertainty for both creators and AI firms. Third, market adoption is slow. Transitioning from traditional licensing models to blockchain-based ones requires time and effort. Both creators and AI firms need to adapt to new technologies and processes, and the market requires time to mature.

In my view, the future prospects are promising. As blockchain technology matures and regulatory frameworks gradually improve, its application in generative AI IP licensing is likely to expand. More creators and AI firms will recognize the benefits of blockchain and adopt it for IP licensing. It could become the standard solution for addressing IP licensing issues in generative AI, driving the healthy development of the generative AI industry.

In conclusion, generative AI firms face a severe IP licensing crisis, while blockchain technology offers a powerful solution. By leveraging blockchain’s decentralization, security, transparency, and smart contracts, among other features, generative AI firms can address IP licensing challenges, protect creators’ rights, and achieve sustainable development. Although challenges remain in areas like technology, regulation, and market adoption, with ongoing advancements in blockchain technology and increased collaboration among stakeholders, blockchain is expected to play an increasingly significant role in resolving generative AI’s IP licensing issues. It will pave the way for the healthy growth of the generative AI industry and foster innovation and development in the digital economy era.

 

Source: https://www.securities.io/8-ways-blockchain-can-revolutionize-ip-licensing-for-ai-firms/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

The Fed’s first rate cut: What it means for equities, risk, and crypto

The Fed’s first rate cut: What it means for equities, risk, and crypto

The Federal Reserve has officially initiated its rate cut cycle, a move long anticipated by markets that have already priced in approximately 3.8 cuts over the next 12 months. I forecast two additional reductions on October 29 and December 12.

Historically, the period immediately following the first rate cut has been marked by heightened volatility as markets recalibrate their expectations, reassess risk premiums, and digest the implications of a new monetary regime.

This transitional phase is particularly delicate because it often coincides with divergent signals from economic data, political uncertainty, and evolving investor positioning. All of these factors are present in today’s environment.

Equities and the magnificent seven effect

Equity markets, led by the S&P 500’s impressive 32 per cent rally from its recent lows, reflect a strong recovery narrative driven disproportionately by the so-called Magnificent Seven (Mag7) stocks. These technology and growth-oriented giants continue to post earnings growth roughly four times that of the remaining 493 companies in the index, underscoring their outsized influence on overall market performance.

However, this concentration introduces significant risk. Mag7 valuations now exceed 30 times forward earnings, not yet at their historical peaks but certainly in elevated territory. While historical backtesting suggests that equities generally perform well in the 12 to 24 months following the start of a Fed easing cycle, the current context differs in important ways.

The market’s narrow leadership, combined with stretched valuations, makes indiscriminate exposure to these names increasingly perilous. Chasing performance at this juncture could expose investors to sharp corrections if earnings disappoint or if macro risks materialise. Diversification, not just across sectors but across geographies and asset classes, emerges as a critical defensive and offensive strategy.

Investor positioning and market signals

Investor positioning data reveals that asset managers hold high equity allocations, though not at extreme levels that typically precede major drawdowns. Meanwhile, equity volatility remains subdued, a condition that historically correlates with lower forward returns over the subsequent six to twelve months.

This low-volatility complacency can lull investors into underestimating tail risks, especially when other asset classes also appear expensive. Gold, for instance, has seen renewed inflows into bullion-backed ETFs and now trades near US$3,760 per ounce, supported by geopolitical tensions and a modestly weaker US dollar, which closed at 98.152.

Yet gold positioning is once again crowded, suggesting limited room for further upside without a significant catalyst such as a sharp escalation in global instability or a deeper-than-expected economic slowdown. Similarly, credit markets show tight bond spreads, indicating that investors are not demanding much compensation for credit risk. In such an environment, security selection becomes paramount.

Broad exposure to high-yield or investment-grade debt may not suffice. Instead, bottom-up analysis of issuer fundamentals is essential.

Mixed economic signals and political risks

The macroeconomic backdrop offers mixed signals. August’s Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) Price Index, the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge, rose 0.3 per cent month-over-month, resulting in a 2.7 per cent annual headline rate. Core PCE, which excludes food and energy, stood at 2.9 per cent year-over-year after a 0.2 per cent monthly increase.

This remains above the Fed’s two per cent target but shows signs of gradual moderation. The data came in largely in line with expectations and did not provoke a strong market reaction, suggesting that investors have already internalised a path of gradual disinflation. However, political risks loom large.

The September 30 deadline for US government funding is fast approaching, and with congressional negotiations stalled, the probability of a partial shutdown is rising. While past shutdowns have had limited economic impact, they inject uncertainty into market psychology and could delay fiscal policy decisions or data releases, further complicating the Fed’s communication strategy.

Wall Street’s reaction and treasury yields

Market reactions to recent events have been muted but telling. Wall Street closed higher last Friday, ending a three-day losing streak, with the Dow Jones up 0.7 per cent, the S&P 500 gaining 0.6 per cent, and the Nasdaq rising 0.4 per cent.

Notably, markets barely flinched at the announcement of new sector-specific tariffs by the Trump administration, signalling either desensitisation to trade rhetoric or confidence that such measures will not significantly disrupt the broader economic trajectory. Treasury yields reflected this calm.

The 10-year yield edged up just one basis point to 4.183 per cent, while the two-year yield dipped two basis points to 3.645 per cent, flattening the yield curve slightly. This dynamic suggests that while near-term rate expectations are stable, longer-term growth and inflation concerns persist.

Asia’s cautious mood and key data ahead

In Asia, equities dipped on Friday as resilient US data prompted a modest reassessment of rate cut expectations. US equity index futures point to a higher open, indicating that global investors remain cautiously optimistic. The coming week will be pivotal, with the September nonfarm payrolls report on October 3 serving as a key barometer of labor market health.

Additional insights will come from the JOLTS job openings data on Tuesday and the ADP private payroll report on Wednesday. Labour market strength remains the Fed’s primary concern. If employment data remains robust, it could delay further rate cuts or reduce their magnitude, directly impacting risk asset valuations.

Bitcoin’s technical recovery

Meanwhile, Bitcoin has staged a “reasonable” technical recovery, rising 2.24 per cent in the past 24 hours to US$111,966 after a 7-day decline of 2.23 per cent. This rebound appears driven by three converging factors. First, price action held firm at the US$108,680 support level, breaking a bearish trend line and reclaiming the US$111,000 mark.

Hourly indicators, including a bullish MACD crossover and an RSI stabilising around 47-48, suggest that short-term momentum has shifted in favour of buyers. The 200-day exponential moving average at US$106,200 continues to act as a structural support, reinforcing the asset’s resilience.

However, the critical test lies ahead. A sustained close above US$112,500, the 50 per cent Fibonacci retracement of the recent decline, could pave the way for US$113,700 to US$115,000. Failure to break this resistance may invite profit-taking and a retest of the lower support level.

On-chain metrics and corporate adoption

Second, on-chain metrics show improving demand dynamics. The 60-day Buy/Sell Pressure Delta has entered what analysts describe as an opportunity zone, indicating reduced selling pressure.

The decline in sending addresses and stable miner reserves, holding steady at 1.8 million BTC, suggests that long-term holders are not capitulating. That said, the 90-day delta remains cautious, reflecting lingering uncertainty among larger participants. The Coinbase Premium Index, currently at +0.041, will be a key gauge of sustained US institutional interest.

Third, corporate adoption continues to provide narrative support. The rebranding of 164-year-old Japanese textile firm Marusho Hotta to Bitcoin Japan and its announcement of a BTC treasury business, while small in absolute scale, aligns with a growing trend among Asian corporations seeking alternative stores of value amid declining traditional revenues.

Firms like Metaplanet and Kitabo have similarly adopted Bitcoin, reinforcing its digital gold thesis in a region that is increasingly skeptical of fiat stability.

Final thoughts: Selectivity over momentum

In sum, the current market environment demands a nuanced approach. While the Fed’s pivot to easing should, in theory, support risk assets over the medium term, the combination of expensive valuations, narrow market leadership, and external risks ranging from a potential government shutdown to geopolitical flare-ups calls for disciplined selectivity.

Investors should avoid chasing momentum in already crowded trades and instead focus on quality earnings, global diversification, and tactical entry points during pullbacks.

 

Source: https://e27.co/the-feds-first-rate-cut-what-it-means-for-equities-risk-and-crypto-20250929/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

Crypto Isn’t The Real Threat – It’s Regulatory Chaos

Crypto Isn’t The Real Threat – It’s Regulatory Chaos

The Crypto Crossroads: How Fragmented Regulation Threatens A Global Financial Revolution

Last spring, I was watching a young entrepreneur named Chinedu send $500 to his family in rural countryside using Bitcoin. “This is how I survive,” he said, tapping his phone. “Traditional banks charge too much, and our currency is falling daily.” Just weeks later, I was told he was detained by authorities for operating an unlicensed crypto exchange.

This duality, crypto as both lifeline and liability, defines the global debate.

The Surging Adoption: A Silent Revolution

Between 2023 and 2025, the number of people globally using cryptocurrency has significantly increased. In 2023, there are approximately 420 million people who own cryptocurrency. In 2024, this number grew to 562 million people, and in 2025, the total is estimated to be around 580 million users, potentially reaching as high as 861 million by other reports.

This explosive growth has been driven not by speculative frenzy alone, but by real-world utility: remittances, inflation hedging, and access to financial services for the unbanked. In 2024 alone, global crypto adoption surged by 172%, with India, Nigeria, and Indonesia leading the charge.

  • The United States and European Union have seen steady growth, but the most dramatic shifts are happening in the Global South.
  • Nigeria’s 33 million crypto users, the highest per capita in Africa, rely on digital assets to bypass a collapsing currency and banking system.
  • In Vietnam, peer-to-peer trading volume has exploded as citizens use Bitcoin to shield themselves from inflation and currency controls.
  • Even in India, where a 30% tax on crypto gains and 1% TDS have created regulatory uncertainty, over 100 million people trade digital assets, a testament to the demand for financial sovereignty.

The numbers tell a clear story: crypto is no longer a fringe phenomenon. It’s a global movement reshaping how people store value, send money, and access financial services. Yet for every success story, there’s a cautionary tale.

The Regulatory Maze: Progress Amidst Paralysis

A recent report analyzing 24 jurisdictions, representing 70% of global crypto exposure, found that 70% made regulatory progress in 2025. But “progress” is a relative term.

While Switzerland’s “Crypto Valley” offers clear frameworks for blockchain businesses, and the UAE’s VARA licenses over 100 firms, the United States remains a fractured landscape where the SEC, CFTC, and state regulators each stake competing claims of jurisdiction. In China, a total ban has driven crypto underground, while El Salvador’s bold Bitcoin-as-legal-tender experiment has faced IMF criticism for its economic risks.

The European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, implemented in 2024, has created a unified framework for stablecoins and asset-referenced tokens. This has attracted firms like Coinbase and Binance to establish European headquarters, but critics argue MiCA’s strict compliance requirements stifle innovation. Meanwhile, the U.S. remains stuck in regulatory limbo. The SEC’s aggressive stance against crypto exchanges has led to lawsuits against giants like Coinbase and Binance, while the CFTC claims authority over Bitcoin as a commodity. This ambiguity has created a “regulatory chill,” where startups avoid the U.S. market entirely.

The UAE, however, has emerged as a model for balanced regulation. Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA) requires strict AML checks, licensing, and transparency, yet also offers tax incentives and clear guidelines for businesses. As a result, over 100 crypto firms now operate in Dubai, creating thousands of jobs and positioning the UAE as a global crypto hub. This success proves that regulation doesn’t have to mean restriction; it can foster innovation while protecting consumers.

The Double-Edged Sword: Inclusion vs. Instability

Critics argue crypto fuels crime, but data tells a different story: the UN estimates less than 1% of illicit finance involves cryptocurrency, compared to 2-5% in traditional banking. The real danger isn’t the technology, it’s the lack of coherent regulation. When countries ban crypto outright, they push users into unregulated spaces where scams and fraud thrive. When they regulate too strictly, they stifle innovation.

El Salvador’s 2021 Bitcoin law promised financial inclusion for the unbanked, but today only 12% of Salvadorans regularly use it. The government’s Chivo wallet has been plagued by security breaches, and the IMF warns that Bitcoin’s volatility threatens economic stability. Salvadorans still rely on crypto for remittances; 80% of the population receives money from abroad, and traditional remittance fees can exceed 10%.

In Nigeria, the Central Bank’s ambiguous stance has created a gray zone where legitimate businesses operate in fear of sudden crackdowns. While crypto adoption has soared, the lack of clear regulations leaves users vulnerable to scams. A report found that 35% of crypto-related fraud cases stemmed from unregulated exchanges, a direct consequence of regulatory uncertainty.

Conversely, countries like Singapore and Switzerland have struck a balance. Singapore’s Payment Services Act requires crypto exchanges to register with the Monetary Authority, ensuring consumer protection while fostering innovation. Switzerland’s “Crypto Valley” in Zug offers clear tax guidelines and business-friendly policies, attracting over 1,000 blockchain companies. These nations prove that regulation can be both rigorous and enabling.

The Path Forward: Toward Harmonized Global Standards

The path forward lies in global cooperation. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) has issued guidelines for crypto regulation, but adoption is inconsistent. Meanwhile, the EU’s MiCA framework and the U.S.’s push for stablecoin legislation show promise. As PwC’s 2025 report notes, “countries that develop balanced regulatory frameworks will lead the next wave of financial innovation.”

Stablecoins, digital assets pegged to fiat currencies, are becoming a critical focus. The U.S., UK, and several Asian countries are developing regulatory frameworks for stablecoins, recognizing their potential to revolutionize payments while mitigating volatility risks.

The EU’s MiCA regulation has already set standards for stablecoin issuers, requiring reserves to be fully backed and audited. This could pave the way for stablecoins to become a bridge between traditional finance and crypto.

The U.S. remains a key player in this evolution. With Bitcoin ETFs approved in 2024 and growing bipartisan support for clearer regulations, Washington has finally established a coherent framework of crypto-friendly legislation. But without coordination with global partners, the U.S. risks becoming a regulatory outlier, driving innovation overseas while losing its competitive edge.

My Perspective: The Real Threat Isn’t Crypto, It’s Regulatory Chaos

Having been involved in this space for over a decade, I’ve seen crypto’s potential to empower the unbanked and disrupt monopolistic financial systems. I’ve also seen how regulatory chaos creates winners and losers. In India, a 30% tax on crypto gains has driven traders to offshore exchanges, while in Nigeria, regulatory ambiguity has left users vulnerable to scams. Meanwhile, the UAE’s clear rules have attracted global firms, creating jobs and economic growth.

The solution isn’t bans or blind enthusiasm, it’s collaboration. The global crypto market cap reached $1.2 trillion in early 2024, rebounding from the volatility of 2022. As of the time of writing, the current market cap is $4.05 trillion. This is 3 to 4 times more than the previous year. Also, bear this in mind, I think this is not the peak of this current bull run. The figures could double at their peak. In my humble opinion, this isn’t a bubble waiting to burst; it’s a foundational shift in how money works.

Consider this: 40% of the world’s population remains unbanked. For them, crypto isn’t a speculative asset; it’s a lifeline. In Venezuela, citizens use Bitcoin to buy groceries as the bolivar collapses. In Kenya, mobile crypto platforms enable microloans for small businesses. In the Philippines, remittances sent via crypto cost 80% less than traditional channels. These aren’t fringe cases, they’re the future of finance.

Of course, for every success story, there’s a cautionary tale. China’s total ban has driven mining operations underground, creating environmental and security risks. El Salvador’s Bitcoin experiment has strained public finances in 2022, with the government losing hundreds of millions on its Bitcoin holdings. These are the past, its value has rocketed. But will this happen again? These issues aren’t due to crypto itself; they’re due to poor implementation and lack of foresight.

The Choice Before Us

The crypto revolution isn’t coming, it’s here. The question isn’t whether we’ll embrace it, but how we’ll govern it. As the world watches India, Nigeria, and the UAE navigate this new landscape, one truth is clear: the countries that get regulation right will reap the rewards. The rest will be left behind.

Global adoption is growing at an unprecedented pace, but fragmented regulation is the real threat. When governments prioritize fear over innovation, they sacrifice economic opportunity for their citizens. When they embrace collaboration and balance, they unlock a future where finance is inclusive, efficient, and resilient.

“Crypto isn’t the problem. The problem is when governments don’t understand it.”

In 2025, the world has a choice: to let regulatory chaos stifle a financial revolution, or to harness its potential for the benefit of all. The time for decisive action is now.

 

Source: https://www.benzinga.com/markets/cryptocurrency/25/09/47787445/crypto-isnt-the-real-threat-its-regulatory-chaos

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j