Tag Archives: but

Is Bitcoin’s geopolitical rally sustainable? The data says maybe, but there’s a catch

Is Bitcoin’s geopolitical rally sustainable? The data says maybe, but there’s a catch

Bitcoin’s climb to US$74,576.33, a 0.56 per cent gain over 24 hours, signals more than a routine bounce. This move breaks the quiet consolidation that held price below US$74,000 for 3–4 weeks and reflects a decisive shift in market sentiment. The catalyst came from an unexpected source: geopolitical de-escalation. News that Iran signalled openness to peace negotiations with former President Donald Trump eased immediate fears of conflict. Risk assets responded swiftly.

Bitcoin reclaimed the critical ETF Cost Basis at US$74,232, a level institutional holders watch closely. This breakout matters because it transitions the market structure from sideways drift to potential upward momentum, but only if price holds above the US$74,500-US$76,000 supply zone.

The geopolitical catalyst did not act alone. Technical resistance at US$74,000 had capped Bitcoin’s advance for nearly a month. When the price finally pushed through, it triggered a cascade of short liquidations exceeding US$95 million within 24 hours. This squeeze accelerated gains as forced buying added fuel to the rally.

Simultaneously, underlying demand from institutions provided steady support. US spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded approximately US$1.1 billion in net inflows last week. These flows suggest foundational buying interest that extends beyond short-term speculation. The combination of leveraged positioning, unwinding, and sustained institutional accumulation created a powerful upward impulse. This dynamic requires careful monitoring. If funding rates climb too quickly or open interest surges without corresponding spot demand, the move could stall.

Broader market action reinforced Bitcoin’s strength. Major US benchmarks closed sharply higher on April 14, 2026. The S&P 500 reached 6,967.38, up 1.18 per cent and now within 0.2 per cent of its January record high. The Nasdaq Composite advanced 1.96 per cent to 23,639.08, marking its 10th consecutive day of gains, the longest streak since 2021. Mega-cap technology names led the charge. NVIDIA, Alphabet, and Tesla each rose between three to four per cent.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 0.66 per cent to close at 48,535.99. Amazon gained 3.83 per cent while Nvidia added 3.75 per cent. Chevron lagged with a 2.47 per cent decline as oil prices cooled. This synchronised rally across equities and crypto underscores how risk appetite returned once geopolitical tensions eased.

Commodity and bond markets echoed the shift. Brent crude fell to roughly US$101/bbl and dipped below US$100 in early trading on April 15. Traders priced in hopes that diplomatic progress could reopen the Strait of Hormuz, easing supply concerns. The 10-year US Treasury yield eased to a range of 4.24-4.25 per cent as inflation fears cooled.

Lower yields support growth assets by reducing the discount rate applied to future cash flows. This environment favours Bitcoin, which behaves as a high-beta risk asset in the current macro regime. The correlation between Bitcoin and the Nasdaq remains evident. When tech stocks rally on improved sentiment, Bitcoin often follows with amplified magnitude.

Asian markets tracked Wall Street’s momentum at the open on April 15. Stocks in Japan, Australia, and Hong Kong moved higher. The ASX 200 advanced despite lowered FY26 production guidance from some local miners. This global risk-on tone provides a supportive backdrop for Bitcoin’s breakout.

The cryptocurrency market remains uniquely sensitive to geopolitical headlines. Any reversal in US-Iran diplomatic signals could quickly unwind the recent gains. That is why the US$72,000-US$74,000 band now serves as critical support. A breakdown below US$72,000 would signal failure of the breakout and likely reflect renewed risk-off pressure.

In my opinion, this move validates a key thesis about crypto markets. They do not operate in isolation. Bitcoin responds to macro liquidity conditions, institutional flows, and geopolitical risk premiums. The recent breakout demonstrates how quickly sentiment can shift when a catalyst emerges. I remain cautious about extrapolating short-term moves into long-term trends. The US$74,232 ETF Cost Basis level matters because it represents the average entry point for many institutional buyers.

Holding above this level encourages continued accumulation. Losing it could trigger profit-taking. The next resistance zone sits between US$77,000 and US$80,000. A daily close above US$76,000 would accelerate momentum toward that range, potentially extending to US$83,000 if buying intensifies.

Derivatives data warrants close monitoring. The US$95 million in short liquidations provided a temporary turbocharge, but sustainable upside requires spot demand to absorb selling pressure. ETF inflows of US$1.1 billion last week indicate that institutions see value at current levels.

If geopolitical headlines turn negative, those same institutions could pause or reverse flows. This is why I emphasise conditional bullishness. The bias favours upside above US$74,500, but the move remains news-sensitive. Traders should watch funding rates and open interest for signs of excessive leverage rebuilding. A rapid rise in these metrics often precedes volatility spikes.

The broader implication extends beyond price levels. Bitcoin’s reaction to geopolitical de-escalation highlights its evolving role in the global financial system. It no longer moves solely on halving narratives or regulatory headlines. It now responds to the same macro drivers that influence equities, bonds, and commodities. This integration brings both opportunity and risk.

Opportunity arises from deeper liquidity and broader investor participation. Risk emerges from heightened correlation during stress events. My experience in both crypto markets and policy circles suggests that navigating this new landscape requires disciplined risk management and a clear understanding of catalysts.

Looking ahead, the path of least resistance points higher if Bitcoin maintains daily closes above US$74,232. The supply zone between US$74,500 and US$76,000 must flip to support. A successful retest of this zone would confirm the breakout and invite additional buying. The $77,000-$80,000 resistance band represents the next major hurdle.

Clearing that level would open a path toward US$83,000. Conversely, a failure to hold US$72,000 would invalidate the bullish structure and likely trigger a move back toward lower supports. The key watch remains geopolitical developments. Official statements from US or Iranian officials could alter the risk narrative within hours.

For now, the market structure favours cautious optimism, but vigilance remains essential. The next few sessions will determine whether this breakout evolves into a durable uptrend or fades as a sentiment-driven spike.

 

Source: https://e27.co/is-bitcoins-geopolitical-rally-sustainable-the-data-says-maybe-but-theres-a-catch-20260415/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

The alarming reason crypto now moves like gold but falls like stocks

The alarming reason crypto now moves like gold but falls like stocks

Financial markets worldwide faced significant pressure this week as escalating geopolitical tensions triggered a broad-based retreat from risk assets. The cryptocurrency market declined 1.17 per cent to reach US$2.42T over a 24-hour period, moving in lockstep with traditional equities and commodities in what analysts describe as a classic risk-off response to mounting global uncertainty. This synchronised movement reveals the extent to which digital assets have become integrated into the broader financial system, with crypto now showing a remarkable 94 per cent correlation with the S&P 500 and an 88 per cent correlation with gold.

The catalyst for this market-wide decline emerged from the collapse of US-Iran peace talks and the subsequent announcement of a US naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz on April 12. This dramatic escalation sent oil prices surging nearly eight per cent to cross US$104 per barrel, reigniting fears of supply disruptions and asymmetric inflation shocks that could derail the global economic recovery. Traditional equity markets responded immediately to the heightened tensions.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average fell 269.23 points to close at 47,916.57, representing a decline of 0.56 per cent. The S&P 500 slipped 7.77 points to 6,816.89, down 0.11 per cent, while Asian markets bore the brunt of the selling pressure. The Nikkei 225 plummeted 477.85 points to 56,446.26, a drop of 0.84 per cent. Only the Nasdaq Composite managed to post gains, rising 80.48 points to 22,902.9 for a 0.35 per cent increase, while the FTSE 100 Index edged up 0.03 per cent to 10,600.53 despite falling 2.95 points in absolute terms.

What makes this particular sell-off noteworthy is the degree to which cryptocurrency has shed its reputation as an uncorrelated alternative asset class. The 94 per cent correlation with the S&P 500 indicates that digital assets now move almost in perfect tandem with traditional equities during periods of market stress. Even more telling is the 88 per cent correlation with gold, traditionally considered the ultimate safe haven during geopolitical crises. This suggests that investors are treating crypto as a risk asset rather than a hedge, liquidating positions across the board as they seek to reduce exposure to volatile markets. The implication is profound for those who believed cryptocurrency would serve as a portfolio diversifier during times of global instability.

Ethereum faced particular headwinds during this downturn, falling 3.65 per cent as asset-specific pressures compounded the broader market weakness. The cancellation of Ether Machine’s planned US$1.5B Nasdaq listing removed a significant vote of confidence in the institutional adoption of Ethereum-based ventures. Large treasury sales by entities like Trend Research added further selling pressure, suggesting that even sophisticated institutional players are reducing their exposure amid the uncertainty. Ethereum’s ability to hold the US$2,100 to US$2,200 support zone has become critical for the broader altcoin market, as a break below this level could trigger additional cascading liquidations across smaller cryptocurrencies.

The timing of this geopolitical crisis could not be worse for risk assets. Wall Street is shifting its focus to Q1 earnings season, with analysts projecting profit growth of roughly 12 per cent, marking the weakest performance since mid-2025. Goldman Sachs kicks off the major financial reporting cycle today, and investors will scrutinise every word for indications of how the banking sector is navigating the twin challenges of geopolitical instability and persistent inflation concerns. The IMF and World Bank Spring Meetings also begin this week, with IMF chief Kristalina Georgieva warning of potential downgrades to global growth forecasts due to the ongoing conflict. This confluence of negative catalysts creates a challenging environment for any sustained market recovery.

Looking ahead, the cryptocurrency market faces several critical inflexion points that will determine whether this decline represents a temporary setback or the beginning of a deeper correction. The SEC and CFTC roundtable on the CLARITY Act scheduled for April 16 could provide regulatory clarity that stabilises market sentiment, though investors should not expect transformative announcements from what is likely to be a preliminary discussion.

From a technical perspective, the market is currently testing the 50 per cent Fibonacci retracement level at US$2.42T. Holding above the US$2.39T level, which represents the 38.2 per cent retracement, is crucial for short-term stability. A break below US$2.34T would signal that deeper correction risks are materialising, potentially opening the door to further downside.

The path forward hinges on two primary factors: whether geopolitical tensions subside and whether regulatory developments provide reassurance to institutional investors. A de-escalation in the Middle East or renewed diplomatic efforts between the United States and Iran could trigger a relief rally across risk assets.

Analysts warn that supply disruptions in the energy market will persist even if a ceasefire holds, meaning inflation pressures may remain elevated for longer than markets currently anticipate. This creates a challenging environment where even positive geopolitical news may not be sufficient to drive a sustained recovery if macroeconomic fundamentals continue to deteriorate.

Investors should monitor several key indicators in the coming days. Price action around the US$2.42T pivot level will reveal whether buyers are willing to step in at current valuations. Any news flow from the April 16 regulatory event could provide short-term catalysts, though the market has become increasingly sceptical of regulatory promises. Ethereum’s performance relative to Bitcoin will indicate whether altcoin-specific pressures are abating or intensifying. The ability of traditional equity markets to stabilise despite ongoing geopolitical tensions will also influence crypto market sentiment, given the high correlation between these asset classes.

The current market environment demands caution and discipline from investors. The coordinated sell-off across cryptocurrencies, equities, and commodities demonstrates that no asset class exists in isolation during periods of systemic stress. Those who viewed cryptocurrency as a hedge against traditional market volatility have received a stark reminder that digital assets remain firmly embedded in the global financial system, subject to the same macroeconomic forces that drive traditional markets.

The coming weeks will test whether the crypto market can establish support at current levels or whether further downside awaits as geopolitical and regulatory uncertainties continue to unfold. Market participants must remain vigilant, focusing on concrete data rather than speculative narratives, as the intersection of geopolitics, regulation, and institutional behaviour continues to shape the trajectory of digital assets in an increasingly interconnected global economy.

 

Source: https://e27.co/the-alarming-reason-crypto-now-moves-like-gold-but-falls-like-stocks-20260413/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

There Are Many Obstacles Behind the CLARITY Act Delay, but Stablecoin Yield Is Not One

There Are Many Obstacles Behind the CLARITY Act Delay, but Stablecoin Yield Is Not One

By the time another headline declares the CLARITY Act stalled because “crypto bros want yield,” we have already lost the plot. The narrative that stablecoin rewards alone are holding up America’s first comprehensive digital asset market structure framework is not just incomplete.

It is dangerously reductive. I can tell you that the delays stem from five substantive, interconnected challenges that reflect deeper tensions about financial architecture, technological feasibility, and political will. Reducing this to a simple fight over yield misunderstands both the stakes and the sophistication required for meaningful regulation.

The Stablecoin Yield Loophole

The first and perhaps most technical issue concerns the so-called “yield loophole” in the GENIUS Act. It is true that the GENIUS Act, signed into law in 2025, explicitly prohibits permitted payment stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield solely for holding a stablecoin.

However, as banking stakeholders have correctly identified, this prohibition does not automatically extend to third-party intermediaries. Exchanges, wallet providers, or payment applications may offer “rewards,” “staking yields,” or other return-like incentives on idle stablecoin balances.

This is not regulatory pedantry. It is a legitimate concern about regulatory arbitrage. If non-bank entities can replicate the economic function of an insured deposit account without equivalent capital, liquidity, or consumer protection safeguards, we risk creating a two-tiered financial system where innovation becomes a vector for systemic vulnerability.

The banking sector’s push for unambiguous statutory language in the CLARITY Act is less about stifling competition and more about ensuring functional equivalence in risk management.

With the total stablecoin market capitalization exceeding $307 billion as of February 2026, the scale of potential disintermediation demands careful calibration, not ideological reflex.

Operational Risks of Always-On Stablecoin Rails

Operational and systemic stability concerns extend far beyond yield semantics. The 24/7 nature of crypto markets introduces liquidity and settlement pressures that traditional banking infrastructure simply was not designed to absorb.

Community banks, which form the backbone of American credit allocation, lack the technological capacity to liquidate reserve assets such as U.S. Treasuries in real time to meet instant redemption demands that could cascade during periods of market stress.

Without parity in operational resilience, always-on stablecoin rails could propagate shocks into the traditional payment system. This would undermine the very stability the Act seeks to protect.

This is not hypothetical.

The DeFi Compliance Dilemma

Nowhere is the tension between regulatory intent and technical reality more acute than in the treatment of decentralized finance. The CLARITY Act’s requirement that DeFi protocols register as financial institutions and report transaction data fundamentally conflicts with the architecture of permissionless code.

Industry experts, including many open-source developers I have consulted, argue that enforcing bank-like KYC/AML obligations on non-custodial, autonomous protocols is not only technically infeasible but risks criminalizing the very act of publishing code.

This is not a defense of illicit activity. It is a recognition that privacy-preserving design and decentralized governance are foundational to the value proposition of Web3. If we mandate compliance mechanisms that require central points of control, we do not regulate DeFi. We extinguish it.

The Act’s provision granting the SEC discretion to exempt certain DeFi activities is a step in the right direction, but it remains insufficient without clearer safe harbors for truly decentralized systems.

Ethics Provisions and Political Gridlock

Compounding these technical challenges are ethics provisions that have become political flashpoints. Senate Democrats’ introduction of stringent conflict-of-interest clauses, widely interpreted as targeting high-profile crypto initiatives linked to former President Trump, such as World Liberty Financial, has intensified partisan gridlock.

While preventing public officials from profiting off the policies they shape is unquestionably important, weaponizing ethics rules to score political points complicates bipartisan compromise on the bill’s core regulatory framework.

In an environment where digital asset policy should be guided by evidence and expertise, the infusion of partisan theater risks producing legislation that satisfies short-term political objectives while failing to address long-term structural needs.

The SEC–CFTC Jurisdiction Battle

At the core of these disputes is the SEC–CFTC jurisdictional tension. Banks favor the SEC’s investor-protection mandate, while critics question the CFTC’s capacity to oversee retail platforms. The CLARITY Act splits authority: the CFTC handles anti-fraud and anti-manipulation in digital commodities, and the SEC covers investment contract assets during fundraising.

While clear in theory, this risks fragmented oversight. SEC Chair Paul Atkins calls it a way to “future-proof” rules, highlighting that ambiguity mainly benefits bad actors.

A Framework for Digital Asset Markets

The Act’s three-category framework—digital commodities, investment contract assets, and permitted payment stablecoins—aims to bring order to a chaotic market. Investment contract assets are treated as securities only during fundraising, converting to digital commodities in secondary markets.

The “maturity” certification, requiring functional blockchain operations, open-source code, transparency, and decentralized control, provides a clear pathway out of securities regulation, forming the foundation for a sustainable innovation ecosystem.

Moving Beyond Simplistic Narratives

The CLARITY Act aims to balance innovation with protection, but its success depends on rules that are technologically literate, economically sound, and ethically grounded. With the stablecoin market now larger than the GDP of many nations, today’s decisions will shape tomorrow’s financial infrastructure and must be guided by evidence, not echo chambers.

 

Source: https://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/many-obstacles-are-behind-the-clarity-act-delay-but-stablecoin-yield-is-not-one/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j