There Are Many Obstacles Behind the CLARITY Act Delay, but Stablecoin Yield Is Not One

There Are Many Obstacles Behind the CLARITY Act Delay, but Stablecoin Yield Is Not One

By the time another headline declares the CLARITY Act stalled because “crypto bros want yield,” we have already lost the plot. The narrative that stablecoin rewards alone are holding up America’s first comprehensive digital asset market structure framework is not just incomplete.

It is dangerously reductive. I can tell you that the delays stem from five substantive, interconnected challenges that reflect deeper tensions about financial architecture, technological feasibility, and political will. Reducing this to a simple fight over yield misunderstands both the stakes and the sophistication required for meaningful regulation.

The Stablecoin Yield Loophole

The first and perhaps most technical issue concerns the so-called “yield loophole” in the GENIUS Act. It is true that the GENIUS Act, signed into law in 2025, explicitly prohibits permitted payment stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield solely for holding a stablecoin.

However, as banking stakeholders have correctly identified, this prohibition does not automatically extend to third-party intermediaries. Exchanges, wallet providers, or payment applications may offer “rewards,” “staking yields,” or other return-like incentives on idle stablecoin balances.

This is not regulatory pedantry. It is a legitimate concern about regulatory arbitrage. If non-bank entities can replicate the economic function of an insured deposit account without equivalent capital, liquidity, or consumer protection safeguards, we risk creating a two-tiered financial system where innovation becomes a vector for systemic vulnerability.

The banking sector’s push for unambiguous statutory language in the CLARITY Act is less about stifling competition and more about ensuring functional equivalence in risk management.

With the total stablecoin market capitalization exceeding $307 billion as of February 2026, the scale of potential disintermediation demands careful calibration, not ideological reflex.

Operational Risks of Always-On Stablecoin Rails

Operational and systemic stability concerns extend far beyond yield semantics. The 24/7 nature of crypto markets introduces liquidity and settlement pressures that traditional banking infrastructure simply was not designed to absorb.

Community banks, which form the backbone of American credit allocation, lack the technological capacity to liquidate reserve assets such as U.S. Treasuries in real time to meet instant redemption demands that could cascade during periods of market stress.

Without parity in operational resilience, always-on stablecoin rails could propagate shocks into the traditional payment system. This would undermine the very stability the Act seeks to protect.

This is not hypothetical.

The DeFi Compliance Dilemma

Nowhere is the tension between regulatory intent and technical reality more acute than in the treatment of decentralized finance. The CLARITY Act’s requirement that DeFi protocols register as financial institutions and report transaction data fundamentally conflicts with the architecture of permissionless code.

Industry experts, including many open-source developers I have consulted, argue that enforcing bank-like KYC/AML obligations on non-custodial, autonomous protocols is not only technically infeasible but risks criminalizing the very act of publishing code.

This is not a defense of illicit activity. It is a recognition that privacy-preserving design and decentralized governance are foundational to the value proposition of Web3. If we mandate compliance mechanisms that require central points of control, we do not regulate DeFi. We extinguish it.

The Act’s provision granting the SEC discretion to exempt certain DeFi activities is a step in the right direction, but it remains insufficient without clearer safe harbors for truly decentralized systems.

Ethics Provisions and Political Gridlock

Compounding these technical challenges are ethics provisions that have become political flashpoints. Senate Democrats’ introduction of stringent conflict-of-interest clauses, widely interpreted as targeting high-profile crypto initiatives linked to former President Trump, such as World Liberty Financial, has intensified partisan gridlock.

While preventing public officials from profiting off the policies they shape is unquestionably important, weaponizing ethics rules to score political points complicates bipartisan compromise on the bill’s core regulatory framework.

In an environment where digital asset policy should be guided by evidence and expertise, the infusion of partisan theater risks producing legislation that satisfies short-term political objectives while failing to address long-term structural needs.

The SEC–CFTC Jurisdiction Battle

At the core of these disputes is the SEC–CFTC jurisdictional tension. Banks favor the SEC’s investor-protection mandate, while critics question the CFTC’s capacity to oversee retail platforms. The CLARITY Act splits authority: the CFTC handles anti-fraud and anti-manipulation in digital commodities, and the SEC covers investment contract assets during fundraising.

While clear in theory, this risks fragmented oversight. SEC Chair Paul Atkins calls it a way to “future-proof” rules, highlighting that ambiguity mainly benefits bad actors.

A Framework for Digital Asset Markets

The Act’s three-category framework—digital commodities, investment contract assets, and permitted payment stablecoins—aims to bring order to a chaotic market. Investment contract assets are treated as securities only during fundraising, converting to digital commodities in secondary markets.

The “maturity” certification, requiring functional blockchain operations, open-source code, transparency, and decentralized control, provides a clear pathway out of securities regulation, forming the foundation for a sustainable innovation ecosystem.

Moving Beyond Simplistic Narratives

The CLARITY Act aims to balance innovation with protection, but its success depends on rules that are technologically literate, economically sound, and ethically grounded. With the stablecoin market now larger than the GDP of many nations, today’s decisions will shape tomorrow’s financial infrastructure and must be guided by evidence, not echo chambers.

 

Source: https://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/many-obstacles-are-behind-the-clarity-act-delay-but-stablecoin-yield-is-not-one/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

RWA Crypto Crosses $25B But Is It Real Adoption or Just ‘Branding’?

RWA Crypto Crosses $25B But Is It Real Adoption or Just ‘Branding’?

Blockchain advisor Anndy Lian just took a public swing at one of crypto’s most dominant narratives, arguing that real-world asset tokenization is little more than traditional finance wearing a blockchain costume.

In a detailed thread, Lian laid out an 11-point case against RWA, and this isn’t coming from someone on the sidelines. He’s been in crypto since 2012, went through the ICO era, and invested in tokenized real estate as early as 2018.

“I’m not bullish on RWA. Not because I don’t ‘get it.’ Because I do,” he wrote.

‘You’ve Built a Database With Extra Steps’

Lian’s core argument hits hard. Most tokenized assets still settle in USD, enforce through courts, and custody off-chain. If the crypto layer adds no unique value, why does it exist?

He questioned whether any capital flowing into RWA protocols is actually crypto-native.

“It’s fiat wrapped, legally ring-fenced, and redeemable off-chain,” he wrote. “That’s not adoption. That’s branding.”

He called the oracle problem “fatal,” noting that smart contracts cannot independently verify property damage, confirm financial filings, or check whether collateral still exists.

On tokenized real estate, he was blunt: “Tokenization doesn’t create liquidity. It exposes illiquidity.”

BlackRock Tokenized Assets and the Billions Flowing In

The institutional capital tells a competing story.

Ethereum’s RWA market surpassed $15 billion in 2025, a threefold increase from the prior year, driven by tokenized gold, Treasury-backed products, and yield-bearing stablecoins, according to Blockonomi. Tokenized money market funds have crossed $9 billion, with BlackRock’s BUIDL fund leading at over $2.5 billion.

The XRP Ledger added $1.3 billion in tokenized RWA value in just the first two months of 2026, surpassing the $900 million recorded for all of 2025. It now holds 63% of all tokenized U.S. Treasury supply, outpacing Ethereum and Solana.

Franklin Templeton’s BENJI fund has also reached $844 million in tokenized government securities.

What Would Make Him Bullish?

Lian isn’t dismissing RWA entirely. His one compelling use case: tokenized stocks powering better perpetual derivatives, which he calls “a crypto-native product inspired by RWA, not RWA itself.”

His conditions for turning bullish? “Crypto primitives that can’t exist in TradFi,” including permissionless composability, censorship-resistant settlement, and native digital scarcity.

The institutions aren’t waiting. Whether billions in tokenized assets represent genuine adoption or sophisticated repackaging remains the sector’s biggest open question heading into Q2 2026.

 

Source: https://coinpedia.org/news/rwa-crypto-crosses-25b-but-is-it-real-adoption-or-just-branding/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

The US$71000 Bitcoin bounce lacks foundation but Japan’s rally has real teeth

The US$71000 Bitcoin bounce lacks foundation but Japan’s rally has real teeth

Asian markets delivered a powerful statement of confidence on Monday, February 9, 2026, as investors embraced a wave of fiscal optimism sweeping across the region. Japan led the charge with extraordinary force as the Nikkei 225 surged more than 2700 points in a single session to reach an intraday historic peak of 57337.07. This remarkable advance followed Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s landslide election victory, which immediately reshaped market expectations toward aggressive fiscal stimulus and potential tax cuts.

The political mandate translated directly into investor enthusiasm, particularly for technology and financial shares, which absorbed most of the buying interest. This Japanese momentum proved contagious, creating a positive feedback loop that lifted markets from Shanghai to Sydney as regional investors recalibrated their outlook toward growth rather than caution.

China participated meaningfully in this regional uplift, with the Shanghai Composite climbing 1.25 per cent to approach the 4100 level. The advance carried particular significance because it coincided with the release of consumer price index data showing inflation at 0.8 per cent year over year. This reading suggested a subtle but important shift away from the deflationary pressures that had constrained Chinese markets for an extended period.

Investors interpreted the data as evidence that Beijing’s economic stabilisation efforts might finally be gaining traction, providing a foundation for cautious optimism even amid ongoing structural challenges. The modest inflation print provided a psychological pivot point, allowing market participants to envision a scenario in which domestic demand could gradually reawaken, supporting corporate earnings and asset values across the Chinese equity landscape.

Australia completed the regional trifecta with the S&P ASX 200 closing substantially higher at 8875.10. This performance proved especially notable given that the Reserve Bank of Australia had recently raised interest rates to 3.85 per cent, a move that typically pressures equity valuations. The market demonstrated resilience, absorbing the hawkish monetary policy signal while focusing instead on the broader global risk environment emanating from Tokyo and reinforced by developments in other major economies.

Australian financial and resources stocks benefited from synchronised regional strength, while the currency remained stable against the yen and the dollar, suggesting investors viewed the rally as sustainable rather than speculative. This ability to rally despite tighter monetary conditions underscored the depth of the sentiment shift across Asia-Pacific markets.

The positive sentiment extended beyond Asia as global markets positioned for continued strength. Wall Street futures indicated a constructive open with Dow Jones futures climbing more than 100 points following the index’s historic first-ever close above 50000 on the previous Friday. European markets exhibited cautious optimism, with the STOXX 600 hovering near the 600-point record, reflecting a synchronised global risk appetite.

Commodities participated vigorously in this broad advance as gold breached the symbolic US$5,000 threshold, reaching a weekly high of US$5,037 per ounce before consolidating around US$5,022. Crude oil stabilised as geopolitical tensions in the Middle East eased, removing a persistent risk premium from energy markets. This synchronised global move suggested investors were pricing in a coordinated economic expansion rather than isolated regional strength.

Amid broader environmental risks, the cryptocurrency market recorded a modest but telling advance, rising 0.86 per cent to reach a total valuation of US$2.39 trillion over 24 hours. The move carried distinctive characteristics that revealed crypto’s evolving relationship with traditional markets. Most significantly, the sector demonstrated a 94 per cent correlation with the S&P 500 over the past week, underscoring how digital assets have become tightly integrated into macro-driven market movements rather than operating as an independent asset class.

The primary catalyst for the bounce came from an unverified claim by CNBC’s Jim Cramer, who suggested President Trump would establish a United States Bitcoin reserve, with purchases made at the US$60,000 level. Though entirely speculative, this narrative generated immediate buying pressure, lifting Bitcoin above US$71,000 and pulling the broader market upward in its wake.

Beneath this rumour-driven surface, the rally found genuine technical support. The market had entered deeply oversold territory, with a seven-day relative strength index of just 27, creating fertile conditions for a corrective bounce. Simultaneously, on-chain data revealed substantial accumulation activity, as a whale withdrew 3,500 Bitcoin, equivalent to US$249 million, from the Binance exchange. This combination of extreme oversold conditions and significant institutional-scale buying provided a foundation that extended beyond mere speculation, suggesting some sophisticated participants viewed current levels as attractive entry points despite the absence of fundamental catalysts.

The near-term outlook for both traditional and digital markets now hinges on confirmation of catalysts. For Asian equities, the sustainability of the rally depends on whether Prime Minister Takaichi’s administration moves swiftly to implement concrete fiscal measures that validate current optimism.

For cryptocurrencies, the entire advance remains precariously balanced on an unverified political rumour, making the move inherently fragile. Bitcoin must hold above US$71,000 to maintain bullish momentum, with a break above US$75,000 potentially extending gains toward the 78.6 per cent Fibonacci retracement level corresponding to a US$2.4 trillion total market capitalisation. Conversely, a rejection below US$68,000 would invalidate the bounce, signalling a return to distribution patterns.

My perspective on this market environment recognises two distinct but parallel narratives. Asia’s rally stems from tangible political developments with clear policy implications, creating a foundation for sustained strength if follow-through occurs. The cryptocurrency advance, however, represents pure sentiment speculation lacking institutional or regulatory anchors. This divergence matters profoundly because policy-driven rallies typically exhibit greater durability than rumour-driven spikes.

Yet the exceptionally high correlation between crypto and equities reveals an uncomfortable truth for digital asset investors: their fortunes remain tethered to broader macro sentiment rather than blockchain-specific developments. The market has not achieved true independence; instead, it functions as a high-beta extension of risk assets.

The critical question facing investors now centres on resilience. Will Asian markets maintain their advance when fiscal details emerge, potentially revealing implementation challenges or budget constraints? Will cryptocurrency markets hold their gains if the Bitcoin reserve rumour is officially denied by the White House or the Treasury Department?

The answer likely depends on whether underlying macroeconomic conditions continue to support risk assets generally. With inflation showing signs of stabilisation in China, global growth indicators improving, and geopolitical risks receding temporarily, the environment remains conducive to risk-taking. Investors must recognise that Japan’s policy-driven rally possesses fundamentally stronger underpinnings than crypto’s rumour-fuelled bounce. One represents anticipation of real economic stimulus, the other reflects speculative positioning on unverified political theatre.

Both may rise together in a risk on environment, but their paths will inevitably diverge when market conditions test their respective foundations. The coming days will reveal whether this surge marks the beginning of a sustained expansion or merely a temporary reprieve within a more complex market cycle.

 

Source: https://e27.co/the-us71000-bitcoin-bounce-lacks-foundation-but-japans-rally-has-real-teeth-20260209/

 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j