THORChain’s decentralized model faces backlash – ‘The industry is watching’

THORChain’s decentralized model faces backlash – ‘The industry is watching’

THORChain saw a considerable spike in trading activity and fees between the 24th and 26th of September.

Meanwhile, its swap volume reached $1.72 billion by the 26th of September, up from $610 million in August.

At the same time, THORChain’s fees rose to $479,033.13 from $145,464.59. However, the news is not as good as it appears to be.

As the surge in on-chain activity happened after the recent Bitget security incident, wherein the stolen funds were reportedly laundered via THORChain to swap and transfer assets between blockchains.

Slamming the exchange, Bitget CEO Gracy Chen argued,

Our attacker addresses are publicly listed and actively tracked. We are formally asking @THORChain to refuse service to these addresses. Decentralization is a design principle, not a shield for facilitating known stolen funds. The industry is watching.

THORChain makes its case

THORChain’s response was based on the distinction between a permissionless blockchain protocol and a centralized exchange. For context, on a centralized exchange such as an ordinary crypto trading platform, the company can maintain a blacklist.

But THORChain does not operate in exactly that way.

THORChain is decentralized and permissionless like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB Chain. What responsibility should Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB Chain bear when handling known stolen funds?

OKX founder stands in THORChain’s support

But Mingxing Xu, aka Star XU, OKX’s founder, is arguing that THORChain should not be compared directly with Bitcoin or Ethereum’s base-layer consensus.

Xu further explained that Bitcoin’s network does not have a group of people sitting together and deciding whether a Bitcoin transaction should be signed. Instead, it uses Threshold Signature Scheme (TSS) vaults.

The assets that are held within THORChain’s cross-chain infrastructure are controlled through a group of participating validators/nodes. Therefore, a transaction involving those assets requires a threshold of those participants to provide signatures.

Hence, he said,

Bitcoin cannot be stopped. THORChain can—it simply chooses when to do so.

Anndy Lian, an all-rounded business strategist in Asia, added,

Blaming @THORChain and saying they are not helpful and decentralized will not solve the problems.

RUNE’s price action and more

Despite these criticisms, THORChain’s native token RUNE stood strong, trading at $0.7908 at press time after a hike of 15.8% in the past 24 hours.

As of now, withdrawals remain suspended as Bitget investigates the breach and works with law enforcement and blockchain-security firms.


Final Summary

  • BitGet’s CEO, OKX founder, and many in the crypto industry are slamming THORChain’s decentralized nature.
  • But in reality, THORChain is different because it uses Threshold Signature Scheme (TSS) vaults.

 

 

 

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/thorchains-decentralized-model-faces-backlash-the-industry-is-watching/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author. The latest book is Web4: The Age of Autonomous Intelligence.

j j j

The Stablecoin in the Headlines Is Not the Stablecoin I Know

The Stablecoin in the Headlines Is Not the Stablecoin I Know

When you scroll through the financial news these days, you meet one stablecoin. The articles describe a digital dollar, a boring token that hugs the greenback, and a shiny new tool for Wall Street. Then you open a DeFi app and meet something else entirely, a lively instrument that moves at 3 a.m. on a Sunday and settles in seconds.

My complaint with the coverage is simple. The media keeps flattening three different animals into one word, and that word hides the parts I care about most. So let me separate the animals, because a public-chain stablecoin, a private-chain stablecoin, and a tokenized deposit do not share much beyond a family resemblance.

The Public-Chain Stablecoin

Start with the creature crypto natives know first. A typical stablecoin in our world is a fiat-collateralized token, and the idea is refreshingly simple. For every digital token an issuer mints on a blockchain, one real dollar sits in a bank account or in a short-term U.S. Treasury bill.

USDT and USDC dominate this market, and together with the rest of the field, they push the total stablecoin market cap past $300 billion in 2026. Traders use these tokens as the base pair for everything, parking value between bets without touching a bank. I use them for what I love most, which is DeFi.

They fuel lending markets on Aave, for instance, and they let anyone with a phone and a wallet earn, borrow, and settle without asking a branch manager for permission.

That permissionless quality is the whole point, and it is also the part the headlines skip. A public-chain stablecoin lives on Ethereum, Solana, or TRON and follows smart-contract code that anyone can read. You hold it in your own wallet with your own keys. You send a million dollars to a friend on another continent at 2 a.m. on a Sunday, and no bank approves the trip.

Every transaction is printed on a public ledger that anyone can audit with a block explorer. That transparency cuts both ways, and it is why regulators actually love these ledgers as tools for tracking illicit finance, but it also means the system answers to mathematics before it answers to a committee.

The Private-Chain Version

Now meet the second animal, the one Wall Street prefers. Banks can also mint dollar tokens, but they do it on private blockchains where only approved clients participate. JPMorgan runs JPM Coin on its own internal ledger, and the bank now moves billions of dollars a day for corporate clients through that system.

The industry calls this a wholesale stablecoin or a tokenized deposit, and the GENIUS Act, which President Trump signed in July 2025, explicitly lets licensed banks build on private chains with built-in controls. The differences from the public version are not cosmetic.

A corporation does not want rivals watching its treasury flows, a bank wants the power to freeze or reverse a mistaken transfer, and nobody wants to pay public gas fees that spike without warning. So the private chain trades openness for control, and it serves interbank settlements and large corporate payments rather than you and me.

The Third Animal Is Different

The third animal is not a stablecoin at all, even though journalists keep calling it one. The dollar balance you see in your PayPal or Venmo app is a stored-value liability under state money-transmitter law, and the balance in your Chase app is a commercial bank deposit insured by the FDIC up to $250,000.

The Federal Reserve’s FedNow rail, which launched in 2023, settles bank dollars instantly around the clock without any ledger technology. Federal law draws a bright line here. To earn the name stablecoin, a digital dollar must exist as a token on a distributed ledger, and the law does not care whether that ledger is public or private.

Off-chain database dollars fall under older banking and electronic-money rules, and they come with fractional-reserve lending rather than the strict one-to-one reserve mandate that the GENIUS Act sets for payment stablecoins.

What Washington Sees

Notice what Washington sees in all of this, because the government views stablecoins through a completely different lens than either crypto natives or bankers do. Treasury officials cheer dollar-backed stablecoins as hungry buyers of short-term U.S. debt, and Tether alone holds roughly $140 billion in Treasuries, a stake that ranks it ahead of countries like South Korea and the United Arab Emirates.

Lawmakers wrote the GENIUS Act to turn stablecoin issuers into something like narrow banks that must hold cash and Treasuries one-to-one, publish audited reserve reports, and freeze tokens when law enforcement flags a wallet.

The law also strips stablecoins of any interest payment, and a separate executive order blocks the Federal Reserve from issuing a central bank digital currency. Washington therefore anoints the private, regulated stablecoin as America’s digital dollar, treating the token more like a digital cashier’s check than Bitcoin.

Why Reserve Quality Matters

That legal carve-out explains why the government refuses to call a payment stablecoin a security or a commodity. The SEC and the CFTC police bets on rising prices, and a token that stays at one dollar and pays no yield gives nobody an expectation of profit.

Banking regulators like the OCC and the Federal Reserve take the stablecoin file instead, because a run on a big issuer would spill into real banks and the Treasury market, while a crash in a speculative coin mostly burns its own holders. The 2022 collapse of TerraUSD perfectly illustrates risk.

That algorithmic coin had no real reserves backing it, and when trust evaporated, it fell from $1 to a few cents, wiping out about $45 billion in market value in days. Reserve quality is the entire game, and the law now writes that lesson into statute.

Where I Plant My Flag

Here is where I plant my flag. The private-chain version and the tokenized deposit do real work for corporate treasurers, and I welcome the clarity the GENIUS Act brings. I still root for the public one because openness compounds.

A permissionless dollar token lets a freelancer in Manila collect wages from Berlin in seconds for pennies, lets an unbanked teenager hold digital cash that no one can freeze with a phone call, and lets developers compose money into code the way they compose software.

DeFi turns those tokens into credit markets, savings tools, and insurance pools that run in the open, and every transaction leaves a public trail that any citizen can check. The private rails optimise for institutional comfort, while the public rails optimise for user dignity.

So the next time a headline calls stablecoins “boring digital dollars,” ask which animal the writer actually means. The answer changes everything about the risk you hold, the rights you keep, and the future you get. I know which one I hold, and I know which one I cheer for.

 

Source: https://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/the-stablecoin-in-the-headlines-is-not-the-stablecoin-i-know/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author. The latest book is Web4: The Age of Autonomous Intelligence.

j j j

Anndy Lian: Integration with off-chain oracles to verify trademarks

Anndy Lian: Integration with off-chain oracles to verify trademarks

Anndy Lian has proposed a new verification structure for tickers that involve both basic and verified tiers.

In the basic tier, tickers are available on a first-come, first-served basis provided they are not trademarked.

In the verified tier, an integration with off-chain oracles like Chainlink will facilitate trademark checks via APIs from institutions like the USPTO and EUIPO. This approach prioritizes projects linked with well-established brands, offering them priority claims. This novel method aims to streamline and secure the trademark verification process, ensuring legitimate use of tickers in the evolving crypto space.

 

 

Lian’s proposed verification structure underscores the crypto sector’s ongoing efforts to balance innovation with regulatory robustness. The prioritization of strong branding recalls his earlier observations on how the economic potential of blockchain projects can be amplified by community engagement and entertainment value, as detailed in the examination of crypto fun driving economic potential. Additionally, by safeguarding legitimate use of project tickers, the new approach responds to shifting dynamics among crypto natives, as noted in the renewed interest in memecoins resurgence shaping current market trends.

 

 

Source: https://tradersunion.com/news/market-voices/show/695183-off-chain-oracles-trademarks/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author. The latest book is Web4: The Age of Autonomous Intelligence.

j j j