India eyes global crypto regulations in G20: Are we ready for uniformity?

India eyes global crypto regulations in G20: Are we ready for uniformity?

India holds the G20 Presidency this year and is a member of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). At the G20 and FATF meetings, it has been actively engaged in discussions on the issue of cryptocurrencies and their potential risks, particularly concerning money laundering and terrorist financing. Hence, cryptocurrency regulation is among the many topics that are likely to be discussed.

In recent years, India has taken a cautious approach to cryptocurrencies and has expressed concerns about their potential for illegal activities. Although trading in cryptocurrency assets are not prohibited in India, the introduction of a severe tax rate last year has significantly reduced activity. Offsetting losses from one cryptocurrency asset with gains from another have been prohibited. The Indian government has also discussed the possibility of implementing stricter regulations for cryptocurrencies, although it has not yet taken any concrete steps toward this direction.

At the G20 and FATF meetings, India emphasized the need for international cooperation in addressing the risks posed by cryptocurrencies, including sharing information and best practices among countries. India has also supported the FATF’s efforts to develop global standards for regulating cryptocurrencies and expressed its commitment to working with other states to ensure the effective implementation of these standards.

What is the purpose of the proposed uniform regulations for cryptocurrency in India?

The purpose of the proposed uniform regulations for cryptocurrency in India is to provide a clear and consistent framework for using and managing cryptocurrencies. It is aimed to address the various risks associated with cryptocurrencies, such as financial instability, consumer harm, and illicit activities, while also promoting the development of the cryptocurrency industry in India.

The proposed regulations are aimed at ensuring that the use of cryptocurrencies is in line with the overall goals of the Indian economy and that the risks associated with cryptocurrencies are effectively mitigated. The Indian government hopes to create a level playing field for all market participants and encourage the responsible and transparent use of cryptocurrencies.

In addition to mitigating risks posed by cryptocurrencies, the proposed regulations also promote the growth and innovation of the cryptocurrency industry. By providing a clear and stable regulatory environment, the Indian government hopes to attract investment, spur innovation, and support the industry’s growth, thereby contributing to the overall development of the economy.

What should be the key features of the proposed regulations?

The key features of the proposed regulations should consider to include provisions for licensing and registration of cryptocurrency exchanges, the reporting of suspicious transactions, and the implementation of anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) measures. The regulations should also include consumer protection and data privacy provisions and requirements for maintaining records and reporting to regulatory authorities.

The proposed regulations should outline the responsibilities of various stakeholders in the cryptocurrency ecosystem, such as exchangers, wallet providers, and users. They must set standards for their operation and conduct. As well as specify the types of cryptocurrencies that can be traded or held by individuals or businesses and establish rules for their safe storage and transfer. Addressing issues related to taxation and the treatment of cryptocurrency-related transactions for tax purposes should also be included. They must specify the tax implications of holding, buying, and selling cryptocurrencies and the tax treatment of income generated from related activities.

How will the introduction of these regulations impact the cryptocurrency industry in India?

Currently, the status of cryptocurrency regulations in India is somewhat uncertain. While the Indian government has expressed concerns about the potential risks posed by cryptocurrencies, it has not yet taken any concrete steps to regulate the industry. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued several warnings about using cryptocurrencies but has not yet implemented any specific regulations.

The introduction of these regulations may have a significant impact on the cryptocurrency industry in India. The regulations may create a more favorable environment for the industry’s growth by providing a clear and consistent framework for using cryptocurrencies. Additionally, the regulations may affect consumer behavior, as they may increase consumer confidence in the safety and security of cryptocurrencies. However, the regulations may impose additional costs and compliance requirements on cryptocurrency exchanges, which may impact their profitability.

In recent years, there has been a growing interest in the industry, and many cryptocurrency exchanges have emerged to meet this demand. However, without clear and consistent regulations in place, the use and management of cryptocurrencies in the country remain largely unregulated and continue to pose risks.

The proposed regulations have a broader impact on the Indian economy. If the regulations effectively reduce the risks, they may increase investor confidence and boost the industry’s growth. This, in turn, may positively impact the country’s employment and economic development. However, if the regulations are too restrictive or difficult to implement, they may limit the industry’s growth and reduce its potential.

Are countries ready for uniform crypto regulations?

This is a key question for countries with an active cryptocurrency industry.

By introducing uniform regulations,  India hopes to ensure that cryptocurrencies are used safely and securely while also protecting investors’ interests. However, it can be said that the need for uniformity in the regulation of cryptocurrencies among G20 countries is a matter of debate. On one hand, uniform regulations can help ensure a level playing field for businesses and prevent regulatory arbitrage, where companies flock to more lenient laws. This can also help to reduce the potential for cross-border risks to the financial system. On the other hand, each country has unique economic, political, and cultural contexts and may have different needs and priorities. For example, some countries may place a higher emphasis on consumer protection, while others may focus more on anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism.

Ultimately, the ideal approach to regulating cryptocurrencies is likely to be a balance between these two perspectives, where countries adopt a standard set of principles while still retaining the flexibility to tailor regulations to their specific circumstances. This approach ensures that cryptocurrencies are regulated in a way that promotes innovation, protects consumers, and reduces potential risks to the financial system while respecting individual countries’ sovereignty.

However, it might be too early to have uniform regulations on cryptocurrency across G20 countries. Given that many issues still remain in the conduct of traditional finance, it can be expected to be a lot harder for cryptocurrency. Regulations should be localized to move fast and catch up with the speed of changes in the cryptocurrency space.

The proposal for uniform regulation of cryptocurrencies among G20 countries could potentially delay regulation in individual countries, including India. For the Indian government, the proposal would be to localize regulations rather than uniform them across the entire country. This approach has several advantages, such as allowing for a more flexible and agile regulatory framework that can respond quickly to market changes and industry needs. Localized regulations can also take into account the specific needs and circumstances of different regions and jurisdictions and allow for the development of regulations tailored to the local context and priorities. This is especially important in a country as diverse and complex as India, where there may be significant regional variations in the needs and challenges faced by the cryptocurrency industry.

Indeed, the recent events in the crypto market have highlighted its need for some form of regulation. These events have demonstrated the potential risks associated with cryptocurrencies, including the volatility of prices, lack of investor protection, and the potential for illegal activities.

The G20 Presidency provides an opportunity for India to showcase its leadership and to promote its views and interests on cryptocurrency matters and other issues of global significance. The timeline for introducing the regulations has not been officially announced yet. With the looming G20 conference, it is expected that the regulations will be presented at the upcoming conference in February. The international community awaits concrete and reasonable discussions on cryptocurrency from this meeting.

Anndy Lian is an all-rounded business strategist in Asia. He has provided advisory across a variety of industries for local, international, public listed companies and governments. He is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur, book author, investor, board member, and keynote speaker.

 

 

Source: https://www.factsasia.org/blog/india-eyes-global-crypto-regulations-in-g20-are-we-ready-for-uniformity

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

India eyes global crypto regulations in G20: Are we ready for uniformity?

India eyes global crypto regulations in G20: Are we ready for uniformity?

India holds the G20 presidency this year and is a member of the G20 and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). At the G20 and FATF meetings, India has been actively engaged in discussions on the issue of cryptocurrencies and their potential risks, particularly concerning money laundering and terrorist financing. I think that cryptocurrency regulation is likely to be one of the many things that will be talked about this year while the G20 is in charge.

In recent years, India has taken a cautious approach to cryptocurrencies and expressed concerns about their potential for illegal activities. In India, although trading in cryptocurrency assets is not prohibited, the introduction of a severe tax rate last year has significantly reduced such activity.

Additionally, offsetting losses from one cryptocurrency asset with gains from another has been prohibited. The Indian government has also discussed the possibility of implementing stricter regulations for cryptocurrencies, although it has not yet taken any concrete steps in this direction.

At the G20 and FATF meetings, India emphasized the need for international cooperation in addressing the risks posed by cryptocurrencies, including sharing information and best practices among countries. India has also supported the FATF’s efforts to develop global standards for regulating cryptocurrencies and has expressed its commitment to working with other countries to ensure the effective implementation of these standards.

What is the purpose of the proposed uniform regulations for cryptocurrency in India?

The purpose of the proposed uniform regulations for cryptocurrency in India is to provide a clear and consistent framework for using and managing cryptocurrencies. It is aimed to addressing the various risks associated with cryptocurrencies, such as financial stability, consumer protection, and illicit activities, while also promoting the development of the cryptocurrency industry in India.

The proposed laws are aimed at ensuring that the use of cryptocurrencies is in line with the overall goals of the Indian economy and that the risks associated with cryptocurrencies are effectively mitigated. The Indian government wants to make the cryptocurrency market fair for everyone and encourage people to use cryptocurrencies in a responsible and open way.

In addition to mitigating the risks posed by cryptocurrencies, it would also promote the growth and innovation of the cryptocurrency industry in India. By having clear and stable rules, the Indian government hopes to encourage investment, encourage innovation, and support the growth of the industry, which will help the Indian economy as a whole.

What are the key features of the proposed regulations?

The key features of the proposal may include provisions related to the licensing and registration of cryptocurrency exchanges, the reporting of suspicious transactions, and the implementation of anti-money laundering and countering the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) measures. The rules may also include rules to protect consumers and keep their information private, as well as requirements to keep records and report to regulatory authorities.

It may outline the responsibilities of various stakeholders in the cryptocurrency ecosystem, such as exchanges, wallet providers, and users. They may set standards for their operation and conduct. They may also specify the types of cryptocurrencies that can be traded or held by individuals or businesses and establish rules for their safe storage and transfer.

The regulations may also address issues related to taxation and the treatment of cryptocurrency-related transactions for tax purposes. They may specify the tax implications of holding, buying, and selling cryptocurrencies and the tax treatment of income generated from cryptocurrency-related activities.

How will the introduction of these regulations impact the cryptocurrency industry in India?

Currently, the status of cryptocurrency regulations in India is somewhat uncertain. While the Indian government has expressed concerns about the potential risks posed by cryptocurrencies, it has not yet taken any concrete steps to regulate the industry. The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has issued several warnings about using cryptocurrencies but has not yet implemented any specific regulations.

The introduction of these regulations may have a significant impact on the cryptocurrency industry in India. The regulations may create a more favorable environment for the industry’s growth by providing a clear and consistent framework for using cryptocurrencies. However, the regulations may impose additional costs and compliance requirements on cryptocurrency exchanges, which may impact their profitability. Additionally, the regulations may affect consumer behaviour as they may increase consumer confidence in the safety and security of cryptocurrencies.

In recent years, there has been growing interest in cryptocurrencies in India, and many cryptocurrency exchanges have emerged to meet this demand. But without clear and consistent rules, the use and management of cryptocurrencies in India are mostly uncontrolled.

How will it affect the wider Indian economy?

The proposed regulations for cryptocurrency in India may have a broader impact on the Indian economy. If the regulations effectively reduce the risks associated with cryptocurrencies, they may increase investor confidence and boost the industry’s growth. This, in turn, may positively impact employment and economic development.

But if the rules are too strict or hard to follow, they could slow down the growth of the industry and make it less likely to help the economy.

Are we ready for uniform crypto regulations?

This is a key question. Are we ready?

By introducing uniform regulations, the Indian government hopes to ensure that cryptocurrencies are used safely and securely while also protecting investors’ interests. From my point of view, the need for uniformity in the regulation of cryptocurrencies among G20 countries is a matter of debate. On the one hand, uniform regulations can help ensure a level playing field for businesses and prevent regulatory arbitrage, where companies flock to more lenient laws. This can also help to reduce the potential for cross-border risks to the financial system.

On the other hand, each country has unique economic, political, and cultural contexts and may have different needs and priorities regarding regulating cryptocurrencies. For example, some countries may put more emphasis on protecting consumers, while others may put more emphasis on fighting money laundering and terrorism financing.

Ultimately, the ideal approach to regulating cryptocurrencies is likely to be a balance between these two perspectives, where countries adopt a standard set of principles while still retaining the flexibility to tailor regulations to their specific circumstances. This approach can help make sure that cryptocurrencies are regulated in a way that encourages innovation, protects consumers, and reduces potential risks to the financial system while still respecting the sovereignty of each country.

I think it is too early to have uniform regulations across G20 countries on cryptocurrency. They did not perfect it in traditional finance; it will be a lot harder for cryptocurrency. Regulations should be localized if they want to move fast to catch up with the speed of changes in the cryptocurrency space.

The proposal for uniform regulation of cryptocurrencies among G20 countries could potentially delay regulation in individual countries, including India. Being an intergovernmental advisor on blockchain and cryptocurrency matters, I would propose that the Indian government do the same, rather than have uniform regulations across the entire country; they should be LocalizedThis approach can have several advantages, such as allowing for a more flexible and agile regulatory framework that can respond quickly to market changes and industry needs. LoLocalizedegulations can also take into account the specific needs and circumstances of different regions and jurisdictions and allow for the development of regulations tailored to the local context and priorities. This can be especially important in a country as diverse and complex as India, where there may be significant regional variations in the needs and challenges faced by the cryptocurrency industry.

To conclude

Indeed, the recent events in the crypto market have highlighted the need for some form of regulation in the crypto market. These events have demonstrated the potential risks associated with cryptocurrencies, including the volatility of prices, the lack of investor protection, and the potential for illegal activities.

The Indian Presidency provides an opportunity for India to showcase its leadership and to promote its views and interests on these and other issues of global significance. The timeline for introducing the regulations has not been officially announced yet. It is expected that the regulations will be presented in the near future following the G20 conference this month.

I hope something concrete and reasonable on cryptocurrency will come out of this meeting. Fingers-crossed.

 

 

Source: https://myvoice.opindia.com/2023/02/india-eyes-global-crypto-regulations-in-g20-are-we-ready-for-uniformity/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

‘All eyes are on it:’ CryptoPunks at center of copyright legal dispute

‘All eyes are on it:’ CryptoPunks at center of copyright legal dispute
Additional comments from me.
From an investor standpoint myself, the key issues to this lawsuit will result in financial repercussions. CryptoPunks V2 is the most talked-about NFT collection globally, they are one of the key figures in the NFT market. Imagine another 10,000 images from CryptoPunks V1 is proven to be legit, this move could possibly affect the brand and show a significant decrease in their NFT price. Simple maths, V2 has 10,000, V1 added another 10,000. The price could be halved technically. This potential decrease in price is not only affecting CryptoPunks, it could also let the non-crypto natives or non-believers create new FUDs.
Firstly, NFTs are intellectual property (IP) in my opinion. They are changing how we see ownership and usage rights. Secondly, NFTs is likely to supplement and disrupt the IP markets. Web 3.0 is that enabler and the bridge.

Web 1.0: Ownership is a legal contract; Usage rights are non and unauthorised; Enforcement is by lawyers.

Web 2.0: Ownership is a legal contract; Usage rights is is based on the platform;  Enforcement is by the platform and lawyers.

While Web 3.0 is a combination. Ownership is NFT; Usage rights are creator-driven and platform to facilitate; Enforcement is by lawyers, smart contract. platform and community.

In this structure, the creator will be able to gain their IP rights in a global manner, compensated accordingly when they authorised usage and all these are trackable, administrated by the smart contract and platform.

With all these in mind, I believe NFTs need a global standard and enforceable contracts and licenses agreement to protect all parties.

– Anndy Lian

 

‘All eyes are on it:’ CryptoPunks at center of copyright legal dispute

The biggest-selling NFT collection of all time has two competing versions, threatening to undermine the value of the tokens and faith in the industry itself.

Holders of the original non-fungible token (NFT) collection CryptoPunks V1 have filed a counter-DMCA notice to overturn a request by creator Larva Labs to delist the collection from OpenSea.

Larva Labs issued the DMCA notice — a takedown notice by copyright holders — earlier in the month, arguing it maintains the license for the V1  tokens and no longer wants them to be traded, as they undermine the value of the current V2 series. The V1 community is arguing that as close to US$50 million has been spent on the V1s, the community holds at least some ownership over the assets.

As the legal proceedings continue, the case will be closely watched for what it may reveal about the future of copyright laws and the potential need for oversight within the industry.

“I’m really excited to see how it does play out,” said Yehuda Petscher, strategist at NFT data aggregator CryptoSlam, telling Forkast it’s one of the more significant stories we’ve seen on the NFT scene to date. “All eyes are on it: we’re talking about the biggest brand in NFTs with Larva Labs and CryptoPunks, so it’s going to be a wild one.”

The V1 series was the original minting of the CryptoPunks collection but were replaced by the current V2 models upon the discovery of a bug that allowed buyers to instantly withdraw the Ether used to purchase them, leaving sellers with no profits. Existing holders of the series were airdropped updated V2 versions which became the standard, authorized versions of the collection.

Petscher himself is a V1 holder, which he bought as he recognized the historic significance of the initially discarded collection.

CryptoPunks are the most traded NFT collection in the world, with over US$2 billion in sales volume across their 10,000 units. If the V1s are considered legitimate, that would double the supply of CryptoPunks and potentially deflate their unit price.

Larva Labs had actually sold 210 ETH or over US$600,000 worth of CryptoPunks V1 prior to issuing the takedown order, as the company thought selling the tokens would give the impression they were not of any value — a fact the firm now recognizes was a poor decision.

The V1s have already been delisted from OpenSea only weeks after launch once the V2s were issued, as they were perceived to be inauthentic. Once the V1s were wrapped and listed on competing marketplace LooksRare, however, OpenSea reversed course once they began growing in popularity.

But the impacts of the case go beyond simply the price, as some have suggested it could see an NFT standard introduced in the industry in order to protect copyright — and investors.

“Until there is the NFT standard, it is very tough to police each and every single transaction and collection in the market,” Anndy Lian, founding member of NFT creative studio Influxo, told Forkast, explaining that blockchain is useful for determining ownership but does not guarantee copyright. “The industry is still very much driven by speculation and price and if this continues you will see a lot more of these cowboys running around in the crypto market and in the NFT space,” he added.

CryptoSlam’s Petscher disagrees, saying all the information required to verify an asset is already stored on the blockchain along with the token itself, it’s just a matter of educating people to read and interpret the data that is stored there.

“The beauty of the blockchain is you don’t need that kind of oversight,” he said. “You don’t need certain regulations because some of these things are now indisputable. That is the power of the blockchain.”

The V1 CryptoPunks are still available through LooksRare, the upstart marketplace that has transacted greater sales volumes than OpenSea since launching in early January, though they have a significantly lower floor price of 9.3 ETH (US$26,500) compared to 72.69 ETH for the V2s. 

 

 

 

Original Source: https://forkast.news/all-eyes-cryptopunks-center-copyright-legal-dispute/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j