Tag Archives: hack

Crypto’s triple threat: Exchange hack, technical rejection, and Fed policy fog

Crypto’s triple threat: Exchange hack, technical rejection, and Fed policy fog

The crypto market’s 1.24 per cent decline over the past 24 hours reflects a convergence of distinct yet interlocking pressures: security vulnerabilities, technical resistance, and macroeconomic ambiguity. All of this unfolds against the backdrop of a quiet US holiday week. While the broader seven-day trend remains in positive territory at plus 4.26 per cent, the short-term retracement underscores the fragility of risk sentiment in an environment where liquidity thins, correlations tighten, and geopolitical shocks reverberate through digital asset markets with amplified force.

This week’s bearish tilt lies in the Upbit hack, a stark reminder that even regulated, institutionally backed exchanges remain high-value targets for sophisticated threat actors. On November 27, South Korea’s largest cryptocurrency platform confirmed a theft of US$30.4 million in digital assets, with early forensic evidence pointing squarely to North Korea’s Lazarus Group. This attribution carries weight not only because of its geopolitical implications but also due to the group’s notorious track record of targeting crypto infrastructure to fund regime activities.

The market’s immediate reaction, a plunge into Extreme Fear as measured by the Fear & Greed Index dropping to 20, demonstrates how legacy concerns about custody and exchange security continue to haunt an asset class striving for mainstream legitimacy. Investors responded by rotating capital toward perceived safe havens within the crypto universe, notably Bitcoin, whose dominance rose to 58.61 per cent. This flight to relative stability highlights a recurring pattern. When trust in centralised intermediaries erodes, decentralised base-layer assets often benefit, even if only temporarily.

Compounding this security-driven caution was a decisive technical breakdown in Bitcoin’s price structure. For days, US$92,000 had served as a critical psychological and structural resistance level. The failure to sustain a breakout above this threshold triggered a cascade of algorithmic sell orders, resulting in US$20.41 million in liquidations, predominantly short positions caught off guard by the initial dip but unable to recover as momentum faded. Technical indicators further reinforced the bearish undertone. While the 14-day RSI at 42.63 remains technically neutral, it shows a clear loss of upward momentum, slipping from overbought territory earlier in the week.

Meanwhile, the MACD histogram, though still positive at plus 20.24 billion, presents a troubling divergence. Price action contradicts the bullish signal implied by the indicator, suggesting a weakening of buyers’ conviction. Compounding the issue, derivatives open interest fell by nearly 5 per cent, signalling that leveraged traders are stepping back, a classic sign of risk aversion ahead of major macroeconomic events.

This brings us to the third pillar of today’s market dynamics: macro correlation and policy uncertainty. Despite the US equity markets being closed for Thanksgiving, crypto did not trade in isolation. Its seven-day correlation with the Nasdaq-100, measured via the QQQ ETF, has surged to an unusually tight 0.92. This near-perfect linkage means that even in the absence of US equity trading, crypto remains hostage to the same macro narratives driving tech stocks, namely, the path of Federal Reserve policy. Recent US jobs data came in stronger than expected, tempering market expectations for aggressive rate cuts.

While UOB still anticipates a 25 basis point reduction at the December 17 FOMC meeting, the probability has softened from near-certainty to approximately 85 per cent. This shift matters deeply for crypto, which has increasingly functioned as a risk-sensitive asset class. The slowdown in spot Bitcoin ETF inflows, dropping to just US$21 million on November 26 compared to US$128 million on prior high-volume days, reflects institutional hesitation. With the Fed entering its pre-meeting blackout period this weekend through December 12, 2025, traders are left to navigate a policy vacuum, relying on lagging indicators and thin holiday liquidity to set prices.

That thin liquidity has magnified market volatility. Total 24-hour trading volume across major exchanges fell by 21.5 per cent, a typical seasonal pattern during US holidays, but one that exacerbates price swings when large orders enter the market. In such environments, even modest sell pressure, whether from hacked assets being offloaded or leveraged positions unwinding, can trigger outsized moves. This dynamic is particularly acute in crypto, where market depth remains shallower than in traditional equities or FX markets, despite growing institutional participation.

Within this short-term turbulence, structural undercurrents remain supportive. The broader macro environment still points toward impending monetary easing. Bond markets signal renewed appetite for fixed income, with UOB noting that spread widening has made quality bonds attractive again, a precursor to rate cuts. Meanwhile, the US dollar has held steady, and Asian currencies are gaining modest ground, buoyed by easing trade tensions and a stable Chinese yuan. These factors create a more favourable external backdrop for risk assets, including crypto, once the immediate fog of uncertainty lifts.

Looking ahead, three variables will dictate the market’s next directional move. First, developments in the Upbit investigation could either calm nerves if authorities confirm containment and recovery efforts or deepen panic if stolen funds begin circulating widely. Second, Bitcoin’s ability to hold the 89,080 dollar level, which corresponds to the 50 per cent Fibonacci retracement of its recent rally, will serve as a critical technical support.

A breakdown below this level could invite further liquidations and test deeper support zones. Third, and most importantly, Friday’s release of the US Personal Consumption Expenditures price index, the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge, will offer the clearest signal yet on whether December’s anticipated rate cut remains on track. A softer print would likely reignite risk appetite across equities, bonds, and crypto alike, while a hotter-than-expected reading could extend the current period of caution.

In sum, today’s dip is not a reversal of trend but a recalibration, a moment of hesitation amid overlapping uncertainties. The crypto market, now deeply enmeshed in the global macro framework, cannot escape the gravitational pull of Fed policy, tech sector sentiment, or geopolitical risk. Its resilience over the past week, despite the Upbit breach and technical rejection, suggests underlying demand remains intact.

The challenge for market participants lies in distinguishing transient noise from structural shifts. In a world where digital assets increasingly mirror traditional financial cycles, patience and precision will determine who navigates this transitional phase most successfully.

 

Source: https://e27.co/cryptos-triple-threat-exchange-hack-technical-rejection-and-fed-policy-fog-20251128/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

How North Korea’s US$1.5 billion hack exposed Asia’s crypto weaknesses

How North Korea’s US$1.5 billion hack exposed Asia’s crypto weaknesses
It began, as so many epochal crimes do, with a single breach. But by the time the dust had settled on the Bybit hack, nearly US$1.5 billion in digital assets had vanished, exposing not just the vulnerabilities of Asia’s fledgling crypto markets but the growing reach of North Korea’s cyber operatives.

The hack on February 21 represented a quantum leap in the scale and sophistication of cyber operations emanating from North Korea, according to a report released last month by American blockchain analysis firm Chainalysis.

It accounted for nearly 70 per cent of all stolen digital assets globally in the first half of 2025 – laying bare the widening security cracks in Asia’s digital ecosystem and signalling the arrival of a new era of cybercrime that is increasingly targeting victims around the globe, from Bybit’s Dubai headquarters to the United States and beyond.

Last year, North Korea-linked cybercriminals were responsible for an estimated US$1.3 billion in losses, then the highest figure on record. But this year is shaping up to be even worse for the victims, with Pyongyang’s state-sponsored hackers on track to reap even greater illicit rewards, according to the Chainalysis report.

Experts warn that the sheer size of the Bybit heist is not the most alarming element. The degree of technical proficiency, coupled with clear signs of state involvement, have raised concerns that the stolen funds are being funnelled directly into North Korea’s arms and weapons programmes, fuelling instability far beyond the digital realm.

“While North Korea typically doesn’t claim responsibility for these cyber exploits, extensive evidence has linked them to sophisticated hacking groups like the Lazarus Group,” Diederik van Wersch, regional director for Asean at Chainalysis, told This Week in Asia.

The Lazarus Group, a shadowy collective of state-sponsored cybercriminals infamous for siphoning off billions from the cryptocurrency industry, is thought to be behind the Bybit hack. The group’s modus operandi? Exploiting security vulnerabilities in order to finance the North Korean regime by employing complex laundering methods to obscure the trail of stolen funds.

“These aren’t merely cybersecurity incidents, they represent significant national security concerns,” van Wersch warned. “The UN has confirmed that North Korea uses these stolen funds to finance its weapons programmes, making these attacks a direct threat to international security.”

The United States and its allies have repeatedly accused Pyongyang of using cyberattacks to fund its military and nuclear ambitions.

Pyongyang has never officially acknowledged any connection to the Lazarus Group, but it is believed to be unique in its state-directed quest for financial gain through hacking. Its operations, which include advanced social engineering and the infiltration of crypto platforms via compromised IT staff, have set a new standard for financial cybercrime.

Asia: cybercrime epicentre?

The dangers are not confined to any one country. Southeast Asia – Cambodia, Myanmar and Laos, in particular – has now become a global hub for cybercrime, cybersecurity experts say, driven by a toxic mix of weak rule of law, authoritarian protection and economic desperation.
International sanctions and the closure of criminal platforms such as Russia’s Garantex and Cambodia-based Huione Guarantee have barely made a dent in the volume of illicit cyber transactions, which Chainalysis estimates hit US$51 billion worldwide in 2024 alone.
Against this backdrop, North Korea’s relentless focus on cryptocurrency theft had been propelled by US-led sanctions strangling its other revenue streams, said Anndy Lian, a Singapore-based intergovernmental blockchain adviser.

“It seems likely that this phenomenon could inspire other countries, particularly those facing political instability or sanctions, to engage in similar activities,” he said. “However, replicating North Korea’s capabilities requires significant investment in cyber infrastructure and expertise, which may be challenging.”

Research suggests that while North Korea leverages a mixture of services to launder its gains, other nations that lack its technical sophistication would indeed struggle to emulate its success.

The technical prowess of Pyongyang’s hackers was now such that it allowed them to “target even well-versed cybersecurity professionals”, Lian said, adding that their increasingly elaborate laundering networks complicated the recovery of stolen assets.

In Asia’s other cybercrime hotspots, such as Myanmar and Cambodia, the focus has tended to be more on scamming and money laundering, but this threat matrix now appears to be evolving.

According to Chainalysis, 2025 has seen a marked expansion of cybercriminal activities: more laundering, larger cross-border networks and a disturbing rise in physical violence.

‘Wrench attacks’

For the hackers’ victims the pain can be both financial and physical. Chainalysis in its report described a “particularly disturbing subset” of recent thefts known as “wrench attacks”.

Far less sophisticated than the image of an invisible hand picking the digital pockets of unsuspecting crypto adopters, these actual assaults rely on violence and threats of force to extract assets from victims.

The kidnapping and murder of Chinese-Filipino tycoon Anson Que, former CEO of Ellison Steel, earlier this year provided a chilling example of these so-called wrench attacks in action. Investigators believe his death was linked to ransom payments laundered through casino gaming and digital shell accounts to obscure the money trail.
Meanwhile, Asia’s digital boom has in many ways made it a magnet for cybercriminals. Japan, Indonesia and South Korea now rank among the world’s leading victims of stolen digital funds, reflecting not only their increasing adoption of crypto but also their exposure to North Korean hackers – with the infamous 2016 Bank of Bangladesh cyber heist being an early and illuminating case in point.
That US$81 million theft from the bank’s account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York was one of the largest cyber heists ever recorded at the time. The attack, attributed to the Lazarus Group, was ultimately traced back to servers in the Philippines, where much of the stolen money was laundered through casinos.

A decade on and the “velocity and consistency” continues to grow exponentially, Chainalysis warns. It took hackers just 142 days this year to surpass the US$2 billion mark in global losses, compared to 214 days in 2022. At this rate, total losses could exceed US$4.3 billion by year’s end, the report warned.

The soaring prices of cryptocurrencies and other digital tokens have only made things worse. Bitcoin, for example, hit an all-time high of more than US$123,000 last month, buoyed in part by favourable signals from US President Donald Trump’s administration and a growing global appetite for crypto assets.

Chainalysis data shows that attackers are now deliberately targeting high-value individual wallets, with bitcoin theft accounting for a disproportionate share of losses. As asset values rise, the incentive for thieves grows ever larger.

“The current crypto market momentum also presents increased opportunities for attackers,” van Wersch said, adding that the liquidity and cross-border nature of digital tokens made them especially attractive targets.

Experts warn that advanced economies such as South Korea and Japan are especially exposed to hacks due to their proximity to North Korean actors and their thriving crypto markets, while emerging economies like Indonesia are also at risk as digital finance gains in popularity.

“Geopolitical tensions may motivate North Korea to target these nations, as seen in reports linking attacks to historical adversaries,” Lian said of Japan and South Korea.

Building smarter defences

Amid the surge in cybercrime, there are signs of hope. Advances in tracing cryptocurrency transactions now allow for near-instant tracking of funds and the transparency of blockchain technology provides some measure of visibility into illicit flows.

“As jurisdictions like Hong Kong move forward with progressive stablecoin legislation, the focus should be on building robust security alongside innovation,” van Wersch said.

“The key is implementing sophisticated real-time threat monitoring systems and leveraging advanced blockchain analytics that can help prevent attacks before they occur.”

Real-time monitoring and predictive technologies are set to become indispensable, as hackers probe for vulnerabilities across the region’s digital infrastructure. Crypto exchanges, in turn, must demonstrate to regulators and users alike that they can safeguard funds against increasingly resourceful adversaries, according to van Wersch.

Jake Sims, founding partner of Operation Shamrock – a global coalition working to disrupt Southeast Asian cybercrime networks – stressed the complexity of taking on state-linked actors, as well as the risks of financial contagion.

“The use of crypto for laundering cyber-scam proceeds certainly erodes public and regulatory confidence in digital assets,” he said. “Unresolved enforcement gaps in Southeast Asia risk contaminating broader digital finance ecosystems.”

Earlier this year, Hong Kong was ranked as the second-most crypto-friendly city in the world, behind only the Slovenian capital of Ljubljana, by migration platform Multipolitan.

Regional rival Singapore, meanwhile, was recently named as one of the most crypto-obsessed countries globally, after research from digital asset exchanges ApeX Protocol and Taurex found nearly one in four Singaporeans owned cryptocurrency in 2024.

Recent high-profile attacks have exposed the urgency with which robust defences need to be built. In July last year, US$235 million was stolen from Indian crypto exchange WazirX by North Korean hackers masquerading as legitimate users – a breach that ultimately led to the closure of the platform and a restructuring plan by its Singapore-based parent Zettai.

Lian said such incidents had exposed persistent weaknesses in the security of even major exchanges and risked provoking a regulatory backlash that could stifle digital innovation.

Hong Kong, which has spent years steadily building a regulatory framework for virtual assets, has so far licensed 10 virtual asset trading platforms including New York-based Bullish, which in February became the first international crypto exchange to gain approval in the city.

Experts are now calling for regional and international cooperation, from establishing intelligence-sharing platforms to harmonising cryptocurrency regulation, to help reduce risks.

Joint efforts under the aegis of the United Nations might exert much-needed diplomatic pressure, Lian suggested, while targeted sanctions could help stem the tide of cyber crimes.

A “harm minimisation approach” targeting revenue streams and increasing reputational costs and legal expenses for jurisdictions that host cybercriminals was another option, Sims said.

Regulators needed to strengthen both domestic security and cross-border collaboration, he argued, possibly through task forces operating outside the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.

“A subregional task force outside formal Asean structures may actually be more effective for constraining harms emerging in high-risk contexts, like Cambodia where political will is lacking,” Sims said.

Despite differing international treatment, Sims said that North Korea and Cambodia shared “significant similarities … in terms of the degree of consolidated coercive power, the degree of state involvement in criminal activity, and the global reach of state-embedded criminal industries”.

The recent border conflict with Thailand could also lead “Cambodia’s scam-invested elite to look away from the Thai border as they evaluate new locations”, he said. “But it is important to note that scam compounds in Cambodia are everywhere.”

So what of Asia’s digital future? While new tools built using artificial intelligence can flag scam scripts and analyse transaction patterns for signs of deep-faked identities, Sims cautioned that technology alone was insufficient to combat cybercrime.

“These tools will need to be complemented by human intelligence, as well as policy reforms and enforcement mechanisms,” he said. “Without political will and cross-border cooperation, AI and other technological interventions will only offer partial mitigation.”

For now, it would seem that no one is immune. The Bybit hack may have set a new record, but it is unlikely to be the last. Asia’s digital future will depend on what happens next.

 

Source: https://www.scmp.com/week-asia/economics/article/3321262/how-north-koreas-us15-billion-hack-exposed-asias-crypto-weaknesses

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

Why Dubai’s Regulatory Hack Could Rewrite Crypto’s Rulebook

Why Dubai’s Regulatory Hack Could Rewrite Crypto’s Rulebook

The recent announcement by Dubai’s Virtual Assets Regulatory Authority (VARA), allowing licensed crypto companies to host other firms under their umbrella through “Sponsored Access,” represents a seismic shift in regulatory strategy. This policy, operationalized in 2024, dismantles traditional barriers to entry in the cryptocurrency sector while maintaining institutional-grade oversight. I argue that this model exemplifies “smart regulation”—a framework that balances innovation with accountability, scalability with safety, and local sovereignty with global ambition.

By analyzing its mechanics, implications for startups and institutional players, and alignment with broader trends in regulatory design, it becomes evident that Dubai has redefined what it means to lead in the digital economy.

Barriers, Not Gateways

Prior to this policy shift, launching a regulated cryptocurrency product in Dubai was a complicated process. Prospective virtual asset service providers (VASPs) faced a gauntlet of requirements: months-long licensing procedures, substantial capital investments in infrastructure, and exorbitant legal fees to navigate VARA’s stringent compliance standards. As of early 2024, the average time to secure a full license exceeded six months, with costs often surpassing $500,000—a prohibitive barrier for startups lacking institutional backing. While these measures aimed to safeguard financial integrity, they inadvertently stifled competition, centralized power among well-capitalized incumbents, and delayed the deployment of innovative products to market.

This approach mirrored global trends, where regulators—grappling with the volatility and novelty of crypto—defaulted to heavy-handed frameworks. For instance, the European Union’s Markets in Crypto-Assets (MiCA) regulation, finalized in 2023, imposed rigorous disclosure and transparency mandates, creating compliance burdens that smaller firms struggled to meet. Similarly, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) enforcement-heavy stance against exchanges like Binance and Coinbase has fostered a climate of uncertainty, driving innovators to jurisdictions with clearer rule sets. Dubai, despite its reputation as a tech-forward hub, risked falling into the same trap—until now.

Compliance, Shared

VARA’s Sponsored Access model inverts this paradigm by leveraging existing license holders as “Regulatory Hosts.” Under this system, licensed VASPs—subject to VARA’s approval—can onboard unlicensed entities as “appointed representatives,” effectively extending their compliance infrastructure to these newcomers. The hosts assume full legal responsibility for their sponsored firms, including audits, reporting obligations, and capital adequacy requirements. Crucially, VARA retains overarching oversight, ensuring that decentralization of accountability does not equate to dilution of standards.

This layered approach draws parallels to the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) “parent-subsidiary” licensing model, which allows established firms to vouch for affiliates. Dubai’s iteration is distinct in its operational scalability. By mandating that Sponsored VASPs be locally incorporated, VARA anchors accountability within its jurisdiction while enabling rapid onboarding. Early data reveals that over 40 startups have leveraged this to launch products within 30 days of application—a 90% reduction in time-to-market compared to traditional licensing. Costs, too, have plummeted, with sponsored firms reporting compliance expenses under $50,000—a threshold accessible to early-stage ventures.

Speed. Cost. Credibility.

The implications of this shift are profound. First, Sponsored Access democratizes entry into the UAE’s crypto ecosystem, enabling nimble startups to pilot products without diverting resources to redundant compliance structures. For instance, a decentralized finance (DeFi) protocol focused on cross-border remittances can now concentrate on algorithmic risk modeling rather than rebuilding know-your-customer (KYC) systems from scratch. Second, the policy aligns with investor appetites for regulated vehicles: institutional allocations to UAE-based crypto funds have surged, as it reduces counterparty risks.

Notably, this model circumvents the pitfalls of regulatory sandboxes—a tool widely criticized for creating artificial environments that are disconnected from real-world constraints. Sandboxes, such as Singapore’s MAS initiative, often impose arbitrary transaction limits and short-term licenses, forcing firms to reengineer operations post-graduation. Sponsored Access, by contrast, immerses startups in full regulatory compliance from day one, fostering muscle memory around anti-money laundering (AML) protocols and consumer protection. This distinction is vital: while sandboxes simulate safety, VARA’s framework embeds it.

Compliance That Scales

At its core, Sponsored Access embodies the philosophy of “smart regulation”—the idea that regulatory systems must evolve beyond one-size-fits-all mandates. By distributing accountability across hosts and sponsored entities, VARA mitigates its own bureaucratic load while preserving systemic resilience. Consider the analogy of cloud computing: just as AWS provides scalable infrastructure for startups to deploy applications without owning servers, Sponsored VASPs offer a compliance “cloud” where smaller players rent access to regulatory frameworks.

This model also addresses a persistent tension in crypto governance: balancing innovation with investor protection. Critics of decentralized finance (DeFi) often cite its “Wild West” reputation—characterized by rug pulls, exit scams, and opaque tokenomics that erode retail trust. Sponsored Access inoculates against such risks by tethering every participant to a vetted host, creating a chain of liability that deters malfeasance. For example, if a sponsored exchange facilitates illicit transactions, VARA can penalize both the exchange and its host, ensuring that accountability cascades upward.

No Free Passes in Compliance

Skeptics may question whether delegated oversight compromises rigor. But VARA’s design anticipates this concern. Sponsored VASPs must undergo annual third-party audits, publish transparency reports, and maintain minimum capital reserves tied to their risk profiles—a structure reminiscent of Basel III’s tiered capital requirements for banks.

Moreover, the policy incentivizes hosts to act as gatekeepers. Since their reputational and financial stakes are high, Sponsored VASPs conduct due diligence exceeding VARA’s baseline standards. I spoke with two licensed hosts who revealed that all required sponsored firms to implement real-time blockchain analytics tools—a measure beyond current regulatory mandates. This “compliance arms race” elevates industry standards organically.

Regulation That Attracts

The UAE’s strategic bet on Sponsored Access is already paying dividends. Dubai attracted 60% of the Middle East’s crypto venture capital, with firms like Amber Group and Bybit establishing regional headquarters. More critically, the policy has catalyzed niche innovation: startups specializing in sharia-compliant tokenization and halal blockchain gaming—sectors often overlooked in Western markets—are flourishing under this model.

This growth is not merely quantitative. Dubai’s model challenges the dominance of offshore crypto hubs like Seychelles and the British Virgin Islands, which thrived on lax oversight but now face increasing scrutiny from G20 regulators. By offering a middle path—neither a sandbox nor a free-for-all—the UAE positions itself as a Goldilocks jurisdiction: strict enough to earn G20 approval, flexible enough to outpace peers.

Risks, Replication, and What Comes Next

Despite its merits, Sponsored Access is not without risks. Over-reliance on a handful of hosts could create systemic vulnerabilities: if a major VASP collapses, its sponsored entities might face cascading suspensions. VARA must also guard against regulatory arbitrage, where firms exploit ambiguities in cross-border enforcement. To address this, the authority has initiated bilateral agreements with counterpart agencies in other countries, harmonizing audit standards and information-sharing protocols.

Globally, Dubai’s experiment could inspire copycats. The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has floated similar ideas for derivatives trading, while Brazil’s Securities and Exchange Commission (CVM) is exploring sponsored models for security tokens. If these jurisdictions adopt VARA’s principles, we may witness the emergence of a modular regulatory architecture—a “Lego-block” system where compliance frameworks interlock across borders.

Blueprint for the Digital Age

VARA’s Sponsored Access policy is more than a local reform—it is a blueprint for governing frontier technologies without sacrificing dynamism. By reimagining regulation as shared infrastructure rather than a bottleneck, Dubai has shown that innovation and oversight can coexist without being adversaries. Startups gain agility, hosts earn revenue from compliance-as-a-service, and regulators preserve systemic stability—all while cementing the UAE’s status as a vanguard of the digital age.

As the crypto industry matures, the lessons from Dubai will resonate far beyond the Persian Gulf. In an era where AI, quantum computing, and biohacking challenge existing governance models, the UAE’s gamble offers a template: distribute accountability, empower intermediaries, and build frameworks that scale with technology—not against it. The future belongs to regulators bold enough to take the lead.

 

Source: https://intpolicydigest.org/why-duba-s-regulatory-hack-could-rewrite-crypto-s-rulebook/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j