Tag Archives: now

Binance cracks down on market makers: What traders need to know now

Binance cracks down on market makers: What traders need to know now

Binance just announced stricter rules for market makers and token issuers, and this move deserves careful attention from anyone watching how crypto markets mature. The exchange now requires projects to disclose their market maker identity, legal entity, and key contract terms covering inventory and fee handling. It explicitly bans profit-sharing and guaranteed-return arrangements between projects and market makers, as well as opaque token lending that permits broad, undefined use of borrowed tokens. These structures often hide incentives that drive manipulative behaviour.

They will also monitor market maker activity more closely, watching for selling that conflicts with vesting schedules, one-sided quote provision, or trading that artificially inflates volume. The platform reserves the right to blacklist firms that engage in these practices. Bloomberg separately notes a prohibition on any revenue-sharing models tied to market-making on Binance. This is not a minor policy tweak. It represents a fundamental shift toward transparency in a part of crypto markets that has long operated in the shadows.

Market makers play a vital role in healthy trading environments. They tighten spreads and provide depth, allowing traders to enter and exit positions without excessive slippage. But when market makers receive payments to pump volumes or support price levels at all costs, they create fake liquidity that misleads traders about real demand. The new Binance rules aim to separate genuine market making from arrangements designed to manufacture the appearance of activity. By forcing disclosure of who the market maker is and what they can do, and by banning profit-sharing and price-manipulation deals, Binance tries to reduce conflicts of interest and wash trading that drew criticism after past market meltdowns. Tokens that relied on aggressive, opaque market making to appear healthier than they truly were could see wider spreads or lower volumes in the near term. Projects with organic demand and clean arrangements may stand out more clearly once the noise fades. This short-term discomfort could actually help investors distinguish between substance and spectacle.

The real test of these new rules will be enforcement. Binance says it will take swift, decisive action against misconduct, including blacklisting market makers. But it remains unclear whether blacklisted entities will be publicly named or only handled internally. Transparency about enforcement would strengthen the credibility of this policy shift. Without public accountability, bad actors could simply migrate to less scrutinised venues while continuing similar practices. Watch how liquidity metrics change, especially for smaller or recently listed tokens. Persistent widening spreads or sharp drops in reported volume could signal that prior activity depended heavily on now-constrained arrangements.

Also, watch whether rival exchanges adopt similar policies or position themselves as more flexible alternatives. If Binance’s stricter stance becomes an industry norm, it could reduce room for aggressive market making across the entire ecosystem, not just on one venue. That would represent meaningful progress toward more honest price discovery.

These changes reflect a necessary evolution in how crypto markets operate. I have seen how opaque arrangements can undermine trust. When market makers and projects hide their relationships, they create information asymmetry that harms retail participants the most. Requiring disclosure does not eliminate all manipulation, but it raises the cost of deceptive behaviour and makes it easier for observers to spot red flags. Banning profit sharing between projects and their market makers removes a powerful incentive to coordinate trades that serve internal interests rather than genuine supply and demand. This aligns with a broader principle I hold: decentralised systems work best when incentives are transparent and aligned with long-term network health, not short-term price engineering.

That said, I approach these rules with measured optimism. Regulation and self-regulation in crypto must balance market integrity with innovation. Overly rigid constraints could push legitimate market-making activity offshore or into decentralised venues where oversight is minimal. The goal should not be to eliminate market making but to ensure it serves real liquidity needs rather than marketing narratives. Binance’s focus on specific harmful practices, such as front-running token release schedules or providing one-sided quotes, shows a nuanced understanding of where manipulation occurs. This targeted approach is more promising than blanket restrictions that might stifle useful activity. I also believe that traditional financial tests, such as the Howey test, often fail to capture the realities of decentralised systems. Similarly, market-making rules designed for traditional equities may not translate perfectly to crypto. Binance appears to be crafting rules specific to the dynamics of digital asset markets, which is the right direction.

 

Source: https://e27.co/binance-cracks-down-on-market-makers-what-traders-need-to-know-now-20260326/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

Market crash or buying opportunity? What investors need to know now

Market crash or buying opportunity? What investors need to know now

United States indices closed Tuesday with modest losses, relinquishing early gains as crude prices resumed their ascent. The S&P 500 fell 0.37 per cent to 6,556.37, while the Nasdaq Composite dropped 0.84 per cent to 21,761.89, pressured by weakness in software names and the so-called Mag 7 technology leaders. The Dow Jones Industrial Average shed 84.41 points, or 0.18 per cent, to settle at 46,124.06. These movements reflect a market grappling with conflicting signals.

De-escalation narratives boost risk appetite while persistent inflation concerns keep the Federal Reserve on a hawkish footing. Technology stocks, which have led gains in prior months, now face scrutiny as higher-for-longer interest rate expectations compress valuation multiples. Investors who chased early Tuesday strength found themselves caught on the wrong side of a late-session reversal, a reminder that liquidity can vanish quickly when macro headlines dominate.

Asia-Pacific markets displayed sharper divergence. South Korea’s KOSPI surged 3.06 per cent at Wednesday’s open, fuelled by reports of a potential 15-point US-Iran de-escalation plan. This optimism contrasted with earlier heavy losses in Japan’s Nikkei and Hong Kong’s Hang Seng, both of which fell more than three per cent as energy prices spiked.

The regional split underscores how rapidly sentiment shifts when geopolitical headlines dominate, leaving traders to parse signal from noise in real time. Energy-dependent economies feel these swings most acutely, as oil price volatility directly impacts trade balances and corporate earnings forecasts. The KOSPI’s sharp rebound also highlights how local markets can decouple temporarily from global risk trends when catalyst-specific news emerges, creating both opportunity and whipsaw risk for cross-border capital.

The cryptocurrency market has stabilised after intense volatility, though it remains acutely sensitive to macroeconomic currents. Bitcoin trades around US$70,950, holding modest gains after rebounding from February lows. Ethereum hovers near US$2,130-US$2,160, recently underperforming Bitcoin amid heightened institutional selling pressure in ETH exchange-traded funds. Among altcoins, Solana holds steady near US$88-US$89, while XRP remains around US$1.42-US$1.45.

Market drivers remain anchored in geopolitical uncertainty. Recent liquidations of nearly US$550 million in short positions helped Bitcoin reclaim the US$71,000 threshold, demonstrating how leverage and sentiment can amplify moves in digital asset markets. This dynamic reveals a maturing yet still fragile ecosystem in which traditional finance flows increasingly intersect with decentralised protocols, creating new channels for volatility transmission.

Commodities reflect the same tug-of-war. Brent crude fell more than four per cent to drop below US$100 a barrel at Wednesday’s open on hopes of a de-escalation, after hitting highs near US$119 last week. The Federal Reserve held its benchmark rate at 3.5 per cent to 3.75 per cent this month and signalled only one rate cut for the remainder of 2026, while raising its inflation outlook to 2.7 per cent. Gold trades around US$4,550 per ounce, retaining some safe-haven appeal despite rising bond yields.

These moves highlight how traditional stores of value and inflation hedges respond to the same geopolitical and policy forces shaping equities and crypto. Oil’s sharp pullback from US$119 shows how quickly risk premiums can evaporate on diplomatic headlines, but the Fed’s cautious stance reminds markets that underlying inflation pressures have not disappeared.

This market environment reveals the intelligence gap that persists in Web3 and traditional finance alike. While institutional players react to Federal Reserve signals and Middle East headlines, decentralised networks continue processing transactions without pause. The US$550 million in short liquidations that propelled Bitcoin higher demonstrates how legacy market structures can create asymmetric opportunities for those who understand on-chain dynamics.

Ethereum’s underperformance relative to Bitcoin, driven by ETF selling pressure, reminds us that institutional adoption does not always align with network fundamentals. I see these moments not as noise but as data points in a larger transition toward more resilient, human-centric financial infrastructure. The current volatility underscores why true decentralisation matters. Systems that depend on single points of failure, whether geopolitical or institutional, remain vulnerable to sudden regime shifts.

The path forward demands more than reactive trading. It requires visionary architecture that anticipates the next cycle of innovation while respecting the lessons of past volatility. Markets will continue to oscillate between fear and hope, but the foundational shift toward open, programmable, and user-owned infrastructure represents a structural trend that transcends daily price action. Those who focus on building rather than merely speculating will define the next era of financial technology.

 

 

Source: https://e27.co/market-crash-or-buying-opportunity-what-investors-need-to-know-now-20260325/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

Fear and greed at 28: Why traders are fleeing crypto right now

Fear and greed at 28: Why traders are fleeing crypto right now
Most regional indices closed lower, weighed down by anxieties over US technology earnings and the looming announcement of President Donald Trump’s nominee for Federal Reserve chair. While Japan’s Nikkei 225 managed to stay slightly in positive territory amid choppy trading, Hong Kong and mainland Chinese benchmarks retreated, ending what had otherwise been a strong monthly rally. The divergence in performance underscored the growing sensitivity of global markets to both domestic policy signals and external shocks.
At the heart of the day’s market dynamics lay two dominant narratives:
  • First, concerns mounted over whether the massive artificial intelligence investments made by US tech giants would translate into tangible returns. Mixed earnings reports from major firms failed to reassure investors, casting doubt on the sustainability of the AI-driven valuation surge that has powered equity markets in recent quarters.
  • Second, anticipation built around the imminent nomination of the next Federal Reserve chair. With interest rate policy hanging in the balance, traders braced for potential shifts in monetary direction under a new leadership aligned with the Trump administration’s economic priorities. These dual uncertainties created a risk-averse backdrop across Asia.
This aversion to risk extended beyond equities into currencies and commodities. The US dollar strengthened as a traditional safe haven, while gold, typically a refuge during geopolitical stress, unexpectedly declined. This unusual move signalled that capital was not rotating into traditional hedges but instead retreating broadly from speculative exposure. Notably, Indian markets bucked the regional trend. The Sensex closed at 82,566.37 and the Nifty at 25,418.90, lifted by domestic optimism ahead of the Union Budget. India’s relative insulation highlighted how localised fiscal expectations can temporarily override global headwinds.
Meanwhile, the cryptocurrency market experienced a sharp contraction, shedding 6.82 per cent in 24 hours to settle at a $2.78 trillion valuation. This decline did not stem from internal protocol failures or regulatory crackdowns but from a cascading geopolitical risk-off event. Specifically, President Trump’s explicit threat of military strikes against Iran triggered a broad flight from all assets perceived as risky.
In this environment, crypto behaved not as a decentralised hedge but as a correlated risk asset, moving in near lockstep with equities and commodities. The correlation between crypto and gold reached an unusually high 88 per cent, confirming that macro forces, not blockchain fundamentals, were driving price action.
The primary catalyst was clear. Escalating US-Iran tensions injected acute uncertainty into financial markets. Investors, fearing broader conflict and potential oil supply disruptions, reduced exposure across the board. Crypto, despite its narrative as a non-sovereign store of value, proved vulnerable to the same macro fears affecting traditional markets. This moment laid bare a critical reality. In times of acute geopolitical stress, crypto still trades as part of the risk spectrum rather than outside it.
Compounding the sell-off was a violent unwinding of leverage. Over US$363 million in Bitcoin long positions were liquidated within 24 hours, a 175 per cent increase from baseline levels. This forced selling created a negative feedback loop. Falling prices triggered more margin calls, which accelerated the decline further.
Market sentiment deteriorated rapidly, with the 

Fear and Greed Index plunging to 28, deep into fear territory. Funding rates turned negative, averaging -0.00215 per cent, indicating that short sellers now dominated the derivatives market and were effectively being paid to maintain bearish positions. Open interest stood at US$608 billion, but its stability remained precarious as longs continued to exit.
Looking ahead, the market faces a pivotal juncture. Technically, the US$2.79 trillion level serves as a crucial support pivot. Holding this zone could allow for stabilisation if geopolitical tensions ease. A decisive break below opens the path toward the yearly low of US$2.42 trillion, particularly if institutional demand continues to wane. Bitcoin ETF flows on January 30 will offer a telling signal. Sustained outflows would confirm that even large players are adopting a defensive stance, reinforcing downward pressure.
This episode underscores a recurring theme in crypto’s maturation. Its increasing integration into the global macro framework means it no longer operates in a vacuum. Instead, it responds to the same geopolitical tremors, monetary policy shifts, and risk sentiment swings that govern equities and commodities. The notion of crypto as a crisis hedge remains aspirational unless it can decouple during true black-swan events, a test it has yet to pass convincingly.
Moreover, the role of leverage cannot be overstated. The US$363 million liquidation wave reveals how fragile market structure can amplify external shocks. While decentralisation promises resilience, the reality is that centralised exchanges, derivative platforms, and leveraged traders create systemic vulnerabilities that mirror traditional finance. Until these structural imbalances are addressed, crypto will remain susceptible to cascading sell-offs driven by macro panic.
In conclusion, January 30, 2026, marked another chapter in crypto’s evolution from fringe experiment to integrated financial asset, one that shares the burdens and behaviours of the broader market. The path forward hinges not on code or consensus alone, but on the unpredictable currents of global politics and investor psychology.
Whether this moment becomes a temporary dip or the start of a deeper correction depends on de-escalation, institutional resolve, and the market’s ability to hold its psychological and technical supports. Until then, crypto remains tethered to the world it once sought to transcend.

 

Source: https://e27.co/fear-and-greed-at-28-why-traders-are-fleeing-crypto-right-now-20260130/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j