Is September a Critical Risk Threshold for Bitcoin?

Is September a Critical Risk Threshold for Bitcoin?

Bitcoin’s September performance has long been a focal point for investors, oscillating between historical bearishness and recent bullish surges. This month, often dubbed a “critical risk threshold,” now faces a confluence of macroeconomic pressures, leveraged market dynamics, and diverging investor sentiment. As the U.S. tariff war escalates and derivatives markets grow increasingly overheated, the question of whether September 2025 will mark a turning point—or a tipping point—demands closer scrutiny.

Ask Aime: Will Bitcoin’s September performance be defined by historical bearishness or recent bullish trends?

Seasonal Trends: From Bearish Legacy to Bullish Anomaly

Historically, September has been a weak period for Bitcoin. In 2024, the cryptocurrency fell below $55,000 during the month, reflecting a pattern of profit-taking and macroeconomic uncertainty [1]. However, 2025 shattered this narrative. By August 27, 2025, Bitcoin had surged to an all-time high of $111,842.71, driven by the approval of U.S. Bitcoin ETFs and a weakening U.S. dollar [2]. This 11% September rally—the best in a decade—defied historical trends, signaling a shift in market sentiment from risk-off to risk-on [3].

The divergence underscores Bitcoin’s evolving role. While traditional safe-haven assets like gold have delivered a mere 6% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) from 2015 to 2025, Bitcoin’s CAGR of ~115% has repositioned it as a growth asset rather than a hedge [4]. Yet, this transformation does not negate September’s inherent volatility. The month remains a battleground for macroeconomic forces, where institutional flows and geopolitical shocks can amplify price swings.

Macroeconomic Triggers: Tariffs, Dollar Weakness, and Diverging Flows

The unresolved U.S. tariff policies under President Donald Trump have injected unprecedented uncertainty into global markets. By 2025, tariffs had pushed the average U.S. tariff rate from 2.5% in 2024 to 16.5%, disrupting supply chains and triggering retaliatory measures from trade partners [5]. While Bitcoin initially dipped amid tariff-driven economic anxiety, its inverse correlation with the U.S. dollar has since become a tailwind. The Dollar Index (DXY) hit a multi-year low in late 2024, bolstering Bitcoin’s appeal as a hedge against fiat devaluation [3].

Meanwhile, investor flows between Bitcoin and gold have diverged sharply. Gold, traditionally a store of value, has struggled to compete with Bitcoin’s speculative allure. Data from 2015 to 2025 shows Bitcoin’s market cap expanding from ~$1 billion to over $1 trillion, while gold’s growth has remained stagnant [6]. This shift reflects a broader reallocation of capital toward assets perceived to outperform in inflationary environments, even as leveraged derivatives markets amplify systemic risks.

Leveraged Market Fragility: Derivatives and the Amplification of Volatility

The Bitcoin derivatives market has reached unprecedented levels of activity. By Q3 2025, open interest (OI) in BTC derivatives exceeded $73.59 billion, with institutional participation driving concentrated positions on exchanges like CME and Binance [7]. While leverage ratios have not shown sustained spikes, the sheer volume of speculative bets creates fragility. A single macroeconomic shock—such as a tariff-related market selloff—could trigger cascading liquidations, exacerbating price swings.

This fragility is compounded by the lack of regulatory clarity. Unlike traditional markets, crypto derivatives operate in a gray zone, where leverage limits and margin requirements vary widely across platforms. As of June 2025, leveraged longs accounted for 60% of total OI, with short positions struggling to gain traction amid bullish sentiment [8]. Such imbalances heighten the risk of a “gamma squeeze” if prices move sharply against leveraged positions.

Strategic Implications: Cautious Positioning in a High-Stakes Environment

For investors, the convergence of these factors suggests a need for cautious positioning. While Bitcoin’s September 2025 rally hints at strong institutional confidence, the interplay of tariffs, dollar weakness, and leveraged markets creates a volatile cocktail. Key considerations include:
1. Hedging Against Derivatives Risk: Diversifying exposure across spot and derivatives markets to mitigate liquidation risks.
2. Monitoring Macro Triggers: Closely tracking U.S. tariff announcements and Federal Reserve policy shifts, which could disrupt both Bitcoin and gold.
3. Leveraging Divergent Flows: Allocating capital to Bitcoin for growth while maintaining a smaller gold position to hedge against systemic shocks.

Conclusion

September 2025 has emerged as a critical juncture for Bitcoin, where historical volatility collides with macroeconomic tailwinds and leveraged fragility. While the cryptocurrency’s surge defies traditional seasonal patterns, the unresolved U.S. tariff war and derivatives-driven speculation create a high-risk environment. Investors must balance optimism with prudence, recognizing that Bitcoin’s role as a macro hedge—and its susceptibility to systemic shocks—is far from settled.

Source:
[1] Bitcoin surges 11% in best September in a decade [https://www.etoro.com/news-and-analysis/crypto/bitcoin-surges-11-in-best-september-in-a-decade-is-85k-next/] [2] Bitcoin price history Aug 27, 2025 [https://www.statista.com/statistics/326707/bitcoin-price-index/] [3] Bitcoin’s price history: From its 2009 launch to its 2025 [https://www.aol.com/finance/bitcoin-price-history-2009-2024-191156264.html] [4] XAUUSD vs. Bitcoin – A Decade of Data (2015-2025) [https://www.tradingcup.com/learn/xauusd-vs-bitcoin-decade-of-data-should-you-copy-trade] [5] The Trade Deficit Delusion: Why Tariffs Will Not Make … [https://www.intereconomics.eu/contents/year/2025/number/4/article/the-trade-deficit-delusion-why-tariffs-will-not-make-america-great-again.html] [6] Bitcoin Value Graph 2015-2024 [https://www.statmuse.com/money/ask?q=bitcoin+value+graph+2015-2024] [7] The New Gold standard? Bitcoin’s macro hedge role amid… [https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/new-gold-standard-bitcoins-macro-hedge-role-amid-us-debt-anndy-lian-uv9cc] [8] CoinGlass Crypto Derivatives Outlook-2025 Semi annual [https://www.coinglass.com/learn/semi-annual-outlook-en]

 

Source: https://www.ainvest.com/news/september-critical-risk-threshold-bitcoin-2509/

 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Jackson Hole looms: Can Powell save markets from a global risk meltdown?

Jackson Hole looms: Can Powell save markets from a global risk meltdown?

The global financial landscape presented a picture of cautious stability, with investors navigating a mix of easing geopolitical tensions and lingering uncertainties ahead of the Federal Reserve’s Jackson Hole symposium later in the week. Risk sentiment held steady, buoyed by slight improvements in US fiscal outlooks and a softening of immediate concerns over international conflicts, particularly in Ukraine.

President Donald Trump’s recent affirmations of support for Ukraine, coupled with optimistic remarks about a potential summit between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, contributed to a modest dip in Brent crude oil prices, which fell 1.2 per cent amid growing hopes for a ceasefire.

This development rippled through energy markets, underscoring how diplomatic signals can swiftly influence commodity valuations in an interconnected world. The broader narrative remained fixated on the Fed’s upcoming gathering, where Chair Jerome Powell’s speech could provide critical clues about interest rate trajectories amid a slowing but resilient US economy.

In the US equity markets, the session unfolded with a tech-led retreat that highlighted vulnerabilities in an index heavily reliant on a handful of megacap names. The S&P 500 closed down 0.59 per cent at around 6414 points, erasing some of the gains from the previous week’s rebound and snapping a brief streak of optimism.

The Nasdaq Composite bore the brunt of the selling pressure, tumbling 1.46 per cent as investors rotated out of high-growth technology stocks amid fresh doubts about the sustainability of the artificial intelligence boom. Nvidia, a bellwether for the sector, plunged 3.5 per cent, dragging down peers and exposing the market’s narrow breadth despite over 350 S&P constituents posting gains; the index’s fate hinged on a few giants.

In contrast, the Dow Jones Industrial Average eked out a marginal 0.02 per cent increase, supported by resilient performances in non-tech sectors like retail, where Home Depot’s earnings provided a lift. This divergence illustrated a market grappling with rotation themes, as value-oriented and cyclical stocks attempted to reclaim ground from the growth darlings that have dominated 2025’s narrative.

Bond markets offered a counterpoint of calm, with US Treasury yields dipping as traders sought safety. The two-year note yield declined two basis points to 3.75 per cent. In comparison, the benchmark 10-year yield fell 3 basis points to 4.30 per cent, reflecting tempered expectations for aggressive Fed tightening in light of recent data showing inflation pressures easing but not vanishing entirely.

Currency and commodity dynamics further painted a picture of measured adjustment rather than outright panic. The US Dollar Index edged up 0.1 per cent, steadying against a basket of peers as investors weighed the implications of a potentially hawkish Fed stance against global growth concerns.

Gold, often a haven in turbulent times, slipped 0.4 per cent, suggesting that immediate fears of escalation were subdued. Brent crude’s decline, driven by those ceasefire prospects, marked a shift from the volatility seen earlier in the year when energy prices spiked on supply disruption fears.

Trump’s reiteration of US backing for Ukraine, while expressing hope for dialogue, added a layer of geopolitical nuance that markets interpreted as de-escalatory, at least for now. These movements came against a backdrop of broader economic indicators, including a mixed bag from China’s data; retail sales slowed to 3.7 per cent in July, while property investment sank 12 per cent. Exports held firm despite US tariff pressures.

Across the Pacific, Asian equities mirrored the global caution, mainly closing lower in a session characterised by narrow ranges and selective buying. Taiwan’s Taiex fell 0.53 per cent, and South Korea’s Kospi dropped 0.81 per cent, reflecting tech sector weakness that echoed the Nasdaq’s woes, given the region’s heavy exposure to semiconductor supply chains. However, India bucked the trend, with the Sensex rising 0.46 per cent on continued momentum from weekend announcements of indirect tax cuts aimed at boosting consumer spending.

These measures, including income tax rebates totalling 1 trillion rupees, have invigorated urban households and supported sectors like retail lending and consumer discretionary goods. Early trading in Asia pointed to further softness, with US equity futures implying a lower open stateside, perpetuating the risk-off tone.

This regional performance aligns with a year where Asian markets have shown resilience amid trade tensions, with valuations remaining attractive compared to developed peers. Asia ex-Japan trades at a discount, offering entry points for long-term investors amid stable inflation and proactive fiscal policies.

The cryptocurrency space, however, stole headlines with Bitcoin’s sharp descent below US$113,000, the first such breach in over two weeks, triggering US$113 million in leveraged long position liquidations and sparking debates about the end of the bull run. From its all-time high of US$124,176 just days prior, BTC’s nine per cent plunge reflected a confluence of factors: profit-taking after a euphoric surge, mounting macroeconomic uncertainties, and a broader risk-off sentiment amplified by Trump’s trade policies and Fed ambiguity.

On-chain data revealed short-term holders selling at losses for the first time since January, with net exchange outflows of 3.4K BTC daily signaling potential capitulation. Analysts like those at The Block noted repositioning ahead of Powell’s Jackson Hole address, while Forbes warned of deeper corrections if support at US$110,530 fails.

Social media buzzed with mixed reactions—some X users viewed it as a healthy reset, others feared a 70 per cent drop to US$23K-US$43K based on bearish RSI divergences. Whales appeared to buy the dip, and ETF inflows of US$17 billion in BTC and ETH over the past 60 days suggested institutional interest persists, potentially cushioning further downside.

Compounding Bitcoin’s woes was news of a US Securities and Exchange Commission probe into Alt5 Sigma, a firm entangled in a US$1.5 billion partnership with Trump-backed World Liberty Financial. The investigation centers on allegations of fraud, stock manipulation, and earnings inflation involving Alt5’s president, Jon Isaac, who claims that surfaced amid insider share sales during price surges.

World Liberty, positioning itself as a DeFi and stablecoin platform with Trump as “co-founder emeritus,” raised US$550 million via token sales, and the former president disclosed US$57.4 million in earnings from his stake. Eric Trump is set to join Alt5’s board, deepening the family’s ties. Alt5 clarified that Isaac is not its president and denied knowledge of any SEC inquiry, but the reports triggered a sharp drop in its stock. This scandal rippled through crypto sentiment, exacerbating the Nasdaq’s 1.5 per cent fall and linking political intrigue to market volatility.

Adding fuel to the tech correction was a sobering MIT NANDA report, revealing that 95 per cent of companies fail to achieve rapid revenue growth from AI pilots, based on 150 corporate interviews and 300 deployments. The study highlighted a “GenAI Divide,” with most efforts stalling due to integration challenges, hesitancy in solo implementations, and over half of 2025 AI budgets funneled into sales and marketing without proportional returns. This revelation triggered sell-offs in AI-linked stocks, amplifying doubts about the hype cycle and contributing to the Nasdaq’s woes.

From my vantage, who has chronicled market cycles for years, this day’s events underscore a pivotal inflection point. The Bitcoin plunge and SEC scrutiny on Trump-linked crypto ventures highlight the perils of intertwining politics with speculative assets. World Liberty’s rapid fundraising and high-profile ties risk amplifying regulatory backlash, potentially eroding trust in an industry still recovering from past scandals. While Trump’s involvement has injected visibility, it also invites scrutiny that could deter mainstream adoption.

On AI, the MIT findings validate growing skepticism about an overhyped revolution; with 95 per cent failure rates, we’re witnessing echoes of past tech bubbles, where promise outpaces delivery. I remain cautiously optimistic: markets have absorbed tariff shocks before, and Asia’s undervalued equities, bolstered by domestic stimulus like India’s tax cuts, offer diversification amid US concentration risks.

The Jackson Hole meeting could catalyse a rebound if Powell signals dovish intent, but investors must brace for volatility. Focusing on fundamentals over frenzy will separate winners from the washout. In a world where geopolitical whispers move billions, resilience lies in balanced portfolios that weather these storms, not chase fleeting highs.

 

Source: https://e27.co/jackson-hole-looms-can-powell-save-markets-from-a-global-risk-meltdown-20250820/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

The crypto catalyst: How inflation, rates, and risk sentiment shape Bitcoin’s path

The crypto catalyst: How inflation, rates, and risk sentiment shape Bitcoin’s path

Bitcoin, the world’s pioneering and largest cryptocurrency, has been riding a wave of momentum in recent days, hovering tantalisingly close to its all-time high of just under US$112,000, a peak it reached on May 22. As of Wednesday morning, Bitcoin’s price surged to US$110,400 before retreating slightly to US$108,800, mirroring a broader pullback in US stock markets.

This performance comes against a complex backdrop of cooling US inflation data, escalating trade tensions, and shifting global risk sentiment. With the cryptocurrency staging a decisive breakout above a technical flag pattern earlier this week, investors are eyeing potential new highs, even as macroeconomic uncertainties loom large. Let’s take a look.

A technical breakout signals bullish momentum

From a technical analysis standpoint, Bitcoin’s recent price action paints an encouraging picture for bulls. Earlier this week, the cryptocurrency broke out above a flag pattern—a chart formation that typically emerges after a sharp price move, signalling a period of consolidation before the trend resumes.

In this case, the breakout suggests that Bitcoin is poised for another leg higher, building on its rally over the past week. Key resistance levels to watch are US$112,000—the previous record high—and US$137,000, which could serve as the next major target if upward momentum persists.

On the flip side, support levels at US$107,000 and US$100,000 provide critical floors. Should Bitcoin slip below US$107,000, it could trigger a deeper correction, potentially testing the US$100,000 mark. For now, the breakout above the flag pattern reinforces a bullish narrative, but these key levels will determine whether Bitcoin can sustain its climb or face a near-term setback.

Technical analysis alone doesn’t tell the whole story, but it provides a roadmap for interpreting price movements. The flag pattern’s bullish implication is bolstered by Bitcoin’s 16 per cent gain since the start of the year, a performance that has outpaced major US stock indices, such as the S&P 500 and Nasdaq, which ended Wednesday down 0.27 per cent and 0.50 per cent, respectively.

This divergence highlights Bitcoin’s growing appeal as an alternative asset, even as traditional markets grapple with renewed trade tensions sparked by President Donald Trump’s pledge to set unilateral tariff rates within two weeks.

Fundamental drivers: From political support to institutional adoption

Beyond the charts, a confluence of fundamental factors is underpinning Bitcoin’s resilience. One of the most striking developments is the cryptocurrency’s newfound legitimacy, driven in part by political support. President Trump, who was once a skeptic of digital currencies, has recently expressed enthusiasm for cryptocurrencies, alongside several allies in Congress.

This shift could pave the way for more favorable regulatory frameworks, a stark contrast to the early days when Bitcoin was dismissed as a speculative oddity. While Trump’s tariff threats have rattled global markets, his pro-crypto stance offers a counterbalancing positive for Bitcoin, potentially boosting its long-term adoption.

Institutional interest is another powerful tailwind. Publicly traded companies like Strategy (MSTR) have been aggressively accumulating Bitcoin, using proceeds from equity sales to bolster their corporate treasuries with the digital asset.

This trend reflects a growing perception of Bitcoin as a store of value and a hedge against inflation, particularly in an environment where traditional safe havens like US Treasuries are seeing yields slip—the 10-year yield fell 6 basis points to 4.12 per cent on Wednesday following cooler-than-expected inflation data.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have seen their total assets balloon to US$132 billion this month, up from US$91 billion in early April. This surge highlights the growing demand from institutional investors, who now have regulated avenues to gain exposure to Bitcoin without directly holding the asset.

Perhaps most telling is the steady decline in Bitcoin held on centralised exchanges. Since the beginning of 2025, exchange balances have dropped 14 per cent, reaching 2.5 million BTC—a level last seen in August 2022. This trend signals growing investor confidence and a shift toward long-term holding.

When investors move Bitcoin into cold storage or custodial wallets, it reduces the liquid supply available for trading, limiting short-term sell pressure. Large entities, including institutional players and so-called “whales,” often withdraw coins after buying, suggesting accumulation is underway. With fewer coins readily available to flood the market, this dynamic could amplify upward pressure on Bitcoin’s price, especially if demand continues to climb.

Macro context: Inflation, rates, and risk sentiment

Bitcoin’s recent surge hasn’t occurred in a vacuum—it’s been fuelled by encouraging macroeconomic signals. On Wednesday, US CPI and Core CPI data revealed a modest 0.1 per cent increase in May, weaker than economists had forecast. This softer-than-expected inflation print suggests that companies are absorbing higher tariff costs rather than passing them on to consumers, easing inflationary pressures.

For investors, this is a green light: cooler inflation strengthens the case for the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates as early as September. Lower rates typically diminish the appeal of yield-bearing assets, such as bonds, driving capital toward riskier investments, including equities and cryptocurrencies. Gold, a traditional inflation hedge, edged up 0.1 per cent to US$3,324.72 per ounce on the news, while Bitcoin’s rally reflects a similar flight to alternative stores of value.

Yet, the macroeconomic picture isn’t uniformly rosy. Global risk sentiment took a hit as Trump’s tariff threats dialed up trade tensions, sending US stocks lower and dragging the US Dollar Index down 0.47 per cent to 98.63. Asian equity markets were mixed on Thursday morning, and US equity futures pointed to a lower open, signalling persistent unease.

In commodities, Brent crude jumped 4.3 per cent to US$69.77 per barrel amid escalating US-Iran tensions, highlighting geopolitical risks that could ripple across asset classes. Bitcoin, often touted as “digital gold,” may benefit from this uncertainty, but its correlation with risk assets, such as stocks, suggests it’s not immune to broader market sell-offs.

Risks and opportunities: A balanced perspective

The outlook for Bitcoin remains overwhelmingly bullish, but it’s not without caveats. On the positive side, the technical breakout, institutional adoption, and declining exchange balances form a robust foundation for further gains.

The prospect of Fed rate cuts, bolstered by Wednesday’s inflation data, adds fuel to the fire, as does the growing political and corporate embrace of cryptocurrencies. If Bitcoin can clear the US$112,000 hurdle, US$137,000 becomes a plausible target, potentially marking a new chapter in its ascent.

However, risks loom on the horizon. Regulatory uncertainty remains a wildcard—while political support is growing, the specifics of future legislation are unclear, and adverse rules could dampen enthusiasm. Bitcoin’s high volatility is another concern; sharp price swings are par for the course, and a sudden shift in risk sentiment could trigger a pullback.

The broader economic context adds complexity: Trump’s tariff plans could disrupt global trade, and a resulting downturn might drag risk assets, including Bitcoin, lower. Finally, despite its gains, Bitcoin’s long-term value proposition is still debated. Critics argue it lacks intrinsic value, while proponents see it as a hedge against fiat currency debasement. This tension keeps the asset class polarising.

My point of view: Optimism tempered by caution

Tracking Bitcoin’s evolution, I’m struck by how far it’s come—from a fringe experiment to a mainstream contender. Its recent performance reflects a maturing asset class, buoyed by institutional credibility and macroeconomic tailwinds.

I’m optimistic about its near-term prospects; the technical breakout and fundamental drivers suggest more upside, especially if the Fed pivots to rate cuts. The declining exchange balances, in particular, strike me as a powerful signal of conviction—investors aren’t just speculating, they’re committing for the long haul.

That said, I can’t ignore the risks. Bitcoin’s volatility is a double-edged sword, and its sensitivity to global risk sentiment means it could falter if trade tensions escalate or economic clouds gather. For all its progress, it’s still a young asset, and its fate hinges on factors beyond its control—regulation, geopolitics, and market psychology among them.

My view is one of cautious optimism: Bitcoin has the wind at its back, but investors should tread carefully, balancing its potential rewards against its inherent uncertainties.

 

Source: https://e27.co/the-crypto-catalyst-how-inflation-rates-and-risk-sentiment-shape-bitcoin-path-20250612/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j