From Meme to Meaning: How Trust Replaced Hype in the $60 Billion Token Market

From Meme to Meaning: How Trust Replaced Hype in the $60 Billion Token Market

The memecoin market, once the playground of viral trends and overnight riches, is entering a new phase. In 2024, it ballooned into a $60 billion ecosystem, according to BDC Consulting—a 169% surge driven by coins like Dogecoin, valued at $35.91 billion, Shiba Inu at $8.97 billion, and PEPE at $6.12 billion. But this explosion has brought saturation. Thousands of tokens now flood platforms like Ethereum and Solana, fragmenting liquidity and thinning investor focus.

From what I’ve observed on Raydium’s liquidity pools, coins often hold only 20–40% of their market cap in liquidity. That leaves little margin for volatile assets. Gone are the days of 7,000% rallies like Pepe’s 17-day sprint in late 2024. Today, most investors are chasing 1.5x returns with significantly higher risk.

The Shift Toward Trust

This crowded market has sharpened investor expectations. No longer will a meme and a mascot suffice. The winning tokens now build trust—through transparency, accountability, and community engagement.

CAPTAINBNB is one such example. Its 100% circulating supply and renounced contracts signalled integrity, helping it build a loyal base. This kind of trust—backed by open AMAs, clear roadmaps, and genuine developer commitment—often sustains projects through downturns. In contrast, countless memecoins launched with fanfare in 2023–24 are now abandoned, unable to survive a single market dip.

The Decline of Influencer Power

Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) once ruled the memecoin narrative. A tweet from a prominent name could spike a market cap to $10 million overnight. But by 2025, skepticism has caught up. From my experience speaking at Cointelegraph panels and watching the market closely, over 60% of KOL-backed coins pump briefly before collapsing. Most fail to sustain a $1 million market cap, let alone deliver returns.

Communities are growing wary. Past failures of influencers are haunting new launches. On platforms like X, followers openly question the motives of “clown” promoters. Even those with a million followers struggle to raise momentum if their track record is marred by rugs or failed projects.

In short, the influencer model is no longer a guarantee. In many cases, it’s a liability

Utility and Community: The New Edge

Where hype is fading, utility and grassroots support are taking its place. Shiba Inu’s transformation offers a blueprint—evolving into a broader ecosystem with ShibaSwap and Shibarium, giving holders reasons to stay beyond the meme.

PEPE has also built around partnerships and community-led initiatives. These projects prove that even memecoins can benefit from real use cases in DeFi, gaming, or DAOs. Investors are noticing. Communities that offer governance, creator monetization, or Web3 tooling are starting to attract more serious participants.

Some projects are pivoting to super app models that empower user decisions and foster participation. This bottom-up governance reflects a maturing memecoin scene, where communities are not just holders but stakeholders.

Bots and Market Integrity

Another challenge in 2025 is the rise of trading bots—particularly sniper bots—on decentralized exchanges. These tools manipulate launches, grabbing tokens before retail traders can react, inflating prices artificially before dumping them.

I’ve seen launches where bots scoop up early supply, cause brief spikes, and leave latecomers holding the bag. In response, projects are now deploying anti-bot tools and locking liquidity to protect early investors. While not foolproof, these developments show that the space is adapting, prioritizing fairness and sustainability.

Regulatory Changes on the Horizon

The regulatory backdrop is shifting too. With the U.S. Bitcoin Act and banks now allowed to custody crypto, a more structured environment is emerging. This could bring KYC and AML obligations to memecoins—difficult for anonymous teams, but appealing for institutional entry.

While some tokens may not survive this scrutiny, others could flourish. The prospect of memecoin ETFs or regulated products isn’t far-fetched. But to succeed, projects will need more than clever marketing—they’ll need transparency, compliance, and vision.

The Trust Era Begins

In 2025, memecoins are at a crossroads. The frenzy of 10x gains is waning. Saturation has forced investors and developers to recalibrate. What remains is a landscape where trust, not trend, determines success.

KOLs can no longer drive sustained growth. Trading bots pose structural threats. Regulation is tightening. And in this complex terrain, the only lasting edge is a community built on truth, purpose, and utility.

To developers: build with transparency, plan for the long haul, and invite your community in. To investors: do your due diligence, question hype, and look for teams that show up every day.

Ask yourself: What’s your trust metric in a memecoin? Is it contract renouncement, team visibility, roadmap clarity, or community voice? Whatever it is, let that guide your decisions. The market no longer rewards shortcuts—but it still honors conviction.

 

Source: https://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/from-meme-to-meaning-how-trust-replaced-hype-in-the-60-billion-token-market/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

The Hard Truth About Launching a Token: Why Most Fail and How to Succeed

The Hard Truth About Launching a Token: Why Most Fail and How to Succeed

The cryptocurrency space has become a playground for innovation, speculation, and ambition. For many, the idea of launching a token feels like the ultimate entrepreneurial pursuit—a chance to disrupt industries, build a loyal community, and achieve financial independence. But while the dream is enticing, the reality is far more brutal. Most tokens fail. And they don’t just fail quietly; they collapse in spectacular fashion, leaving behind a trail of disappointed investors, wasted resources, and shattered reputations.

Having spent years immersed in the crypto ecosystem, I’ve seen this cycle repeat itself more times than I can count. I’ve invested in countless projects, from angel rounds to presales, Series A, and beyond. I’ve watched some of these projects soar to unimaginable heights, while others crumbled under the weight of poor planning, unrealistic expectations, and a lack of strategic foresight. The difference between success and failure is rarely luck. It’s almost always about preparation, execution, and strategy. Yet, time and again, I see founders making the same mistakes: underestimating costs, overpromising utility, and neglecting the fundamentals of community building.

If you’re a developer or entrepreneur considering launching a token, let me be clear: this is not a game for the unprepared. The crypto market is unforgiving, and the margin for error is razor-thin. But with the right approach, it’s possible to navigate the chaos and emerge on the other side with a successful project. Let’s explore the hard truths of token launches and the steps you need to take to avoid becoming another cautionary tale.

One of the most pervasive myths among new token founders is that listing a token on a centralized exchange (CEX) is a straightforward and inexpensive process. This couldn’t be further from the truth. In reality, securing a CEX listing is one of the most challenging and costly aspects of launching a token. And if you’re not prepared to shoulder these costs, your project is doomed before it even begins. Most reputable CEXs charge between $200,000 and $500,000 in fees. Some exchanges may offer alternative payment structures, such as accepting 5-20% of your token supply, but this is still a significant cost. Beyond the listing fee, you’ll also need to budget for audits, token integration, and security deposits. These are non-negotiable if you want your token to be taken seriously. And then there’s marketing. Once your token is listed, you’ll need to promote it aggressively. This includes everything from social media campaigns to influencer partnerships, which can easily cost tens of thousands of dollars.

Perhaps the most overlooked expense is liquidity. Without sufficient liquidity, your token will struggle to gain traction, and its price will be highly volatile—both of which are red flags for potential investors. This is where market makers (MMs) come in. MMs are essential for maintaining a healthy order book and ensuring that your token is tradable. They typically operate on one of two business models: a loan plus call option (where they borrow tokens and receive a call option on them) or a monthly retainer fee. Either way, you’re looking at another significant expense. The bottom line is simple: if you don’t have a substantial budget—think seven figures—you’re not ready to launch a token. Start applying to multiple exchanges early, and use competing offers as leverage to negotiate better terms. But remember, without proper funding, your token is dead on arrival.

In the crypto world, your documents are your first impression. They’re the lens through which exchanges, investors, and potential users will evaluate your project. If your documents are sloppy, incomplete, or riddled with errors, you’ll be dismissed as an amateur. And in a market as competitive as crypto, there’s no room for amateurs. Your whitepaper is the cornerstone of your project. It should articulate your vision, outline your roadmap, and explain your protocol in detail. A good whitepaper doesn’t just inform—it inspires. Investors want to know how your token will be used, how it will be distributed, and whether it has long-term value. Your tokenomics document should answer these questions with precision and clarity. Security is paramount in crypto, so a comprehensive audit from a reputable firm is essential for building trust. Compliance is no longer optional, and you’ll need to prove that your token and entity are legally sound, especially if you’re targeting regulated markets. Finally, your pitch deck is your opportunity to sell your project. Highlight your traction, cap table, and last valuation. Make it compelling. Exchanges are inundated with token applications. A flawless application is the bare minimum if you want to stand out. Don’t cut corners here—invest in professional help if necessary.

If there’s one universal truth in crypto, it’s this: tokens without communities are destined to fail. Your community is your lifeline. It’s what drives adoption, creates buzz, and sustains your token in the long run. But building a community isn’t as simple as creating a Telegram group and hoping for the best. It requires strategy, effort, and resources. Start by establishing a strong presence on the platforms that matter most in crypto: X (formerly Twitter), Telegram, and Discord. These are where your potential users and investors are. But simply being present isn’t enough. You need to actively engage with your audience, answer their questions, and address their concerns. This is where experienced community managers come in. Hire professionals who know how to keep your groups active and engaged. Gamification is another powerful tool for community building. Airdrops, rewards, and early access programs can incentivize participation and create a sense of loyalty among your users. But be careful—poorly executed gamification can backfire, attracting opportunists rather than genuine supporters. Community building isn’t just about numbers. A small, engaged community is far more valuable than a large, inactive one. Focus on quality over quantity.

The crypto space is a cacophony of voices, each vying for attention. If you’re not strategic about your marketing, you’ll be drowned out by the noise. Visibility builds credibility, and credibility drives adoption. Publishing deep-dive articles on platforms like Delphi Digital and Messari can help establish your credibility and attract serious investors. Partnering with key opinion leaders (KOLs) can amplify your message and introduce your token to their followers. Choose KOLs with engaged audiences and proven track records. Hiring a top marketing agency can also make a huge difference. Look for agencies with experience in the crypto space and a history of successful campaigns. Marketing is an ongoing process. Don’t stop once your token is listed. Keep promoting it to maintain interest and drive adoption.

Sometimes, it’s the small details that make or break a token launch. Listings on aggregators like CoinGecko, CoinMarketCap, and DefiLlama are essential for visibility. Make sure your token is listed on these sites as soon as possible. On-chain analytics tools like Dune dashboards can showcase your token’s metrics, building transparency and trust. Platforms like Token Terminal and DexScreener can help users track your token’s performance. These details may seem minor, but they can have a big impact on your token’s success.

Launching a token isn’t just a technical process—it’s a business decision. It requires a clear plan, a strong community, and enough funding to see it through. If you skip any of these steps, you’re setting yourself up for failure. The crypto space is filled with opportunities, but it’s also filled with risks. Don’t underestimate the challenges of launching a token. Take the time to do it right, and you’ll increase your chances of success. Remember, a token launch is just the beginning. The real work starts after your token is live. Build a strong foundation, and you’ll be better prepared to navigate the challenges ahead. In the end, the success of your token will depend on your ability to execute your vision, adapt to challenges, and build a loyal community. It’s not easy, but with the right strategy, it’s possible. Don’t be the founder who skips the basics. Be the founder who sets a new standard for success.

 

Source: https://www.securities.io/the-hard-truth-about-launching-a-token-why-most-fail-and-how-to-succeed/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

What Singapore should do for Token Regulation: My Suggestions for Proposed DTSPs Framework

What Singapore should do for Token Regulation: My Suggestions for Proposed DTSPs Framework
  • In the first half of 2024, Singapore’s cryptocurrency and blockchain sectors grew by 22%, reaching over US$200 million.
  • The MAS proposed a risk-based regulatory approach to enhance anti-money laundering and counter-financing of terrorism.

Singapore has consistently positioned itself as a forward-thinking jurisdiction, balancing innovation with robust regulatory oversight. As a fellow Singaporean, I am very proud of its future planning.

The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) is seeking submissions for the Consultation Paper on the proposed regulatory approach for Digital Token Service Providers (DTSPs) under the Financial Services and Markets Act 2022.

Instead of replying to the submission directly, I will try to share my point of view openly here, offering insights, potential plans, and timelines for implementation. Before I start, I am sharing this in my personal capacity: I do not represent any self-claimed digital assets expert groups, associations, or schools.

License Application and Fee Structures

In the first half of 2024, Singapore’s fintech market saw its cryptocurrency and blockchain sectors achieve US$211.90 million across 72 deals, marking a 22% increase from US$166.30 million over 38 deals in the second half of 2023.

Singapore has been actively working on strengthening risk management frameworks for digital asset tokenization and has recently launched an initiative to expand asset tokenization within financial services.

The proposed license application processes and fee structures are crucial elements that will shape the DTSP landscape in Singapore. From my perspective, MAS should consider implementing a tiered approach to both timelines and fees, reflecting the diversity of DTSPs in terms of size, complexity, and risk profile.

For timelines, I propose a three-tier system:

Fast-track (60 days): For small, low-risk DTSPs with straightforward business models.

Standard (90 days): For medium-sized DTSPs or those with moderately complex operations.

Extended (120+ days): For large, complex DTSPs or those proposing novel business models.

This tiered approach would allow MAS to allocate resources efficiently while ensuring thorough vetting of more complex applications. The fee structures can follow a similar tiered system based on the DTSP’s annual revenue or transaction volume could be implemented.

Minimum Financial Requirements

The proposed minimum financial requirements are a critical safeguard against potential market disruptions and consumer losses. Based on my analysis, I believe a risk-based approach to setting these requirements is more feasible. This could involve:

Base Capital Requirement: A minimum base capital for all DTSPs, regardless of size or services offered.

Risk-Weighted Capital Requirement: Additional capital requirements based on the DTSP’s types of services offered, transaction volumes, and risk profile.

Liquidity Requirement: A minimum liquidity ratio to ensure DTSPs can meet short-term obligations.

Specifically, providers with capital ratios above 15% were 30% less likely to face operational disruptions during periods of extreme market stress. I propose that MAS consider setting the base capital requirement at SGD 250,000, with additional risk-weighted requirements that could increase this amount up to SGD 5 million for the largest and most complex DTSPs.

Audit Requirements

The proposed duties of CEOs, directors, and partners, along with audit requirements, are fundamental to ensuring good governance and accountability in the DTSP sector. The following enhancement is recommended for consideration:

Mandatory Training: Annual training programs for CEOs and directors on regulatory compliance, risk management, and emerging trends in digital assets.

Risk Committee: DTSPs above a certain size must establish a dedicated risk committee at the board level.

Independent Directors: Mandating a minimum number of independent directors based on the DTSP’s size and complexity.

Audit Frequency: Annual external audits for all DTSPs, with additional quarterly internal audits for larger providers.

Regulators are increasingly leveraging technological solutions to enhance their supervisory functions and manage vast amounts of data. Consequently, firms must engage more frequently with regulators regarding fintech and regtech developments.

Fintech companies that implement robust governance structures and conduct regular audits are indeed less likely to experience compliance breaches.

AML/CFT Measures

The measures proposed in parts 5–8 of the consultation paper, particularly those related to Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Countering the Financing of Terrorism (CFT), are crucial for maintaining the integrity of Singapore’s financial system. I propose the following enhancements:

Risk-Based Approach: Implement a tiered KYC/AML approach based on transaction volumes and risk profiles.

Technology Integration: Encourage the use of AI and machine learning for transaction monitoring and suspicious activity detection.

Regulatory Technology (RegTech) Sandbox: Establish a sandbox environment for DTSPs to test innovative compliance solutions.

For existing customers onboarded prior to licensing, I suggest a phased approach:

Phase 1 (0–6 months): Risk assessment of existing customer base

Phase 2 (6–12 months): Enhanced due diligence for high-risk customers

Phase 3 (12–18 months): Full compliance with new requirements for all customers

Correspondent Account Services

The proposed requirements for Correspondent Account Services and information sharing for law enforcement purposes are essential components of a comprehensive regulatory framework. Perhaps the following would help:

Standardized Data Format: Develop a standardized data format for information sharing across the industry.

Blockchain Analytics: Encourage the use of blockchain analytics tools to enhance transaction traceability.

Secure Information Sharing Platform: Establish a secure, centralized platform for information sharing between DTSPs and law enforcement agencies.

Blockchain analytics tools have been instrumental in recovering stolen or illicitly obtained digital assets worldwide. They allow law enforcement agencies to trace and identify suspicious cryptocurrency transactions on the blockchain, leading to asset recovery efforts.

Technology Risk Management

The draft notices FSM-N28 to FSM-N33 cover critical aspects of DTSP operations, including technology risk management, cyber hygiene, and conduct. Based on my observations, I propose the following:

Continuous Monitoring: Implement real-time monitoring systems for cyber threats and operational risks.

Incident Response Drills: Mandate regular incident response drills and simulations.

Third-Party Risk Management: Establish clear guidelines for managing risks associated with third-party service providers.

Consumer Education: Require DTSPs to allocate resources for ongoing consumer education initiatives.

Regarding operating hours, perhaps MAS can consider a flexible approach that allows for 24/7 operations while ensuring adequate risk management and customer support. This could involve:

Core operating hours (e.g., 9 AM to 5 PM SGT) with full support services

Extended hours with automated systems and on-call support

Scheduled maintenance windows during low-volume periods

Timeline for Implementation:

To ensure a smooth transition to the new regulatory framework, I propose the following timeline:

Month 0–3: Publication of final regulations and guidelines

Month 3–6: Industry consultation and feedback period

Month 6–9: Finalization of technical specifications and reporting formats

Month 9–12: DTSP preparation and system upgrades

Month 12–18: Phased implementation of new requirements

Month 18–24: Full compliance deadline for all DTSPs

This timeline allows for a gradual implementation, giving DTSPs sufficient time to adapt their systems and processes while ensuring that the regulatory framework is fully operational within two years.

With careful implementation and continuous refinement, this regulatory framework has the potential to cement Singapore’s position as a global leader in digital asset regulation, attracting innovative businesses while safeguarding the interests of consumers and the broader financial system.

 

Source: https://www.financemagnates.com/cryptocurrency/what-singapore-should-do-for-token-regulation-my-suggestions-for-proposed-dtsps-framework/

 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j