Tag Archives: trade

Inflation, trade, and tariffs: A mixed macro picture

Inflation, trade, and tariffs: A mixed macro picture

assets and the anticipation surrounding key macro events, numerous factors are driving market movements across equities, volatility, digital assets, fixed income, currencies, and commodities.

I’ll break down these drivers and catalysts, weaving in specific data and headlines to provide a thorough understanding of the current landscape.

Equities: Trade tensions and regional resilience

The equities market is experiencing a tug-of-war between geopolitical uncertainty and regional strength. Donald Trump’s confirmation of a 50 per cent tariff on copper imports, a figure double the anticipated 25 per cent, has sent ripples through global markets.

This bold move, aimed at protecting domestic industries, is poised to increase costs for US businesses reliant on copper, such as those in construction, electronics, and renewable energy. The tariff’s immediate effect has been to heighten uncertainty, with investors bracing for potential retaliatory actions from trading partners.

Yet, despite this turbulence, equities in the European Union are holding strong. The STOXX Europe 600 Index has climbed over two per cent in the past week, fuelled by robust economic data and optimism about the region’s recovery. Sectors like technology and industrials are leading the charge, suggesting that European markets are, for now, shrugging off the broader trade war concerns.

Meanwhile, UK exporters are reaping the benefits of a weaker pound, which has depreciated by roughly 1.5 per cent against the dollar recently. This currency movement has made British goods more competitive internationally, boosting companies like Rolls-Royce and AstraZeneca, which have reported increased export orders. The FTSE 100 has seen modest gains as a result, though the shadow of escalating trade tensions looms large.

In my view, the resilience of EU and UK equities is impressive, but it’s tempered by the risk that Trump’s tariff policies could spark a broader trade conflict, potentially derailing these gains. Investors should keep a close eye on how these dynamics unfold, as the balance between regional strength and global uncertainty remains delicate.

Volatility: A calm before the storm?

Turning to volatility, the VIX, often dubbed the market’s “fear gauge,” has eased to 16.8, down from recent highs, signalling a period of relative calm. This decline suggests that investors are less worried about immediate market swings, possibly reassured by positive economic signals or the resolution of some geopolitical tensions.

The S&P 500’s expected move of ±0.44 per cent further supports this picture of stability, indicating a tight trading range for the index. Additionally, the flat volatility curve, where short-term and long-term expectations align, hints at a lack of imminent stress. Historically, a VIX below 20 is considered a sign of market confidence, and at 16.8, we’re in that territory.

However, I’m skeptical that this tranquility will last. A flat volatility curve can be a double-edged sword; while it reflects calm now, it’s often a precursor to sharp corrections when underlying risks such as Trump’s trade policies or upcoming macroeconomic events resurface.

My take is that this lull is a breather rather than a new normal. Investors might be lulled into complacency, but the potential for sudden disruptions remains high. Keeping an eye on catalysts like the FOMC minutes or unexpected tariff escalations will be critical in the days ahead.

Digital assets: Stability and divergence

The digital asset space presents a fascinating contrast to traditional markets, striking a balance between stability and selective growth. Bitcoin has held steady around US$109,000, a sign of its maturing role as a store of value amid broader market uncertainty. This resilience is bolstered by continued inflows into Bitcoin ETFs like IBIT, which have drawn institutional interest seeking exposure to cryptocurrencies.

Meanwhile, Ethereum has posted gains, trading at approximately US$2,557, likely driven by developments in decentralised finance (DeFi) and anticipation of network upgrades. However, not all digital assets are thriving equally, ETHA, an Ethereum-based ETF, has dipped, highlighting the nuanced dynamics within this sector.

Beyond the price action, there’s notable activity in the crypto-treasury space. Binance co-founder Changpeng Zhao’s family office, YZi Labs, is backing The BNB Treasury Company, a new firm offering exposure to BNB with plans to list on a major US exchange. With BNB trading at US$662.43, this move highlights the growing convergence of cryptocurrency and traditional finance.

Similarly, Donald Trump Jr.’s investment in Thumzup Media Corp, a social media marketing firm adopting Bitcoin as a treasury asset at US$111,178 per coin, reflects a broader trend of corporate Bitcoin adoption. Thumzup’s stock, trading at US$9.50 per share with Trump Jr. holding 350,000 shares valued at nearly US$3.3 million, illustrates how even non-tech firms are embracing crypto strategies.

Analysts also suggest Bitcoin may face a short-term dip below US$107,000 before its next rally, potentially hitting a Fair Value Gap between US$106,500 and US$106,200. This correction could be a strategic play by “smart money” to grab liquidity before pushing prices to new highs.

Fixed income: Yields on the rise

In the fixed income market, US Treasury yields are climbing ahead of the pivotal 10-year auction, with the benchmark 10-year yield reaching approximately 4.35 per cent. This uptick reflects investor expectations of tighter monetary policy from the Federal Reserve, as well as anticipation of higher interest rates to combat lingering inflation pressures.

Rising yields have broad implications: they make bonds more attractive compared to equities, potentially triggering a shift in investor allocations, and they increase borrowing costs, which could slow economic growth. The upcoming US$39 billion 10-year Notes auction at 1700 GMT will be a litmus test; strong demand could signal confidence in the US economy, while weak demand might raise red flags about yield sustainability.

The rise in yields is a double-edged sword. It reflects a healthy adjustment to economic realities, but it also risks stifling growth if rates rise too quickly. The auction’s outcome will be a key indicator of market sentiment, and I’d wager that investors are bracing for a bumpy ride as they balance yield opportunities against broader uncertainties.

Currencies: Dollar’s modest strength

The US dollar is enjoying modest gains against its G10 peers, buoyed by rising Treasury yields and its safe-haven status amid trade war jitters. It’s particularly strong against the Japanese yen and the euro, where dovish central bank policies have weakened local currencies.

However, these gains are restrained by concerns over the economic fallout from Trump’s tariffs, which could dampen US growth and, in turn, the dollar’s appeal. The pound’s 1.5 per cent drop, as noted earlier, is another piece of this puzzle, driven by export dynamics rather than broad dollar strength.

I see the dollar’s current position as a reflection of short-term flight-to-safety flows rather than a sustained bullish trend. If trade tensions escalate, the dollar could face headwinds, but for now, it’s holding its ground. Currency markets are notoriously sensitive to macro shifts, so the FOMC minutes and auction results could quickly alter this trajectory.

Commodities: Copper in the spotlight

Commodities are feeling the heat of Trump’s trade policies, with HG copper surging to a near 30 per cent premium over London prices following the 50 per cent tariff announcement.

Copper, a critical input for industries like electronics and construction, is now at the centre of supply chain concerns, with US manufacturers warning of price hikes and disruptions. This premium reflects anticipated shortages and higher costs, though global supply chains may eventually adapt to blunt the tariff’s impact.

In my view, copper’s surge is a classic case of policy-driven volatility. While the short-term effects are clear, the long-term picture depends on how producers and consumers adjust. For now, it’s a stark reminder of how quickly commodities can become geopolitical pawns.

Macro events and data: What’s next?

Two major macro events loom large: the US 10-year Notes auction and the release of the FOMC minutes from the June meeting at 1800 GMT. The auction will gauge investor appetite for US debt, while the minutes will offer clues about the Fed’s stance on rates and inflation, critical drivers of market expectations.

Elsewhere, macro data paints a mixed picture. US consumer inflation expectations for June 2025 have dropped to three per cent, a sign of cooling pressures, but commodity price expectations remain elevated for gas (4.2 per cent), medical care (9.3 per cent), college education (9.1 per cent), and rent (9.1 per cent). Taiwan’s trade surplus, meanwhile, jumped to US$12.07 billion, driven by exports of tech products, though exports to Europe declined.

Headlines amplify the noise: Trump’s tariff threats extend beyond copper to pharmaceuticals (up to 200 per cent, delayed 12-18 months) and India (an extra 10 per cent for BRICS ties), with no extensions on country-specific levies due in August. He’s also mulling a new tariff on the EU over tech disputes. These moves keep markets on edge, and I’d argue they’re a wildcard that could overshadow even the Fed’s signals if they materialise.

My take: Navigating the uncertainty

In wrapping up, the current market environment is a complex tapestry of opportunity and risk. Trump’s trade policies are the loudest drumbeat, shaking up commodities and equities while leaving volatility deceptively calm.

Digital assets are carving out a niche of stability, fixed income is adjusting to policy shifts, and currencies are caught in the crosscurrents. The upcoming macro events will either clarify or complicate this picture, but for now, caution seems warranted.

The markets’ resilience strikes me: EU equities, UK exporters, and Bitcoin are holding firm, but I can’t shake the feeling that we’re one tariff tweet away from a sharper correction. Investors would do well to remain nimble, closely monitor the data, and be prepared for surprises in this unpredictable landscape.

 

 

Source: https://e27.co/inflation-trade-and-tariffs-a-mixed-macro-picture-20250710/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

The new gold standard? Bitcoin’s macro hedge role amid US debt and trade turmoil

The new gold standard? Bitcoin’s macro hedge role amid US debt and trade turmoil

The interplay of global macroeconomic dynamics and cryptocurrency market trends presents a complex tapestry of investor sentiment, speculative positioning, and structural shifts in asset valuation frameworks.

At the forefront of this landscape lies Bitcoin (BTC), whose recent price action and derivatives market metrics have sparked intense scrutiny. Simultaneously, Ethereum’s (ETH) unique capacity to generate organic yield through protocol-level mechanisms offers a stark contrast to Bitcoin’s store-of-value narrative.

To dissect these phenomena, we must contextualise Bitcoin’s soaring open interest within broader market psychology while contrasting Ethereum’s yield-generating potential against traditional financial paradigms.

Bitcoin’s derivatives surge: Implications for price dynamics

Bitcoin’s derivatives market has reached unprecedented levels of activity, with total open interest across exchanges hitting US$73.59 billion, a figure that underscores the growing institutionalisation of crypto markets. This metric reflects the total notional value of outstanding futures and options contracts, serving as a barometer for speculative fervour and hedging activity.

The dominance of regulated venues like CME (US$16.71 billion) and Binance (US$12.08 billion) highlights divergent participant profiles: CME’s institutional-heavy structure versus Binance’s retail-driven ecosystem. Such bifurcation amplifies market complexity as macro-hedge funds and algorithmic traders interact with retail sentiment, often leading to asymmetrical price discovery mechanisms.

Historically, surges in open interest have preceded heightened volatility. For instance, Bitcoin’s 2021 bull run saw open interest peak at US$25 billion before a 35 per cent correction, illustrating the liquidation risks inherent in leveraged positions. The current US$73.59 billion figure, however, operates within a transformed regulatory and infrastructural environment.

Institutional-grade custody solutions and improved risk management tools have enhanced market resilience, potentially mitigating cascading liquidations even during sharp corrections. Yet, the concentration of US$28.79 billion in the top two exchanges raises concerns about systemic interconnectivity, particularly given Binance’s recent regulatory challenges and CME’s role as a clearinghouse for macro funds.

The psychological significance of Bitcoin’s US$100,000–US$110,000 range cannot be overstated. Having breached this threshold in May 2025, BTC’s subsequent consolidation reflects a classic accumulation phase, wherein long-term holders absorb volatility while short-term speculators test support levels.

On-chain data revealing 19,400 BTC inflows to institutional wallets corroborates this thesis, suggesting strategic positioning ahead of anticipated catalysts, possibly tied to the US election cycle or ETF approval timelines. Notably, the 0.9 outflow/inflow ratio signals net accumulation, a bullish indicator historically associated with multi-month rallies.

However, the persistent short-side pressure on Binance derivatives, despite BTC’s resilience, introduces a tug-of-war dynamic where capitulation events could trigger explosive moves in either direction.

From a technical perspective, the US$100,000–US$110,000 range may serve as a springboard for a parabolic rally, as suggested by cyclical patterns observed in prior halving cycles. The nine per cent correction to US$98,300 in June 2025 barely grazed the 200-day moving average, preserving the uptrend’s integrity.

Should volume profiles expand alongside institutional inflows, a breakout above US$111,800 could activate algorithmic buy orders, propelling BTC toward US$120,000 by year-end. Conversely, a decisive close below US$95,000 would invalidate this thesis, potentially triggering a retest of US$85,000 support—a scenario deemed low probability by analysts tracking on-chain fundamentals.

Ethereum’s yield paradigm: A structural shift in crypto valuation

While Bitcoin dominates headlines as a macro hedge and digital gold, Ethereum’s evolution into a yield-generating infrastructure asset represents a seismic shift in crypto-economics.

Unlike Bitcoin’s fixed-supply, proof-of-work model, which relies solely on a monetary premium for returns, Ethereum’s post-Merge architecture enables stakers to earn ~three per cent annualised yields through network validation. This organic cash flow mechanism aligns Ethereum with traditional income-producing assets, bridging the gap between decentralised protocols and institutional portfolios.

Staking’s appeal lies in its dual function as both a security mechanism and a revenue stream. By locking ETH to validate transactions, participants secure the network while earning issuance rewards and transaction fees.

Restaking protocols like EigenLayer further amplify yields by allowing staked ETH to secure third-party applications, creating a layered economy of risk and return. This operational model contrasts sharply with Bitcoin’s reliance on financial engineering, such as ETFs or lending products, to generate yield, positioning Ethereum as a hybrid between a utility network and a capital asset.

The implications for institutional adoption are profound. Traditional investors, accustomed to dividend-paying equities or coupon-bearing bonds, often struggle to reconcile Bitcoin’s non-yielding nature with portfolio allocation models. Ethereum’s three per cent base yield, however, provides a familiar entry point, particularly for sovereign wealth funds and pension schemes seeking inflation-hedged returns.

BlackRock’s recent filings for an Ethereum ETF underscore this trajectory, signaling a potential influx of US$50 billion or more in institutional capital should regulatory hurdles ease.Moreover, Ethereum’s yield ecosystem extends beyond passive income. Decentralised finance (DeFi) protocols enable dynamic strategies—such as liquidity provision or leveraged staking—that can boost returns to 8–12 per cent, albeit with elevated risk.

This programmable yield, combined with Layer 2 scaling solutions reducing transaction costs, creates a virtuous cycle of capital inflows and network utility. In contrast, Bitcoin’s yield opportunities remain tethered to centralised intermediaries (e.g., BlockFi’s interest accounts), exposing holders to counterparty risks that Ethereum’s trustless staking avoids.

Intermarket dynamics: Bitcoin, Ethereum, and macro resilience

The divergence between Bitcoin and Ethereum narratives plays out against a backdrop of global uncertainty. With US Treasury yields climbing toward five per cent and trade wars intensifying, risk assets face headwinds that disproportionately impact high-duration investments.

Bitcoin’s correlation with Nasdaq equities, evident in its muted response to tariff-driven volatility, suggests lingering sensitivity to Fed policy. Ethereum’s staking yield, however, may decouple it from traditional tech valuations, as its cash flows provide downside protection during liquidity crunches.

Gold’s retreat to US$3,300/oz amid dollar strength further highlights Bitcoin’s evolving role as a non-sovereign reserve asset. While gold remains a crisis hedge, its lack of yield and logistical constraints in storage and transmission render it inferior to programmable digital alternatives.

Ethereum’s ability to offer both appreciation potential and income generation could accelerate this substitution effect, particularly in emerging markets grappling with currency debasement and capital controls.

Energy markets also influence crypto dynamics. Brent crude’s rebound to US$70/bbl, despite OPEC+ supply increases, underscores the inflationary pressures that have historically buoyed BTC. Ethereum benefits indirectly, as stable energy prices reduce miner capitulation risks—a concern during Bitcoin’s 2022 bear market.

Furthermore, Ethereum’s energy-efficient proof-of-stake model aligns with ESG mandates, granting it a regulatory advantage in jurisdictions that prioritise sustainability.

Strategic outlook: Navigating the dual narrative

For portfolio managers, the Bitcoin-Ethereum dichotomy demands nuanced allocation strategies. Bitcoin’s role as a macro hedge against fiscal profligacy and currency debasement remains intact, particularly with US gross federal debt exceeding 130 per cent of GDP. Institutions seeking pure exposure to global liquidity expansion should prioritise BTC, leveraging derivatives to hedge against short-term volatility while accumulating during dips in the inflow ratio.

Ethereum, meanwhile, appeals to investors seeking alpha through participation in the protocol. The three per cent staking yield acts as a floor for total returns, with DeFi and NFT ecosystems offering asymmetric upside. A 60/40 BTC-ETH portfolio, rebalanced quarterly, could optimise risk-adjusted returns while capturing both monetary and utility premiums. Retail traders, conversely, may exploit Ethereum’s yield volatility through options straddles or basis trades, capitalising on protocol upgrade cycles.

Regulatory developments will loom large in Q3 and Q4 2025. The SEC’s impending rulings on spot Ethereum ETFs, coupled with MiCA compliance deadlines in Europe, could catalyse a US$200 billion inflow into compliant crypto products. Bitcoin’s derivatives market, now a US$73.59 billion ecosystem, may see regulatory convergence as the CFTC intensifies oversight, a double-edged sword that enhances legitimacy while squeezing unregistered exchanges.

In conclusion, the confluence of derivatives-driven speculation in Bitcoin and Ethereum’s yield revolution encapsulates crypto’s transition from fringe assets to mainstream infrastructure. While Bitcoin’s path hinges on macro resilience and institutional flows, Ethereum’s ascent depends on its ability to sustain yield premiums amid rising competition from layer-2 ecosystems.

Both assets, however, share a common destiny: redefining the storage and transfer of value in an era of unprecedented monetary experimentation. Investors who grasp this duality stand to navigate the volatility ahead with clarity, positioning themselves at the intersection of innovation and tradition.

 

Source: https://e27.co/the-new-gold-standard-bitcoins-macro-hedge-role-amid-us-debt-and-trade-turmoil-20250709/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j

Musk, markets, and money: Trade risks meet crypto rewards

Musk, markets, and money: Trade risks meet crypto rewards

The world is watching as the July 9 deadline for trade deals approaches, casting a shadow of uncertainty over global markets. Meanwhile, a mix of economic data, policy decisions, and influential voices, like that of Elon Musk, are shaping a complex narrative.

Let’s explore what’s happening in the market right now, weaving together the threads of trade tensions, market performances, and emerging trends in crypto, all while offering my perspective on what these developments might mean for investors and the global economy.

Global risk sentiment and the trade deadline

The global risk sentiment is palpably tentative as the July 9 deadline for trade negotiations looms. This date marks the end of a 90-day tariff pause, a period during which the United States and its trading partners have been working to finalise agreements.

On July 7, President Donald Trump announced that the first 12 letters would be sent to these partners, signalling that new tariff rates potentially ranging from 10 per cent to 70 per cent could take effect as early as August 1 if no deals are reached. This wide range of possible tariffs introduces significant uncertainty, as the final rates will depend on the outcomes of these negotiations, which remain fluid and unpredictable.

The threat of tariffs could pressure trading partners into concessions, potentially strengthening the US position in global trade. On the other hand, the prospect of higher tariffs risks disrupting supply chains, increasing costs for consumers, and slowing economic growth, particularly for export-dependent economies.

Markets hate uncertainty, and the lack of clarity around these tariffs is keeping investors on edge, contributing to a cautious global mood. As the deadline nears, every statement from the White House and every response from trading partners will be scrutinised for hints of what’s to come.

US markets: A pre-holiday boost

Turning to the US, equity markets were closed on July 4 for Independence Day, but their performance prior to the holiday offers a glimpse into investor sentiment. On July 3, Wall Street ended in the green, with the S&P 500 rising 0.8 per cent , the Nasdaq climbing one per cent, and the Dow Jones Industrial Average also advancing 0.8 per cent.

This uptick was driven by a stronger-than-expected employment report, which likely bolstered confidence in the US economy’s resilience. Robust job growth suggests that consumer spending, a key driver of economic activity, remains robust, providing a buffer against external pressures, such as trade tensions.

However, the holiday closure meant that US investors couldn’t immediately react to subsequent developments, such as Trump’s trade letter announcement or moves in Asian markets. US equity index futures have since pointed to a lower opening, suggesting that these global uncertainties may temper the optimism sparked by the employment data.

In my view, the US market’s pre-holiday strength is a positive signal, but it’s not immune to the broader risk-off tone emerging elsewhere. Investors will likely reassess their positions as trading resumes, weighing domestic economic health against international risks.

Asian markets: A risk-off tone prevails

Closer to home in Asia, the mood is decidedly more cautious. Major equity indices have posted declines, reflecting a risk-off sentiment among investors. South Korea’s KOSPI fell 1.99 per cent, Taiwan’s TWSE dropped 0.73 per cent, Thailand’s SET declined 0.64 per cent, and Hong Kong’s HSI also shed 0.64 per cent.

These markets, heavily tied to global trade, are particularly vulnerable to the spectre of US tariffs. For instance, South Korea and Taiwan rely heavily on exports of electronics and semiconductors. At the same time, Hong Kong serves as a financial hub that is sensitive to shifts in global capital flows.

Commodities: OPEC+ shakes up oil markets

In the commodities space, oil markets are grappling with their own set of dynamics. Over the weekend, OPEC+, the alliance of oil-producing nations, agreed to boost production by 548,000 barrels per day starting next month, a move that exceeded market expectations.

As a result, Brent crude prices dipped 0.6 per cent to settle at US$71 per barrel. This increase in supply comes at a time when demand uncertainties, fuelled by trade tensions, are already in play.

This production hike is a strategic play by OPEC+ to maintain market share, but it’s a gamble. If global growth slows due to tariffs, the additional supply could outstrip demand, pushing oil prices lower and squeezing revenues for producers. Conversely, if trade talks resolve favourably and economic activity picks up, this move could stabilise prices and prevent a supply crunch.

For now, the drop in Brent crude signals bearish sentiment, and it’s a development that bears watching. Lower oil prices could ease inflation pressures but might also signal broader economic weakness.

Cryptocurrency: Bitcoin bounces back

Shifting gears to the cryptocurrency market, Bitcoin has staged a notable recovery, gaining nearly five per cent. The rally is partly attributed to a weakening of selling pressure from Grayscale, a major institutional player whose actions often sway the market. Beyond Bitcoin, optimism is spreading to smaller cryptocurrencies and crypto-related stocks, with Coinbase shares rising nearly three per cent and MicroStrategy jumping nine per cent.

I see this divergence between US and Asian markets as a telling sign of regional fault lines. While the US benefits from a domestic economy that can weather some external shocks, Asia’s export-driven growth model leaves it more exposed to trade disruptions. The sharp declines in these indices suggest that investors are bracing for a worst-case scenario, higher tariffs, and a potential slowdown in global demand. If trade talks falter, the risk-off tone could deepen, with ripple effects across emerging markets.

What’s driving this resurgence? I’d argue it’s a combination of market-specific factors and broader catalysts. The Grayscale reprieve is a technical boost, but the bigger story is the anticipation surrounding “Crypto Week” in the US Congress, set for July 14 to 18.

Lawmakers are poised to debate several pivotal bills, including the Clarity Act, which aims to define rules for crypto trading and investment, and the Stablecoin Bill (also known as the Genius Act), intended to regulate dollar-backed stablecoins. There’s also the Anti-CBDC Surveillance State Act, which seeks to block government digital currencies that could encroach on privacy.

In my opinion, “Crypto Week” could be a game-changer. Clear regulations have long been the missing piece for institutional adoption of crypto. If these bills pass, they could unlock fresh capital inflows, legitimising the asset class in the eyes of traditional finance.

The recent US$5 trillion debt ceiling increase adds fuel to this fire; more liquidity in the system historically lifts risk assets like Bitcoin. I’m cautiously optimistic that these developments could spark a breakout, especially if the sideways price action we’ve seen lately is indeed a prelude to a larger move.

Elon Musk and the America Party

No market analysis would be complete without mentioning Elon Musk, whose influence continues to ripple across financial landscapes. Musk recently declared that his newly formed America Party will fully support Bitcoin, doubling down with a statement on X that “Fiat is hopeless.”

This follows a public feud with Donald Trump and the launch of his political entity, born from a poll where 80 per cent of his followers backed the idea of a centrist party. Musk’s pro-Bitcoin stance isn’t new, but tying it to a political platform amplifies its reach.

I find Musk’s move fascinating and polarising. His sway over markets, as evidenced by Tesla stock surges or Dogecoin’s pump, is undeniable, and a Bitcoin-friendly party could galvanise retail and institutional interest alike. However, the America Party’s broader impact hinges on its ability to gain traction beyond Musk’s fan base.

If it remains a niche player, its influence on crypto might be more symbolic than substantive. Still, in a market hungry for narratives, Musk’s endorsement is a tailwind that could bolster sentiment, especially alongside regulatory tailwinds from Congress.

Stay nimble! The coming weeks could bring clarity or chaos to this intricate market puzzle.

 

Source: https://e27.co/musk-markets-and-money-trade-risks-meet-crypto-rewards-20250707/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

www.anndy.com
j j j