Treasury yields up, Ethereum down: Tariffs hit traditional and crypto

Treasury yields up, Ethereum down: Tariffs hit traditional and crypto

Looking at the evolving narrative around Trump’s tariff policies and their ripple effects across markets, currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. The question at hand offers a rich tapestry of data points—ranging from US economic indicators to equity market movements, Treasury yields, and the intriguing interplay between Trump’s America-First agenda and the crypto sphere.

A blend of optimism for market resilience and a healthy scepticism about the long-term implications of protectionist policies shapes my perspective. Let’s dive into this multifaceted story, unpacking the facts, analysing the trends, and offering a grounded take on what it all means.

The weekend headlines suggesting that Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, slated for April 2, might be more targeted and flexible than feared have undeniably lifted global risk sentiment. This shift in tone is a breath of fresh air for investors who’ve been bracing for a blunt, across-the-board trade war that could throttle growth and stoke inflation. The idea that the administration might tailor these tariffs—perhaps sparing certain sectors or negotiating carve-outs—hints at a pragmatic streak beneath the bombastic rhetoric.

It’s a signal that Trump, now in his second term, may be tempering his approach with an eye on economic stability rather than just political theatre. Markets responded swiftly, with the S&P 500 climbing 1.8 per cent, the Dow Jones gaining 1.4 per cent, and the Nasdaq surging 2.3 per cent, driven by a 3.4 per cent rally in the “Magnificent Seven” megacaps—think Apple, Amazon, and Nvidia. This buoyancy reflects a collective sigh of relief, a belief that the tariff storm might not be as destructive as anticipated.

On the data front, the US March PMIs paint a nuanced picture. The uptick in the Services PMI is a welcome surprise, easing fears of a sharp economic slowdown and suggesting that the consumer-driven backbone of the US economy remains intact. Services, after all, account for over two-thirds of US GDP, so any sign of resilience here is a bulwark against recession chatter.

But the manufacturing PMI slipping back into contraction territory—below the 50 threshold—raises a red flag. The culprit? A tariff-related spike in materials costs. Manufacturers are already feeling the pinch of uncertainty, with supply chains recalibrating and input prices ticking up.

This divergence between services and manufacturing underscores a bifurcated economy: one part humming along, the other creaking under trade policy pressures. It’s a reminder that tariffs, even if targeted, don’t operate in a vacuum—they ripple through production networks, hitting some sectors harder than others.

The bond market’s reaction reinforces this cautious optimism tinged with concern. US Treasuries fell on Monday, pushing yields up across the curve. The 2-year yield rose 8.6 basis points to 4.035 per cent, while the 10-year yield climbed 8.8 basis points to 4.335 per cent. This uptick reflects a dialling back of expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, as investors digest the possibility that tariffs could keep inflation stubbornly above the Fed’s two per cent target.

Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic’s comments amplify this shift: he’s now projecting just one rate cut in 2025, down from two, and doesn’t see inflation hitting two per cent until early 2027. That’s a significant recalibration, signaling that the Fed might stay hawkish longer than hoped, especially if tariff-induced price pressures persist. The Fed’s reticence to push back on this market repricing suggests they’re in wait-and-see mode, letting the data—and Trump’s policy moves—dictate the pace.

The US Dollar Index, up 0.2 per cent to 104.30, its highest since early March, is another piece of the puzzle. A stronger dollar aligns with the narrative of a US economy holding its own amid global uncertainty, bolstered by higher yields and a perception of relative safety. But it’s a double-edged sword—while it boosts purchasing power for American consumers, it squeezes exporters and multinational corporations, potentially denting S&P 500 earnings down the line.

Commodities, meanwhile, tell a split story: gold dipped 0.4 per cent, perhaps as risk-on sentiment reduced its safe-haven appeal, while Brent crude rose 1.2 per cent to US$69.11 per barrel, buoyed by supply-side optimism or perhaps a flicker of demand recovery in Asia.

Speaking of Asia, the MSCI Asia ex-Japan index snapping a three-day losing streak with a 0.46 per cent gain is a subtle but telling sign. India’s SENSEX 30, up 1.40 per cent, has clawed back nearly all its year-to-date losses, showcasing the resilience of an economy less exposed to US trade whims.

Chinese stocks, too, caught a bid—Hang Seng up 0.91 per cent, CSI 300 up 0.51 per cent — possibly reflecting hopes that targeted tariffs might spare Beijing the worst. Yet early trading today showed mixed results across Asian indices, hinting that the relief rally might be fragile, contingent on further clarity from Washington.

Now, let’s pivot to crypto, where Trump’s influence is weaving an unexpected thread. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw a net inflow of US$84.17 million yesterday, marking seven straight days of gains. Fidelity’s FBTC led the pack with US$82.85 million, pushing its historical total to US$11.47 billion, while Bitwise’s BITB added US$19.23 million. Even with Ark Invest’s ARKB shedding $40.97 million, the broader trend is clear: institutional appetite for Bitcoin remains robust.

This resilience stands in contrast to Ethereum, which is grappling with its own challenges. ETH tested resistance at US$2,069 on Monday, buoyed by transaction fees hitting an all-time low—a double-edged sword. Lower fees might attract users, but they also signal waning network activity, a bearish undercurrent for a blockchain whose valuation hinges on usage. Grayscale’s research team nailed it: Ethereum’s price weakness—down 35 per cent in two months—ties directly to this fee slump and a broader crypto downturn sparked by Trump’s tariff threats.

The correlation between crypto and macroeconomics is tightening, and Trump’s policies are a big driver. US spot Ethereum ETFs have bled nearly US$390 million over 13 consecutive days of outflows, per Farside data, while on-chain metrics like transaction counts echo pre-election lows. Validators and token burners, who rely on fees, are feeling the pinch, undermining ETH’s value proposition.

Yet here’s where it gets fascinating: Trump Media and Technology Group (TMTG) is diving headfirst into this space, partnering with Crypto.com to launch “America-First Investment Funds” under the Truth.fi brand. These ETFs and SMAs, backed by a US$250 million TMTG investment and custodied by Charles Schwab, will span cryptocurrencies and “Made in America” securities—think energy and manufacturing. Trademarks like Truth.Fi Bitcoin Plus ETF and Truth.Fi US Energy Independence ETF scream Trump’s playbook: blending nationalism with financial innovation.

This move is a masterstroke of branding and ambition. By tying crypto to an America-First ethos, Trump’s team is betting on a narrative that could galvanise retail and institutional investors alike. It’s a counterpoint to Ethereum’s struggles—Bitcoin, with its ETF inflows, is riding a wave of momentum, while ETH languishes. The tariff flexibility hinted at over the weekend might bolster this venture further; if energy and manufacturing sectors get a pass, those “Made in America” funds could thrive, drawing capital away from more volatile altcoins like Ether.

Let me sum up. The US economy’s resilience, as seen in the Services PMI and equity gains, is real, but manufacturing’s woes and sticky inflation (thanks, tariffs) temper my optimism. The Fed’s hawkish tilt and a stronger dollar could cap upside, especially if global growth falters. In Asia, selective strength—India and China holding firm—suggests diversification might shield some markets, but the jury’s out on sustainability.

Crypto’s split fate—Bitcoin soaring, Ethereum stumbling—mirrors this dichotomy, with Trump’s Truth.fi gambit potentially reshaping the landscape. I’m cautiously bullish on equities and Bitcoin, skeptical of ETH’s near-term prospects, and watchful of how Trump’s tariff chess game unfolds. It’s a high-stakes story, and we’re only in the opening chapter.

 

Source: https://e27.co/treasury-yields-up-ethereum-down-tariffs-hit-traditional-and-crypto-20250325/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

The US Treasury department’s first report on DeFi: Is it fair

The US Treasury department’s first report on DeFi: Is it fair

The U.S. Department of the Treasury published the 2023 DeFi Illicit Finance Risk Assessment, the first illicit finance risk assessment report conducted on decentralized finance (DeFi) in the world. This report highlights the risks associated with the burgeoning decentralized cryptocurrency market, stating that it threatens national security and requires greater oversight and enforcement against money laundering. The report addresses explicitly decentralized finance (DeFi) services and their need to comply with anti-money laundering and terrorist financing laws, in addition to highlighting the threat posed by cybercriminals and ransomware attackers.

While there are still a couple of unclear things, the report pointed out that fiats currency is used in illicit finance more than cryptocurrencies. I agree with this statement.

What is decentralized cryptocurrency?

Decentralized cryptocurrency is a type of digital currency that operates independently of intermediaries such as banks and payment processors. Unlike traditional currencies, decentralized cryptocurrencies are not controlled by any central authority or government. It offers several advantages over traditional financial systems. For one, users of decentralized exchanges do not need to transfer their assets to a third party, reducing the risk of company or organization hacks, failures, fraud, or theft. The decentralized nature of cryptocurrencies allows for peer-to-peer transactions directly between individuals, facilitating faster and more efficient transactions.

Decentralized Finance, commonly known as DeFi, is a disruptive phenomenon that has shaken the traditional financial sector to its core. In essence, DeFi is a remarkable unraveling of conventional finance that has taken the fundamental aspects of banking, insurance, and exchange, such as lending, borrowing, and trading, and disentangled them from the traditional financial infrastructure. Instead, DeFi utilizes innovative technology protocols that operate in a decentralized manner, enabling many individuals to reach consensus efficiently and make informed decisions.

Illicit activities prefer fiat or crypto?

According to a Chainalysis report, illicit activities associated with cryptocurrencies include malware, terrorism financing, outright stealing of crypto funds, investment fraud, sanctions evasion, and ransomware are on a rise. Despite the increasing popularity of cryptocurrencies, recent research indicates that fiat currency is still the preferred choice for criminals engaging in money laundering. In fact, fiat currency is used for money laundering 800 times more often than cryptocurrencies, according to a report by the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

Fiat currencies like the USD are still more commonly used in illicit financial activities compared to cryptocurrencies. The report noted that while there has been an increase in the use of cryptocurrencies in money laundering and other illicit activities, fiat currencies remain the primary means of payment for such activities. It also highlights that the anonymity and lack of regulation in the cryptocurrency space can make them an attractive option for criminals. However, the vast majority of illicit financial activities still involve traditional fiat currencies as the barrier to entry into cryptocurrency is still high and not widely accepted.

The U.S. dollar was the second most commonly counterfeited currency in the world in 2015, with one in 10,000 US dollars being forged. The $20 bill is the most commonly counterfeited banknote in the United States, while overseas counterfeiters are more likely to make fake $100 bills. The amount of counterfeit currency in circulation can affect everyone who receives the counterfeit money and is unable to pass it on. This problem can be reduced using Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). With money going digital, tracing where the money went becomes easier. This would be a story to share on another occasion.

Only 0.24% of all cryptocurrency transactions in 2022 were tied to illicit activity. This was up from 0.12% in 2021, according to Chainalysis. Despite the recent increase in the share of all cryptocurrency activity associated with illicit activity, it still only represents a small percentage of overall cryptocurrency activity compared to fiat currencies.

Why not use cryptocurrency since it’s anonymous?

Of course not. Fiat money is generally considered more stable than cryptocurrency, its issuance and governance are dictated by central banks, whereas blockchain protocols, code, and communities govern cryptocurrency. It is also true that cryptocurrencies are vulnerable to abuse due to their decentralization and borderless transactions. But it is worth noting that while crypto transactions are not entirely anonymous, they can be more difficult to trace than fiat transactions. This anonymity has led to concerns that cryptocurrencies may facilitate illicit finance activities, such as money laundering and terrorist financing.

Cryptocurrency transactions are recorded on a public ledger called the blockchain, which anyone can view. Due to cryptocurrencies’ trackable nature, I would say that the transactions made and recorded on chain are generally more transparent and traceable than cash transactions. This makes it difficult for criminals to use cryptocurrency for illicit activities without leaving a trail. On the other hand, cash transactions are often untraceable and can be easily used for money laundering and other illegal activities.

An anti-cryptocurrency lobbyist once pointed out to me that some privacy-focused cryptocurrencies, such as Zcash are designed to be untraceable. I corrected him in front of the public consultation group that the right phrase to use is “They are designed to be more difficult to trace.” This means that it would be more complex if you want to track it, but it is not impossible.

Privacy-focused cryptocurrencies prioritize privacy and anonymity, making tracing transactions back to their originators difficult. Take Monero as an example, is an open-source, decentralized cryptocurrency launched in 2014 and has become one of the most popular privacy-focused cryptocurrencies in the market. Monero’s combination of stealth addresses, ring signatures, and confidential transactions makes it almost impossible to trace transaction details. It has gained a reputation for its level of privacy and security. However, while they can offer higher levels of privacy and security than traditional money, the trade-off is that privacy-focused measures may make it more difficult to track activity and could lead to government regulation or taxation. Again, the words used here are “almost impossible” and “more difficult”. It is still possible to track.

Conclusion

The U.S. Treasury Department’s report has caused quite a stir among crypto traders, with some warning about the impact it could have on the market. While the report is the first illicit finance risk assessment conducted on DeFi, it is essential to note that there is currently no generally accepted definition of DeFi. This makes it difficult to pinpoint exactly what type of DeFi services are at risk of being used for illicit purposes. It is important to note that the report does not necessarily mean that the government will immediately impose stricter regulations on the DeFi market. Instead, it lays the foundation for future regulations and greater oversight.

One thing to keep in mind is that while the report focuses on the risks associated with decentralized cryptocurrency markets, it does not necessarily condemn cryptocurrency as a whole. In fact, Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell has recently stated that crypto itself is not the problem but rather the lack of regulation.

So, what does this mean for the future of cryptocurrency? While it is impossible to predict exactly what will happen, we will likely see increased scrutiny and regulation of the DeFi market in the coming years. This could lead to greater stability and security in the crypto market as a whole, making it a more attractive investment option for traditional investors.

 

Source: https://www.financialexpress.com/business/blockchain/the-us-treasury-departments-first-report-on-defi-is-it-fair/3056602/lite/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j