Treasury yields up, Ethereum down: Tariffs hit traditional and crypto

Treasury yields up, Ethereum down: Tariffs hit traditional and crypto

Looking at the evolving narrative around Trump’s tariff policies and their ripple effects across markets, currencies, commodities, and cryptocurrencies. The question at hand offers a rich tapestry of data points—ranging from US economic indicators to equity market movements, Treasury yields, and the intriguing interplay between Trump’s America-First agenda and the crypto sphere.

A blend of optimism for market resilience and a healthy scepticism about the long-term implications of protectionist policies shapes my perspective. Let’s dive into this multifaceted story, unpacking the facts, analysing the trends, and offering a grounded take on what it all means.

The weekend headlines suggesting that Trump’s reciprocal tariffs, slated for April 2, might be more targeted and flexible than feared have undeniably lifted global risk sentiment. This shift in tone is a breath of fresh air for investors who’ve been bracing for a blunt, across-the-board trade war that could throttle growth and stoke inflation. The idea that the administration might tailor these tariffs—perhaps sparing certain sectors or negotiating carve-outs—hints at a pragmatic streak beneath the bombastic rhetoric.

It’s a signal that Trump, now in his second term, may be tempering his approach with an eye on economic stability rather than just political theatre. Markets responded swiftly, with the S&P 500 climbing 1.8 per cent, the Dow Jones gaining 1.4 per cent, and the Nasdaq surging 2.3 per cent, driven by a 3.4 per cent rally in the “Magnificent Seven” megacaps—think Apple, Amazon, and Nvidia. This buoyancy reflects a collective sigh of relief, a belief that the tariff storm might not be as destructive as anticipated.

On the data front, the US March PMIs paint a nuanced picture. The uptick in the Services PMI is a welcome surprise, easing fears of a sharp economic slowdown and suggesting that the consumer-driven backbone of the US economy remains intact. Services, after all, account for over two-thirds of US GDP, so any sign of resilience here is a bulwark against recession chatter.

But the manufacturing PMI slipping back into contraction territory—below the 50 threshold—raises a red flag. The culprit? A tariff-related spike in materials costs. Manufacturers are already feeling the pinch of uncertainty, with supply chains recalibrating and input prices ticking up.

This divergence between services and manufacturing underscores a bifurcated economy: one part humming along, the other creaking under trade policy pressures. It’s a reminder that tariffs, even if targeted, don’t operate in a vacuum—they ripple through production networks, hitting some sectors harder than others.

The bond market’s reaction reinforces this cautious optimism tinged with concern. US Treasuries fell on Monday, pushing yields up across the curve. The 2-year yield rose 8.6 basis points to 4.035 per cent, while the 10-year yield climbed 8.8 basis points to 4.335 per cent. This uptick reflects a dialling back of expectations for Federal Reserve rate cuts, as investors digest the possibility that tariffs could keep inflation stubbornly above the Fed’s two per cent target.

Atlanta Fed President Raphael Bostic’s comments amplify this shift: he’s now projecting just one rate cut in 2025, down from two, and doesn’t see inflation hitting two per cent until early 2027. That’s a significant recalibration, signaling that the Fed might stay hawkish longer than hoped, especially if tariff-induced price pressures persist. The Fed’s reticence to push back on this market repricing suggests they’re in wait-and-see mode, letting the data—and Trump’s policy moves—dictate the pace.

The US Dollar Index, up 0.2 per cent to 104.30, its highest since early March, is another piece of the puzzle. A stronger dollar aligns with the narrative of a US economy holding its own amid global uncertainty, bolstered by higher yields and a perception of relative safety. But it’s a double-edged sword—while it boosts purchasing power for American consumers, it squeezes exporters and multinational corporations, potentially denting S&P 500 earnings down the line.

Commodities, meanwhile, tell a split story: gold dipped 0.4 per cent, perhaps as risk-on sentiment reduced its safe-haven appeal, while Brent crude rose 1.2 per cent to US$69.11 per barrel, buoyed by supply-side optimism or perhaps a flicker of demand recovery in Asia.

Speaking of Asia, the MSCI Asia ex-Japan index snapping a three-day losing streak with a 0.46 per cent gain is a subtle but telling sign. India’s SENSEX 30, up 1.40 per cent, has clawed back nearly all its year-to-date losses, showcasing the resilience of an economy less exposed to US trade whims.

Chinese stocks, too, caught a bid—Hang Seng up 0.91 per cent, CSI 300 up 0.51 per cent — possibly reflecting hopes that targeted tariffs might spare Beijing the worst. Yet early trading today showed mixed results across Asian indices, hinting that the relief rally might be fragile, contingent on further clarity from Washington.

Now, let’s pivot to crypto, where Trump’s influence is weaving an unexpected thread. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw a net inflow of US$84.17 million yesterday, marking seven straight days of gains. Fidelity’s FBTC led the pack with US$82.85 million, pushing its historical total to US$11.47 billion, while Bitwise’s BITB added US$19.23 million. Even with Ark Invest’s ARKB shedding $40.97 million, the broader trend is clear: institutional appetite for Bitcoin remains robust.

This resilience stands in contrast to Ethereum, which is grappling with its own challenges. ETH tested resistance at US$2,069 on Monday, buoyed by transaction fees hitting an all-time low—a double-edged sword. Lower fees might attract users, but they also signal waning network activity, a bearish undercurrent for a blockchain whose valuation hinges on usage. Grayscale’s research team nailed it: Ethereum’s price weakness—down 35 per cent in two months—ties directly to this fee slump and a broader crypto downturn sparked by Trump’s tariff threats.

The correlation between crypto and macroeconomics is tightening, and Trump’s policies are a big driver. US spot Ethereum ETFs have bled nearly US$390 million over 13 consecutive days of outflows, per Farside data, while on-chain metrics like transaction counts echo pre-election lows. Validators and token burners, who rely on fees, are feeling the pinch, undermining ETH’s value proposition.

Yet here’s where it gets fascinating: Trump Media and Technology Group (TMTG) is diving headfirst into this space, partnering with Crypto.com to launch “America-First Investment Funds” under the Truth.fi brand. These ETFs and SMAs, backed by a US$250 million TMTG investment and custodied by Charles Schwab, will span cryptocurrencies and “Made in America” securities—think energy and manufacturing. Trademarks like Truth.Fi Bitcoin Plus ETF and Truth.Fi US Energy Independence ETF scream Trump’s playbook: blending nationalism with financial innovation.

This move is a masterstroke of branding and ambition. By tying crypto to an America-First ethos, Trump’s team is betting on a narrative that could galvanise retail and institutional investors alike. It’s a counterpoint to Ethereum’s struggles—Bitcoin, with its ETF inflows, is riding a wave of momentum, while ETH languishes. The tariff flexibility hinted at over the weekend might bolster this venture further; if energy and manufacturing sectors get a pass, those “Made in America” funds could thrive, drawing capital away from more volatile altcoins like Ether.

Let me sum up. The US economy’s resilience, as seen in the Services PMI and equity gains, is real, but manufacturing’s woes and sticky inflation (thanks, tariffs) temper my optimism. The Fed’s hawkish tilt and a stronger dollar could cap upside, especially if global growth falters. In Asia, selective strength—India and China holding firm—suggests diversification might shield some markets, but the jury’s out on sustainability.

Crypto’s split fate—Bitcoin soaring, Ethereum stumbling—mirrors this dichotomy, with Trump’s Truth.fi gambit potentially reshaping the landscape. I’m cautiously bullish on equities and Bitcoin, skeptical of ETH’s near-term prospects, and watchful of how Trump’s tariff chess game unfolds. It’s a high-stakes story, and we’re only in the opening chapter.

 

Source: https://e27.co/treasury-yields-up-ethereum-down-tariffs-hit-traditional-and-crypto-20250325/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Alameda Research files $90M ‘aggressive’ lawsuit against Waves founder

Alameda Research files $90M ‘aggressive’ lawsuit against Waves founder

Alameda Research filed a lawsuit against Aleksandr Ivanov, founder of Waves, as part of its ongoing legal strategy to recover crypto assets.

The trading arm of the bankrupt FTX exchange is aiming to recoup at least $90 million of digital assets from Waves, according to a Nov. 11 court filing.

In March 2022, Alameda Research deposited $80 million worth of USDt (USDT) and USD Coin (USDC) to the Waves-based decentralized liquidity protocol, Vires.Finance.

The court filing alleges that Ivanov artificially inflated the value of Waves (WAVES) tokens. According to the complaint:

“Ivanov secretly orchestrated a series of transactions that inflated artificially the value of WAVES, while at the same time siphoning funds from Vires. As the fraudulent scheme began to be uncovered, WAVES lost substantial market capitalization—losing over 95% of its value—and Vires users were saddled with $530 million in losses.”

FTX filed for bankruptcy on Nov. 11, 2022, causing over $8.9 billion in losses for its users and investors. The period after the collapse of the FTX exchange and its 130 subsidiaries was one of the darkest times in crypto history.

Bankman-Fried was arrested in the Bahamas on Dec. 12, 2022, after United States prosecutors filed criminal charges against him. He was extradited to the US in January 2023. Bankman-Fried was sentenced to 25 years in federal prison on March 28.

FTX and Alameda’s “aggressive legal strategy” highlights financial issues

Alameda’s recent lawsuit is part of a wider effort to recoup funds from multiple entities.

Alameda and the FTX estate have sued over 20 entities this year as part of an “aggressive legal strategy” that underscores their financial challenges, according to blockchain expert and author Anndy Lian.

He told Cointelegraph:

“In my view, the allegations against Ivanov point to possible misconduct, such as inflating the WAVES token’s value and misdirecting funds. If these claims are validated, they underscore the ongoing challenges of transparency and accountability within the crypto industry.”

For stakeholders, these legal actions are vital for potentially reclaiming lost assets,” Lian added, noting that the FTX case may set a precedent for future crypto regulations.

Post-FTX crypto industry needs education before regulation — Former Biden adviser

The crypto industry needs to prioritize education, not just regulation, to avoid the next FTX-like meltdown, according to Moe Vela, former senior adviser to US President Joe Biden and senior adviser to Unicoin.

Financial education, especially regarding risk management, should be the fundamental concern of the crypto industry, Vela told Cointelegraph in an exclusive interview:

“Education is the fundamental key to empowerment. […] We will not have equality in any form until we have economic parity. We’re not going to have economic parity until we teach people to be, instead of unsophisticated at anything, sophisticated, and that comes through education.”

Moe Vela Interview for Cointelegraph

The senior adviser’s comments came a week after FTX’s new amended proposal was released on May 7. The proposal promised “billions in compensation” for the users and creditors of the bankrupt exchange who had been unable to access their funds since November 2022.

 

Source: https://cointelegraph.com/news/alameda-research-90-m-waves-founder

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j

Biden’s plan to close crypto tax loss harvesting loophole is a step in the right direction

Biden’s plan to close crypto tax loss harvesting loophole is a step in the right direction

President Joe Biden’s proposed budget plan has caused a stir in the crypto community due to its intention to terminate tax loss harvesting on crypto transactions. The reactions from the community have been mixed, with some perceiving this as an infringement on the freedom of crypto traders while others view it as a necessary step in regulating the industry and curbing tax evasion.

Tax loss harvesting is a technique used to minimize an individual’s tax liability by deliberately selling an investment at a loss to offset present and/or future capital gains. It reduces the amount of tax one pays for selling profitable investments. Although tax loss harvesting is usually carried out manually towards the end of the year, a systematic approach that identifies these opportunities automatically and acts on them throughout the year can be more effective, even for fixed income or income-generating securities. This approach allows individuals to decrease their tax liability by deducting the losses from their taxable income. However, this strategy has come under fire for being a loophole that enables affluent investors to evade taxes. The termination of tax loss harvesting on crypto transactions is estimated to raise up to $24 billion and reduce the deficit by $3 trillion.

Advocates of this proposition contend that it is an imperative measure to promote fairness and equity among taxpayers by ensuring that everyone contributes their fair share. They argue that the current tax system is biased towards the wealthy, who are able to exploit various tax loopholes and deductions to lower their tax bills. This ultimately results in middle-class and low-income earners being unfairly burdened with a disproportionate share of taxes. This imbalance creates an unjust and unequal tax system.

On the other hand, critics of the Biden budget plan assert that ending tax loss harvesting on crypto transactions is ill-advised as it could discourage innovation and investment in the cryptocurrency industry. They posit that this move could prompt some investors to relocate their assets offshore or to other countries with more lenient tax policies, leading to an exodus of talent and capital from the United States. Moreover, they contend that this change could disproportionately affect small and medium-sized enterprises that depend on cryptocurrency investment and trading for their expansion and growth.

The strategy of tax loss harvesting is commonly utilized by investors in the United States as a means of reducing capital gains taxes on their cryptocurrency investments. However, this approach is not extensively used in other countries due to differences in tax policies specific to cryptocurrency investments. For instance, in Canada, cryptocurrency investments are regarded as commodities and are thus subject to capital gains taxes. Meanwhile, in Australia, profits from cryptocurrency investments are also subject to capital gains taxes, with cryptocurrency considered property for tax purposes.

In the United Kingdom, gains from cryptocurrency investments are taxable under capital gains tax, but it is not possible to use losses to offset other gains. On the other hand, in Germany, cryptocurrency investments held for over a year are exempted from capital gains taxes, but those held for less than a year are taxed at the investor’s personal income tax rate. While other countries like Japan and South Korea have also established tax policies specific to cryptocurrency investments, these policies can differ significantly and may be subject to revision over time.Closing the crypto tax loss harvesting loophole could be viewed as a step in the right direction towards regulating the cryptocurrency industry and ensuring tax fairness. However, it is important to weigh the potential consequences of this policy change.

To summarize, I believe that closing the cryptocurrency tax loss harvesting loophole as proposed in President Biden’s budget plan is not a good policy. It could have negative impacts on small investors, innovation, and the market as a whole, while also not generating significant revenue for the government. Rather than this approach, I suggest exploring alternative policies that promote growth and innovation in the cryptocurrency industry while still ensuring that the government can collect revenue.

By Anndy Lian.

The author is an intergovernmental blockchain expert

Source: https://www.financialexpress.com/blockchain/bidens-plan-to-close-crypto-tax-loss-harvesting-loophole-is-a-step-in-the-right-direction/3013562/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.

Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.

An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.

j j j