Coinbase’s MPI License: A Game-Changer For Crypto In Singapore, But A Challenge For Competitors

Coinbase’s MPI License: A Game-Changer For Crypto In Singapore, But A Challenge For Competitors

Coinbase, the largest cryptocurrency exchange in the US, has recently obtained a Major Payment Institution (MPI) licence from the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), the country’s central bank and financial regulator. This licence will allow Coinbase to offer regulated digital payment token (DPT) products and services in Singapore, such as buying and selling cryptocurrencies, storing them in wallets, and transferring them to other users.

They not the first crypto exchange to receive an MPI licence from MAS. In June 2023, two other platforms, Crypto.com and Circle, were also granted full licences after obtaining in-principle approvals in 2021. However, Coinbase is arguably the most prominent and influential one among them, given its global reach, market capitalization, and reputation.

Coinbase’s entry into the Singaporean market is seen by many as a positive sign for the crypto industry in the region, as it reflects the country’s openness and support for innovation and digital finance. Singapore has been widely regarded as a crypto-friendly jurisdiction, with a clear and progressive regulatory framework for DPT service providers under the Payment Services Act (PSA) that came into effect in 2020.

According to the PSA, any entity that provides DPT services in Singapore must obtain a licence from MAS, either as a standard payment institution (SPI) or as an MPI. The difference between the two types of licences lies in the scale and scope of their operations. SPIs can provide any combination of regulated payment services, but are subject to transactional volume or e-money limits. MPIs have no such limits, but are subject to more stringent requirements, such as safeguarding customer funds, complying with anti-money laundering and counter-terrorism financing rules, and submitting regular audits and reports to MAS.

By obtaining an MPI licence, Coinbase has demonstrated its ability and willingness to meet the high standards set by MAS for DPT service providers. This could give it a competitive edge over other crypto exchanges that operate in Singapore, especially those that have not yet obtained a licence or are still waiting for approval.

As mentioned on MAS’s website, there are currently 170 entities that have applied for a licence under the PSA, but only three have been granted full licences so far (Coinbase, Crypto.com, and Circle). Among the applicants are some of the most popular and well-known crypto exchanges in Singapore, such as Binance, Kraken, Coinhako, Gemini, and Independent Reserve. These exchanges have been allowed to continue their operations while their applications are being processed by MAS, under a grace period that was initially supposed to end on July 28, 2021. However, due to the large number of applications and the complexity of the assessment process, MAS has extended the grace period for most applicants until January 28, 2023.

This means that these exchanges have less than four months left to obtain their licences from MAS, or they will have to cease their DPT services in Singapore. This could pose a significant challenge and risk for them, as they may lose their market share and customer base to Coinbase and other licensed platforms.

Competitive Challenges For Other Crypto Exchanges

While Coinbase’s MPI license is undoubtedly a boon for the company, it also presents a competitive challenge for other crypto exchanges operating in Singapore. Here are some key challenges they are likely to face:

  • Regulatory Compliance Pressure: The foremost challenge for competitors is the need to meet the stringent regulatory standards set by MAS. Coinbase’s compliance with these standards sets a high bar, and other exchanges will need to invest significant resources to achieve similar levels of regulatory approval.
  • Increased Competition: Coinbase’s entry into the Singaporean market intensifies competition. As a well-established global exchange, Coinbase has a strong brand presence and the resources to invest in marketing, user acquisition, and product development. Competitors will need to step up their game to compete effectively.
  • User Trust and Confidence: Coinbase’s MPI license not only signifies regulatory compliance but also implies a higher degree of trust and confidence from users. Competitors will need to work harder to gain the trust of customers and differentiate themselves in a market where regulatory compliance and security are paramount.

Recommendations For Success In The Singaporean Crypto Market

To thrive in this evolving landscape and address the challenges posed by Coinbase’s MPI license, crypto exchanges in Singapore should consider several strategic approaches:

  • Collaborate with Local Partners: Building relationships with local financial institutions, fintech companies, and government agencies can help crypto exchanges navigate the complex regulatory landscape in Singapore. Collaborations can also open doors to new markets and customer segments.
  • Innovate New Products and Services: To stand out in a competitive market, exchanges should focus on innovation. Developing new products and services that cater to the unique needs and preferences of Singaporean users can help differentiate them from Coinbase and other competitors.
  • Educate Customers and Regulators: Crypto exchanges should actively engage in educational initiatives aimed at both customers and regulators. Providing resources and information on responsible crypto use, security practices, and the benefits of blockchain technology can help build trust and bridge knowledge gaps.
  • Adapt to Changing Market Conditions: The crypto industry is known for its rapid evolution. Exchanges must remain agile and adaptable to changing market conditions, regulatory updates, and technological advancements. Staying ahead of the curve can be a key differentiator.
  • Foster Regulatory Relationships: Building positive relationships with regulators is essential. Exchanges should actively engage with regulatory authorities, participate in industry consultations, and contribute to the development of fair and effective crypto regulations.
  • Emphasize Security and Compliance: Like Coinbase, prioritizing security measures and regulatory compliance is non-negotiable. Exchanges should invest in robust security infrastructure and continuously monitor for potential vulnerabilities or risks.
  • Customer-Centric Approach: To succeed in a competitive market, exchanges should prioritize the needs and concerns of their customers. Providing excellent customer service, transparent fee structures, and responsive support channels can help build loyalty and trust.
  • Diversify Product Offerings: Beyond trading, exchanges should consider diversifying their product offerings. This could include services like staking, lending, or even non-fungible tokens (NFTs). Diversification can attract a broader user base and increase revenue streams.

In Conclusion

Coinbase’s MPI license from MAS is a watershed moment for the cryptocurrency industry in Singapore. It signifies not only the legitimization of digital assets but also the importance of regulatory compliance and security within the sector. While this development poses competitive challenges for other crypto exchanges operating in the country, it also sets a high standard that can benefit the entire industry.

Success in the Singaporean crypto market will require a combination of regulatory adherence, innovation, customer education, and adaptability. By focusing on these aspects and strategically positioning themselves, other exchanges can thrive alongside Coinbase in this dynamic and rapidly evolving sector. Ultimately, the success of these exchanges will contribute to the broader adoption and acceptance of cryptocurrencies in Singapore and around the world.

 

 

 

Source: https://www.benzinga.com/23/10/35201460/coinbases-mpi-license-a-game-changer-for-crypto-in-singapore-but-a-challenge-for-competitors

j j j

Ethereum NFT production falls to all-time low in September

Ethereum NFT production falls to all-time low in September

NFT production on Ethereum fell to an all-time low in September, as the floor prices of blue-chip NFT collections continued their decline.

Non-fungible token (NFT) production on Ethereum, or the value of the primary sales generated from NFT minting, fell to an all-time low of US$17.55 million in September, down 12.4% from US$20.05 million in August, according to Forkast Labs data.

NFTs are blockchain-based digital assets that can provide information on digital ownership. Notable collections like the Bored Ape Yacht Club (BAYC) were trading at a floor price of 128 ETH (US$211,000) in May 2022, before dropping more than 60% along with other notable NFT collections like CryptoPunks, which fell 60.4% to 45 Eth (US$72,727), from an all-time high of 113.9 Eth (US$184,080) recorded on Oct. 9, 2021.

“Blue-chip NFT collections such as Bored Ape Yacht Club and CryptoPunks serve as indicators of broader NFT market sentiment. Their decline might signify a shift in investor sentiment, perhaps questioning the intrinsic value of such assets,” Matan Doyich, the chief executive officer of Crypto Index, a firm building centralized infrastructure for tokenized crypto exchange-traded funds, told Forkast.

Reflecting the overall NFT bear market, the Forkast ETH NFT Composite, an index that measures the performance of the top 250 NFTs in the Ethereum blockchain, fell 48% year-to-date to an all-time low of 715.22 points recorded on Sept. 28.

NFT production on the Polygon blockchain fell to a seven-month low of US$4.7 million in September, down from a yearly high of US$14.44 million in August. Polygon NFT production is up 219% year-to-date, from US$1.47 million in January. Despite the rising numbers, the Forkast POL NFT Composite fell over 46% year-to-date.

The overall NFT market slump, along with the decrease in NFT production, can be attributed to a loss of interest by NFT investors, according to Anndy Lian, author of NFT: From Zero to Hero.

“The NFT market was driven by a lot of hype in 2021. However, this has died down in recent months, as people have become more realistic and choosy about the kind of NFTs they want,“ said Lian.

NFT services revenue on Ethereum, or total marketplace fees and creator royalties from secondary sales, fell 84.4% year-to-date to US$6.01 million in September from US$38.74 million in January according to Forkast Labs data.

At OpenSea, one of the world’s largest NFT marketplaces, the protocol’s monthly NFT trading volume fell 31.8% to US$76.79 million in September from US$112.74 million in August, according to data from The Block.

Blur, OpenSea’s rival marketplace, had its trading volume fall 38.3% to US$150.42 million in September, down from US$243.92 million in August.

“To reignite interest in NFTs, the industry needs to see and demand innovations that go beyond digital art and collectibles, such as incorporating NFTs into more substantial real-world applications,” Doyich told Forkast.

This year brought new use cases for NFTs, which will be needed to drive institutional investors, according to David Tng, managing director at TZ APAC, the Asian entity of the Tezos blockchain.

“NFTs will rely on the same pain point of needing to prove their utility, especially against the backdrop of a very volatile market. However, we are still seeing rapid growth and innovation. Enterprises and artists continue to use NFTs as a platform to explore, create and engage with their audiences,” wrote Tng, in a statement shared with Forkast.

Despite the market slump, globally recognized brands continue adopting NFTs. Starbucks launched an NFT version of its iconic pumpkin spice latte last Thursday, to commemorate the 20-year anniversary of the iconic drink. The NFTs worth US$20 have no minting limit and users will receive 250 bonus points that can be spent to improve their Starbucks Odyssey experience, which is the company’s Web3 rewards and loyalty platform.

 

Source: https://forkast.news/ethereum-nft-production-falls-all-time-low-september/

j j j

JPEX:一起撼动香港声誉的加密丑闻

JPEX:一起撼动香港声誉的加密丑闻

香港,作为全球金融中心和通往中国的门户,被涉及JPEX的一起大规模加密货币丑闻所震惊。这家总部位于迪拜的加密货币交易所据称欺诈了数千名投资者,涉及金额超过1.6亿美元。这起案件揭示了香港新兴加密货币行业中的监管漏洞、投资者保护的不足以及依赖社交媒体影响者推广无牌平台的风险。

JPEX,即 “日本交易所”,声称是世界上第一家向用户提供分红的加密货币交易所。它还自夸与汇丰、渣打银行和阿里巴巴等主要机构合作。它承诺高回报和低费用吸引了投资者,并采用了激进的营销策略,如广告牌、在线广告和影响者背书。

在宣传JPEX的影响者中,有Joseph Lam,一位曾经是大律师现为保险销售员的人,自称是香港的“Trolling King”,还有Chan Yee,一个有20万订阅者的YouTube名人。他们向追随者展示了比特币利润如何帮助他们购买房屋和汽车,并鼓励他们使用他们的推荐代码注册JPEX。

然而,事情开始在2023年9月出现问题,当时JPEX宣布面临“流动性短缺”并暂停提款。许多投资者无法访问他们的资金或联系到该平台的客户服务。一些人还发现,JPEX在香港的证券及期货事务监察委员会(SFC)没有许可证的情况下运营,而该机构负责监管虚拟资产交易平台。

SFC透露,他们在2023年6月曾向JPEX发出警告信,要求其停止在香港的活动或申请许可证。然而,JPEX无视了该信函并继续非法运营。SFC还表示,他们对JPEX在迪拜注册的经营活动没有管辖权。

香港警方在接到来自2000多名投资者的投诉后,对JPEX展开了调查,这些投资者声称损失了13亿港元(1.66亿美元)。警方以涉嫌欺诈、洗钱和共谋欺诈的罪名逮捕了11人,包括Lam和Chan。警方还从嫌疑人的住所查获了计算机、手机、银行卡和文件。

这起案件引发了公众的愤怒,并引发了对香港加密资产监管框架的质疑。自2020年实施国家安全法以来,香港一直试图将自己定位为创新和技术的全球中心,尤其是在2020年11月,SFC宣布了一项新的虚拟资产交易平台许可制度,以增强投资者保护和打击洗钱。

该制度直到2023年6月才生效,给像JPEX这样的无监管平台留下了超过六个月的空白期。此外,该制度仅覆盖至少交易一种安全代币的平台,这种代币代表了底层资产或业务的所有权或权利。仅交易非安全代币(如比特币或以太坊)的平台不需要从SFC获得许可证。

这意味着在香港仍存在一个大规模未受监管和无监督的加密市场领域。根据CoinMarketCap的数据,目前有超过11,000种加密资产在流通,总市值超过2万亿美元。其中许多资产具有极高的波动性和投机性,一些可能是欺诈性的或非法的。

Anndy 指出JPEX案件还突显了信任社交媒体影响者在没有适当披露或尽职调查的情况下背书加密产品或平台的危险。影响者在推广某些平台或代币时可能有不可告人的动机或利益冲突。他们也可能缺乏投资加密资产的风险和回报的准确可靠信息的专业知识或信誉。

投资者应谨慎对待任何承诺不切实际回报或未披露风险的平台或产品。他们还应进行自己的研究,验证他们打算使用的任何平台或产品的资质和声誉,以及该平台或产品是否受到香港或其他地方任何机构的许可或监管。

JPEX案件还引起了对迪拜作为不正当操作商的加密天堂的角色的关注。迪拜是阿联酋的一部分,以其低税收、宽松的监管和友好的态度吸引了加密业务。迪拜没有专门的法律或机构来监管加密资产,也不要求加密平台获得许可证或向任何机构注册。迪拜还与香港没有引渡条约,这使得当局难以追究JPEX或其创始人的责任。

然而,迪拜的加密友好立场可能会对其声誉和安全造成代价。迪拜可能会成为欺诈者、黑客和恐怖分子的磁石,他们使用加密资产来逃避制裁、洗钱或资助非法活动。迪拜还可能面临来自其他国家或国际组织的压力,要求其加强对加密行业的监管和合规性。迪拜可能需要在促进和监管加密行业与保护和赋权投资者之间取得平衡,这是实现其在全球领域保持竞争优势的责任。

JPEX案件不是香港将面临的第一起也不是最后一起加密丑闻。这不仅是对投资者的警钟,也是对监管机构和政策制定者的警醒。随着加密行业的不断发展,香港和其相关利益相关者将面临新的挑战和机遇。香港需要从JPEX案件中吸取经验教训,采取积极和预防性的措施来保护其利益和价值观。

香港需要加强对加密行业的监管框架、执法力度以及向公众进行教育和宣传。香港必须与其他司法管辖区和机构合作协调,以打击跨境加密犯罪和风险。

“JPEX案件是一起撼动香港声誉的加密丑闻” Anndy 在采访中提到,“香港作为全球金融中心和通往中国的门户,JPEX的恶性欺诈事件揭示了香港加密行业中的监管漏洞和投资者保护不足,以及依赖社交媒体影响者推广无牌平台的风险。香港需要加强对加密行业的监管和执法,并向公众传达教育和意识。香港还需要在促进和监管加密行业与保护和赋权投资者之间取得平衡。只有这样,香港才能在全球竞技场上保持竞争优势。”

 

 

 

Source: https://cn.investing.com/analysis/article-200480876

j j j