I use strategies such as diversification to manage risks: Blockchain expert Anndy Lian

I use strategies such as diversification to manage risks: Blockchain expert Anndy Lian

Amidst the challenges of a tough funding climate, e27 is launching an exciting new article series called Angel’s Advocate to provide fresh perspectives on angel funding. In this exclusive series, we sit down with prominent angels to hear their stories and strategies and gain unique insights about the early-stage financing space.

Anndy Lian is an all-rounded business strategist in Asia. He has provided advisory across various industries for local, international, and publicly listed companies and governments. He is an early blockchain adopter, serial entrepreneur, author, investor, board member, and keynote speaker.

In this edition, Lian shares his take on angel funding.

Edited excerpts:

How do you typically approach investing during a funding winter?

I would put my eggs into different baskets. In one of my baskets, I will focus on companies with solid fundamentals and a proven track record of generating revenue and profits. This kind of investment tends to be on the safe side, longer term, and returns may not be fantastic.

Then in my next basket, I will find low-valuation, high-potential startups with the right fundamentals to invest in. Crypto companies fit into this category nicely.

What are your typical investment criteria, such as industry, stage, and geographic location?

Investment criteria do not cover everything. It gives me guidelines that my team and I can use to filter out bad companies. In the current state of the market, I only look at tech companies, mainly in the cryptocurrency and blockchain industries. If they are more infrastructure-like, I do not mind investing in them at later stages. If the project is one of a kind, I would like to invest as early as possible, maybe pre-seed. If the project is more hype-driven, I will invest when the volume picks up.

Can you describe your investment process from initial contact to closing a deal?

First of all, the initial contact. We may learn about a potential investment opportunity through their personal network, a pitch event, or by contacting the company seeking funding directly. Then followed by screening. This process is a deeper level of evaluation where we will have longer calls to look for investment alignment.

We will go through the due diligence process if they pass this stage. We will conduct more in-depth research and analysis to evaluate the company’s business model, management team, financial performance, and growth potential. This process is the most important to me. The chance to interact with the team would be one of the key things.

The next stage would be negotiation. If we decide to move forward with the investment, we will negotiate the terms of the deal with the company, including the amount of funding and the valuation.

Once all parties have agreed upon the terms of the deal, legal documents will be prepared and signed to finalise the investment.

How do you evaluate a startup’s potential for growth and success?

Evaluating a startup’s potential for growth and success can be challenging, as many factors can impact a company’s future performance. I look at the market opportunity, business model, management team, financial performance and competition.

How important is the founder’s experience and background when making investment decisions?

Well, it is definitely important. The founder is the brain and creator of the company. If the main driver does not have the experience and background, the outcome would generally be disastrous.

Can you share your successful investment and what made that investment successful?

So far, crypto investments are the most successful in my portfolio. At crazy times, meme-coins can also be a potential 100X gem.

What are some common mistakes that startups make when pitching to angel investors? What are some myths about angel investment?

Some common mistakes that startups make when pitching to angel investors include not understanding the needs and goals of angel investors, failing to clearly articulate the value proposition, relying too heavily on financial projections, not doing enough research on potential investors, and not having a multi-faceted marketing strategy.

Another mistake is sending your executive summary or business plan unsolicited. Many investors do not read unsolicited emails and prefer a referral from someone in their network. It’s also important to do your homework on the investor and ensure your company is aligned with the investors’ objectives.

How important is the alignment of values between the investor and the founder?

The alignment of values between the investor and the startup founder is crucial. Ideally, your investors should be experts in your field or sector so that they not only understand the costs, time-to-market, and potential pitfalls of your vision but can also connect you with the right people and resources to help you achieve it. It’s important for the investor to spend some time understanding the skills and capabilities of startups.

How do you manage risks when investing in startups? Are there any specific metrics or indicators you look for?

Investing in startups is risky, but it can be very rewarding if the investments pay off. Most new companies or products do not make it, so the risk of losing one’s entire investment is a real possibility.

To manage risk, I can use strategies such as diversification, which refers to spreading my investments over a variety of assets with the aim that a portfolio of lowly-correlated assets does not all move in the same direction at the same time or even if they do move in the same direction, it should at least be by different degrees.

Can you share any advice for startups looking to raise funds from angel investors?

My humble advice to startup owners is to develop a business plan before approaching someone about funding. Put in writing what the investor is offering the business outside of funding because many angel investors expect to contribute their time actively to startups in which they invest. Establish roles.

It’s also important to create a strong, thorough, and engaging investor pitch deck and guidance on presenting to angel and venture capital investors.

 

Source: https://e27.co/i-use-strategies-such-as-diversification-to-manage-risks-blockchain-expert-invest-anndy-lian-20230524/

j j j

NCET cracks down on illicit activities in cryptocurrency market

NCET cracks down on illicit activities in cryptocurrency market

Multiple news outlets have reported that the US Department of Justice (DOJ) is increasing its efforts to combat illicit activities and criminal behaviour, such as money laundering, within cryptocurrency exchanges and platforms. To this end, the DOJ’s national cryptocurrency enforcement team (NCET) is focusing its attention not only on exchanges but also on crypto mixers and decentralised finance (DeFi) platforms that engage in unlawful acts.

NCET’s focus

The NCET’s focus on cryptocurrency-related crimes highlights the United States government’s efforts to regulate the cryptocurrency market. The NCET aims to prevent criminals from using digital assets to carry out illegal activities and to ensure the safety and fairness of the cryptocurrency market for investors. The increased efforts of the NCET and other regulatory bodies to combat cryptocurrency fraud and criminal activity indicate the growing importance of regulation in the cryptocurrency market.

They have a broad mandate, blurring lines between traditional white-collar and other federal crime and the emerging technologies associated with cryptocurrency and cyber-instrumentalities, neither of which are governed by clear, subject matter-specific statutes. The team aims to assist in tracing and recovering assets lost to fraud and other illegal activities.

Eun Young Choi, the newly appointed director of the cryptocurrency enforcement team, has vowed to crack down on illicit behaviour and to hold companies accountable for allowing or facilitating criminal activity on their platforms. In recent months, the US government has shut down nine exchanges suspected of money laundering.

For example, in May 2023, the US government, in collaboration with Ukrainian authorities, shut down nine cryptocurrency exchanges suspected of money laundering activities in recent months. The authorities shut down all servers of crypto exchanges 24xbtc.com and 100btc.pro, pridechange.com, 101crypta.com, uxbtc.com, trust-exchange.org, bitcoin24.exchange, paybtc.pro, and owl.gold.

Each platform offered users anonymous crypto transactions through voluntary registration programs violating several US laws. The exchanges were considered important hubs in the cybercrime ecosystem and were accused of violating US laws and having lax know-your-customer (KYC) controls.

It was also mentioned that the NCET Team wants to crack down on illicit investment scams such as the “pig butchering” scheme on crypto exchanges. This scam involves scammers playing the long game, “fattening up” potential victims to extract as much money as possible before the “slaughter”. The goal is not to extract money quickly, unlike other common scams. The term originated from a Chinese phrase with the same meaning.

They have also emphasized its partnerships with other federal agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), in monitoring the cryptocurrency industry.

The government’s goal is to coordinate efforts and respect primacy among subject matter experts while unleashing US regulators to dig deeper into emerging markets and the technologies that support them. With the creation of the NCET, a rise in enforcement actions, and the end of the cryptocurrency “grace period,” stakeholders active in the cryptocurrency markets need to ensure their regulatory compliance.

A two-phase strategy for cryptocurrency regulation

Some experts believe that the US government’s actions signal a coordinated regulatory campaign to stymie the growth of the cryptocurrency industry. Personally, I do not think so. The regulation of cryptocurrencies requires a meticulously planned strategy that adapts to the ever-changing landscape of this digital realm.

To ensure its effectiveness, a two-phase approach should be followed. In the initial phase, the primary objective is to disrupt the flow of cryptocurrencies to illicit actors. This can be achieved by maintaining updated lists of sanctioned intermediaries and providing clear guidelines to individuals and businesses in the United States, helping them identify and avoid engaging with foreign companies under sanctions.

Furthermore, a comprehensive analysis should be conducted concurrently to evaluate the efficacy of these measures in combatting illicit financial activities associated with cryptocurrencies. This in-depth assessment would give regulators a deeper understanding of the outcomes of their actions.

By closely monitoring cryptocurrency intermediaries and rigorously evaluating the results, regulators can gather invaluable insights into the potential of cryptocurrencies as a legitimate instrument for promoting financial inclusion.

The findings and evaluations obtained in the initial phase will form the basis for the subsequent stage. If the analysis demonstrates a significant reduction in illegal cryptocurrency transactions due to effective law enforcement, it would create strong momentum for the government to proceed with the implementation of a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC).

This would indicate that the risks tied to illicit cryptocurrency activities can be adequately managed. However, if the measurements from the first phase reveal limited progress in addressing the criminal use of virtual currencies, it would underscore the government’s need to enhance enforcement mechanisms before considering the introduction of a CBDC.

It becomes crucial to prioritise efforts to target foreign exchanges and influential intermediaries through stringent sanctions, effectively combating theft, fraud, and extortion. Prudence dictates that new currencies should not be introduced hastily, and a comprehensive understanding of cryptocurrency dynamics must be achieved before any further steps are taken.

I think a well-executed phased approach to cryptocurrency regulation, supported by vigilant monitoring, thorough evaluation, and targeted enforcement measures, promises to provide valuable insights into the viability of cryptocurrencies for legitimate financial activities.

By diligently assessing the impact of regulatory efforts, policymakers can make informed decisions regarding the potential implementation of a CBDC, thereby ensuring effective control over illicit activities within the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Continual adaptation and improvement in response to the evolving challenges of this digital landscape are essential for fostering a safe and inclusive environment for cryptocurrency transactions.

 

Source: https://e27.co/ncet-cracks-down-on-illicit-activities-in-cryptocurrency-market-20230522/

j j j

Exploring the future of digital currency: HKMA launches e-HKD Pilot Programme

Exploring the future of digital currency: HKMA launches e-HKD Pilot Programme

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) has made an exciting announcement regarding the launch of the e-HKD Pilot Programme. This initiative involves the participation of 16 carefully selected firms from the financial, payment, and technology sectors. The primary objective of the program is to explore and identify potential use cases for the e-HKD across various categories, including payments, programmable payments, offline payments, tokenised deposits, settlement of Web3 transactions, and settlement of tokenised assets.

  • Alipay Financial Services (HK) Limited: Programmable payments – Merchant reward programme
  • ARTA-Emali HK Limited: Programmable payments – Investment
  • Bank of China (Hong Kong) Limited: Programmable payments – Government grant disbursement; Programmable payments – Prepaid services
  • China Construction Bank (Asia) Corporation: Programmable payments – Prepaid services 
  • Fubon Bank (Hong Kong) Limited: Settlement of tokenised assets
  • Ripple Labs Inc.: Settlement of tokenised assets
  • Giesecke+Devrient: Offline payments
  • Standard Chartered Bank (Hong Kong) Limited: Offline payments
  • Hang Seng Bank Limited: Programmable payments – Government grant disbursementProgrammable payments – Merchant reward programme
  • Hang Seng Bank Limited: Tokenised deposits
  • The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited: Tokenised deposits
  • Visa Inc. : Tokenised deposits
  • Industrial and Commercial Bank of China (Asia) Ltd:. Offline payments
  • Mastercard Asia/Pacific Pte. Ltd.: Settlement of Web3 transactions
  • The Boston Consulting Group: Settlement of tokenised assets
  • HKT Payment Limited: Settlement of tokenised assets
  • ZA Bank Limited: Settlement of tokenised assets
  • The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation: Limited Full-fledged payments

Chief Executive of the HKMA, Eddie Yue has expressed his enthusiasm for the e-HKD Pilot Programme and its potential to explore innovative use cases while laying the groundwork for the possible implementation of the e-HKD. He has also acknowledged and appreciated the active participation of industry stakeholders in the pilot projects, and extended gratitude to the academic experts who are contributing their knowledge and experience to this important CBDC initiative. The ultimate goal is to foster collaboration among all stakeholders and ensure that the research and development efforts align with practical business opportunities.

The e-HKD Pilot Programme represents a significant step forward in the HKMA’s approach to the development of a potential retail central bank digital currency (CBDC). By working closely with stakeholders, the HKMA will conduct a series of pilot projects aimed at examining use cases and addressing implementation and design challenges associated with the e-HKD. The valuable insights gained from these pilots will inform and enhance the HKMA’s overall strategy and decision-making process in relation to the potential implementation of the e-HKD. It is important to note that a final decision to introduce the e-HKD has not been reached at this stage.

At the commencement event, senior executives from the selected firms had the opportunity to present the key highlights of their proposed use cases. In the coming months, the HKMA will maintain close collaboration with these firms, closely monitoring the progress of the pilot projects. While the specific outcomes may evolve and develop over time, the HKMA plans to share the key learnings and insights with the public during Hong Kong FinTech Week 2023. Additionally, the HKMA has expressed its intention to continue conducting further rounds of pilots in collaboration with industry stakeholders in the future.

In order to facilitate effective collaboration between the government, industry, and academia in the realm of CBDC research, the HKMA will establish a dedicated CBDC Expert Group. Comprised of leading academics from local universities, this group will provide invaluable insights and expertise on policy and technical issues relevant to CBDC, including privacy protection, cybersecurity, and interoperability.

 

Source: https://www.financialexpress.com/business/blockchain-exploring-the-future-of-digital-currency-hkma-launches-e-hkd-pilot-programme-3095794/

n

j j j