Bitcoin Dominance at 58.5% and the 55% Line That Still Blocks Altseason

Bitcoin Dominance at 58.5% and the 55% Line That Still Blocks Altseason

Bitcoin trades around $84,200 to $84,550 on Monday, September 28, 2026. It is not exploding higher today. Most sources show a modest move, slightly up or down 0.2% to 0.5%, as it consolidates after last week’s sharp rally. The bigger picture is that Bitcoin has rebounded strongly from mid-September lows near $75,000 to $76,000. It briefly hit an 8-month high above $87,000 on September 21 before pulling back. It is up roughly 4% over the past week and more than 40% for Q3.

The recent rise has clear drivers. Heavy ETF buying stands out. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded a multi-day inflow streak totaling about $2.4 to $3 billion, including nearly $1 billion on September 21 alone. This flipped 2026 year−to−date flows positive after earlier outflows. Institutional demand also played a role. Companies like Strategy continued accumulating Bitcoin. The market absorbed 2 normally bearish events, the Fed’s 1st rate hike in years and the Senate’s failure to advance the CLARITY Act, without a lasting sell-off. Technical and seasonal factors matter too. Bitcoin closed above its 50-week moving average for the 1st time in many weeks. It is on track for 1 of its strongest 3rd quarters on record, defying the typical September curse.

Today’s action looks more like digestion of those gains than a new catalyst. ETF inflows have slowed from the peak but remained positive through last Friday. Broader risk sentiment, Treasury yields, and any fresh comments from figures like Michael Saylor could influence the next move. Prices remain well below the October 2025 all-time high near $126,000.

So, are we in altcoin season? My answer is not quite. We are in a transitional phase with improving altcoin breadth, but the classic altcoin season, where most alts clearly outperform Bitcoin, has not officially started.

The standard Altcoin Season Index, which measures the % of the top 50 coins that have beaten Bitcoin over 90 days, sits between 57 and 70 as of late September 2026. The usual threshold for declaring altseason is 75. Readings below 25 signal Bitcoin season. Readings from 26 to 74 are neutral. The index has risen from the 30s to 40s earlier this month but remains short of confirmation.

Bitcoin dominance is holding near 58.5%. It has eased slightly from recent highs around 59%, consistent with some rotation, but it has not broken down in a way that typically signals a full altseason. Analysts often watch for a sustained drop below about 55%. ETH/BTC is around 0.0317-0.0318. It is relatively stable rather than in a strong uptrend that would signal Ethereum leading a rotation.

What is actually happening? Glassnode’s Altcoin Cycle Signal flipped toward altcoin season around September 21 after the rally broadened beyond Bitcoin. Last week, 45 of the top 50 coins finished higher. Some names, like ZEC, UNI, and certain mid-caps, have posted large 90-day outperformance versus BTC. This looks more like selective rotation after Bitcoin’s move than a broad everything pumps versus BTC altseason. The last clear altseason reading was around October 2025. Capital has been flowing heavily into Bitcoin ETFs, which keeps dominance elevated and delays a full rotation into alts.

My view is that this is a classic late-cycle, Bitcoin-led move. ETF flows are the dominant story. They pull capital into Bitcoin first. Altseason typically follows only after Bitcoin consolidates for a while and dominance breaks down. The current index at 57 to 70 is encouraging for alt bulls but not decisive. I would call it a pre-season warm-up, not altseason. The rotation is selective. Some alts are running, but the broader market is not.

The trigger for a full altseason would be a sustained break below 55% in Bitcoin dominance and the Altcoin Season Index holding above 75 for days. Until then, Bitcoin remains the safer bet for most investors. That said, the improving breadth suggests the window is opening. If ETF inflows continue and Bitcoin holds its gains, capital will likely rotate into quality alts. We are not there.

This does not mean alts lack opportunity. The improving breadth shows capital is willing to look beyond Bitcoin. But the market has not shifted into the phase where almost every major alt beats Bitcoin. The index needs to push through 75. Dominance needs to fall below 55%. ETH/BTC needs to trend up. Until those signals appear, rallies in ZEC, UNI, and mid-caps look isolated rather than broad.

For traders, the difference matters. Buying Bitcoin now offers exposure to ETF flows, institutional demand, and technical strength. Buying alts now offers higher beta but also more risk if dominance stays high. A selective approach makes sense. Focus on names showing 90-day outperformance versus BTC. Watch ETH/BTC, the index, and dominance. Those 3 gauges give a clearer picture than price alone.

Today’s modest move supports the digestion view. A 0.2% to 0.5% move after a sharp rally is normal. It does not signal a new trend. ETF inflows slowing from the peak but staying positive through last Friday is also normal. It shows buyers remain but with less urgency. Treasury yields, risk sentiment, and comments from Michael Saylor can shift the next move. Prices below the October 2025 all-time high near $126,000 remind us this is a recovery, not a new high.

Conditions are better for alts than they were 1 month ago. Some coins are already running. By the usual metrics, we are not in altcoin season. We are more like the early stages of a possible rotation. Watch for the index to hold above 75 and Bitcoin dominance to keep falling. If Bitcoin stays range-bound and ETF flows remain positive, the rotation could accelerate. If Bitcoin breaks higher again, dominance may stay elevated and altseason may face further delay. For now, I would stay patient and selective. The table waits for the main course.

Source: https://e27.co/bitcoin-dominance-at-58-5-and-the-55-line-that-still-blocks-altseason-20260928/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author. The latest book is Web4: The Age of Autonomous Intelligence.

j j j

THORChain’s decentralized model faces backlash – ‘The industry is watching’

THORChain’s decentralized model faces backlash – ‘The industry is watching’

THORChain saw a considerable spike in trading activity and fees between the 24th and 26th of September.

Meanwhile, its swap volume reached $1.72 billion by the 26th of September, up from $610 million in August.

At the same time, THORChain’s fees rose to $479,033.13 from $145,464.59. However, the news is not as good as it appears to be.

As the surge in on-chain activity happened after the recent Bitget security incident, wherein the stolen funds were reportedly laundered via THORChain to swap and transfer assets between blockchains.

Slamming the exchange, Bitget CEO Gracy Chen argued,

Our attacker addresses are publicly listed and actively tracked. We are formally asking @THORChain to refuse service to these addresses. Decentralization is a design principle, not a shield for facilitating known stolen funds. The industry is watching.

THORChain makes its case

THORChain’s response was based on the distinction between a permissionless blockchain protocol and a centralized exchange. For context, on a centralized exchange such as an ordinary crypto trading platform, the company can maintain a blacklist.

But THORChain does not operate in exactly that way.

THORChain is decentralized and permissionless like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB Chain. What responsibility should Bitcoin, Ethereum, and BNB Chain bear when handling known stolen funds?

OKX founder stands in THORChain’s support

But Mingxing Xu, aka Star XU, OKX’s founder, is arguing that THORChain should not be compared directly with Bitcoin or Ethereum’s base-layer consensus.

Xu further explained that Bitcoin’s network does not have a group of people sitting together and deciding whether a Bitcoin transaction should be signed. Instead, it uses Threshold Signature Scheme (TSS) vaults.

The assets that are held within THORChain’s cross-chain infrastructure are controlled through a group of participating validators/nodes. Therefore, a transaction involving those assets requires a threshold of those participants to provide signatures.

Hence, he said,

Bitcoin cannot be stopped. THORChain can—it simply chooses when to do so.

Anndy Lian, an all-rounded business strategist in Asia, added,

Blaming @THORChain and saying they are not helpful and decentralized will not solve the problems.

RUNE’s price action and more

Despite these criticisms, THORChain’s native token RUNE stood strong, trading at $0.7908 at press time after a hike of 15.8% in the past 24 hours.

As of now, withdrawals remain suspended as Bitget investigates the breach and works with law enforcement and blockchain-security firms.


Final Summary

  • BitGet’s CEO, OKX founder, and many in the crypto industry are slamming THORChain’s decentralized nature.
  • But in reality, THORChain is different because it uses Threshold Signature Scheme (TSS) vaults.

 

 

 

Source: https://ambcrypto.com/thorchains-decentralized-model-faces-backlash-the-industry-is-watching/

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author. The latest book is Web4: The Age of Autonomous Intelligence.

j j j

Why did Bitcoin and Ethereum move in near-perfect lockstep after the Fed rate hike?

Why did Bitcoin and Ethereum move in near-perfect lockstep after the Fed rate hike?

Bitcoin rose 0.82 per cent in 24 hours to US$76,318.25. Ethereum gained 0.80 per cent to US$2,418.94. The total crypto market cap increased one per cent, and the broader crypto market rose 0.99 per cent. These numbers point to a single conclusion. A relief bounce tied to the Federal Reserve lifted the entire asset class.

No coin-specific catalyst appeared in the data. The primary force came from the central bank. Bitcoin slightly underperformed that broad rise even as it gained. Ethereum tracked its larger peer almost exactly. This synchronised move indicates that the market is currently driven by macro headlines rather than project-level news.

The Fed raised rates by 25 basis points on September 16 to a target range of 3.75 per cent to 4.00 per cent. Market participants had widely anticipated this unanimous decision. The confirmation removed near-term uncertainty. Risk assets responded with a modest rally. The two largest digital assets moved in lockstep with that broader tide.

Bitcoin’s 90-day correlation with gold recently hit a multi-year high. That detail matters. It shows the leading cryptocurrency now trades more like a macro asset than a speculative tech bet. Ethereum remains highly sensitive to central bank cues and Bitcoin’s direction in the short term. The move has less to do with each network’s fundamentals and more with a market-wide sigh of relief.

This is a beta trade, not a fundamental repricing. A priced-in event often produces this kind of reaction. Traders sell the rumour and buy the fact. The fact here was a rate hike that no longer surprised anyone. The market had already absorbed the news before the Fed spoke, so the actual announcement simply cleared the air.

Supporting data in derivatives markets adds nuance. Bitcoin open interest fell 3.1 per cent. Liquidations dropped 65.79 per cent. That decline in forced selling suggests a calmer backdrop. Bitcoin dominance stayed elevated near 58.85 per cent. Capital has not rotated aggressively into riskier altcoins.

Instead, it remains defensive. Ethereum told a slightly different story. Average perpetual funding rates rose 40.74 per cent over 24 hours to +0.0053 per cent. Some derivatives traders leaned cautiously bullish. The absolute rate stayed far from extreme levels. Ethereum also benefited from its place in the Layer 1 narrative, which posted a 0.99 per cent sector gain.

Risk capital is rotating toward large-cap blockchain platforms, but it is doing so selectively. Bitcoin still leads. Ethereum follows. That relationship defines the current market structure. The lack of a leverage washout and the sustained dominance of the largest asset create a stable floor, but they also limit upside momentum. When capital stays defensive, rallies tend to be measured and shallow rather than explosive.

Institutional flows provide the most important test. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded US$450 million in outflows on September 15. That figure shows hesitation among institutional investors. A return to net inflows would confirm renewed demand. Until then, price stability rests more on reduced selling pressure than on a fresh wave of buying.

Ethereum faces a similar question. The daily ETF flow report will show whether spot Ethereum ETF flows turn positive in the next 24 to 48 hours. Positive flows would confirm a return of institutional interest. Sustained outflows could pressure the support zone. The bounce then looks technical rather than durable.

This flow data matters more than any single derivative metric because it reflects real capital allocation from large investors. Without that capital, the rally depends on short-term traders and macro sentiment. That foundation is thin and can crack quickly if the next data release or policy comment shifts the mood.

Technical levels define the near-term battlefield. Bitcoin trades just above the US$75,000 support level, which has held for weeks. If the largest asset holds above US$75,000, a retest of US$78,189 resistance becomes possible. A break below US$75,000 would shift focus to the next support near US$74,000.

Ethereum consolidates between support at US$2,350-US$2,400 and resistance at US$2,500-US$2,600. Its 4-hour RSI sits at 53.17, a neutral reading. A daily close above US$2,500 would signal a breakout attempt. A break below US$2,350 would risk a deeper correction toward US$2,200.

The market is in a wait-and-see mode. It balances relief from the Fed against lingering regulatory uncertainty from the failed CLARITY Act. That legislative setback removed a potential positive catalyst and left the market without a clear regulatory path forward. Without that path, institutional investors may continue to hesitate, and that hesitation shows up in ETF flows.

In my view, the synchronised price action tells a story of a market where macro forces set the tone but internal dynamism remains weak. The Fed-induced relief rally is welcome. It is also fragile. It is a pause, not a pivot.

The path forward depends on two developments. One is that ETF flows must reverse from negative to positive. That shift would provide fresh institutional demand. The other is that both assets need convincing technical breaks above resistance. Bitcoin must reclaim and hold above US$78,189. Ethereum must close above US$2,500. Without those confirmations, the crypto complex remains vulnerable to the next macro shock or regulatory headline.

The high correlation with gold and Bitcoin’s persistent dominance show that capital seeks the safest harbours within the asset class during uncertainty. Until capital rotates more clearly into Ethereum and beyond, the recovery remains a beta-chasing exercise rather than a genuine broad-based bull market.

The next 24 to 48 hours of ETF flow data will offer the primary real test of whether this relief rally has legs. I would watch the US$75,000 level for Bitcoin and the US$2,350 level for Ethereum as the lines that separate consolidation from correction. I would also watch funding rates for signs of overheating. A sharp reversal there could trigger a squeeze and undermine the calm that currently supports prices. For now, the market has bought itself time, but it has not earned a new trend.

 

Source:
 

Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author. The latest book is Web4: The Age of Autonomous Intelligence.

j j j