The digital asset market stumbled through a bruising 24-hour stretch as two outside forces collided with a market already stretched by borrowed money. Bitcoin lost 3.12 per cent to trade at US$75,697.61. Ethereum fell 4.49 per cent to US$2,399.07. Both underperformed a flat broader market.
A procedural vote in the United States Senate on September 15 failed to advance the CLARITY Act, a bill that would have clarified how regulators treat digital tokens. Hours later, investors braced for a Federal Reserve policy meeting on September 16, with markets pricing a high probability of a 25-basis-point rate hike. That combination of legislative disappointment and fears of monetary tightening proved too heavy for prices to bear.
The CLARITY Act had offered something rare, a legislative path toward clear rules. Its failure did more than postpone a decision. It told the trading community that Washington remains divided over how to oversee digital assets. Without a clear framework, exchanges and token issuers continue to face conflicting signals from agencies.
That uncertainty weighs on sentiment because it raises the cost of doing business and makes long-term planning difficult. When the Senate declined to advance the bill, traders who had positioned for progress faced a sudden void. They responded by reducing exposure, and that reduction fed on itself.
Macro anxiety added another layer of pressure. The Federal Reserve has spent months tightening financial conditions, and a rate hike makes borrowing more expensive for everyone. Risk assets suffer first when money becomes costlier. Bitcoin and Ethereum trade like risk assets in moments of stress, regardless of the arguments about their long-term value.
The central bank meeting on September 16 became the immediate focal point. A less hawkish signal could offer relief. A firm hike could confirm the worst fears. Investors did not wait to find out. They sold first and planned to ask questions later. The Fed does not need to surprise the market to cause damage. The mere expectation of tighter policy can pull capital away from speculative bets.
Leverage turned a difficult session into a cascade. The total crypto market cap fell by 3.26 per cent, suggesting a broad, beta-driven move rather than a Bitcoin-specific issue. Within that broad decline, forced selling took over. Liquidations wiped out over US$226 million in Bitcoin long positions in 24 hours, a 163 per cent spike.
Liquidations across the market reached approximately US$146 million in long positions, with Ethereum and Bitcoin leading the forced selling. The mechanics are familiar. Traders borrow to amplify gains. Prices dip. Margin calls arrive. Traders sell to meet those calls. Selling pushes prices lower. More margin calls follow. This feedback loop can push prices well below fair value in a short window.
Bitcoin now sits at a technical crossroads. The intraday low of US$75,600 has become the most important level. If Bitcoin holds above that support, a relief rally toward US$77,000 resistance is possible. That scenario becomes more likely if the Fed signals a less hawkish stance than markets fear.
A break below US$75,600 would open the door to a deeper correction, with the next zone near US$74,000 as a possible target. Social media sentiment remains divided, with a net score of 4.7 on a zero-to-ten scale. That reading reflects cautious uncertainty rather than panic. Traders appear to be waiting for the Fed before committing to a direction. The 4.7 reading does not indicate capitulation. It indicates a market holding its breath.
Ethereum faces a similar set of pressures with its own technical twist. The asset broke below the lower support trendline of an ascending channel. A daily close below US$2,380 could signal further weakness toward US$2,200. If Ethereum can reclaim and hold above the US$2,380 to US$2,400 zone, it may attempt to stabilise between US$2,380 and US$2,500. The trend is bearish in the very short term, and direction hinges on macro news and key technical holds. Ethereum does have structural tailwinds.
Strong demand from exchange-traded fund inflows and a shrinking supply of exchange-traded funds would normally provide support. In this environment, immediate macro and sentiment headwinds have overwhelmed those tailwinds. That does not erase their importance, but it does show how quickly liquidity and leverage can dominate the narrative. Those tailwinds matter over months, not hours. In a leveraged sell-off, they provide little comfort to traders facing margin calls.
My own view is that this episode exposes a stubborn truth about digital assets. The industry has spent years arguing that Bitcoin and Ethereum offer a hedge against inflation and political dysfunction. When the Senate failed to advance a crypto-specific bill and the Fed prepared to raise rates, both assets fell in lockstep with technology stocks and other speculative holdings.
That correlation is not accidental. The same investors trade these assets. They use the same leverage. They react to the same macro signals. Until the sector develops a deeper base of non-speculative demand, it will remain vulnerable to decisions made in Washington and at the Federal Reserve. That dependence is not a flaw in the technology. It is a feature of the investor base.
The path forward is easy to describe and hard to execute. Bitcoin needs to defend US$75,600. Ethereum needs to defend US$2,380. If those levels hold after the Fed announcement, a relief rally is possible, but it will be fragile. If they break, the next targets are US$74,000 for Bitcoin and US$2,200 for Ethereum.
The market outlook is cautiously bearish for Bitcoin and bearish for Ethereum. The key watch is whether these assets can defend their support levels after the Fed decision, or whether macro fears trigger a deeper correction.
For now, the wise approach is to wait for the Fed, watch the reaction around those key levels, and monitor whether open interest and funding rates stabilise. That stabilisation would signal that the deleveraging is complete. Until then, prices remain in a precarious position. Forces outside any blockchain’s control hold it hostage. A single press conference can reshape the short-term path for both assets.
Source: https://e27.co/bitcoin-falls-3-12-to-75697-61-did-washington-just-kill-the-rally-20260916/
Anndy Lian is an early blockchain adopter and experienced serial entrepreneur who is known for his work in the government sector. He is a best selling book author- “NFT: From Zero to Hero” and “Blockchain Revolution 2030”.
Currently, he is appointed as the Chief Digital Advisor at Mongolia Productivity Organization, championing national digitization. Prior to his current appointments, he was the Chairman of BigONE Exchange, a global top 30 ranked crypto spot exchange and was also the Advisory Board Member for Hyundai DAC, the blockchain arm of South Korea’s largest car manufacturer Hyundai Motor Group. Lian played a pivotal role as the Blockchain Advisor for Asian Productivity Organisation (APO), an intergovernmental organization committed to improving productivity in the Asia-Pacific region.
An avid supporter of incubating start-ups, Anndy has also been a private investor for the past eight years. With a growth investment mindset, Anndy strategically demonstrates this in the companies he chooses to be involved with. He believes that what he is doing through blockchain technology currently will revolutionise and redefine traditional businesses. He also believes that the blockchain industry has to be “redecentralised”.